Re: [PATCH] pcidump - Enhanced Capabilities

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:20:07PM +0100, Simon Mages wrote: > Hi, > > on some machines i saw some unknown enhanced capabilities. After > looking into it i saw that > on some intel chipsets there actually is a capability with id 0x0. > This capability contains some > registers of the Advanced

Re: regarding OpenSSL License change

> On 24 Mar 2017, at 3:51 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > it is great that someone found a way to convert between licenses. > > AGPL -> GPL -> ISC -> PD pfSense went through with this, being a 2-Clause BSD fork of m0n0wall, going through a 6-Clause ESF and CLA (all your

Re: regarding OpenSSL License change

> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 16:48:10 -0400 > From: lice...@openssl.org > To: dera...@cvs.openbsd.org > Subject: OpenSSL License change [...] > We are asking for your permission to change the licence for your > contribution. Please visit this link to respond; you will have a chance [...] > If we

Re: regarding OpenSSL License change

On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 20:51:06 -0600 "Theo de Raadt" wrote: > Dude, you are being melodramatic > > it is great that someone found a way to convert between licenses. > > AGPL -> GPL -> ISC -> PD > > thumbs up to the people who found a shortcut > Now this is genius.

Re: [PATCH] pcidump - Enhanced Capabilities

> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:33:18 -0700 > From: Mike Larkin > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 04:20:07PM +0100, Simon Mages wrote: > > Hi, > > > > on some machines i saw some unknown enhanced capabilities. After > > looking into it i saw that > > on some intel chipsets there

Re: pf: percpu anchor stacks

Hello, I'm attaching patch, which removes stack-as-a-global variable. it's updated patch [1] to current tree. sorry for being pushy advocating my old, rusty patch. thanks and regards sasha [1]

Re: regarding OpenSSL License change

Bob Beck wrote: ... Disclaimer: i have read about licenses many years ago (likely over a decade, i stopped reading the german computer magazine c't somewhen in 2005). I like and use the ISC license that your project has chosen and fosters whenever i can. According to [1] the

relayd.conf.5: X-Forwarded-By $REMOTE_ADDR typo

Hey, I think there is a typo in relayd.conf(5). X-Forwarded-By should be the server $SERVER_ADDR instead of the client $REMOTE_ADDR. X-Forwarded-For is the client (correct). diff --git a/usr.sbin/relayd/relayd.conf.5 b/usr.sbin/relayd/relayd.conf.5 index 8bed93efa1f..5f3eb0b2f9a 100644 ---

[Patch] (www) Updated Copyright on CVS Page

Just updating the copyright to 2017 for the anoncvs page. Index: anoncvs.html.head === RCS file: /cvs/www/build/mirrors/anoncvs.html.head,v retrieving revision 1.61 diff -u -p -r1.61 anoncvs.html.head --- anoncvs.html.head22 Oct

Re: regarding OpenSSL License change

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:55:10AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > > It's about "You cannot change the licence without consent of the author" and > > "We just assume that you say yes to this because we dont care about your > >

Re: ipcomp bcopy -> mem*

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:58:29PM -0400, David Hill wrote: > This diff converts the existing three bcopy's to memcpy or memmove. > The memcpy's are on freshly malloc'd memory so no overlap. As tc and tdb are properly aligned malloc(9)ed data and tc_dst and tdb_dst are sockaddr_union fields

"PF - Introduction to Open BSD" Edit

Added the appropriate hyphens in “32 bit” and “64 bit” under “Hardware Support” Index: faq1.html === RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq1.html,v retrieving revision 1.213 diff -u -p -r1.213 faq1.html --- faq1.html 12 Mar 2017

ipcomp bcopy -> mem*

Hello - This diff converts the existing three bcopy's to memcpy or memmove. The memcpy's are on freshly malloc'd memory so no overlap. OK? Index: netinet/ip_ipcomp.c === RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/netinet/ip_ipcomp.c,v retrieving

J-core MMU and OpenBSD/landisk

For individuals who are unaware, I wanted to point out the J-core project. http://www.j-core.org It's a "clean-room open source" re-implementation of the SuperH instruction set. They're currently debating what sort of MMU they should use

Typo in faq1.html

Fixes typo in spelling of "attachment". Index: faq4.html === RCS file: /cvs/www/faq/faq4.html,v retrieving revision 1.503 diff -u -p -r1.503 faq4.html --- faq4.html 16 Mar 2017 19:56:07 - 1.503 +++ faq4.html 24 Mar 2017 17:08:52

Re: regarding OpenSSL License change

"Michael W. Lucas" wrote: |On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote: |> It's about "You cannot change the licence without consent of the \ |> author" and |> "We just assume that you say yes to this because we dont care about your |>

Re: regarding OpenSSL License change

Sebastian Benoit wrote: |Steffen Nurpmeso(stef...@sdaoden.eu) on 2017.03.24 14:03:45 +0100: |> Bob Beck wrote: ... |> According to [1] the chosen license is however the "best" academic |> license, and the only one which allows patent protection. Best in

Re: Ralink (MediaTek) MT7650 / MT7610 usb stick problem with run(4) driver

It detects as MT7650 by OpenBSD 6.0 after some code modification, not MT7601U. Many sources like WikiDevi says that TP-LINK Archer T2UH has MT7610U and somewhere I found that is equivalent to RT2860, but OpenBSD detects is as MT7650. I haven't opened the stick to check the model exactly. Going to

Re: Ralink (MediaTek) MT7650 / MT7610 usb stick problem with run(4) driver

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:47:47AM +0900, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:42:13PM +0300, Denis wrote: > > Having trouble with TP-LINK AC600 Archer T2UH based on Ralink's MT7650 > > chipset with run driver on OpenBSD 6.0-stable with all the latest source > > tree patches

Re: Ralink (MediaTek) MT7650 / MT7610 usb stick problem with run(4) driver

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:42:13PM +0300, Denis wrote: > Having trouble with TP-LINK AC600 Archer T2UH based on Ralink's MT7650 > chipset with run driver on OpenBSD 6.0-stable with all the latest source > tree patches installed. Our run(4) driver does not yet support this chipset. Additional

Re: regarding OpenSSL License change

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > It's about "You cannot change the licence without consent of the author" and > "We just assume that you say yes to this because we dont care about your > rights", which is morally and legally wrong. It's very simple. Four words.

sendsyslog file race

Hi, There is a race in dosendsyslog() which resulted in a crash on a 5.9 system. sosend(syslogf->f_data, ...) was called with a NULL pointer. So syslogf is not NULL, f_data is NULL and f_count is 1. The file structure is ref counted, but the global variable syslogf is not protected. So it may

Re: Atheros AR9280+AR7010 USB stick don't work in BSS mode but Host AP

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:56:08PM +0300, Denis wrote: > Have Atheros AR9280+AR7010 USB stick athn(4). > Long ago I tested it with OpenBSD 5.6 in Host AP mode 5GHz band, it does > not work as AP but successful in BSS in both supported bands. > > On OpenBSD 6.0 situation is different. It is

Re: regarding OpenSSL License change

Steffen Nurpmeso(stef...@sdaoden.eu) on 2017.03.24 14:03:45 +0100: > Bob Beck wrote: > ... > > Disclaimer: i have read about licenses many years ago (likely over > a decade, i stopped reading the german computer magazine c't > somewhen in 2005). I like and use the ISC license