On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 11:55:10AM -0400, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Sebastian Benoit wrote: > > It's about "You cannot change the licence without consent of the author" and > > "We just assume that you say yes to this because we dont care about your > > rights", which is morally and legally wrong. > > > It's very simple. Four words. > > "Silence is not consent." > > Not in contracts. Not in sex. And not in licensing. >
This is the clearest description of the situation. Sadly, "clear" is something the OpenSSL folks are unfamiliar with... -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg