Re: [Techno-Chat]: Sangean PRD-6 Radio Demo

[Dane Trethowan]

Sorry I don’t understand what you’re referring to here.
I didn’t give too much information on the recorder I was using for this test so 
just to clarify things I used an Olympus LS-14 and it would appear that the 
built-in microphones didn’t appreciate my speech though they worked very well 
at capturing the audio from the speaker of the Sangean PRD-6 radio itself.


> On 7 Apr 2019, at 2:11 am, Gordon Smith  wrote:
> 
> Unlike most of their equipment in recent years.
> 
> 
> On 6 Apr 2019, at 14:56, Dane Trethowan  > wrote:
> 
> Subject line says it all and sorry about the microphones of the LS-14, I’ve 
> made a note never to use that device for recording ever again.
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/ewt54y9wptp3ic2/Sangean%20Prd-6.flac?dl=0 
> 

Re: [Techno-Chat]: Sangean PRD-6 Radio Demo

[Gordon Smith]

Unlike most of their equipment in recent years.


On 6 Apr 2019, at 14:56, Dane Trethowan  wrote:

Subject line says it all and sorry about the microphones of the LS-14, I’ve 
made a note never to use that device for recording ever again.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ewt54y9wptp3ic2/Sangean%20Prd-6.flac?dl=0 



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[Techno-Chat]: Sangean PRD-6 Radio Demo

[Dane Trethowan]

Subject line says it all and sorry about the microphones of the LS-14, I’ve 
made a note never to use that device for recording ever again.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ewt54y9wptp3ic2/Sangean%20Prd-6.flac?dl=0