On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 12:25 AM, george2 geor...@spanmail.net wrote:
Most who communicated with me believe this is not the place to raise this
request. That iis too late in the process. The name process was discussed by
Hello george,
you can use the
Fedora community advisory board
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 7:55 PM, george2 geor...@spanmail.net wrote:
I present a request to not move to release F17 until the release name is
changed in the released code.
I appreciate the comments public and private but it remains that this name
may do considerable harm.
This has already
Am Freitag, den 27.04.2012, 14:55 -0400 schrieb george2:
I present a request to not move to release F17 until the release name
is changed in the released code.
I appreciate the comments public and private but it remains that this
name may do considerable harm.
There is not formal
I present a request to not move to release F17 until the release name
is changed in the released code.
I appreciate the comments public and private but it remains that this
name may do considerable harm.
There is not formal criterion for a blocker bug. So I appeal to this
group, as the last
On 27/04/12 19:55, george2 wrote:
I don't know the future, but I think that releasing with this name has
the potential to be a destroyer of the momentum that the contributors to
Fedora with the support of RedHat have worked to build.
Lets not delay the release.
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 16:07, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Lets not delay the release.
+1
who cares about the name?
FC
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 04/27/2012 06:55 PM, george2 wrote:
I don't know the future, but I think that releasing with this name has
the potential to be a destroyer of the momentum that the contributors
to Fedora with the support of RedHat have worked to build.
First and foremost the release name does not have any
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:55 -0400, george2 wrote:
if one headmaster says the release is inappropriate to use in the
teaching or desktop situation;
if one religious leader objects to its use in that the supporting
material for the name says this is your new god
if one advocate of
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 15:55, george2 geor...@spanmail.net wrote:
But also note that few women are involved in the approval processes. The
banking crises was in part formed by many individuals sensing something
wasn't right but did not take any personal responsibility to act.
From Bonsai and
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 01:13 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a hot dog. It has always been a hot dog. The name is not an
innuendo, it is not a double entendre. If anyone thinks it is, that's
their problem, not ours. The whole beefy miracle thing is and _has
always been_ about a food product.
On 04/27/2012 01:55 PM, george2 wrote:
The banking crises was in part formed by many individuals sensing
something wasn't right but did not take any personal responsibility to
act.
If you really meant the words you typed then you would be responding to
the replies to your message.
It is
11 matches
Mail list logo
