The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6371/nginx-1.0.15-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5631/phpMyAdmin-3.5.0-1.fc15
2012/4/26 Pedro Francisco pedrogfranci...@gmail.com
$ sudo reboot
or
$ sudo shutdown -P now
takes ~1/2 mins to shutdown; using Restart or Shutdown in GDM/Gnome
session menu takes ~10 seconds.
Any ideas why?
F17, x86.
--
Pedro
same here.
--
test mailing list
On 04/27/2012 03:22 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Dear all,
after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17), rebooting
hangs
up. Pushing the reset button is needed :-(
I had to downgrade systemd to get rid from this bug.
No such problems with the previous version.
Anybody
Fedora 16 on omen.com tends to wedge on reboot.
The problem may be related to mounted NFS or CIFS shares.
On 04/27/2012 12:22 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Dear all,
after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17),
rebooting hangs up. Pushing the reset button is needed :-(
I
On 04/27/2012 03:45 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Fedora 16 on omen.com tends to wedge on reboot.
The problem may be related to mounted NFS or CIFS shares.
Your issue is not related. The systems I'm testing are F17 with no NFS or CIFS
shares and downgrading as suggested by Joachim
On 04/27/2012 09:45 AM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Fedora 16 on omen.com tends to wedge on reboot.
The problem may be related to mounted NFS or CIFS shares.
Sorry, but I'm speaking about F17, not F16. Additionally, I'm not using
NFS or CIFS.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 09:22:40AM +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17),
rebooting hangs up. Pushing the reset button is needed :-(
I had to downgrade systemd to get rid from this bug.
No such problems with the previous version.
Hi,
just a half-baked idea, I'm carrying some time with me around.
Some packages have a check-section being executed during build. Would it
make sense to execute that test, when required packages of that package
get updated (to see, if the update breaks my package)?
(Or other way around: when
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:10:11 +0200, MR (Matthias) wrote:
Hi,
just a half-baked idea, I'm carrying some time with me around.
Some packages have a check-section being executed during build. Would it
make sense to execute that test, when required packages of that package
get updated (to
On 27/04/12 12:37, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Hardly any %check section uses installed files. Typically, files in the
buildroot are used, or files plus test data in the builddir. Test data
won't be available.
We encourage our packagers to implement useful check-sections.
To make an example,
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:04:56 +0200, MR (Matthias) wrote:
On 27/04/12 12:37, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Hardly any %check section uses installed files. Typically, files in the
buildroot are used, or files plus test data in the builddir. Test data
won't be available.
We encourage our
On 27/04/12 13:57, Michael Schwendt wrote:
A wrong approach?
Why do you insist on using the %check section for that? It's a build-time
feature, found only in the spec file and not packaged in the built rpms
(also due to the test data I've referred to above).
I'm asking if the scripts from
On 04/27/2012 02:11 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
I wonder how different a run-time test-suite dffers from a test suite to
be executed during build.
There are 2 major differences:
1. The package-to-test itself is not installed to its final destination.
2. A testsuite being run in %check has
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be easily
executed inside of a mock-environment as part of building.
Not to mention that running extensive test suites for every build will
put strain on our build
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be easily
executed inside of a mock-environment as part of building.
Not to mention that running
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17), rebooting
hangs up.
Is it just me or disabling wireless/unplugging the network cable seems to work ?
--
Pedro
--
test mailing list
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be
easily
executed inside of a mock-environment as part of building.
Not to mention
On 04/27/2012 09:45 PM, Pedro Francisco wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
after updating to systemd-44-7.fc17 (and systemd-sysv-44-7.fc17), rebooting
hangs up.
Is it just me or disabling wireless/unplugging the network cable seems to
On 04/27/2012 10:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Now, I can't get the failure to reproduce at all!
Well, it gets a bit weirder
If I shutdown from the login screen I get the 2 minute delay.
If I shutdown from within KDE it doesn't delay but dies on a kernel panic...
Last
few lines are...
Cannot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:51:34 -0400
From: Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com
To: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Subject: Fwd: Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
- Original Message
Subject: Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:51:49 -0400
From: Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com
To: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Subject: Fwd: Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
- Original Message
Subject: Re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:52:14 -0400
From: Steve Dickson ste...@redhat.com
To: Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us
Subject: Fwd: Re: nfs-idmap.service removed
- Original Message
Subject: Re:
On 04/27/2012 04:38 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/27/2012 10:28 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Now, I can't get the failure to reproduce at all!
Well, it gets a bit weirder
And still a bit weirder: The problem depends on the runlevel: Booting
into runlevel 3 (no graphics) lets my system then reboot
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 10:14 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2012-04-27
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The second F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be this Friday at
17:00 UTC in
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 10:14 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2012-04-27
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The second F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be this Friday at
17:00 UTC in
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 10:53 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
Steve, can you elaborate? Do pure clients never need idmap?
With F17 we moved to the keyring based ID mapping, which eliminates
the need for the rpc.idmapd daemon to be started on the client side.
Here is how it works...
With NFS
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 17:07 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 10:53 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
Steve, can you elaborate? Do pure clients never need idmap?
With F17 we moved to the keyring based ID mapping, which eliminates
the need for the rpc.idmapd daemon to be
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 15:18 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
selinux-policy needs a newer checkpolicy
Thank you.
I believe the checkpolicy and libsepol have made their way out of testing, so
they should show up soon.
Dan, in future, please bundle interdependent packages like this into a
single
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:30 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Apart of this, there are test-cases, which can not be/can not be easily
executed inside of a
Hey, folks! Can people please provide karma for these builds if
possible:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6800/livecd-tools-17.10-1.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6815/anaconda-17.23-1.fc17
(you can 'yum localinstall' anaconda into a live image, then
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2012-05-02
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The second F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be re-scheduled to
Tuesday 2012-05-02 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers, as most regular
hallo
according to this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817037
I need your help !!!
As you can read in my bug report:
...
I ddrescued the disc and with foremost I scratched 116.000 files from it...
a cat /dev/sdb | grep something shows some/most of the files with
complete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/27/2012 12:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 15:18 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
selinux-policy needs a newer checkpolicy
Thank you.
I believe the checkpolicy and libsepol have made their way out of
testing, so they
On 04/27/2012 12:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2012-05-02
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The second F17 final blocker bug review meeting will be re-scheduled to
Tuesday 2012-05-02 at
I present a request to not move to release F17 until the release name
is changed in the released code.
I appreciate the comments public and private but it remains that this
name may do considerable harm.
There is not formal criterion for a blocker bug. So I appeal to this
group, as the last
On 27/04/12 19:55, george2 wrote:
I don't know the future, but I think that releasing with this name has
the potential to be a destroyer of the momentum that the contributors to
Fedora with the support of RedHat have worked to build.
Lets not delay the release.
--
Regards,
Frank
Jack of
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 16:07, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Lets not delay the release.
+1
who cares about the name?
FC
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 17:23:46 +0100,
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
Hey, folks! Can people please provide karma for these builds if
possible:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6800/livecd-tools-17.10-1.fc17
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6365/openstack-nova-2011.3.1-8.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6368/bugzilla-4.0.6-1.fc16
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6371/nginx-1.0.15-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-5631/phpMyAdmin-3.5.0-1.fc15
On 04/27/2012 06:55 PM, george2 wrote:
I don't know the future, but I think that releasing with this name has
the potential to be a destroyer of the momentum that the contributors
to Fedora with the support of RedHat have worked to build.
First and foremost the release name does not have any
On 04/26/2012 07:46 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
INFO: /usr/bin/ld: warning: -z lazyload ignored.
/usr/bin/ld: warning: -z nolazyload ignored.
/usr/bin/ld:
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/sysman/lib//libnmectl.a(nmectlt.o):
undefined reference to symbol 'B_DestroyKeyObject'
/usr/bin/ld: note:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 13:56 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
On 04/27/2012 12:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
# F17 Final Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2012-05-02
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The second F17 final
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
The following Fedora 17 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6273/openstack-nova-2012.1-2.fc17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-6282/bugzilla-4.0.6-1.fc17
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:44 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
On 04/27/2012 12:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 17:07 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 10:53 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
Steve, can you elaborate? Do pure clients never need idmap?
With F17
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 14:55 -0400, george2 wrote:
if one headmaster says the release is inappropriate to use in the
teaching or desktop situation;
if one religious leader objects to its use in that the supporting
material for the name says this is your new god
if one advocate of
On 04/27/2012 07:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
snip
It's in Proposed Blockers, where it should be.
Sorry, shouldn't have scanned, should have studied. Thanks.
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
2012/4/27 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com:
On 04/26/2012 07:46 PM, Tommy Pham wrote:
INFO: /usr/bin/ld: warning: -z lazyload ignored.
/usr/bin/ld: warning: -z nolazyload ignored.
/usr/bin/ld:
/opt/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/sysman/lib//libnmectl.a(nmectlt.o):
undefined
Dear folks,
I have an acer aspire one netbook with atheros wireless:
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR242x / AR542x
Wireless Network Adapter (PCI-Express) (rev 01)
After kernel 3.3.1(3.3.1-5.fc17.i686), the wireless does not connect
automatically anymore :(,
I have
I do not have LibreOffice installed on my system, I have Apache
OpenOffice 3.4 RC1.
However, launching the system updater notifies me that there is an
update available for URE-Runtime (a component of LibreOffice) and
proceeds to
install such update.
If this breaks Apache OpenOffice 3.4 who's to
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 15:55, george2 geor...@spanmail.net wrote:
But also note that few women are involved in the approval processes. The
banking crises was in part formed by many individuals sensing something
wasn't right but did not take any personal responsibility to act.
From Bonsai and
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm having another problem installing Oracle 11gR2 on F17. I'm getting:
snip output
This is a known bug in Oracle's installer, and apparently they don't
care since they don't support Fedora.
There is a workaround
On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 01:13 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
It's a hot dog. It has always been a hot dog. The name is not an
innuendo, it is not a double entendre. If anyone thinks it is, that's
their problem, not ours. The whole beefy miracle thing is and _has
always been_ about a food product.
On 04/27/2012 01:55 PM, george2 wrote:
The banking crises was in part formed by many individuals sensing
something wasn't right but did not take any personal responsibility to
act.
If you really meant the words you typed then you would be responding to
the replies to your message.
It is
On 04/28/2012 02:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 19:21 +0200, sixpack13 wrote:
...
Alternatively: if you pick 'custom partition layout', then make sure you
_actually check_ the layout before proceeding.
Did that !
As I ever do since redhat 6.x !
Please take a look at
My system is up-to-date with updates-testing.
Since about 2-3 days, coinciding with the release of firefox
12, I think, the adobe flash plugin crashes in firefox, but
it runs in konqueror, but only this site appears to be
affected:
http://www.cbc.ca/thenational/watch/
Youtube works.
--
On 04/28/2012 12:15 PM, Peter Gueckel wrote:
My system is up-to-date with updates-testing.
Since about 2-3 days, coinciding with the release of firefox
12, I think, the adobe flash plugin crashes in firefox, but
it runs in konqueror, but only this site appears to be
affected:
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5163 . Please
see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
testing
Hello Keith,
You should be sponsored in the triage group as of this writing and have the
bugzilla permissions to get started.
You may want to look in to the 'proventesters' group as well. Here is a
link for further information.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester
You may have already
Hi folks,
Could someone please install the new trash-cli in rawhide and see if it
works as expected please? Upstream's made a lot of changes, and I'd like
to know it works before I build for f17 etc. I don't have a rawhide
machine handy at the moment :/
It's just a command line client to Trash.
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5163 . Please
see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
testing
62 matches
Mail list logo
