Re: [Tex-music] globalizing ` and '

Bob Tennent writes: > According to musixdoc.pdf, > > These characters have cumulative effects but in a somewhat > restricted sense. They will alter the value of \transpose, > but only until changing to a different staff or instrument > or encountering \en, at which

Re: [Tex-music] globalizing ` and '

>|How risky is this for backward compatibility? With any change there is some risk. Has anyone ever used braces or hboxes to localize the effect of ` and ' transposition? The workaround is to use ! before the closing brace. >|I'll try to do some testing. The first thing I'll test is

[Tex-music] globalizing ` and '

According to musixdoc.pdf, These characters have cumulative effects but in a somewhat restricted sense. They will alter the value of \transpose, but only until changing to a different staff or instrument or encountering \en, at which time it will be reset to the value it had before the

Re: [Tex-music] globalizing ` and '

Rodolpho: >|Maybe I'd personally prefer leaving it as it is now. >|I often use ` and ' within braces, for example with >|\zcharnote, and I find it important. Could you provide a small example? "inside braces" means inside stand-alone braces, not argument braces as in \qa{j'j}. The proposed

Re: [Tex-music] globalizing ` and '

Bob Tennent writes: > Rodolpho: > > >|Maybe I'd personally prefer leaving it as it is now. > >|I often use ` and ' within braces, for example with > >|\zcharnote, and I find it important. > > Could you provide a small example? "inside braces" means > inside stand-alone

[Tex-music] r+0.g error?

At the ‘r+0.g’ i get the error for the ‘g’: illegal character, ASCII code 103. On the other places the ‘g’ is ok. All other chars give no error. Thanks for looking at it Andre = 114 4 4 4 0 0 1 1 16 .0 t ./ r8+0.f r.g g.f r+0.g