Hi,
On 04/23/2016 02:54 AM, Stewart Cobb wrote:
TimeLab can show "mask" overlays on various plots. It comes with a set of
ADEV masks for cesium clocks, derived from the manufacturer's
specifications for those clocks.
Those masks don't show up on MDEV plots, because the manufacturers don't
Rather than use the Hat, you might consider just using the breakout board and
just using hookup wires to connect it up. Connect up the Vin pin to +5, ground
to ground, TX and RX to the serial port pins and the PPS pin to GPIO 18.
That’ll save you $5, if nothing else.
Add
> This is great news. Will the code be available for inspection /
> modification?Yes. It is the same source code as the current version. Just
> compile under Linux and voila... The code currently has a no-commerical
> copyright on it, but I am going to GPL it (if I can ever figure out what
Hi Bob,
There's one thing I forgot to mention: the 5 yards of RG-174 that an active
puck antenna usually has connected. That's probably a loss of more than 15DB
right off the bat. But, if you're using a puck, you're probably using a short
cable to your receiver, so you shouldn't cut the
Lady Heather does say what the S/N for each satellite is. I use a lot of PA6H
modules (the AdaFruit ones) and GPSMon also conveniently gives the S/N too.
It’s in the GPGSV sentences.
I’m kinda blessed in that my antenna location is just outside the wall from my
workbench, and that position
TimeLab can show "mask" overlays on various plots. It comes with a set of
ADEV masks for cesium clocks, derived from the manufacturer's
specifications for those clocks.
Those masks don't show up on MDEV plots, because the manufacturers don't
provide MDEV specs.
For the mathematicians out there:
I think all RG6 cable has a solid core otherwise the F type connector
wouldn't work.
I almost universally use an RG6 type cable for all my receive only systems.
In fact, I came across several hundred feet of a Belden product labled
1694A HD-SDI Precision Video Cable 4.5GHz. This has a solid
Hi All,
I recently acquired an Erfatom (Datum) MFS-176 RVFS and GPS frequency and time
system. The system works, except the date shows September 9, 1996 (increases
daily). I can set the date and time during startup, but the displayed date
reverts to 1996 when the GPS system locks and is
Hi
Ok, well, let’s over think this a bit more:
The antenna has 38 db gain. It *might* have a noise figure of 0.7 db. A typical
modern GPS has < 2db noise figure. Anything over 6 db of net
gain is “good enough”. On that basis, a line loss of 32 db would be OK. Your
100 M of quad shield at 21 db
One simple trick I have used many times is to split the TX pin from the GPS
receiver - ntpd really only needs to receive. Some ntpd refclock drivers
will attempt to configure the receiver but if you can ensure that ntpd is
getting the messages it needs, then all should be fine. Otherwise, hack the
> Again the problem with LH is that it and NTP both want access to the
> GPS' serial port.
This came up a few months ago. Search in the archives for tboltd,
gpsclientd, and wa5znu.
Someone wrote a driver to act as a pass through so the Thunderbolt could
be connected to Lady Heather, and the
Bob,
Fair enough. I’ll just stop worrying about it. =)
I believe that number sounds like per 100 meter, not per 100 foot. Once I have
the actual coax, as someone suggested, I’ll just hook some ends up, and check
it. =)
Sadly, I don’t have an SA, so checking the attenuation might be
On 4/22/16 12:41 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
jim...@earthlink.net said:
But what about when the observations have gaps? Say you're measuring the
frequency of a spacecraft oscillator, and you can only see it for 8 hours a
day?
One interesting question... Can you match up the cycles after the gap?
jim...@earthlink.net said:
> But what about when the observations have gaps? Say you're measuring the
> frequency of a spacecraft oscillator, and you can only see it for 8 hours a
> day?
One interesting question... Can you match up the cycles after the gap? Is
your clock stable enough or do
Hi Ryan,
For the few years I've been on time-nuts, I understood the consensus view to be
to get a good quality RG-6QS satellite cable. A few of the posts in this
thread have made me wonder if the consensus is changing, or if it's just too
much trouble to stand up to the crowd. I've got about
Home Depot carries 3M Electrical Tape Products (Rubber, Cotton Friction, Vinyl)
http://www.homedepot.com/b/Electrical-Electrical-Tools-Accessories-Electrical-Tape-Wire-Connectors/3M/N-5yc1vZbm6yZ30
3M Temflex 2155 Rubber Splicing Tape
On 21 Apr 2016 01:00, "Bob Camp" wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> RG-6 Quad Shield should be fine as long as it’s meeting the published
specs. The advantage of LRM-400 is that you likely *know* where it came
from and what the specs are.
There is plenty of coax marked LMR400 that is produced in
Paul,
LOL! So, along those lines… one other question, since I can’t find my belden,
I’ll be buying some coax. Anyone have any opinions about RG6 for CCTV vs CATV?
My understanding is the CCTV version always has a solid copper center conductor
(which in my mind would mean less voltage loss for
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 05:41:25 -0700
jimlux wrote:
> although the analysis not by time-nuts, since their statistical analysis
> of drumming rates is not of the kind with which *we* are familiar. This
> is no surprise: over the past 3 years, I've been looking at literature
This is great news. Will the code be available for inspection /
modification?
Paul Alfille
K1PHA
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:13 AM, Mark Sims wrote:
> Well, Lady Heather finally got off her ample ass and dug into the tao of
> X11 and all things Linuxy. The program is
albertson.ch...@gmail.com said:
> The problem is that I think BOTH NTP and LH will want to communicate with
> the T-bolt's serial port. You'd have to figure out way around that. They
> both can't have exclusive access. ...
gpsd uses shared memory to pass info to ntpd. If Lady Heather is
paulsw...@gmail.com said:
> As I recall there was work using the Pi 1 to make a ntp server and that
> could use a simple gps receiver dedicated to the system. Its installation
> was pretty simple.
Adafruit sells a GPS HAT. Some soldering required: the 40 pin header comes
loose.
Uputronics
On 4/22/2016 12:00 PM, time-nuts-requ...@febo.com wrote:
On 4/21/16 6:03 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
>Paul,
>
>If possible can you make an audio recording of a woodpecker attack? You know
it's a form of 1pPS.
>I'd like to add that data set to my list of ADEV plots.
>
I am sure, like almost all
On 4/22/16 9:18 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <7521eb48-ebcd-c037-4dcc-8581ed857...@earthlink.net>, jimlux writes:
For many years, physiologists eschewed the use of mathematical models.
Uhm, that is not really a fair claim.
It stems back to the late 19th century, when
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 1:58 AM, GandalfG8--- via time-nuts
> wrote:
>
> Thanks. I’ve taken your suggestion for the sine-to-square converter.
> I believe there are two separate commands for tuning the 5680 - one is “
> temporary” and one writes through to the EEPROM. I’ll
The install is easy as NTP comes with most Linux distributions. So it
would likely already be there and all you do is edit the .conf file
Again the problem with LH is that it and NTP both want access to the
GPS' serial port.
NTP can be configured to NOT require access to the GPS' serial port
but
In message <60f3d927-124c-aeb6-8591-81206616f...@earthlink.net>, jimlux writes:
>But what about when the observations have gaps? Say you're measuring the
>frequency of a spacecraft oscillator, and you can only see it for 8
>hours a day?
That will still allow you to calculate
In message <7521eb48-ebcd-c037-4dcc-8581ed857...@earthlink.net>, jimlux writes:
>For many years, physiologists eschewed the use of mathematical models.
Uhm, that is not really a fair claim.
The research field of "permanent biomonitoring" is barely five years
old in terms of usable
I would think the major difficulty of the scenario you outline would be the
periodicity of the measurements coinciding with whatever environmental
differences impact the device under test during the measurement window. If you
get to see the oscillator the *same* 8 hours every day, are those
All woodpecker kidding aside, this brings up an interesting question.
For most of the measures we look at: ADEV and related measures, you're
looking at statistics collected essentially continuously (e.g. adjacent
sample frequency) at various time offsets.
But what about when the observations
Cornell has recordings of thousands of bird sounds..
https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Pileated_Woodpecker/sounds
and then, the frequency of woodpecker "drumming" has been the subject of
some study
https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/condor/v100n02/p0350-p0356.pdf
reports,
Chris,
Quite the good point on the TBolt overkill and power. But the whole reason
for LH is to monitor an operating TBolt so a great use for something
already sucking power is a NTP server.
As I recall there was work using the Pi 1 to make a ntp server and that
could use a simple gps receiver
Hi Chris/Mark,
thanks for the feedback on the Pi 3 horsepower.
For stratum 1 NTP the PPS interface from the Thunderbolt would be
required...
Hopefully Mark can conquer the GPU and sound challenges soon.
Best regards
Darren
On 22 April 2016 at 07:01, Chris Albertson
Thanks. I’ve taken your suggestion for the sine-to-square converter.
I believe there are two separate commands for tuning the 5680 - one is “
temporary” and one writes through to the EEPROM. I’ll be using the latter,
of course.
---
I'm surprised nobody else seems to have
Groan...
>> If possible can you make an audio recording of a woodpecker attack?
> I am sure, like almost all oscillators, it will have 1/f flicker noise.
In case some of you aren't familiar with the local fauna:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colaptes
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
Love the sound of them as they use the telephone-pole as target, the
phone line ties into the house and the ceiling becomes a speaker
element. No recording. Woodpeckers run faster than 1 PPS, around 2 PPS
or so I'd guess from memory.
I was once asked by a friend, who lives a couple of km
Neither of those two programs require much in the way of CPU power and
the Pi 3 is a very powerful computer. The Pi 3 could be doing several
additional things all at once. I doubt NTP and LH together would use
10% of the Pi 3's CPU.
The problem is that I think BOTH NTP and LH will want to
37 matches
Mail list logo