The Skylab is effectively useless for sub-second timing. The message arrival
time periodically jumps around, up to +/- 300 msecs. There are a couple of
values that it seems to prefer, but any value can be seen.
NMEA works a lot better on most receivers that I expected. They send several
Lady Heather keeps the date/time time in two sets of variables. One is the
receiver time message values in UTC (or GPS) time. The other is local time
(UTC/GPS adjusted for time zone or time scale) that is used for the clock
displays. There are integer year,month,day, hours,minutes,seconds
Hi
So everything is inside a 10 ms sdev except:
UBLOX LEA-6T NMEA at 11.1 ms (Binary is much better)
Adafruit Ultimate at 39.8 ms
Neither one of those are really surprising. NMEA is not the best thing on uBlox.
The specs on the Adafruit part have never made much sense for timing. Somebody
was
Yo Mark!
On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 02:13:09 +
Mark Sims wrote:
> I found what was causing the apparent ramps in the message offset
> time for the Motorola mode receivers and the Z38xx receivers.
And the problem was?
RGDS
GARY
I found what was causing the apparent ramps in the message offset time for the
Motorola mode receivers and the Z38xx receivers. Here is the updated and
corrected info. Note that a couple of receivers do have some minor ramp
sawtooths in their message timing. They are less than +/- 10 msecs
hol...@hotmail.com said:
> I originally thought the SCPI receivers would be right on time due to
> my original measurements of their message jitter, but when I started
> measureing the actual message arrival times... surprise, surprise, surprise!
> I think the issue is due to the fact that they
Heather will take either time format, but requests the receiver to send T2
format.
I originally thought the SCPI receivers would be right on time due to my
original measurements of their message jitter, but when I started measureing
the actual message arrival times... surprise, surprise,
hol...@hotmail.com said:
> Here are the results of measuring the difference between the time code in a
> GPS receiver time message and the arrival time of the last byte of the
> message. Negative values mean that the receiver sends the timing message
> after the 1PPS pulse that it describes. The
Yo Mark!
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 22:51:01 +
Mark Sims wrote:
> Here are the results of measuring the difference between the time
> code in a GPS receiver time message and the arrival time of the last
> byte of the message. Negative values mean that the receiver sends
> the
Here are the results of measuring the difference between the time code in a GPS
receiver time message and the arrival time of the last byte of the message.
Negative values mean that the receiver sends the timing message after the 1PPS
pulse that it describes. The table also shows the standard
10 matches
Mail list logo