I had some of these boards made:
http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/osmo-lea6t-gps from the Gerbers
in the git repo. I'm running the cheaper LEA-6S modules for
prototyping but the boards seem to work well and were designed for the
pin compatible LEA-6T you're after.
On 25 May 2016 at 23:30,
On Wed, 18 May 2016 05:31:45 +, you wrote:
>There is what looks like a decent carrier board for Ublox modules on
>OSHPARK.COM's shared project library. It has a voltage regulator and RS-232
>interface on it... would be nicer if it had a prototype area and swoopty PPS
>driver, but I'm too
That is why we stay with Ublox 5T for saw tooth correction and 6M for what
I call PLL applications where you can change the 1 pps to higher frequency
to be used in a PLL.
Maybe we will one of these days see 1 ns on ebay. I am sure NDA's prohibit
the company from resale of chip
Bert Kehren
Hi
Well, the first step is to talk to the outfits about you weekly usage rate of
the
chip sets. In some cases anything under 10K chips a day simply isn’t
interesting to
them. After that you sign their NDA and they sign your NDA. After both of the
lawyer teams are happy that the right
On Thu, 19 May 2016 15:30:05 -0400, you wrote:
>...
>
>> You can see this phenomena with the LEA modules quite clearly:
>> The LEA-4, -5, -6, -7 and -8 modules all use an internal 48MHz clock.
>> Even though there were 2 complete overhauls of the system in this ~13 year
>> timespan.
>
>Which is
On Thu, 19 May 2016 19:17:17 +0200, you wrote:
>...
>
>The node size of microcontrollers is also kind of stuck, mostly due
>to power consumption constraints. If you want a transistor to switch
>off well and not just becomming a high valued resistor, you have to make
>it big. Hence most
Hi
> On May 19, 2016, at 1:17 PM, Attila Kinali wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 May 2016 09:08:40 -0400
> Bert Kehren via time-nuts wrote:
>
>> Today GPS receivers are getting better by the year due to the fact that in
>> order to save silicon the chips are
On Thu, 19 May 2016 09:08:40 -0400
Bert Kehren via time-nuts wrote:
> Today GPS receivers are getting better by the year due to the fact that in
> order to save silicon the chips are getting smaller and the clock frequency
> goes up reducing saw tooth excursion. If it was
Today GPS receivers are getting better by the year due to the fact that in
order to save silicon the chips are getting smaller and the clock frequency
goes up reducing saw tooth excursion. If it was not for hanging bridge
filtering it on the input of a GPSDO would be simple without info from
Bert wrote:
Our first tests are with a 500 ps
DS chip because I did have them, but 200 ps will work with a T5 or 6. We
are also considering using two Micrel SY 89295UTG in series with 10 ps
resolution, but with the limitation of a single frequency GPS receiver and
ionosphere delay
Hi
While it may not be the only parameter worth considering:
The standard deviation of the delta between adjacent pps outputs goes down to
below 500 ps on the LEA-6T when sawtooth is applied.
Bob
> On May 18, 2016, at 7:23 PM, Charles Steinmetz wrote:
>
> Bert
Attached is a picture of our ublox board that we plan on making available
to time-nuts once we have the FE 5680/50 GPSDO under control so it does not
wipe out under any circumstances the memory. We will if any one is
interested in a board also make the board only available for less than $ 10
There is what looks like a decent carrier board for Ublox modules on
OSHPARK.COM's shared project library. It has a voltage regulator and RS-232
interface on it... would be nicer if it had a prototype area and swoopty PPS
driver, but I'm too lazy to lay out a better one. Three boards will
Hi guys,
This is the last call for the group buy of the Ublox LEA-6T modules. Just be
be sure you know what you're getting: these are new in package LEA-6T modules.
They are not on a breakout board of any type.
I have the following names and quantities. If your name is not on this list,
14 matches
Mail list logo