Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-28 Thread davidh
Howdy Charles, Could you tell us more about the PLL, what sort of phase comparator, filters and so forth. I'd be keen to duplicate and test your configuration. Thanks, david David wrote: How do you lock your OCXO to the PRS10? I just use a 1:1 PLL. Some will argue that phase

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-24 Thread Hal Murray
Does anybody have data on the drift of Rs or Cs? Rule of thumb: ... Ah, thanks. But by Rs and Cs I meant plural or R/resistor and C/capacitor. I know they change a lot with temperature, but how much do they drift if the temperature is constant? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam.

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-24 Thread Charles Steinmetz
David wrote: How do you lock your OCXO to the PRS10? I just use a 1:1 PLL. Some will argue that phase locking two oscillators running at the same frequency is not optimal, but I have found that it can work very well. YMMV. Perhaps locking a 100 MHz OCXO to the PRS10 and dividing its

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-24 Thread Bob Camp
Hi Which R’s and C’s did you buy? There are a *lot* of different types and they each have their issues. A very common issue is - “they came from the store”. Any ability to trace them back to a manufacturer and a process has been lost. Bob On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:29 AM, Hal Murray

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Bill wrote: 1. The difficulty with disciplining a local oscillator to a GPS signal is due to variations in the received GPS signal and the LO. I'm not sure I'd call that the difficulty -- it is the task of a GPSDO to discipline the local oscillator *at time scales where the GPS is better

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi The real answer is always “that depends”. 1) How much does the sensitivity of your OCXO change with a change in EFC? 1.4:1, 2:1, 4:1 …. (slope sensitivity not % linearity) 2) How quiet is your DAC compared to your OCXO? 3) How quiet is your reference compared to your OCXO? 4) How much

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 23/03/14 14:02, Bob Camp wrote: Hi The real answer is always “that depends”. 1) How much does the sensitivity of your OCXO change with a change in EFC? 1.4:1, 2:1, 4:1 …. (slope sensitivity not % linearity) 2) How quiet is your DAC compared to your OCXO? 3) How quiet is your reference

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi One thing that should be noted. Some of this stuff has zero impact at long tau. Some of it only has an impact at long tau. It might be easier to split a model into long and short versions to deal with this stuff. Getting the data is the next step. You can find app notes on some voltage

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Hal Murray
4) How much do the DAC, reference, op-amps, resistors, capacitors, drift with time? Assuming constant temperature and supply voltage... What is the time scale for parts drifting? Is it very low frequency so well within the loop bandwidth or is it jumps that will be hard to filter out?

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread EWKehren
Hi There are many issues when it comes to a GPSO. But what has to be first discussed what is it one wants to accomplish. Last year when we worked on the latest Shera GPSDO we always got better than 1E-11 with a unit lying on the bench with no enclosure or thermal management. Chasing

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi If you have a source of “noise” that is not in your model *and* it’s significant, then your model will not predict the outcome. That’s true if it’s in or if it’s outside the loop bandwidth. Bob On Mar 23, 2014, at 2:27 PM, Hal Murray hmur...@megapathdsl.net wrote: 4) How much do the DAC,

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Chris Albertson
I'm working on a GPSDO but with different goals. I want mine to be 1) very low cost, under $50 for everything if I can 2) No PCB required. 3) very easy to replicate by a first time builder 4) Easy to understand. The parts count is very low, no exotic parts and the software written very clearly

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Tom Miller
You are nine days too early. :) Tom - Original Message - From: Chris Albertson albertson.ch...@gmail.com To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement time-nuts@febo.com Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 5:26 PM Subject: Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system I'm working

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Chris wrote: 4) why use a PPS as the communications link from GPS to GPSDO? Generally, because that is the only precision timing output you get from a GPS unit. The models with a 10kHz output were prized by the simple GPSDO crowd precisely for the fact that the phase-locked 10kHz signal

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Hal Murray
li...@rtty.us said: If you have a source of “noise” that is not in your model *and* it’s significant, then your model will not predict the outcome. That’s true if it’s in or if it’s outside the loop bandwidth. Does anybody have data on the drift of Rs or Cs? In this context, is it

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Charles Steinmetz
Hal wrote: Does anybody have data on the drift of Rs or Cs? Tom has some data posted at leapsecond.com (for H-masers, too). John Miles has some at ke5fx.com. John Ackermann has some at febo.com. I encourage you to roam widely over all three sites -- you will be well rewarded. Best

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Hal Murray
csteinm...@yandex.com said: Can I find a way to move the OXCO into the guts of a GPS receiver. I don't know. Can you? That is essentially what the Thunderbolt does, and it brings with it the tremendous advantage that it removes the sawtooth error -- which is why some of us think so

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Magnus Danielson
On 24/03/14 00:08, Charles Steinmetz wrote: Chris wrote: 4) why use a PPS as the communications link from GPS to GPSDO? Generally, because that is the only precision timing output you get from a GPS unit. The models with a 10kHz output were prized by the simple GPSDO crowd precisely for the

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Charles Steinmetz
I've lost track now of who it was, but someone asked if there was a better strategy than a GPS disciplined quartz oscillator or a GPS disciplined rubidium. My best standard uses an SRS PRS10 rubidium disciplined by GPS PPS at tau = VERY long ( ~12 hours), using the PRS10's internal PPS

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Tom Van Baak (lab)
Rule of thumb: - really good OCXO have frequency drift rates of 1e-10 to 1e-11/day - common Rb have frequency drift rates on the order of 1e-11/month - Cs do not have frequency drift - H-maser drift rates are 1e-15 to 1e-16/day /tvb (i5s) On Mar 23, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Charles Steinmetz

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread Bob Camp
Hi …. and GPS has cyclic issues on a 24 / 48 hour basis …. Bob On Mar 23, 2014, at 8:58 PM, Tom Van Baak (lab) t...@leapsecond.com wrote: Rule of thumb: - really good OCXO have frequency drift rates of 1e-10 to 1e-11/day - common Rb have frequency drift rates on the order of 1e-11/month -

Re: [time-nuts] GPSDO control system

2014-03-23 Thread davidh
Hi Charles, How do you lock your OCXO to the PRS10? Thanks, david I've lost track now of who it was, but someone asked if there was a better strategy than a GPS disciplined quartz oscillator or a GPS disciplined rubidium. My best standard uses an SRS PRS10 rubidium disciplined by GPS PPS