Re: Cheesy debate

2001-02-02 Thread Jeff Ricker
Oh, no!! I'm having a paradigmatic identity crisis! I am a boomer (born 1957: rock on, dead Elvis) and the parent of a 12-year-old daughter. You would think that this is all you'd need to know about me to know where I stand on the issue of "The Nurture Assumption." Blaming my daughter's

Re: Cheesy debate - speculations

2001-02-02 Thread Drnanjo
Hello again - In a message dated 2/1/2001 1:27:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is exactly where Harris says that parents have the strongest effect on the development of their children. As I understand her, she is arguing that parenting style and other "in home

Re: Cheesy debate

2001-02-01 Thread Drnanjo
Hello friends, I am wondering why a more middle-of-the-road view on this question is not being studied (or is it, and I am just clueless?) That is, it makes little sense to say, however convincingly, that parents have virtually NO influence on how their children turn out, and makes equally

RE: Cheesy debate

2001-02-01 Thread Dennis Goff
Nancy wrote: "Who one's parents are (genetically, in their social status/financial resources, their values, the neighborhood they settle the family in, the schools they send the kids to, etc.) almost certainly affects the type of friends, clique, or crowd a child chooses." This is exactly where

Re: Cheesy debate

2001-02-01 Thread David
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Weisskirch, Rob went: ... I think the real reason it received so much attention is because it appeals to the Baby Boomer psych-types. [I am aware I am opening up a can of generational worms]. For Boomer parents who have kids who, well, uh, didn't turn out exactly how