Filip Hanik wrote:
if you are getting a new laptop, at least get one with a 15 screen,
I have had Sony before, and they are kick ass. IBM is not too bad either.
Dell have been a little flaky on us
* Maybe the Dells are flaky, but they seem to have a good warranty (3
years, international, onsite),
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21175.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
* Release plan vote (early this week)
* Interim releases: in order to make the end of the month deadline for a
beta, new interim releases are needed more often than before (5.0.x has
been roughlty on a 2 months interval between releases); therefore, I
propose making a new release every two
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21175.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Snif, snif, my Sony Vaio GRX laptop is dead :-(
I was using it for all my TC development, as well as my email. That
means I'll waste some time reconfiguring stuff on my desktop (which I
was using as a test machine) before I'm up and running again on TC
development.
As a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21176.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Snif, snif, my Sony Vaio GRX laptop is dead :-(
I was using it for all my TC development, as well as my email. That
means I'll waste some time reconfiguring stuff on my desktop (which I
was using as a test machine) before I'm up and running
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21175.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21175.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21176.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21175.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21176.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi everybody
I have been searching previous mails about killing idle threads, and I
found lots of them describing the same problem (lots of requests carry
out new threads that never are released, so, in a long-term, max number
of proccesses is reached and Tomcat stops). Some
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Brian Olsen wrote:
Hey Guys,
I just made a proposed patch for the enhancement request I made
regarding the SIP Servlet API
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21169
It adds a new interface org.apache.catalina.ServletSession that
contains the methods that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21176.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
- Original Message -
From: Carlos Rodríguez Colino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:21 AM
Subject: decrease idle threads in the pool faster... (II)
Hi everybody
I have been searching previous mails about killing idle threads, and I
found lots of
- Original Message -
From: Brian Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change getSession() in org.apache.catalina.Session from
HttpSession to a more general interface (enhancement request 21169)
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Here is a small explanation on how I managed to do it myself.
I spent a while looking for detailed documentation with no success.
If you find anything better, please keep me informed :-)
HTH,
Laurent
---BeginMessage---
Laurent Blume wrote:
No, it's part of Tomcat, and I think the most relevant
Bill Barker wrote:
Somewhat OT, but is there a plan for TC 4.1.25? There are some serious bugs
in the Jk-Coyote code in TC 4.1.24.
I was thinking a two week timeframe for 4.1.25. Are all the patches
needed already there ?
Personally, I need to port a Jasper patch.
Remy
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21183.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I was thinking a two week timeframe for 4.1.25. Are all the patches
needed already there ?
Mine isn't. OutOfMemoryException due to recursive calls in log() of
StandardWrapperValve:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19312
Patch was sent to mailing list April 30th.
// J
Howdy,
I'm also not a fan of this patch. I don't think it's a particularly good idea
to modify the session interface for 4.1.x at this point.
Yoav Shapira
--- Bill Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Bill Barker wrote:
Like Remy, I'm -0 on the patch. As I read Remy's post, this means that
neither of us will actually veto it if some other developer decides to post
it. However, neither of us consider it to be a-good-idea, so we will be
looking for implementation holes to veto ;-).
The internal
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21184.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change getSession() in org.apache.catalina.Session from
HttpSession to a more general interface (enhancement request 21169)
Remy
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21187.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21187.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21190.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21116.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21116.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21116.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
Like Remy, I'm -0 on the patch. As I read Remy's post, this means that
neither of us will actually veto it if some other developer decides to
post
it. However, neither of us consider it to be a-good-idea, so we will be
looking for implementation holes
Hi all!
If somebody is interested in solution for BUG #21190 (recently submited by me -
JDBCRealm is trying to use closed connections without checking in tomcat
4.0.6, http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21190) please see the
file attached. BTW this bug also seems to be actual for
get an apple power book with a 17 display ;-)
bye
daniel s. haischt
--
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. Juni 2003 23:55
An: Tomcat Developers List
Betreff: [OT] Dead laptop
Snif, snif, my Sony Vaio GRX laptop is
Hey Guys,
I just made a proposed patch for the enhancement request I made
regarding the SIP Servlet API
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21169
It adds a new interface org.apache.catalina.ServletSession that contains
the methods that HttpSession has in common with
SipSession
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
For laptoppy goodness you can't beat a Powerbook G4[1], java 1.4.1 on
these guys rocks, and Eclipse is available now. Project builder isn't
so great, but the form factor, battery life, unix/gnu tools built-in
and OS makes it the best laptop (IMHO) that you can buy.
On the other hand they're a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21194.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2003/06/30 11:21:35
Modified:.build.properties.default build.xml
Log:
- Update to Struts 1.1.
Revision ChangesPath
1.97 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.properties.default
Index: build.properties.default
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18220.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
IDEA and Together are available as OS X versions too.
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: kev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 30. Juni 2003 19:34
An: Tomcat Developers List
Betreff: Re: [OT] Dead laptop
For laptoppy goodness you can't beat a Powerbook G4[1], java 1.4.1 on
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 4:17 AM
Subject: Re: [5.0] Upcoming action items
Bill Barker wrote:
Somewhat OT, but is there a plan for TC 4.1.25? There are some serious
bugs
in
Bill Barker wrote:
I was thinking a two week timeframe for 4.1.25. Are all the patches
needed already there ?
If we're still using coyote_10, then there are a few things I need to port
from HEAD (e.g. the // fix for mod_jk).
Yep, coyote_10 is still used there. I think it would be a big change to
Brian Olsen wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
It's not that I do think it's a bad idea, it's just I think there are
other problems. I would be willing to consider including the patch
(but I need to look into possible side effects first).
What could those side effects be???
You're changing the core
remm2003/06/30 15:10:00
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper JspC.java
Log:
- Don't generate the comments (they can screw up the char encoding in case
i18n is used) when including in an existing web.xml.
Revision ChangesPath
1.47 +5 -5
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2003/06/30 15:16:40
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
- Use the flag to include declarations inside web.xml, rather than
rely on a token.
Revision ChangesPath
1.137 +3 -15 jakarta-tomcat-5/build.xml
Index: build.xml
I'm wondering if anyone can point me towards the class/classes that I
should look at to add custom HTTP response headers for a customized
Tomcat application I'm working on.
Thanks very much.
-Adam
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20752.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20860.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21207.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Monday 30 June 2003 23:25, Remy Maucherat wrote:
Bill Barker wrote:
I was thinking a two week timeframe for 4.1.25. Are all the patches
needed already there ?
If we're still using coyote_10, then there are a few things I need to
port from HEAD (e.g. the // fix for mod_jk).
Yep,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21207.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
HttpServletResponse which is part of the servlet API (and portable to other
containers)
-Tim
Adam Fisk wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone can point me towards the class/classes that I
should look at to add custom HTTP response headers for a customized
Tomcat application I'm working on.
Thanks
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21157.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21207.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I am interested in getting in on the TOMCAT 5.0 development
What is needed?
Where can I be of some help?
--
Andre D Bonner
Sun Certified Programmer for the Java 2 Platform 1.4
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20376.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15278.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
billbarker2003/06/30 22:16:47
Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 Tag: coyote_10 mod_jk.c
jk/native/apache-2.0 Tag: coyote_10 mod_jk.c
jk/native/common Tag: coyote_10 jk_uri_worker_map.c
jk_uri_worker_map.h
Log:
Port patch for // from
billbarker2003/06/30 22:21:30
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/puretls Tag: coyote_10
PureTLSSocketFactory.java PureTLSSupport.java
Log:
Porting fixes for CLIENT-CERT from HEAD branch.
Revision ChangesPath
No
billbarker2003/06/30 22:27:13
Modified:util/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/jsse Tag: coyote_10
JSSE14SocketFactory.java JSSE14Support.java
JSSEImplementation.java JSSESocketFactory.java
Added:
billbarker2003/06/30 22:42:00
Modified:.RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Log:
Documenting changes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.73 +11 -1 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
Index: RELEASE-NOTES-4.1.txt
70 matches
Mail list logo
