DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24882.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
He has my +1.
+1
--
Andy Armstrong, Tagish
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dmitriy . wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to setup IIS - Tomcat plug in. Went through all the steps
described on tomcat's
site(http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk/iishowto.html),
but still getting a 404 resource (/jakarta/iisapi_redirect.dll) not
available error. /jakarta/ is my
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22677.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Okay, I'm trying to writing an e-mail to those here at SAS Institute
to explain the behavioral change in Tomcat 5.0.14 and Tomcat 4.1.29
with respect to the URIEncoding issue, and how it impacts our webapps.
At the moment, I'm still struggling a bit on the justification for this
change.
True,
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Okay, I'm trying to writing an e-mail to those here at SAS Institute
to explain the behavioral change in Tomcat 5.0.14 and Tomcat 4.1.29
with respect to the URIEncoding issue, and how it impacts our webapps.
At the moment, I'm still struggling a bit on the justification for
Yes, it does... As to the spelling - I misspelled it in the e-mail. An
interesting thing
From: Andy Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: IIS with Tomcat
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 13:27:43 +
Hi Remy,
Okay, re-reviewed the original 22666 thread. To complete this thread,
I'll assume the following from RFC2718 is our justification for the
new behavior:
Unless there is some compelling reason for a
particular scheme to do otherwise, translating character
sequences into
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20714.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Dmitriy . wrote:
Yes, it does... As to the spelling - I misspelled it in the e-mail. An
interesting thing
Well there's certainly no need to set up a /jakarta virtual directory on
Tomcat. The virtual directory on IIS is just part of the mechanism the
connector uses to pass requests to itself.
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hi Remy,
Okay, re-reviewed the original 22666 thread. To complete this thread,
I'll assume the following from RFC2718 is our justification for the
new behavior:
Unless there is some compelling reason for a
particular scheme to do otherwise, translating character
Hi,
I got a support question about LB with mod_jk 2 (and I saw posts about
that on tomcat-user).
Either there's something I don't understand, or the
jk2_get_most_suitable_worker method in jk_worker_lb will always return
the first worker which is not in an error state (assuming there was no
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24897.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24897.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24774.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
For IIS and Tomcat setup, here are some posts I did to get it to work... I
have IIS 6 on Windows Server 2003 and it is working fine for me... I even
got the JK2 connector to work..
{all my posts in archive}
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL
Hi,
It occurred to me that perhaps we should include examples of filters and
listeners in our example webapp? We have some example code, but nothing
linked like the servlet and JSP examples.
Should we perhaps also include tomcat-specific examples such as valves?
Again, we probably have code in
mmanders2003/11/21 09:58:20
Added: common/build get_ver.awk
Log:
Awk script submitted by Guenter Knauf to help building for NetWare.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/common/build/get_ver.awk
Index: get_ver.awk
Thanks Remy, that helps me finally catch up with the rest of
you on understanding this change. It looks like I should update
my pending admin changes to only allow US-ASCII or UTF-8 as choices
for the URIEncoding attribute.
Since I have only committed the resource update, the admin
webapp
Yep excellent idea, filters and valves are excellent techniques and need
more explorations.
- Original Message -
From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 9:21 AM
Subject: Tomcat 5 examples
Hi,
It occurred to me that perhaps we should
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hi Remy,
Okay, re-reviewed the original 22666 thread. To complete this thread,
I'll assume the following from RFC2718 is our justification for the
new behavior:
Unless there is some compelling reason for a
particular scheme to do otherwise,
funkman 2003/11/21 11:00:52
Modified:catalina/src/conf web.xml
catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/servlets
DefaultServlet.java
Log:
Allow welcome files and directory redirects to be urlEncoded to satisfy
many tomcat-user complaints. I
funkman 2003/11/21 11:09:22
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/realm JDBCRealm.java
Log:
Backport JDBCRealm from 5 which had the following fixes:
7116 - JDBC realm doesn't handle NULL passwords
10623 - JDBCRealm lacks one DB commit, preventing sucessfull
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7116.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11929.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15680.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20349.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24904.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
-- Jeanfrancois
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Mark Thomas as a Tomcat committer. He has
contibuted a significant amount of fixes already, and does what nobody
else does: roam Bugzila to fix older issues and cleanup the database.
He has special interest in the WebDAV
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23564.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12196.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22416.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12810.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15758.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
funkman 2003/11/21 12:11:14
Modified:webapps/ROOT index.jsp
Log:
BZ - 15879 default tomcat homepage index.jsp says it's index.html
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-4.0/webapps/ROOT/index.jsp
Index: index.jsp
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15879.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thanks... Went through all the steps that you specified, but something is
still not right. If I change the appbase as you specified to
c:/intetpub/wwwroot the server doesn't find the pages. If I leave it as is
webapps I still get that error:
HTTP Status 404 - /jakarta/isapi_redirect.dll
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I made a web application on SunOne studio IDE.
It is working fine in IDE. But when I move it to Tomcat 4.1, I get a
filenotfoundexception (access is denied) error.
In the IDE, I am using the same Tomcat install.
I am on Win2k adv. server.
when I use the application without database
amyroh 2003/11/21 13:10:22
Modified:http11/src/java/org/apache/coyote/http11
Http11Processor.java
Log:
Fix NPE - was thrown from org.apache.coyote.RequestInfo.getRemoteAddr when getting
remoteAddr via JMX.
Revision ChangesPath
1.88 +18 -9
Hans,
The behavior change is unrelated to the use of getParameter()
to search for jsp_precompile. Both Tomcat 3.x and Tomcat 4.x
were bit by this log ago and Craig's fix was applied to both.
In Tomcat 4's case, it was prior to the 4.0 release.
Assuming I have a good grip on the issue, I think
kinman 2003/11/21 14:06:02
Modified:jsr152/examples/WEB-INF/lib jstl.jar standard.jar
jsr152/examples/WEB-INF/tags displayProducts.tag
jsr152/examples/jsp2/jspx basic.jspx textRotate.jspx
Log:
- Patch by Jan Luehe:
Update JSP examples to use JSTL
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hans,
The behavior change is unrelated to the use of getParameter()
to search for jsp_precompile. Both Tomcat 3.x and Tomcat 4.x
were bit by this log ago and Craig's fix was applied to both.
In Tomcat 4's case, it was prior to the 4.0 release.
Okay, I'm sure you're right that
I believe that I have found a problem with the SingleSignOn valve, and
the Principal caching that is performed in the FormAuthenticator. I
believe that I have a valid patch for the issue, and I would like to
discuss my proposed changes with the community. After reading the
community rules,
Are you using Windows Server 2003? Windows 2000?
Did you set the jakarta folder as execute permissions (not script)..
Richard Norman
web/Application Developer
Original Message Follows
From: Dmitriy . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
kinman 2003/11/21 18:09:35
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
JspDocumentParser.java
Log:
- Fix bugzilla 24904: Nested custom tag causes bogus compilation errors.
Revision ChangesPath
1.71 +10 -7
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24904.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I got a support question about LB with mod_jk 2 (and I saw posts about
that on tomcat-user).
Either there's something I don't understand, or the
jk2_get_most_suitable_worker method in jk_worker_lb will always
Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Larry Isaacs wrote:
Hi Remy,
Okay, re-reviewed the original 22666 thread. To complete this thread,
I'll assume the following from RFC2718 is our justification for the
new behavior:
Unless there is some
50 matches
Mail list logo
