Hello Remy,
Thanx for your help and I hope we have now a better server.xml saving
support.
The new features are:
- Clustering support
- new 5.5 Connector attribute mapping support (with correct https saving)
- backup the context.xml also as default mode
- Internally you can save
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project jakarta-tomcat-jk-native has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Hi all,
You can find the sources at:
http://www.apache.org/~mturk/
File is:
http://www.apache.org/~mturk/apr-java.tar.gz
My intention is to put that inside:
jakarta-tomcat-connectors/apr-java
Although OtherBill thinks this is not a proper
place to put that code, IMO until we have a
generic
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33063.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33080.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
pero2005/01/13 05:08:20
Modified:modules/storeconfig/src/share/org/apache/catalina/storeconfig
StandardContextSF.java StoreContextAppender.java
modules/storeconfig/test/src/share/org/apache/catalina/storeconfig
pero2005/01/13 05:16:51
Modified:webapps/docs changelog.xml
Log:
Upate my storeconfig comment
Revision ChangesPath
1.219 +2 -1 jakarta-tomcat-catalina/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Index: changelog.xml
Yes, I thing the first step to better saving server.xml is done!
+1
Vote for Release 5.5.7
Peter
Remy Maucherat schrieb:
I think the initial work on the new config save is now done, and it
appears to be working at least as well as the old one.
Yoav, would it be ok to do a new build picking up
Peter Rossbach wrote:
Yes, I thing the first step to better saving server.xml is done!
It works very well (I tested again with your latest patch - the removal
of path will hopefully avoid users getting bad ideas ;) ). The XML is
clean, well indented, and easy to read.
Rémy
Hi,
It's certainly OK for you to do one ;) If you want me to do it, that's also
OK, but it will have to wait until this weekend. Either way is fine with
me. I haven't looked at (much less written) any code recently, as I
expected for this January boot camp at school...
Yoav
-Original
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
It's certainly OK for you to do one ;) If you want me to do it, that's also
OK, but it will have to wait until this weekend. Either way is fine with
me. I haven't looked at (much less written) any code recently, as I
expected for this January boot camp at school...
I'm
Well, that really OK!
Peter
Yoav Shapira schrieb:
Hi,
It's certainly OK for you to do one ;) If you want me to do it, that's also
OK, but it will have to wait until this weekend. Either way is fine with
me. I haven't looked at (much less written) any code recently, as I
expected for this
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33085.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33058.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33002.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33002.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33002.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
org.apache.apr... ???
If this is private, and you've suggested it should be,
don't you mean
org.apache.jakarta.apr... ?
Bill
At 04:25 AM 1/13/2005, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi all,
You can find the sources at:
http://www.apache.org/~mturk/
File is:
http://www.apache.org/~mturk/apr-java.tar.gz
My
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
org.apache.apr... ???
If this is private, and you've suggested it should be,
don't you mean
org.apache.jakarta.apr... ?
He he :)
I didn't said it should be private to J-T-C nor Jakarta.
But the fact is that we don't have OO languages infrastructure
for APR glue code.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33002.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I've been running Tomcat 3.3 with Apache frontend servers for quite some
time now without any problems. Recently I switched to Tomcat 4.1.30,
Apache 1.3.33 and Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 4.1.30.
The site is ran on two servers with load balanced AJP 1.3 workers
handled by mod_jk. The JDK
Mathias Herberts wrote:
Hi,
I've been running Tomcat 3.3 with Apache frontend servers for quite some
time now without any problems. Recently I switched to Tomcat 4.1.30,
Apache 1.3.33 and Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 4.1.30.
That's interesting.
Can yo try the latest JK 1.2.8 version?
Also are
Mathias Herberts wrote:
Hi,
I've been running Tomcat 3.3 with Apache frontend servers for quite some
time now without any problems. Recently I switched to Tomcat 4.1.30,
Apache 1.3.33 and Jakarta Tomcat Connectors 4.1.30.
And also...
This kind of question belongs to Tomcat users list.
Mladen.
At 01:56 PM 1/13/2005, Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
org.apache.apr... ???
If this is private, and you've suggested it should be, don't you mean
org.apache.jakarta.apr... ?
He he :)
I didn't said it should be private to J-T-C nor Jakarta.
But the fact is that we don't have OO
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31804.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10671.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10671.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm definitely a +1 on this. Since I changed jobs, I haven't been
able to keep up like I would like, and Jean-Jacques has stepped in to
help. Having worked directly with him, his is a great fit, especially
since he is already a httpd and an apr committer, I think he can be a
great help on mod_jk
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33090.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To be honest, I don't like where this is going. I think access to native
functionality for tomcat is great - and starting with functionality
provided by apr is ok. But there is a lot outside apr, and if this
becomes 'apr - java interface', it won't be easy to add.
So maybe it would be better to
Costin Manolache wrote:
To be honest, I don't like where this is going. I think access to native
functionality for tomcat is great - and starting with functionality
provided by apr is ok. But there is a lot outside apr, and if this
becomes 'apr - java interface', it won't be easy to add.
I
At 01:25 AM 1/14/2005, Mladen Turk wrote:
Costin Manolache wrote:
To be honest, I don't like where this is going. I think access to native
functionality for tomcat is great - and starting with functionality provided
by apr is ok. But there is a lot outside apr, and if this becomes 'apr - java
37 matches
Mail list logo
