Shapira, Yoav wrote:
But every time I install tomcat, I go through a set of steps that is
always the same:
- Unzip the distribution
- Remove all its webapps
- Strip server.xml down to a minimum
I suppose I could just write some scripts to do the above, but a
distribution that does it is relatively
Howdy,
Yes, but soon you're going to pitch a HTTP-server-in-100k, complete
with
its own proprietary API ;)
The embedded distribution is IMO good for a minimal distribution.
;) Not, I don't want a proprietary anything as in the Jetty world.
That's no good for any organization that wants
George MATKOVITS wrote:
Please, PLEASE add it! There is no demand because MOST users do not
know any compatible clients!
Thank you - George
WebDAV seems to be largely an empty promise due to the lack of
reasonable, compatible clients.
90% of all clients are Microsoft Windows.
Microsoft
Jess Holle wrote:
WebDAV seems to be largely an empty promise due to the lack of
reasonable, compatible clients.
90% of all clients are Microsoft Windows.
Microsoft Windows' Web Folders support WebDAV to a *small* degree. Yet
the way this is integrated into the OS is at such a level that 99%
Julian Reschke wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
WebDAV seems to be largely an empty promise due to the lack of
reasonable, compatible clients.
90% of all clients are Microsoft Windows.
Microsoft Windows' Web Folders support WebDAV to a *small* degree.
Yet the way this is integrated into the OS is
Jess Holle wrote:
How does the user use the filesystem driver?
net use ...
The end-user certainly cannot achieve anything meaningful via web
folders. I did a lot of testing in this regard.
Well, I disagree. Lots of my customers use webfolders heavily.
Now if there is a better level of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: WebDAV and TC5
Jess Holle wrote:
How does the user use the filesystem driver?
net use ...
The end-user certainly cannot achieve anything meaningful via web
folders. I
Howdy,
I don't think small market shares or lack of clients is a reason for
exclude
a server feature. They are separate. If the WebDAV app added some
negative
impact to the tomcat server, then take it out, but if not, then lets
add it
back in.
Even if WebDAV is useful in the general sense (I
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
I don't think small market shares or lack of clients is a reason for
exclude
a server feature. They are separate. If the WebDAV app added some
negative
impact to the tomcat server, then take it out, but if not, then lets
add it
back in.
Even if
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
I don't think small market shares or lack of clients is a reason for
exclude
a server feature. They are separate. If the WebDAV app added some
negative
impact to the tomcat server, then take it out, but if not, then lets
add it
back in.
Even if WebDAV is useful in
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yes, but soon you're going to pitch a HTTP-server-in-100k, complete
with its own proprietary API ;)
The embedded distribution is IMO good for a minimal distribution.
I for one wasn't about to :-)
Rather I think that the module-catalog approach broadens the exposure of
the
11 matches
Mail list logo
