RE: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-13 Thread IAS
Project Coordinator http://jakarta.apache-korea.org -Original Message- From: jean-frederic clere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 7:15 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement Henri Gomez wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: iasandcb

RE: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-13 Thread IAS
: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:20 PM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement Costin Manolache wrote: iasandcb wrote: Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK 1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4

Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-08 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 5/10/02 12:43 am, Mark Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It has been brought to my attention that some members of the Tomcat community have expressed a desire to see a requirement lower than J2SE 1.4 in JSP 2.0. Great... One more reason to start thinking about kicking JSP out of the door! :-)

Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-08 Thread Henri Gomez
Costin Manolache wrote: iasandcb wrote: Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK 1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4 and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together. Actually, it isn't. All we know is that the

Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-08 Thread jean-frederic clere
Henri Gomez wrote: Costin Manolache wrote: iasandcb wrote: Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK 1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4 and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together. Actually, it isn't. All we

RE: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-07 Thread iasandcb
Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK 1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4 and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together. At this point, I'd like to propose an idea. It's Tomcat subprojects plan. So far, Tomcat has had

RE: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-07 Thread Costin Manolache
iasandcb wrote: Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK 1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4 and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together. Actually, it isn't. All we know is that the current draft has this

Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-07 Thread Remy Maucherat
Costin Manolache wrote: iasandcb wrote: Now it's almost clear that SRV 2.4 requires JDK 1.2 and JSP 2.0 does JDK 1.4. The main issue is discrepancy of J2SE requirement between SRV 2.4 and JSP 2.0, which are supposed to come up together. Actually, it isn't. All we know is that the

Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-07 Thread Costin Manolache
Remy Maucherat wrote: If the EG prefers features over portability - then we need to find a way to create a distribution without JSP ( is this possible ?) and maybe compensate by including cocoon or velocity. Personally, I would support 1.3 (and 1.2 assuming you are willing to download

Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-07 Thread Steve Downey
The spec defines a conforming JSP 2.0 implementation as one that runs on JDK 1.4. A JSP author may therefore assume the new API's are available when creating their webapp. It's a serious issue for, say, Oracle, or IBM, who has a custom Java VM. But, I hadn't noticed that Apache is bundling

Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-07 Thread V. Cekvenich
My opinion is that being cross platform (IBM VM, JRockit (BEA), etc.) is very important and making it required using Sun VM (1.4) is not a good idea. Until there are other VMs that are 1.4, there must be a workaround (add these JARs to make 1.3 work). .V Mark Roth wrote: It has been

Re: JSP 2.0's J2SE 1.4 Requirement

2002-10-07 Thread Jean-Francois Arcand
Costin Manolache wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: If the EG prefers features over portability - then we need to find a way to create a distribution without JSP ( is this possible ?) and maybe compensate by including cocoon or velocity. Personally, I would support 1.3 (and 1.2 assuming