Costin Manolache wrote:
Could someone explain what's the (current) difference between our webdav
servlet and slide ? Looking at the site, slide seems to have far more
features ( which is not necesarily good ). Is there a good point of
maintaining 2 webdav solutions ? Could we just bundle slide
Mark Thomas wrote:
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howdy,
I don't have a big objection. But we removed it from TC5
intentionally,
not by accident. No one has been complaining, aside from the one user
who just voice in a few minutes ago, so we should have a good argument
for
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
But every time I install tomcat, I go through a set of steps that is
always the same:
- Unzip the distribution
- Remove all its webapps
- Strip server.xml down to a minimum
I suppose I could just write some scripts to do the above, but a
distribution that does it is relatively
From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The servlet should be mapped as /* (to override Jasper and all the
others), and the welcome file list should be empty, right ?
Yes. Note an empty welcome file list needs to be included to override the
default defined in conf/web.xml
Maybe
Mark Thomas wrote:
Personally I prefer a working example with appropriate comments. It also saves
me copying it from TC4 all the time ;)
Cool. I think we need docs too (grin) :D
(I know, I'm being mean)
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Personally I prefer a working example with appropriate
comments. It also saves
me copying it from TC4 all the time ;)
Cool. I think we need docs too (grin) :D
(I know, I'm being mean)
Fair point though. I'll put it on my list of things to do.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Any objections to adding the WebDAV web application to TC5?
The plan is to just copy the files across from TC4, modify the build
scripts as
required and make a small change to the web.xml to overcome an issue with
welcome files.
If no-one objects,
.
Thanks.
BaTien
DBGROUPS
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:10 PM
To: Tomcat-Dev
Subject: WebDAV and TC5
All,
Any objections to adding the WebDAV web application to TC5?
The plan is to just copy the files across from TC4
Howdy,
Yes, but soon you're going to pitch a HTTP-server-in-100k, complete
with
its own proprietary API ;)
The embedded distribution is IMO good for a minimal distribution.
;) Not, I don't want a proprietary anything as in the Jetty world.
That's no good for any organization that wants
From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howdy,
I don't have a big objection. But we removed it from TC5
intentionally,
not by accident. No one has been complaining, aside from the one user
who just voice in a few minutes ago, so we should have a good argument
for adding it back,
All,
Any objections to adding the WebDAV web application to TC5?
The plan is to just copy the files across from TC4, modify the build scripts as
required and make a small change to the web.xml to overcome an issue with
welcome files.
If no-one objects, I'll do this tomorrow.
Mark
Howdy,
Why do it now? I haven't seen demand for it on the user list...
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 3:10 PM
To: Tomcat-Dev
Subject: WebDAV and TC5
All,
Any objections to adding
Please, PLEASE add it! There is no demand because MOST users do not know any
compatible clients!
Thank you - George
From: Shapira, Yoav [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: WebDAV and TC5
Date: Thu, 29 Jan
+1
why not, if it is in T4, lets have it in T5
- Original Message -
From: Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:10 PM
Subject: WebDAV and TC5
All,
Any objections to adding the WebDAV web application to TC5?
The plan
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 4:14 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: WebDAV and TC5
+1
why not, if it is in T4, lets have it in T5
- Original Message -
From: Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat-Dev [EMAIL
I don't have a big objection. But we removed it from TC5 intentionally,
ah I missed that,
what was the argument for removing it?
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
George MATKOVITS wrote:
Please, PLEASE add it! There is no demand because MOST users do not
know any compatible clients!
Thank you - George
WebDAV seems to be largely an empty promise due to the lack of
reasonable, compatible clients.
90% of all clients are Microsoft Windows.
Microsoft
Jess Holle wrote:
WebDAV seems to be largely an empty promise due to the lack of
reasonable, compatible clients.
90% of all clients are Microsoft Windows.
Microsoft Windows' Web Folders support WebDAV to a *small* degree. Yet
the way this is integrated into the OS is at such a level that 99%
Julian Reschke wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
WebDAV seems to be largely an empty promise due to the lack of
reasonable, compatible clients.
90% of all clients are Microsoft Windows.
Microsoft Windows' Web Folders support WebDAV to a *small* degree.
Yet the way this is integrated into the OS is
Jess Holle wrote:
How does the user use the filesystem driver?
net use ...
The end-user certainly cannot achieve anything meaningful via web
folders. I did a lot of testing in this regard.
Well, I disagree. Lots of my customers use webfolders heavily.
Now if there is a better level of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: WebDAV and TC5
Jess Holle wrote:
How does the user use the filesystem driver?
net use ...
The end-user certainly cannot achieve anything meaningful via web
folders. I
Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
Any objections to adding the WebDAV web application to TC5?
The plan is to just copy the files across from TC4, modify the build scripts as
required and make a small change to the web.xml to overcome an issue with
welcome files.
If no-one objects, I'll do this tomorrow.
Howdy,
I don't think small market shares or lack of clients is a reason for
exclude
a server feature. They are separate. If the WebDAV app added some
negative
impact to the tomcat server, then take it out, but if not, then lets
add it
back in.
Even if WebDAV is useful in the general sense (I
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
I don't think small market shares or lack of clients is a reason for
exclude
a server feature. They are separate. If the WebDAV app added some
negative
impact to the tomcat server, then take it out, but if not, then lets
add it
back in.
Even if
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
I don't think small market shares or lack of clients is a reason for
exclude
a server feature. They are separate. If the WebDAV app added some
negative
impact to the tomcat server, then take it out, but if not, then lets
add it
back in.
Even if WebDAV is useful in
I have mixed feelings. I don't think it belongs in the tomcat distribution.
I'd rather see the WebDav servlet get moved to another jakarta (commons?)
project. Like commons-webapps, commons-servlets.
But then again the webdav servlet is tomcat specific code and might be hard
being ported to
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Yes, but soon you're going to pitch a HTTP-server-in-100k, complete
with its own proprietary API ;)
The embedded distribution is IMO good for a minimal distribution.
I for one wasn't about to :-)
Rather I think that the module-catalog approach broadens the exposure of
the
27 matches
Mail list logo
