lb_factor defect.

2003-03-24 Thread LAGALISSE Eric
After several test using mod_jk 2.0.43 on Linux with apache 2.0.43 we noticed that if we define workers.properties as followthe load balancing send to both tomcat server but not in the same ratio. For example if we stress with 100 users, 80 are routed to the first tomcat server declared

Re: lb_factor defect.

2003-03-24 Thread Henri Gomez
LAGALISSE Eric wrote: After several test using mod_jk 2.0.43 on Linux with apache 2.0.43 we noticed that if we define workers.properties as follow the load balancing send to both tomcat server but not in the same ratio. For example if we stress with 100 users, 80 are routed to the first tomcat

RE : lb_factor defect.

2003-03-24 Thread LAGALISSE Eric
We're using the 1.2.2 release. Could you explain me what you mean by ' Could you retry with HEAD ?' Thanks for your help. Eric LAGALISSE -Message d'origine- De : Henri Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : lundi 24 mars 2003 13:11 À : Tomcat Developers List Objet : Re: lb_factor

RE: RE : lb_factor defect.

2003-03-24 Thread Jason Corley
He means please try again with the latest version from CVS, i.e. HEAD. Jason -Original Message- From: LAGALISSE Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 3/24/2003 7:29 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Cc: Subject:RE : lb_factor defect. We're using the 1.2.2 release