DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36823.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I encourage you for voting 1.2.15 as stable.
Mladen Turk wrote:
Anyhow, I would like that we vote this (1.2.15) version as stable,
because it's a bug-fix release over the 1.2.14 stable.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36814.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36814.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36814.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36814.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36827.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
Here's the situation as it stands today and what can be done to solve
it. I'll try to keep this short.
Running configuration:
* Running on Linux Red-Hat Ent 3
* 1 X F5 load balancer and hardware SSL box.
* 5 X Apache 1.3.33/mod_jk 1.2.14
* 6 X JBoss 4.0.0/Tomcat
First off, I apologize for the cross-post. I posted this same message
in the User's mailing list with no replies. So, my hope is that one of
you developers may have some insight into the problem that I'm having.
Certain users of my website are having issues with respect to submitting
a form on
Hi,
Could it be the referer URL is too long, causing the query string to be ignored
or dropped? There's a limit (2048 characters, I think?) on GET requests in
some browsers. But actually, you're seeing this on the server, so I'm not
sure. Can you try testing with less parameters or an otherwise
The original referer variable was a little over 1K chars, so I don't
believe that I'm pushing that limit quite yet. As for recreating...I
cannot. I wish I could. In order for me to cut down the # of
parameters, I'd have to modify the workflow process which could
potentially aggitate our users.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
Could it be the referer URL is too long, causing the query string to be ignored
or dropped? There's a limit (2048 characters, I think?) on GET requests in
some browsers. But actually, you're seeing this on the server, so I'm not
sure. Can you try testing with less
Hi;
I understand it is a big no-no to ask user questions on this list. But I
have three questions about isapi_redirect that no one on the user list seems
to know the answer to.
If I can post them here and I get an answer, I would be happy to write up
the solution for posting on the tomcat
If it's undocumented behaviour or it's a clear gap in the documentation
(i.e a doc bug) then it might be appropriate here.
Otherwise, send them through to me and I'll see if I can help.
tim
David Thielen wrote:
Hi;
I understand it is a big no-no to ask user questions on this list. But I
Note: I looked and looked and couldn't find this documented.
Hi;
I want to make sure this is correct:
If you want to run Tomcat against multiple websites, not just the default
website, this is what I have had to do.
This is on Windows 2003/IIS 6.0.
I removed isapi_redirector.dll from the
Hi;
I'm running Tomcat 5.5 on Windows 2003/IIS 6.0 using isapi_redirect
The isapi_redirect.exe installer creates a worker.properties.minimal of:
worker.list=wlb,jkstatus
worker.ajp13w.type=ajp13
worker.ajp13w.host=localhost
worker.ajp13w.port=8009
Hi,
Please use tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org for user support issues. The
tomcat-dev list is for discussion regarding Tomcat's own internal development.
Thank you,
Yoav
--- David Thielen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note: I looked and looked and couldn't find this documented.
Hi;
I want
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jfarcand2005/09/27 16:42:53
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader
WebappClassLoader.java
Log:
Port fix from SJSAS.
Patch submitted by: Jan Luehe
Revision ChangesPath
1.51 +16 -3
Hi all,
Pardon my post to the dev group. I already posted to the User list
but received no useful response.
I've just tried to upgrade from TC v5.5.9 to v5.5.12 and it seems my
(very simple) configuration is now broken.
The following configuration works beautifully under 5.5.9 -- no
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
22 matches
Mail list logo