DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36823] - Ant task Description file catalina.tasks shouldn't have JspC

2005-09-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36823. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: JK 1.2.15 Release plan?

2005-09-27 Thread Rainer Jung
I encourage you for voting 1.2.15 as stable. Mladen Turk wrote: Anyhow, I would like that we vote this (1.2.15) version as stable, because it's a bug-fix release over the 1.2.14 stable. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36814] - Parameter for POST encoding

2005-09-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36814. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36814] - Parameter for POST encoding

2005-09-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36814. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36814] - Parameter for POST encoding

2005-09-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36814. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36814] - Parameter for POST encoding

2005-09-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36814. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36827] New: - Need an option to severe socket connections between mod_jk and ajp connector after request/response cycle.

2005-09-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36827. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Need an option to severe socket connections between mod_jk and ajp connector after request/response cycle.

2005-09-27 Thread Remy Gendron
Hi all, Here's the situation as it stands today and what can be done to solve it. I'll try to keep this short. Running configuration: * Running on Linux Red-Hat Ent 3 * 1 X F5 load balancer and hardware SSL box. * 5 X Apache 1.3.33/mod_jk 1.2.14 * 6 X JBoss 4.0.0/Tomcat

Problems Parsing Request Paramers

2005-09-27 Thread Jeremy Nix
First off, I apologize for the cross-post. I posted this same message in the User's mailing list with no replies. So, my hope is that one of you developers may have some insight into the problem that I'm having. Certain users of my website are having issues with respect to submitting a form on

Re: Problems Parsing Request Paramers

2005-09-27 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Could it be the referer URL is too long, causing the query string to be ignored or dropped? There's a limit (2048 characters, I think?) on GET requests in some browsers. But actually, you're seeing this on the server, so I'm not sure. Can you try testing with less parameters or an otherwise

RE: Problems Parsing Request Paramers

2005-09-27 Thread Jeremy Nix
The original referer variable was a little over 1K chars, so I don't believe that I'm pushing that limit quite yet. As for recreating...I cannot. I wish I could. In order for me to cut down the # of parameters, I'd have to modify the workflow process which could potentially aggitate our users.

Re: Problems Parsing Request Paramers

2005-09-27 Thread Rick Knowles
Yoav Shapira wrote: Hi, Could it be the referer URL is too long, causing the query string to be ignored or dropped? There's a limit (2048 characters, I think?) on GET requests in some browsers. But actually, you're seeing this on the server, so I'm not sure. Can you try testing with less

isapi_redirect expert?

2005-09-27 Thread David Thielen
Hi; I understand it is a big no-no to ask user questions on this list. But I have three questions about isapi_redirect that no one on the user list seems to know the answer to. If I can post them here and I get an answer, I would be happy to write up the solution for posting on the tomcat

Re: isapi_redirect expert?

2005-09-27 Thread Tim Whittington
If it's undocumented behaviour or it's a clear gap in the documentation (i.e a doc bug) then it might be appropriate here. Otherwise, send them through to me and I'll see if I can help. tim David Thielen wrote: Hi; I understand it is a big no-no to ask user questions on this list. But I

Please verify this is correct: Need multiple virtual directories for isapi_redirector

2005-09-27 Thread David Thielen
Note: I looked and looked and couldn't find this documented. Hi; I want to make sure this is correct: If you want to run Tomcat against multiple websites, not just the default website, this is what I have had to do. This is on Windows 2003/IIS 6.0. I removed isapi_redirector.dll from the

What is correct for workers.properties.minimal

2005-09-27 Thread David Thielen
Hi; I'm running Tomcat 5.5 on Windows 2003/IIS 6.0 using isapi_redirect The isapi_redirect.exe installer creates a worker.properties.minimal of: worker.list=wlb,jkstatus worker.ajp13w.type=ajp13 worker.ajp13w.host=localhost worker.ajp13w.port=8009

Re: Please verify this is correct: Need multiple virtual directories for isapi_redirector

2005-09-27 Thread Yoav Shapira
Hi, Please use tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org for user support issues. The tomcat-dev list is for discussion regarding Tomcat's own internal development. Thank you, Yoav --- David Thielen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note: I looked and looked and couldn't find this documented. Hi; I want

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36834] New: - Wrong message length in body chunks ?

2005-09-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-catalina/catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader WebappClassLoader.java

2005-09-27 Thread jfarcand
jfarcand2005/09/27 16:42:53 Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/loader WebappClassLoader.java Log: Port fix from SJSAS. Patch submitted by: Jan Luehe Revision ChangesPath 1.51 +16 -3

TC v5.5.12 Breaks v5.5.9 Configuration

2005-09-27 Thread Bob Bronson
Hi all, Pardon my post to the dev group. I already posted to the User list but received no useful response. I've just tried to upgrade from TC v5.5.9 to v5.5.12 and it seems my (very simple) configuration is now broken. The following configuration works beautifully under 5.5.9 -- no

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36834] - Wrong message length in body chunks ?

2005-09-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36834] - Wrong message length in body chunks ?

2005-09-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36834. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.