All,
Patrick Luby wrote:
I tend to agree with Jon on this issue. When I voted for a
java-servletapi-5 repository, I made the - I think reasonable -
assumption that the java-servletapi-5 repository would only contain the
JSR-154 code. After all, the java-servletapi-4 repository has, for
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
[ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[X] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
It will likely break a few build scripts, but that will be easy to fix.
I'm voting to split (actually, I'm more in the I don't care item)
because
Hi,
the tomcat DirContextURLStreamHandlerFactory class produces a
URLStreamHandler for handling 'jndi' URL's.
On tomcat standalone this works fine.
The Jave 2 Api says that a URLStreamHandler must be named
package.protocol.Handler.java. This class exists in the tomcat 4.0
sources, but is not
patrickl2002/07/18 00:28:50
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/runtime
PageContextImpl.java
Log:
Make source compilable under JDK 1.3 which is required by the Tomcat build.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +4 -4
patrickl2002/07/18 00:44:22
Modified:catalina/src/bin catalina.sh
Log:
Add CATALINA_BASE to environment variables that need to be converted when running
with Cygwin
Submitted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision ChangesPath
1.31 +3 -1
patrickl2002/07/18 00:48:23
Modified:catalina/src/bin Tag: tomcat_40_branch catalina.sh
Log:
Add CATALINA_BASE to environment variables that need to be converted when running
with Cygwin
Submitted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Revision ChangesPath
No
Boon,
I have committed your patch to both the HEAD and 4.0 branch of Tomcat.
Patrick
Boon Hian Tek wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure if everyone else's configuration for cygwin is different.
But I had to change the catalina.sh so that it converts the
CATALINA_BASE to windows format path before it
on 7/17/02 11:35 PM, Patrick Luby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Patrick Luby wrote:
I tend to agree with Jon on this issue. When I voted for a
java-servletapi-5 repository, I made the - I think reasonable -
assumption that the java-servletapi-5 repository would only contain the
JSR-154
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5647.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello all,
I have the following configuration:
Linux Redhat 7.2
Apache 2.0.39
Tomcat 4.1.7beta
In the server.xml file:
I have set up a global JDBC resource in the GlobalNamingResources section.
I have a number of virtual hosts and have found that if the ResourceLink is added
inside Context
[ ] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[X] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5647.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Therefore, I'm asking for another vote to split the CVS repositories to
represent the split JSR's and adapt the build system of the JSP repository
to have a dependency on the Servlet repository, but not the other way
around. It is ok to also have the JSP build
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Patrick Luby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops. The javax.servlet.jsp.* packages have been in jakarta-servlet-4
for a long time.
In any case, I tried seeing if this issue could be solved by merely
moving the javax.servlet.jsp.* packages over to the
jakarta-tomcat-jasper repository.
This is a tomcat-users question, not a tomcat-dev question.
On July 18, 2002 05:25 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have set up a global JDBC resource in the GlobalNamingResources
section.
I have a number of virtual hosts and have found that if the ResourceLink
is added inside Context the
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-07-18/jakarta-tomcat-4.0.html
Buildfile: build.xml
deploy-prepare:
deploy-static:
deploy:
This email is autogenerated from the output from:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2002-07-18/jakarta-tomcat-jk.html
Buildfile: build.xml
detect:
[echo]
Thanks, Bojan. I think that's exactly what I was looking for :-) You
know, I feel really stupid because I think I've seen that exact same
document before and completely missed the section discussing these options!
Is it possible there will be any movement at any time to incorporate the
I've removed the explicit dependency on tomcat-catalina from
jakarta-tomcat-4.0 (i.e. you must remove line 78 from gump.xml) and it
compiles a bit further (see below). This should remove the jzentry
problem.
The build itself fails while compiling Jasper, though:
deploy:
[echo] Target:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
[X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or
tomcat users, but out of his hate for JSPs. But that's
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10947.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10947.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
[X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or
tomcat users, but out
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10947.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
De: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 18 de julio de 2002 1:34
[X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
I dont see why this needs another repo, my only reason is that there are
too
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10948.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10948.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mturk 2002/07/18 08:15:00
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Fix the bug 10789 caused by hook order.
Revision ChangesPath
1.42 +3 -3 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native2/server/apache2/mod_jk2.c
Index: mod_jk2.c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10909.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10789.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10949.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
|
| [X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
| [ ] I don't care
| [ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
|
TC 4 has too many external module dependencies as it is.
Keith
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10948.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10951.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Quoting Ignacio J. Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
De: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: 18 de julio de 2002 1:34
[X] I don't want the API's split into separate repo's
[ ] I don't care
[ ] I want the API's split into separate repo's.
I dont see why this
Ian,
Thanks for your note but I still maintain this is a bug.
I am already using the default standard host that sets autodeploy to true by default.
Also, I have tried adding the resource into DefaultContext directly and that works
fine - so how would you explain that?
Regards
Asar Khan
remm2002/07/18 09:17:00
jakarta-tomcat-5/resources - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
remm2002/07/18 09:17:05
jakarta-tomcat-5/resources/confinstall - New directory
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
remm2002/07/18 09:48:44
Log:
- Import Catalina sources.
- Scripts still need a lot of work.
- Doesn't build yet.
- The actual build process isn't documented yet, but will
include:
- checkout the 5 (or 6) j-t repositories
- use 'ant download' from j-t-5
- use
On July 18, 2002 12:11 pm, you wrote:
I am already using the default standard host that sets autodeploy to true
by default.
It's not a question of autodeploy=true or not. Everything I know says that
DefaultContext's values only apply to Contexts that are auto-deployed, that is,
placed in
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7631.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10902.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
kinman 2002/07/18 10:56:03
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper
JspCompilationContext.java
Log:
- Use _ instead of $ to generate file and class names for jsp servlets.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +6 -6
kinman 2002/07/18 10:57:27
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper Tag: tomcat_4_branch
JspCompilationContext.java
Log:
- use _ instead of $ to generate file and class names for jsp servlets.
Revision ChangesPath
No
kinman 2002/07/18 11:03:49
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler
ParserController.java
Log:
- Fix 10896. Patch by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shao Xiaotang)
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +0 -1
kinman 2002/07/18 11:04:24
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_4_branch ParserController.java
Log:
- Fix 10896. Patch by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shao Xiaotang)
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10896.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8817.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yeah! $ is replaced by _ when JSP's are converted to java files.
Question:
When someone upgrades to this release, would it be advisable for the
user to eliminate the work directory (or clean it) since an older
compiled JSP now has the wrong name?
Or warn them that every JSP will be
Thanks, Bojan. I think that's exactly what I was looking for :-) You
know, I feel really stupid because I think I've seen that exact same
document before and completely missed the section discussing these options!
Is it possible there will be any movement at any time to incorporate the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7989.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3774.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:15:16 -0400
From: Tim Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit:
jakarta-tomcat-jasper/jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper
JspCompilationContext.java
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Yeah! $ is replaced by _
I was considering extending AccessLogValve to add the responsetime to
the access log, but it looks like the class is declared final. Is there
a reason why this is so? Is there a more appropriate logvalve that is
designed to be extended?
thanks in advance.
peter
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kinman 2002/07/18 13:18:10
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler JspReader.java
Parser.java
Log:
- Fixed 10713. Modified on patch by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henner Zeller)
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +33 -2
kinman 2002/07/18 13:18:56
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_4_branch JspReader.java Parser.java
Log:
- Fixed 10713. Modified on patch by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henner Zeller)
Revision ChangesPath
No
javac jdbctest.java run fine, but when i try java jdbctest, this say:
Exception in thread main java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: jdbctest
my
CLASSPATH=/usr/local/source/oraInventory/jdbc/lib/classes12.jar:
/usr/local/source/oraInventory/jdbc/lib/nls_charset12.jar:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10713.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I would like to see it in the release notes. As a user (who lurks in the
dev list), I do not delete the work directory when upgrading. Because of
having 2000+ JSP's on a site, we try to avoid having mass JSP recompiles.
Or is my point worthless since this should only really affect users
going
kinman 2002/07/18 13:48:00
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper
JspCompilationContext.java
Log:
- Fix 10711. Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henner Zeller) for the patch.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +66 -8
kinman 2002/07/18 13:48:19
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper Tag: tomcat_4_branch
JspCompilationContext.java
Log:
- Fix 10711. Thanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henner Zeller) for the patch.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10967.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2002/07/18 14:17:27
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Generator.java
Node.java
Log:
Fixed Bug# 10670: Problem in JSP compilation
Revision ChangesPath
1.42 +13 -54
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10670.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
luehe 2002/07/18 14:34:09
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_4_branch Generator.java Node.java
Log:
Fixed Bug# 10670: Problem in JSP compilation
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
I am using Tomcat 4.0.3, Windows 2000, JDK 1.4
I was getting the following stack trace from a JSP:
ApplicationDispatcher[/SpendMetrix]: Servlet.service() for servlet jsp
threw exception
javax.servlet.ServletException
at
org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.handlePageException(PageContex
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10671.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10291.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10291.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 00:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or
tomcat users, but out of his hate for JSPs.
What's wrong with that?
;-))
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10711.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 01:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk 2002/07/18 08:15:00
Modified:jk/native2/server/apache2 mod_jk2.c
Log:
Fix the bug 10789 caused by hook order.
Thanks Mladen.
Bojan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 15:06, Eddie Bush wrote:
Is it possible there will be any movement at any time to incorporate the
(much more) excellent documentation that existed with the 3.x TC
versions into the 4.x doc sets? I think it might really reduce the
traffic on tomcat-user - and I would
Since I didn't really like my original 'fix' for mod_jk 1.2.0 situation
(bug 9913), I tried this approach, but it seems to make no difference
whatsoever... The content of the directory is being served rather then
default pages.
Bojan
On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 01:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mturk
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10270.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
on 7/18/02 7:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure Jon is not proposing this for the benefit of tomcat or
tomcat users, but out of his hate for JSPs.
From my POV, splitting JSP out of Tomcat would benefit Tomcat and Tomcat
users.
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
on 7/18/02 7:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But that's not the reason
I'm voting against - we already have too many CVS trees and this is
bad organization, it could be well placed in a single CVS in separate
directories.
Having a separate CVS for a dozen of files
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10568.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
But that's not the reason
I'm voting against - we already have too many CVS trees and this is
bad organization, it could be well placed in a single CVS in separate
directories.
Having a separate CVS for a dozen of files instead of just
on 7/18/02 4:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, what about using the original jakarta-servletapi repository and
creating a subdir for each JSR ?
I think it should be renamed...
Or a new jakarta-apis directory and creating one subdir for each JSR ?
Sounds good. Maybe even
luehe 2002/07/18 16:25:05
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_4_branch JspDocumentParser.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/resources Tag:
tomcat_4_branch messages.properties
Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java
+1
Pier
--
[Perl] combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion of different
sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C with
the readability of
Attaching a patch that fixes an intermittent error (that occurs when an
attempt is made to define a package that has already been defined). I
noticed this when running a multi-threaded test.
- Root Cause -
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Servlet22.S05_Request
at
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java
+1 as well.
Costin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:02:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Split the repo's
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
on 7/18/02 5:13 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Who gets commit access? This goes beyond Tomcat's committers
once other APIs start getting added.
Craig
That is why I suggested separate repo's.
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
amyroh 2002/07/18 17:23:20
Modified:catalina/src/share/org/apache/catalina/mbeans
mbeans-descriptors.xml
webapps/admin/WEB-INF/classes/org/apache/webapp/admin
ApplicationResources_en.properties
remm2002/07/18 17:39:13
Added: .build.properties.sample build.xml
download.properties tomcat.nsi
resources INSTALLLICENSE config.ini main.ico tickno.bmp
tickyes.bmp tomcat.ico uninst.ico
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
jakarta-apis/jsr154/src/java
jakarta-apis/jsr152/src/java
+1.
Using the jsr numbers may not be explicit enough, though (but it gets
the job done, so ...).
I have the feeling we're getting somewhere :)
Remy
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
kinman 2002/07/18 18:13:47
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Compiler.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet
JspServletWrapper.java
Log:
- Fixed 10766: %@ page extends % causes ClassCastException
Revision
kinman 2002/07/18 18:16:04
Modified:jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag:
tomcat_4_branch Compiler.java
jasper2/src/share/org/apache/jasper/servlet Tag:
tomcat_4_branch JspServletWrapper.java
Log:
- Fixed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10766.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An immediate prospect would be the JSTL APIs from jakarta-taglibs/standard
(jsr052).
Makes sense. And jakarta-taglibs will remain for our Apache non-standard
ones, right?
A couple of devils in the details questions:
* Where should CVS commit
Shouldn't it be java JdbcTest instead of java jdbctest (case sensitive)
?
Good Luck... Ching
From: Mario Henley Becerril Geldis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: java jdbctest
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:17:20 -0500 (CDT)
That would be most excellent! Sorry for the duplicate post by the way,
guys. I waited and waited and it didn't show up. Not wanting to seem
ungrateful, I re-sent it.
Thanks again, Bojan :-)
Eddie
Bojan Smojver wrote:
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 15:06, Eddie Bush wrote:
Is it possible there
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
