Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Allistair Crossley wrote: i take this back, it's only 5.5.9 that is exhibiting this behaviour, 5.5.12 fully explodes the war correctly. I don't see any relevant changes. Who knows ... Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Hi, I'd like to release a 5.0.31 at some point in the future, but I don't know when, and I don't know the interest level in it. It would certainly be fairly small, containing only a few back-ported fixes from 5.5, no major additions or new features. Yoav --- Leon Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry for jumping in this thread, but should 5.5.12 considered stable > (as it seems) are there plans to release a stable version of 5.0.x? > 5.0.31 or something? > > regards > Leon > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Tomcat 5.5.12 is: [X] Stable - no major issues, [ ] Beta - at least one major issue: what is it? [ ] Alpha - multiple things or a real showstopper: please provide details.. -- Jeanfrancois Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
i take this back, it's only 5.5.9 that is exhibiting this behaviour, 5.5.12 fully explodes the war correctly. > -Original Message- > From: Allistair Crossley > Sent: 06 October 2005 10:53 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability > > > I have one of my weired bugs Remy and it affects 5.5.9+. > > I've mentioned it before about auto deployment of WARs. This > time I am working out as best I can the "critical failure > point", but essentially a valid WAR is not being deployed and > it appears to be linked to the number of JARs in the lib > folder (in this case 20MB) and a web.xml that contains custom > context listeners. On auto deploy the error yields "web.xml > cannot be found" which is false. Depending on how many JARs I > delete from the LIB folder, the WAR explodes or does not with > the error. > > I will have a bug report that explains in more detail the > process I have gone through. > > Allistair. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 06 October 2005 10:49 > > To: Tomcat Developers List > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability > > > > > > Henri Gomez wrote: > > > Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ? > > > > Yes, it seems like it. I don't even know if they are fixable > > at this point. > > > > Rémy > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --- > QAS Ltd. > Registered in England: No 2582055 > Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474 > --- > > Disclaimer: The information contained within this e-mail is > confidential and may be privileged. This email is intended > solely for the named recipient only; if you are not > authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain > this message or any part of it. If you have received this > message in error please contact the sender at once so that we > may take the appropriate action and avoid troubling you > further. Any views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender. QAS Limited has the right lawfully to > record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees > and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such > lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be necessary in > order to protect its information, its interests and its reputation. > > Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound > emails, QAS Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are > virus free or compatible with your systems and does not > accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer > problems experienced. > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Henri Gomez wrote: > > Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ? > +1 for the postponement(sp?) Also, +1 for 5.5.12 (Sol8 and Suse 9.2) -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball." - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Sorry for jumping in this thread, but should 5.5.12 considered stable (as it seems) are there plans to release a stable version of 5.0.x? 5.0.31 or something? regards Leon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
I have one of my weired bugs Remy and it affects 5.5.9+. I've mentioned it before about auto deployment of WARs. This time I am working out as best I can the "critical failure point", but essentially a valid WAR is not being deployed and it appears to be linked to the number of JARs in the lib folder (in this case 20MB) and a web.xml that contains custom context listeners. On auto deploy the error yields "web.xml cannot be found" which is false. Depending on how many JARs I delete from the LIB folder, the WAR explodes or does not with the error. I will have a bug report that explains in more detail the process I have gone through. Allistair. > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 06 October 2005 10:49 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability > > > Henri Gomez wrote: > > Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ? > > Yes, it seems like it. I don't even know if they are fixable > at this point. > > Rémy > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- QAS Ltd. Registered in England: No 2582055 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474 --- Disclaimer: The information contained within this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. This email is intended solely for the named recipient only; if you are not authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error please contact the sender at once so that we may take the appropriate action and avoid troubling you further. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. QAS Limited has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be necessary in order to protect its information, its interests and its reputation. Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound emails, QAS Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are virus free or compatible with your systems and does not accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer problems experienced. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Henri Gomez wrote: Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ? Yes, it seems like it. I don't even know if they are fixable at this point. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Should we post-pone to 5.5.13 the fixes to Jasper2 ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Tested with Mac OS (10.4) , Win32 and Suse 9.3 prof. Tomcat 5.5.12 is: [x] Stable - no major issues, [ ] Beta - at least one major issue: what is it? [ ] Alpha - multiple things or a real showstopper: please provide details.. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Hi, It took me a bit of time to finish testing on a couple of home-brewed apps, but [ X ] Stable - no major issues from me. I'll give the vote 24 more hours or so, looking good right now. If someone with the TCK license can run it and let us know the results, that would be awesome. Thanks, Yoav - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Yoav Shapira wrote: Tomcat 5.5.12 is: [X] Stable - no major issues, [ ] Beta - at least one major issue: what is it? [ ] Alpha - multiple things or a real showstopper: please provide details.. Works like magic, really :) Tested with tomcat-native on WIN32, WIN64, Solaris 2.8 and SLES9/64 Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Allistair Crossley wrote: Hi, I've tested our intranet app on 5.5.12. Our application uses the following extensively; NTLM authentication via IIS5/JK1.2 META-INF/context.xml configuration 8 JNDI datasources (mix of various SQL Server 2K databases and JavaMail) Log4J Hibernate Spring Struts CMS Seems a touch faster than usual to me but this is speculation. The only issue that was reported is lots of these: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: URI was not reported to parser for entity [document] at gnu.xml.aelfred2.SAXDriver.warn(SAXDriver.java:934) I don't see how this is Tomcat related, at this point. These are only WARN level and do not appear to have affected the operation of the web app, however there are at least 10 of these stack traces in the logs which *may* confuse some users to think Tomcat is failing. These only occur for Spring's applicationContext file which has a DTD of "http://www.springframework.org/dtd/spring-beans.dtd";> My verdict based on testing is [X] Stable - no major issues Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Hi, I've tested our intranet app on 5.5.12. Our application uses the following extensively; NTLM authentication via IIS5/JK1.2 META-INF/context.xml configuration 8 JNDI datasources (mix of various SQL Server 2K databases and JavaMail) Log4J Hibernate Spring Struts CMS Seems a touch faster than usual to me but this is speculation. The only issue that was reported is lots of these: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: URI was not reported to parser for entity [document] at gnu.xml.aelfred2.SAXDriver.warn(SAXDriver.java:934) These are only WARN level and do not appear to have affected the operation of the web app, however there are at least 10 of these stack traces in the logs which *may* confuse some users to think Tomcat is failing. These only occur for Spring's applicationContext file which has a DTD of http://www.springframework.org/dtd/spring-beans.dtd";> My verdict based on testing is [X] Stable - no major issues Cheers, Allistair. > -Original Message- > From: Allistair Crossley > Sent: 05 October 2005 10:57 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability > > > i'm going to test our intranet application on 5.5.12 today, > will let you know the result. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 05 October 2005 10:44 > > To: Tomcat Developers List > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability > > > > > > Yoav Shapira wrote: > > > Tomcat 5.5.12 is: > > > [X] Stable - no major issues, > > > > It looks good enough to me. > > > > Rémy > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --- > QAS Ltd. > Registered in England: No 2582055 > Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474 > --- > > Disclaimer: The information contained within this e-mail is > confidential and may be privileged. This email is intended > solely for the named recipient only; if you are not > authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain > this message or any part of it. If you have received this > message in error please contact the sender at once so that we > may take the appropriate action and avoid troubling you > further. Any views expressed in this message are those of > the individual sender. QAS Limited has the right lawfully to > record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees > and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such > lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be necessary in > order to protect its information, its interests and its reputation. > > Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound > emails, QAS Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are > virus free or compatible with your systems and does not > accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer > problems experienced. > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
i'm going to test our intranet application on 5.5.12 today, will let you know the result. > -Original Message- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 October 2005 10:44 > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability > > > Yoav Shapira wrote: > > Tomcat 5.5.12 is: > > [X] Stable - no major issues, > > It looks good enough to me. > > Rémy > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --- QAS Ltd. Registered in England: No 2582055 Registered in Australia: No 082 851 474 --- Disclaimer: The information contained within this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. This email is intended solely for the named recipient only; if you are not authorised you must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error please contact the sender at once so that we may take the appropriate action and avoid troubling you further. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. QAS Limited has the right lawfully to record, monitor and inspect messages between its employees and any third party. Your messages shall be subject to such lawful supervision as QAS Limited deems to be necessary in order to protect its information, its interests and its reputation. Whilst all efforts are made to safeguard Inbound and Outbound emails, QAS Limited cannot guarantee that attachments are virus free or compatible with your systems and does not accept any liability in respect of viruses or computer problems experienced. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Yoav Shapira wrote: Tomcat 5.5.12 is: [X] Stable - no major issues, It looks good enough to me. Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] 5.5.12 Stability
Stable for me 2005/10/3, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > Tomcat v5.5.12 has been out for a little more than a week now, so hopefully > we've had time to test it. Please let us know what you think of its stability > below. If anyone with the proper license could run the Servlet (v2.4) and JSP > (v2.0) TCK tests on Tomcat 5.5.12, that would be great as well. Thank you. > > Tomcat 5.5.12 is: > [ ] Stable - no major issues, > [ ] Beta - at least one major issue: what is it? > [ ] Alpha - multiple things or a real showstopper: please provide details.. > > Yoav > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
