Paul Puschmann wrote:
Hi,
we want to use Apache2 (2.0.53) as a frontend for out Tomcat (4.1.31)
and don't get the right configuration for our jk2 (2.0.4).
This all runs with Java 1.4.2_06 on Debian Sarge x86.
Do not use JK2. Use JK instead.
See:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Paul Puschmann wrote:
Hi,
we want to use Apache2 (2.0.53) as a frontend for out Tomcat (4.1.31)
and don't get the right configuration for our jk2 (2.0.4).
This all runs with Java 1.4.2_06 on Debian Sarge x86.
Do not use JK2. Use JK instead.
See:
1.2.6 is the latest and should work with Apache 2 so you don't have to go back
to apache 1.
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Paul Puschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 March 2005 12:28
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: jk2 for Apache2 and Tomcat 4
Mladen Turk wrote:
Paul
Dale, Matt wrote:
1.2.6 is the latest and should work with Apache 2 so you don't have to go
back to apache 1.
Ta
Matt
Okay, but I don't get jk1 for apache2 as a ready debian-package.
I prefer ready-built packages, because otherwise I could miss some
important compiling options or get some
Okay, but I don't get jk1 for apache2 as a ready debian-package.
I prefer ready-built packages, because otherwise I could miss some
important compiling options or get some version-dependancy-errors or such.
It is an open bug in debian. For a reason I don't know, they made a
correlation
Paul Puschmann a écrit :
Dale, Matt wrote:
1.2.6 is the latest and should work with Apache 2 so you don't have to go back
to apache 1.
Ta
Matt
Okay, but I don't get jk1 for apache2 as a ready debian-package.
I prefer ready-built packages, because otherwise I could miss some
important
Sébastien GALLET wrote:
Paul Puschmann a écrit :
Dale, Matt wrote:
1.2.6 is the latest and should work with Apache 2 so you don't have
to go back to apache 1.
Ta
Matt
Okay, but I don't get jk1 for apache2 as a ready debian-package.
I prefer ready-built packages, because
From: Hari Mailvaganam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jk2.properties Query
Does Tomcat 5.0.28 have mod_jk on by default?
The default server.xml has an AJP13 connector defined on port 8009; it's been
that way for a long time. You should comment it out if you don't need it.
- Chuck
jeff.fong wrote:
Hi,
I have configured the jk connector and it works with apache 2.0.52 and tomcat
5.0.28.
Apache host is: 192.168.1.1
The tomcat project can be accessd thro'
http://192.168.1.100:8080/myProject
After using the jk connector, the tomcat project can also be reached by
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:19 -0700, Sean Dockery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1
I had been under the impression that JK2 was superior to JK. In light
of the announcement, should we be sticking with JK from
IMHO avoid JK2
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:19 -0700, Sean Dockery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially
unsupported.
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1
We're in the process of configuring
It looks like things regarding a connector are still in flux... probably
not time to panic yet. JK2 works. mod_jk works. Choose one.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12-22-2004 17:03
On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially
unsupported.
Thanks for the reply, Dennis.
I did some reading in the list archives on the subject, and we decided to go
with mod_jk.
Dennis Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It looks like things regarding a connector are still in flux... probably
not time to panic yet. JK2
[logger]
level=ERROR
[logger.file:0]
level=ERROR
file=d:\\jakarta-tomcat-jk2\\jk2.log
[workerEnv:]
info=Global server options
timing=1
debug=0
logger=logger.file:0
[shm]
file=d:\\jakarta-tomcat-jk2\\jk2.shm
size=1048576
[channel.socket:localhost:8009]
info=Ajp13 worker, connects to tomcat
After I uninstall and re-install IIS, the problem is fixed. Here is
another hint from a Tomcat user:
==
You've already enabled full debugging for the log
which is a good start. My log info was exactly the
same, although in my
Andrzej,
If you are referring to rewriting URI's before hitting the app servers
then we do this with mod_rewrite which executes before mod_jk. So fr
example if we have to change a legacy URI to a new one then we do this
with a rewrite rule before even mod_jk is called. Works great for us.
HTH,
At 04:03 PM 10/10/2004 -0700, Daxin Zuo wrote:
MY system is UNIX (Sparc) tomcat 5.0.28, Apache2.0.43. when I start the
apache, I get the error in the apache error_log file.
[Sun Oct 10 15:12:24 2004] [error] jk2_init() Can't find child 6351 in
scoreboard
[Sun Oct 10 15:12:24 2004] [error]
]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 9:26 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JK2 2.0.4
No, this is a known bug and will not work. See
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28758
Cox, Charlie wrote:
To avoid all confusion, I would remove your [uri: mappings from the
workers2
to allow Apache to host any of your files/urls
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 6:00 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
I've attached my workers.properties file below.
Paul
#define the shared memory file
yes, i have. do a search for one of my posts from a few weeks back where
i posted the configs you needed to get it all working.
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Paul D. Hester wrote:
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:33:45 -0400
From: Paul D. Hester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL
?
On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Paul D. Hester wrote:
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:00:03 -0400
From: Paul D. Hester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
I've attached my workers.properties file below.
Paul
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 6:00 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
I've attached my workers.properties file below.
Paul
#define the shared memory file
[shm:]
file=/usr/local/apache-2.0.50/logs/jk2.log
size=100
debug=1
# Define
, October 01, 2004 7:58 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
To avoid all confusion, I would remove your [uri: mappings from the
workers2.properties and then specify the mappings in your httpd.conf:
VirtualHost 1.1.1.1:80
Location /
JkUriSet worker ajp13:localhost
Sorry, try Location /*
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 8:06 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
When I try to remove the uri's in the worker2.properties and set up the
mappings in my
Thanks Charlie for you help. I tried what you suggested and now
http://orbt.at.ufl.edu is accessing the ORB webapp properly. However,
http://edist.at.ufl.edu renders an 'Internal Server Error' and I now
have an HTTP1.1 500 error in my apache log file. My httpd.conf and
workers2.properties file
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 10:20 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
Thanks Charlie for you help. I tried what you suggested and now
http://orbt.at.ufl.edu is accessing the ORB webapp properly
post the server.xml :)
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Paul D. Hester wrote:
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:20:00 -0400
From: Paul D. Hester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
Thanks Charlie for you help. I
OK...I've got it working but am getting errors in my Apache error log:
[error] uriEnv.init() map to invalid worker /*
apj13:localhost:8209
[error] uriEnv.init() map to invalid worker /*
apj13:localhost:8209
[error] uriEnv.init() map to invalid worker /*
apj13:localhost:8209
. Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 October 2004 16:27
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
OK...I've got it working but am getting errors in my Apache error log:
[error] uriEnv.init() map to invalid worker /*
apj13:localhost:8209
[error] uriEnv.init() map to invalid
/apache-2.0.50/modules/libjkjni.so
Thanks,
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Dale, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
This is working because of your workers2.properties not the httpd.conf
as your port
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
OK...I've got it working but am getting errors in my Apache error log:
[error] uriEnv.init() map to invalid worker /*
apj13:localhost:8209
[error] uriEnv.init() map to invalid worker /*
apj13:localhost:8209
[error] uriEnv.init
Wouldn't he then have to get the ports right in httpd.conf?
-Original Message-
From: Cox, Charlie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 October 2004 16:47
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
Remove the last 4 lines in workers2.properties. these URI mappings are
duplicating
I'd take out the apr at the beginning of the handler list but can't see how that would
cause the errors
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 October 2004 16:42
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
Below is a copy of the jk2.properties
Yes, I missed that this time because I pointed it out in my last email. The
VirtualHost should use port 80 for it to ever accept requests.
-Original Message-
From: Dale, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:55 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JK2
]
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 11:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
This is working because of your workers2.properties not the httpd.conf
as your port definitions will never match in there. You should be able
to remove those virtual hosts and it will still work.
Can you post
My httpd.conf and worker2.properties files are as follows:
httpd.conf
#
# /usr/local/etc/httpd.conf
#
# Local Apache configuration file for mmdb.at.ufl.edu
#
ServerName mmdbt.at.ufl.edu
Listen 80
AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
Directory /home/*/public_html
Options
Excellent, glad to hear it. I'm sure your weekend will be rosier after getting that
working.
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 October 2004 17:06
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
Thanks Matt. By deleting the Virtual Host and all
Yes it works fine.
You should post your workers2.properties so we can see what your mappings are.
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 September 2004 19:34
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JK2 2.0.4
Has anyone had success installing the JK2
I've attached my workers.properties files.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Dale, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 3:11 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
Yes it works fine.
You should post your workers2.properties so we can see what your
I've attached my workers.properties file below.
Paul
#define the shared memory file
[shm:]
file=/usr/local/apache-2.0.50/logs/jk2.log
size=100
debug=1
# Define the communication channel
[channel.socket:localhost:8409]
[channel.socket:localhost:8209]
#define the worker
. If the webapps are the same then perhaps
you could just miss out the apache section and run 1 tomcat with 2 virtual hosts.
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Paul D. Hester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 September 2004 23:00
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: JK2 2.0.4
I've
Paul D. Hester wrote:
Has anyone had success installing the JK2 v2.0.4 connector with multiple
virtual hosts, with each host having there own port? We have two users,
each with their own instance of Tomcat 4.1.31 running. Each user has a
unique port. I'm running Apache 2.0.50. When I set up
I've installed the jk2 binary on RedHat and there are no problems there.
I'll try to compile from scratch on Suse... wish me luck!
thnx
-Blaine
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]you write:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 05:27:33PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I have recently configured Apache 2.0.51
On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 05:27:33PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: I have recently configured Apache 2.0.51 with mod_jk2.so based on the information
: from the book Professional Apache Tomcat 5, and now all requests
: to the web server cause a segmentation fault. :) Is there something in my
:
what type of problems does 2.0.51 have??
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Kyle Adams wrote:
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:50:49 -0400
From: Kyle Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: jk2 over non-default port
Ding ding ding
CAN-2004-0811 (cve.mitre.org)
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 4:00 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: jk2 over non-default port
what type of problems does 2.0.51 have??
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Kyle Adams wrote:
From the download page, http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi (odd that
it's not on the front page):
Important: Version 2.0.51 has a problem processing Satisfy directives
that may allow access to otherwise restricted areas. Please apply the
patch to fix this problem before using this version. A
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jk2 over non-default port
I've been able to get jk2 running if I use the default port; however, I
get these error messages if I try to switch
add under your [channel.socket:localhost:60002]
host=localhost
port=60002
According to the documentation at
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/jk2/jk2/configwebcom.html
(under channel.socket):
The name of the channels should be: channel.socket:HOST:PORT, where
HOST and PORT are
the logger level to debug and see if it provides anything
useful.
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 9:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: jk2 over non-default port
add under your [channel.socket:localhost
One thought is that your port number may be too high. I'm not
sure what port range jk2 supports, but you may want to try something
less than 32767.
Ding ding ding! That was the ticket!
Port 32767 works fine. Port 32768, and channelSocket.open() reverts
back to using the default 8009.
-Original Message-
From: juhani
Hi! As curren jk2 has problem with file upload i am asking
does anybody know when next version will be available or is
there any workaround?
Software used:
Windows server 2003
IIS 6
Tomcat 5.0.28
apparently in the bugzilla report this has been fixed in the connectors CVS HEAD
ADC
-Original Message-
From: juhani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 September 2004 05:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jk2 and file upload
Hi! As curren jk2 has problem with file upload i am
to have issues).
ADC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 17 September 2004 08:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: jk2 and file upload
-Original Message-
From: juhani
Hi! As curren jk2 has problem with file upload i
Instead of including all your mappings in the workers2.properties, you can
use Location and LocationMatch in httpd.conf to set up your mappings.
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use LocationMatch with PCRE in httpd.conf and you can use negative
matches. In this case, do not use the [uri]
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Zehetbauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JK2: Override
Mark Eggers wrote:
You will need to install the httpd-devel rpm as well. This will give
you apxs and other material needed to compile mod_jk2. You might check
on yum to see if mod_jk2 is already compiled. It is for Fedora Core 2.
I don't know if it is for Redhat 9.
I build my own Apache,
Rick Bragg wrote:
Mark Eggers wrote:
You will need to install the httpd-devel rpm as well. This will give
you apxs and other material needed to compile mod_jk2. You might check
on yum to see if mod_jk2 is already compiled. It is for Fedora Core
2. I don't know if it is for Redhat 9.
I build
I'm not sure what's borked with installing modules on Redhat since I
build everything myself.
Based on your error messages, it doesn't seem that the rpm's apxs is
finding everything correctly.
There have been several threads on this in the mailing list, so you can
search there as well. If I
You will need to install the httpd-devel rpm as well. This will give
you apxs and other material needed to compile mod_jk2. You might check
on yum to see if mod_jk2 is already compiled. It is for Fedora Core 2.
I don't know if it is for Redhat 9.
I build my own Apache, mod_jk2, etc. from
. But if you increase number of
concurrent users to a large extent, then it load balances perfectly.
Cheers
Bhaskar
-Original Message-
From: Weseloh, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 4:52 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JK2: lb_factor
Hello Bhaskar
... ;-)
Greets,
Nicole
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Michael Echerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Juni 2004 22:25
An: Tomcat Users List
Betreff: Re: JK2: lb_factor
Kommuru, Bhaskar wrote:
Thanks for you comments Michael,
So mod_jk2.0.4 does not still seem
,
Bhasar
-Original Message-
From: Weseloh, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 4:20 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JK2: lb_factor
Yes, right, that was the mail I meant.
Your assumption about failover instead of load balancing seems to be
correct, at least
settings are :--(
If you know any links which tells more details on this, Please let me know.
Regards,
Bhaskar
-Original Message-
From: Michael Echerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JK2: lb_factor
I measured similar
which tells more details on this, Please let me know.
Regards,
Bhaskar
-Original Message-
From: Michael Echerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:08 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: JK2: lb_factor
I measured similar effects using The Grinder.
Under maximum load
I too have similar problem and have been struggling since morning.
My problem is my mod_jk2 doesnt even load balance to remote server. When i
shut down local servers, it puts the request to remote server..
no cluesss!!
-Original Message-
From: Weseloh, Nicole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(like
ignoring cluster nodes), we'd of course be thankful, too... :)
Greets, Nicole
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kommuru, Bhaskar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2004 14:12
An: 'Tomcat Users List'
Betreff: RE: JK2: lb_factor
I too have similar problem
List'
Betreff: RE: JK2: lb_factor
I too have similar problem and have been struggling since morning.
My problem is my mod_jk2 doesnt even load balance to remote server. When i
shut down local servers, it puts the request to remote server..
no cluesss!!
-Original Message-
From: Weseloh
, are
there any reasons to use those, after all, instead of Tomcat's balancer-webapp, if
one is mainly interested in performance issues?
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Kommuru, Bhaskar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2004 16:09
An: 'Tomcat Users List'
Betreff: RE: JK2
, Bhaskar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Juni 2004 16:09
An: 'Tomcat Users List'
Betreff: RE: JK2: lb_factor
Do you remember that mail about lb_factor? What you said it right about
lb_factor. Changing this value does not affect easily.
-Original Message-
From: Weseloh
I measured similar effects using The Grinder.
Under maximum load with long running requests it can be even that worse
that one Apache 2.x (default compile: prefork) with 2 Tomcats
5.x/mod_jk2 only distributes to the first Tomcat at all.
This is true as long as Apache runs out of MaxClients
The quality of the distribution depends on the worker type
of apache. (AFAIK only the 'worker' MPM will work)
Nevertheless AFAIK the load balancing in mod_jk is not
complete in this area, so I'm not shure if you will get
the desired distribution (but it should be closer).
-Original
Hi Nicole,
I guess it's the mpm_worker_module, that you need.
Yes, I was talking about mod_jk2.
I guess that it is possible to enable a worker by configuration.
(After all they are just modules)
Sorry, as I'm neither using apache 2 nor mod_jk*, I can't
add much. That was just third hand
Ho
When I dowload the binaries of JK2 for windows, I have a mod_jk2.0.49.so
and not .dll, is this normal and can I use it as is with Apache ?
From what I read on this list, yes, this is normal. (for apache2)
But I havn't used it myself yet.
Also, if you have any good link explaining how to
And this one too:
[Fri Jun 11 16:20:59 2004] [error] mod_jk2.handler() Error connecting to
tomcat 3, status 200
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Carl Olivier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 June 2004 04:21 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: jk2 error explanations
Greetings.
Could
Hi, i have similar problems but the errors are different and i not sure
if theses errors are criticals, and worts is that i don't have response
about theses issues
[Thu Jun 10 20:29:16 2004] (error) [jk_handler_response.c (200)]: Error
ajp_process_callback - write failed
[Thu Jun 10 20:29:16
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: jk2.properties
I've never tried it, but you should be able to set
jkHome=/path/to/new/home on the Connector element to have Tomcat look for
/path/to/new/home/conf/jk2.properties.
Of course, Tomcat will also use this as the base for any other relative file
references (e.g
I've never tried it, but you should be able to set
jkHome=/path/to/new/home on the Connector element to have Tomcat look for
/path/to/new/home/conf/jk2.properties.
Of course, Tomcat will also use this as the base for any other relative file
references (e.g. the unix-socket file).
Martinelli
Any clues on sorting this problem alternately?
don't start apache until tomcat is up and running
- Original Message -
From: Kommuru, Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 10:15 AM
Subject: Jk2 compiling problem sorted ..Do you
Any clues on sorting this problem alternately?
don't start apache until tomcat is up and running
In case if tomcat mechine failed some reason and needs to be restarted?
- Original Message -
From: Kommuru, Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 June 2004 16:26
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Jk2 compiling problem sorted ..Do you know.. How?
Any clues on sorting this problem alternately?
don't start apache until tomcat is up and running
In case if tomcat mechine failed some reason and needs to be restarted
, 2004 10:25 AM
Subject: RE: Jk2 compiling problem sorted ..Do you know.. How?
Any clues on sorting this problem alternately?
don't start apache until tomcat is up and running
In case if tomcat mechine failed some reason and needs to be restarted?
- Original Message -
From: Kommuru, Bhaskar
For future info you're almost always better off with all the GNU tools for apache
products. The tools supplied with solaris dont always work as well as they should.
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Kommuru, Bhaskar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 June 2004 16:16
To: 'Tomcat Users
Filip Hanik - Dev wrote:
Any clues on sorting this problem alternately?
don't start apache until tomcat is up and running
Which is an event not trivial to catch. I know of hacks, like tailing
catalina.out log and seeing when the last of the Mohicans has
loaded, but, again, it is not trivial to
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:31 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JK2 connector binary for solaris8
Try following the instructions below, these are what I use when building the
connector.
cd jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src/jk/native2
./configure
Matt,
Thanks for your help so far. Now i am using Mod_jk2.0.2 + Apache2.0.43
+JBoss3.2.3. It is running perfect.
Now my problem is I will have to use 2 apache servers on 2 different
mechines.
Apach_box_1 has two tomcat/jboss (load balanceing)
Apach_box_2 has two tomcat/jboss (load balanceing)
Hi,
It's probably not a huge deal, and it's definitely on the radar screen.
Take a shot at building tomcat with MX4J 2.0 and let us help you if you
run into problems.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Wilson Jimmy - jiwils [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Jimmy and Yoav,
I have build the lastet CVS HEAD successful with MX4J 2.0.1
and send a patch for JkMX.java support.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29259
So now we must also changed
org.apache.catalina.mbeans.createRMIAdaptor() to support the
ServerLifecycleListener
Try following the instructions below, these are what I use when building the connector.
cd jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src/jk/native2
./configure --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2.0.49/bin/apxs
--with-tomcat-41=/usr/local/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.25 \
--with-apr-lib=/usr/local/apache2.0.49/lib
apache2_0_49_ld/modules
cp
jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src/jk/build/jk2/apache2/libjkjni.so
apache2_0_49_ld/modules
Igor.
-Original Message-
From: Dale, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 4:31 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: JK2 connector binary
I'm pretty sure that there is no cache. Are you sure there isnt any directives in your
httpd.conf that could have the same behaviour?
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ingmar Heinrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 May 2004 09:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jk2 entries persistant
Looks like you use a minus sign (-) in the uri and an underscore (_) in the url.
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 May 2004 12:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: jk2 and mapping uri
I'm running tomcat and apache under linux
and
Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc :
Objet : RE: jk2 and mapping uri
Looks like you use a minus sign (-) in the uri and an underscore (_) in
the url.
Ta
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 May 2004 12:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
[shm]
file=/var/log/apache/inet/jk2.shm
...
can someone explain me if the share memory descriptor is mandatory and
what's best practice about using it's attributes in a jk2 newbie user
language :-)
I'm not sure whether its mandatory but when I've used jk2 on my linux system
if I haven't
Jack Lauman wrote:
I have a site where users enter the members area through a URL like this:
http://www.domain.com/members/minutes.jsp
My workers2.properties file
[uri:/minutes/*]
group:ajp13:localhost:8009
How do you remap the members directory so that jk2 know that it point to
a tomcat app
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting error in my apache tomcat configuration and
I don't know why.
I'm running Tomcat 4.1.18 with apache 2.0.49 under linux.
And I can't make apache running with mod jk stuff.
Here is an extract of my apache httpd.conf file
LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2.so
Here's a more detailed description of the problem:
Apache 2.0.49 site 'www.domain.com' has a subdirectory called 'members'.
Users entering this directory are authenticated using .htaccess. The
index.html file in the 'members' directory has a hyperlink to a webapp
called 'minutes'
Jack Lauman wrote:
Is there a JK2 equivalent of JkMount? If there is what is the JK2
syntax for:
JkMount /members/minutes/*.jsp worker1
JkUriSet, I believe. There are docs in Tomcat on JK connectors.
Nix.
-
To unsubscribe,
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi, 14. mai 2004 01:42
À : Tomcat Users List
Objet : RE: JK2 still broken even in new version 2.0.4 with upload Stream ended
unexpectedly error
Oh, far too many bells!
This problem, is hellish to diagnose properly because uploads works flawlessy for some
Subject: RE : JK2 still broken even in new version 2.0.4 with upload
Stream ended unexpectedly error
Same for me.
FileUpload never worked with JK2 connector on my configuration (W2K + IIS6
+ Tomcat 4.1.29 + JK2), except with files lower than ca. 54 KB. No slow
connection at all here (local
1 - 100 of 461 matches
Mail list logo
