RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.

2003-02-18 Thread pqin
18, 2003 12:19 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there. Look at the link again! You're missing the part that was chopped off at the end of the line... > -Original Message- > From: sunisson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] &

RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.

2003-02-18 Thread Barney Hamish
Look at the link again! You're missing the part that was chopped off at the end of the line... > -Original Message- > From: sunisson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:18 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk vi

Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.

2003-02-18 Thread sunisson
perfectly for me. John -Original Message- From: sunisson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:05 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there. This link is broken.: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc

RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.

2003-02-18 Thread Turner, John
Works perfectly for me. John > -Original Message- > From: sunisson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:05 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the > way there. > > > Th

Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.

2003-02-18 Thread sunisson
This link is broken.: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/confighowto.html [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi RK, I thought my workers.properties file looked very different from everybody else's using mod_jk2 ! I just checked again and realize I misread the page http://jakart

RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.

2003-02-18 Thread Turner, John
dzuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there. Hi RK, I thought my workers.properties file looked very different from everybody else's using mod_jk2 ! I just ch

RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.

2003-02-18 Thread Turner, John
FYI...you aren't using JK2 at all. You are using JK. John -Original Message- From: Soefara Redzuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there. Solved it myself :-) I ad

Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.

2003-02-18 Thread Soefara Redzuan
. From: "Soefara Redzuan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there. Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:18:51 +0800 Hi RK, I thought my workers.pro

Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.

2003-02-18 Thread Soefara Redzuan
Hi RK, I thought my workers.properties file looked very different from everybody else's using mod_jk2 ! I just checked again and realize I misread the page http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/confighowto.html I actually put the following in jk2.properties instead of in w

Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.

2003-02-18 Thread ramakrishna
hi, * Soefara Redzuan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Wow, this mod_jk2 really is much easier to configure than mod_jk was, though > the advanced configuration looks quite daunting. For simple virtual hosting > of a servlet/JSP site, I shouldn't need more than one worker, should I? Correct me if a