18, 2003 12:19 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.
Look at the link again! You're missing the part that was chopped off at the
end of the line...
> -Original Message-
> From: sunisson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
&
Look at the link again! You're missing the part that was chopped off at the
end of the line...
> -Original Message-
> From: sunisson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 9:18 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk vi
perfectly for me.
John
-Original Message-
From: sunisson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:05 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the
way there.
This link is broken.:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc
Works perfectly for me.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: sunisson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:05 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the
> way there.
>
>
> Th
This link is broken.:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/confighowto.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi RK,
I thought my workers.properties file looked very different
from everybody else's using mod_jk2 !
I just checked again and realize I misread the page
http://jakart
dzuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 6:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.
Hi RK,
I thought my workers.properties file looked very different
from everybody else's using mod_jk2 !
I just ch
FYI...you aren't using JK2 at all. You are using JK.
John
-Original Message-
From: Soefara Redzuan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 4:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.
Solved it myself :-)
I ad
.
From: "Soefara Redzuan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Solved it. Re: mod_jk virtual hosts ? 90% of the way there.
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:18:51 +0800
Hi RK,
I thought my workers.pro
Hi RK,
I thought my workers.properties file looked very different
from everybody else's using mod_jk2 !
I just checked again and realize I misread the page
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/confighowto.html
I actually put the following in jk2.properties instead of in
w
hi,
* Soefara Redzuan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Wow, this mod_jk2 really is much easier to configure than mod_jk was, though
> the advanced configuration looks quite daunting. For simple virtual hosting
> of a servlet/JSP site, I shouldn't need more than one worker, should I?
Correct me if a
10 matches
Mail list logo