From: Gibson, Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone put me out of my misery? I have attempted to build the
mod_jk.so for Apache 1.3.33 on HP-UX 11.11 multiple times and failing
miserable.
I don't think we've ever had to compile it, it just comes with the
Apache/Tomcat distribution from HP. I'm
have you got the Gnu versions of all the tools, ie gcc, make etc?
-Original Message-
From: Gibson, Danny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 November 2004 18:01
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.11
Hello All,
Can someone put me out of my misery? I have attempted
it compiled to save me the time of
removing the Apache 2 and installing the Apache 1.3
Anyway, I am open to any suggestions.
Danny
-Original Message-
From: Dale, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 12:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:05:19PM -0500, QM wrote:
Check your httpd.conf syntax: I forget the exact directive, but you must
specify *two* lines to load a module in Apache 1.x; just LoadModule
isn't enough.
Check other modules loaded in httpd.conf as a reference. You'll have
a block of
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:44:19PM -0500, Gibson, Danny wrote:
: Syntax error on line 654 of /opt/app/apache1.3.31/conf/httpd.conf:
: Invalid command 'JkMount', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module not
: included in the server configuration
: ./apachectl start: httpd could not be started
There is an already build binary on the Jakarta.tomcat site!
Just go to binaries and search around!
It is a jk2 binary
The package works, I installed it!
-Original Message-
From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
http://apache.is.co.za/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk2/binaries/linux/
here is the link
-Original Message-
From: Lohan Spies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:28 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
There is an already
Are you telling me that the i386 version will work on a 64bit processor?
-Brad
- Original Message -
From: Lohan Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:28 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
http
Sorry didn't see you were using 64 bit.
Just saw tomcat and fedora!
I don't know give it a bash
-Original Message-
From: Brad Hafichuk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 4:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
Are you telling
btw, I did try the i386 version without any luck.
Anyone else know of any solution...
-Brad
- Original Message -
From: Lohan Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 8:55 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for Fedora Core 1 x86_64
Sorry
Never seen that before.
Did a quick grep (grep -R 'map_alloc' *) through the mod_jk source files for
map_alloc and it is found in
jk/native/common/jk_map.h and
jk/native/common/jk_map.c
The error is saying that it can't find the lib to execute the function.
Maybe you didn't build the common
excuseme, but why did I announce the HOWTO (and binaries) of both
mod_jk and mod_jk2?
Your link is old, although not even as old as my old howto on mod_jk
but twice as involved.
Get the real thing: http://www.humph.com/docs/mod_jk.html
Giuliano
At 11:37 +0100 2003/10/16, James Snelling
Citeren Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Compile/Recompile:
In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked the
connector src):
./buildconf.sh
./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apache/bin/apxs
make
make install
The .so file will be in CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native or
[de internetman] Rene Kooyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Citeren Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Compile/Recompile:
In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked
the
connector src):
./buildconf.sh
http://web.jurriaan.org/examples/jsp/ [ nothin ]
Clicking on this link for me gives a nice, pretty Tomcat page. Are you
sure
that you don't have a caching Proxy server between you and it?
Hi Bill,
The problem isn't that these page's show up (fortunatly) but just click
on one of the
on port 80? Apache's log, mod_jk's log in particular. You might
need to jack up JK's logging level.
John
-Original Message-
From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:16 AM
To: Tomcat Users List; Bill Barker
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so
Citeren Turner, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, very. This isn't a problem with mod_jk, as far as I can tell.
The 8080 URL didn't work for me just now, which implies to me that Tomcat
isn't even up, but that might be due to maintenance instead of error.
Can you post the log entries that you
Well, if you keep going with mod_webapp, it will all be wasted, eventually.
It's dead.
John
-Original Message-
From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:47 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so / apache 1.3.27
Compile/Recompile:
In CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native (where CONNECTOR_SRC = wherever you unpacked the
connector src):
./buildconf.sh
./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apache/bin/apxs
make
make install
The .so file will be in CONNECTOR_SRC/jk/native or native2, I forget which.
John
-Original
I get that too and it doesn't cause any problems. I didn't build Apache so
I don't know what's causing it. However you can probably safely ignore it.
Subir
-Original Message-
From: [de internetman] Rene Kooyman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 12:33 PM
To:
[de internetman] Rene Kooyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Oke, that's done, just use the: /usr/lib/apache folder .. p,
now were getting somewhere, although i can't compile normaly because
apxs is located in the other folder ... so be it
I got this on Apache 1.3.27. I assume you downloaded the binary
mod_jk.so. Make sure that you got that fits your use or non-use of SSL
in the server. Not sure where you got the binary, but there is a note on
the jakarta connector download page that lists which binary is for
which.
I myself just
according to this :
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/connectors.html
i should need mod_jk2 and not mod_jk (well, mod_jk may also work, but
hey,..) - and its enabled by default on the appserver im using..
If by any chance i am right, can someone tell me why I cant find a
On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 12:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
according to this :
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/config/connectors.html
i should need mod_jk2 and not mod_jk (well, mod_jk may also work, but
hey,..) - and its enabled by default on the appserver im using..
I use
My website by the end of the week. Other than that, no. Everyone has been
building them from source.
John
-Original Message-
From: Adar Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:21 AM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: mod_jk.so where from ??
Hi
10x John !
and where would that web site be ?
Tal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
My website by the end of the week. Other than that, no. Everyone
: mod_jk.so where from ??
10x John !
and where would that web site be ?
Tal
-Original Message-
From: Turner, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 2:45 PM
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
My website by the end
I found it here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/release/v4.1.10/bin/
- Original Message -
From: Adar Wesley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tomcat Users List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:05 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so where from ??
10x John
Which connector binaries did you find there?
John
-Original Message-
From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so where from ??
I found it here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta
Oops, didn't read the entire thread before replying. Shame on me...
- Original Message -
From: Ben Souther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 9:20 AM
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so where from ??
Sorry, I mean here:
http
mod_jk seems the same for tc3.x. Take this:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/win32/i386/
Tomas Straupis wrote:
Hello
I have ap13 and tc4. I want to connect them. But I can't find mod_jk.so
(eapi). jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat-connectors
Sorry, for linux:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/linux/i386/
MadBit wrote:
mod_jk seems the same for tc3.x. Take this:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.3.1/bin/win32/i386/
Tomas Straupis wrote:
Hello
I have
to install mod_jk you should read this :
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.0-doc/config/ajp.html
-Message d'origine-
De : Billingham, Walter 475 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoye : mardi 23 juillet 2002 15:23
A : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Objet : mod_jk.so
Ok,
I now
Hello Again,
Can anybody share a copy of their mod_jk.conf file, workers.properties, and
server.xml that has Tomcat 4.0.1 and Apache2 or Apache 1.3.x running, I
would greatly appreciate it. Thanks. Walter B.
Ok,
I now have several compiled versions of mod_jk.so thanks to
Ravi,
Can u send me the binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11.
Thanks in advance.
Trigo
-Original Message-
From: Ravi Verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: sexta-feira, 14 de Junho de 2002 3:37
To: 'Tomcat Users List'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11
Dear
how it works.
what version of apache are you using?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Trigo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11
Ravi,
Can u send me the binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11
and see how it works.
what version of apache are you using?
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Antonio Trigo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 4:36 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for HP-UX 11
Ravi,
Can u send me the binary version of mod_jk.so for HP-UX
HELP i asked this question yesterday still no reply
ryan
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having problem upgrading a box. The box is running red hat linux
6.2 with apache 1.3.20 with modssl, it is running with Tomcat 3.2.2. I was
in the process of upgrading my apache 1.3.20 to
On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 10:54, abhishek srivastava wrote:
Hello All,
I have downloaded the new tomcat 4.0.4 today. I also downloaded the source
for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4-src ... when I run ant the build
says build successfull. but there is no mod_jk.so to be found.
When you
On 24 Jun 2002, Sean M Alderman wrote:
On Sun, 2002-06-23 at 10:54, abhishek srivastava wrote:
Hello All,
I have downloaded the new tomcat 4.0.4 today. I also downloaded the source
for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4-src ... when I run ant the build
says build successfull. but
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, abhishek srivastava wrote:
Hello All,
I have downloaded the new tomcat 4.0.4 today. I also downloaded the source
for the jakarta-tomcat-connectors-4.0.4-src ... when I run ant the build
says build successfull. but there is no mod_jk.so to be found.
I also went in a
I have been getting the same error for days and have tried a lot of things
to no avail. Lets try to share our experiences and hopefully we can both
find a solution
- Original Message -
From: zibie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 5:06 AM
Subject:
is there something to do to omit this error
i can't use AJP connector.
My system is Linux/Slackware 8.0 and kernel 2.4.19pre1
Tomcat version 4.0.3
Connector from package jakarta-connector-tomcat-4.0.2src download from
jakarta.apache.org.
i did:
tar zxf jakarta-connector-tomcat-4.0.2src
I have been getting the same error trying to compile mod_webapp for tomcat
4.
Since you are using tomcat 3.3 you might check out
http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/webservers/apache/index.html
and download the apache/tomcat application offered there. it comes with
mod_jk.so according to the
the configure program with echo statements
to determine where you need
to force the if test statements to do what you want
Good Luck
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so
Hi,
Ed Tybursky wrote:
Does anyone have a compiled version of mod_jk.so for Solaris 8 running
on a sparc that I may have real quick?
I've uploaded some (with and without EAPI) to http://ponschab.de/mod_jk/
But i recommend compiling mod_jk by yourself.
Marc
I got my mod_jk file from the Tomcat 3.3 binary distribution. There's a
folder in there named native with two version of mod_jk -- eap and noeap.
How your Apache was built (with or with out EAP) will determine which to use.
Just a hint though -- if your version of Apache uses SSL, it
sorry.. now I have understood!!
but where I find mod_jk for Linux for Tomcat 3.2.3??
Thanks!
R.
- Original Message -
From: Roberto B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: mod_jk.so differences
I used Tomcat 4 with Apache but I have
I use Debian...
R.
- Original Message -
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
If you using Linux, may I propose you take a look
at my RPMs :
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta
...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
I use Debian...
R.
- Original
..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
I use Debian...
R.
- Original Message
]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
I use Debian...
R.
- Original Message -
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:17 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so
ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Roberto B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so differences
I use Debian...
R.
- Original Message -
From: GOMEZ Henri
How many times I have answered to that ?
eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
noeapi for std apache
so why not name mod_jk-eapi.so - mod_jk-ssl.so?
michael
understanding that something's wrong with what
you are doing...
L.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Weissenbacher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:00 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
How many times I have answered to that ?
eapi
yeah!!!
R.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Weissenbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:00 AM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
How many times I have answered to that ?
eapi is for apache compiled with mod_ssl
noeapi for std apache
: Jan Labanowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy for
people who refuse to read the background information.
mod_jk-eapi.so
This is a perfect explanation.. thanks!!
R.
- Original Message -
From: Jan Labanowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy for
people
thank you, i've always wondered about this...
-Original Message-
From: Jan Labanowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
It seems like you can either be correct or you have to make it easy
: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 4:14 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so differences
thank you, i've always wondered about this...
-Original Message-
From: Jan Labanowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:29 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE
Le Mercredi 15 Août 2001 22:47, vous avez écrit :
I place mod_jk.so in my /etc/httpd/modules directory and then used
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
in httpd.conf. Either case, check where your mod_jk.so file is and set the
LoadModule directive to it. Either absolute or
Jonathon Wallen a écrit :
My probleme:
Thanks but no, it doesn't change something.
you have this line in your httpd.conf -
LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so
maybe it should be -
LoadModule jk_module /etc/httpd/libexec/mod_jk.so
I'm just as new to this as you
I place mod_jk.so in my /etc/httpd/modules directory and then used
LoadModule jk_modulemodules/mod_jk.so
in httpd.conf. Either case, check where your mod_jk.so file is and set the
LoadModule directive to it. Either absolute or relative path to /etc/httpd
should work.
I'm also on
Yann Sagon wrote:
Hi,
I'm very new to tomcat + apache.
I've dowmloaded tomcat 3.2.3 and mod_jk.so (eapi)
I'v installed tomcat as a standalone version without problem.
Now, I want to use it with apache and some virtual hosts.
In case you aren't a French native speaker, write back for
how did you know you wanted the eapi mod_jk rather than non?
My probleme:
when I try to start apache:
#apachectl start
Starting httpd: Syntax error on line 774 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf:
Invalid command 'JkMount', perhaps mis-spelled or defined by a module
not included in the server configuration
Funny signature!
Kyle Wayne Kelly
(504)391-3985
http://www.cs.uno.edu/~kkelly
- Original Message -
From: raghu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: tomcat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 7:01 AM
Subject: mod_jk.so unable to compile, please help. Urgent
../jk/jk_jni_worker.c:67:
Edit the apxs and make sure the path to your apahce is correct (It is hard
coded)
I have a compiled mod_jk.so (but it is for a specific version of Apache)
try using this command to compile (youll have to change the path to your
apahce)
unsubscribe me please ...
DISCLAIMER :
The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the use of the
individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorized to receive it. It
may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If
Hi,
How many times do I have to post this in one week??? 8o)
http://willow.cc.edu/adminguide
http://users.aber.ac.uk/aff9
or for a list of builds of mod_jk I have:-
http://users.aber.ac.uk/aff9/tomcat/tomcat-3.2/
JDK 1.3.0 can be found at
http://users.aber.ac.uk/pms
Adam.
Adam Fowler
mod_jk.so-eapi is to be used when your apache is using EAPI (mod_ssl)
mod_jk.so-noeapi when using plain std Apache
:)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8
is there someone that knows why exists two files mod_jk.so (-eapi and
-noeapi) for LINUX?
I'm updating the mod_jk doc on TC 3.2/3.3/J-T-C
Which do I have to use? Do I have to cut the word after '.so'?
If you have an Apache with EAPI (ie mod_ssl) use mod_jk.so-eapi
and rename to mod_jk.so
Gomez,
I have found docs about the argument on TC 3.3 but not on 3.2.
BTW thanks now I have understood.
Pier Paolo.
- Original Message -
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:02 PM
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so for LINUX
is there someone
There is no need to build mod_jk with libpthread under Apache 1.3.19
The pthread stuff is required 'ONLY' in threaded mode, ie Apache 2.0
-Original Message-
From: Stewart Mclean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 4:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk.so
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:27:58 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000/N
There is no need to build mod_jk with libpthread under Apache 1.3.19
The pthread stuff is required 'ONLY' in threaded mode, ie
Henri, I've been trying to use libpthread because when I try
and build mod_jk
with apxs on Tru64 UNIX v5.1 I get the following error:
cc: Error: /usr/opt/java130/include/jni.h, line 35: #error
Modules that
interface with Java must be compiled and linked with the
-pthread option)
A known
]
list-post: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so kills apache 1.3.19 on tru64 v5.1
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:16:14 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Rating: h31.sny.collab.net 1.6.2 0/1000
Yes, that's a problem most of us had to overcame.
Means that the module was compiled in a diferent platform than yours, you'll
have to download the source code of mod_jk and compile it.
hth,
m-
Hello,
I have compiled Tomcat from the source on RH 7.0 and now I am getting the
following
Kevin Shortt wrote:
Then I've done this:
gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o
And recieved this:
ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but
non-writable
sections
collect2: ld returned 1 exit
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 12:10 PM
Try it with
gcc -shared -o mod_jk.so *.o -lposix4
that worked for me on Solaris 8 x86.
nope. no good either.
I did notice more output though, because the first couple
I have the same doubt, i use 1.3.17. Why on win32 now,
all module has .so ending? what i think is .so is for
unix only. am i right?
--- Ellis Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently use Apache1.3.14 + Tomcat 3.2.1 +
mod_jk.dll on Win32.
I recently tried to upgrade to Apache 1.3.19.
DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
-Original Message-
From: Arne Borkowski (borko.net) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 2:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
Hi,
I am using Apache 1.3.12 under RedHat 6.1 ... I tried to give -DEAPI
with the apxs
Which version of Apache/HTTPD server are you using?
Pae
-Original Message-
From: Arne Borkowski (borko.net) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:35 PM
Subject: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
Hi,
I tried to compile Jakarta mod_jk.so for
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so witn -DEAPI?
Which version of Apache/HTTPD server are you using?
Pae
-Original Message-
From: Arne Borkowski (borko.net) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:35 PM
Subject: mod_jk.so witn
I think it is more suitable to build your own one.
Follow the instruction of the tomcat document.
Just remind you that the source of mod_jserv is under
TOMCAT_SRC_DIR/src/native/apache/jserv
unplug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
OS: Linux Redhat ver 6.1
Apache ver-1.3.14
Tom Cat ver-3.2.1
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
es.com cc:
Subject: Re: ** mod_jk.so for Linux
Redhat
04/03/01 6.2- required
Hi,
You can get one from the jakarta web site:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/jakarta-tomcat/release/v3.2.1/bin/linux/i38
6/mod_jk.so
I use Tomcat 3.2.1.
This version of the mod_jk worked for me with a Apache 1.3.12, and when I
installed a Apache 1.3.19, it was said 'garbled', and I had to
Jacquemont
benoit.jacquemontTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
@smile.frcc:
Subject: RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux
Redhat
04/03/0
7-8355 Ext.: 262
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Benoit Jacquemont
benoit.jacquemontTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@smile.frcc:
Subject:
RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat
cc:
Subject:
RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat
04/03/01 03:32 PM 6.2- required
**
Please respond to
tomcat-user
Hi,
You can get one from the jakarta web s
Jacquemont
benoit.jacquemontTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@smile.frcc:
Subject:
RE: ** mod_jk.so for Linux Redhat
04/03/01 03:32 PM 6.2
some other beginning's end"
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 4:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so installation tar.gz...
Did you notice that there is existing RPM for tomcat modules,
mod_jk and
I picked up the source RPM for tomcat3.2.1.
I've been checking in the startup script and I saw that
JAVA_HOME is being
set to /usr/IBMJava2-13. I was wondering if there is any
particular reason
for this or if it is fine to change it to the standard path
for Sun's JDK
1.3 for Mandrake?
web: http://gucciboy.dyndns.org/aff9
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Every new beginning comes from some other beginning's end"
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 3:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so instal
]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so installation tar.gz...
Hi,
This kind of trouble! 8o) :-
[root@willow RPM]# rpm -ba SPECS/mod_jk-apache1.3-1mdk.spec
File /usr/src/RPM/SOURCES is smaller than 4 bytes
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.14373
+ umask 022
+ cd /usr/src/RPM/BUILD
other beginning's end"
-Original Message-
From: GOMEZ Henri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 4:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_jk.so installation tar.gz...
Did you notice that there is existing RPM for tomcat modules,
mod_jk and mod_jse
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Every new beginning comes from some other beginning's end"
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Peter B. West
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_jk.so installat
Adam Fowler wrote:
I'm trying to make an RPM but am having trouble building it. Any hints?
What kind of trouble?
Peter
--
Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://powerup.com.au/~pbwest
"Lord, to whom shall we go?"
-
To
I give up. Can someone send me mod_jk.so compiled on freebsd.
-Original Message-
From: mikhail malamud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk.so
Has anyone successfuly compile mod_jk.so on FreeBSD? Or perhaps you know
I give up. Can someone send me mod_jk.so compiled on freebsd.
No don't give up.
Could you tell us which .o you've got compiled
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
