Re: Memory leak in Tomcat

2005-09-12 Thread Wade Chandler
--- Ingrid Morterud Rosvall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. We are running an application on Tomcat 4.1.30, and java 1.4.2. Our application is using the struts framework with jsp's, and cocoon to render the xml's. There seems to be a major memory leak at startup - the application

RE: Memory leak in Tomcat

2005-09-12 Thread Michael Oliver
Ingrid, I am not on the tomcat developer committer list so my reply is just an FYI from my own experience. I saw unstable performance myself in a very similar deployment of Struts applications similar to yours. I too thought there was a memory leak and there may be, but I don't think it is in

RE: Memory leak in Tomcat

2005-09-12 Thread Mark
Hi, Can you share how much memory do you have and how much used by tomcat and what JAVA_OPTs do you have. Thanks a lot, Mark. --- Michael Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ingrid, I am not on the tomcat developer committer list so my reply is just an FYI from my own experience. I saw

RE: Memory leak in Tomcat

2005-09-12 Thread Ingrid Morterud
. :-) Ingrid and Tommy -Original Message- From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12. september 2005 22:36 To: Tomcat Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Memory leak in Tomcat Hi, Can you share how much memory do you have and how much used by tomcat and what JAVA_OPTs do you have

RE: Memory leak in Tomcat

2005-09-12 Thread Wade Chandler
--- Ingrid Morterud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the quick reply. You might be right in us not understanding the java heap. Still - then we are even more at a loss on how to fix the problem than if we really had understood how it works. We are running on a test server with

Re: Memory leak in tomcat 5.0.28

2005-02-14 Thread Mark Thomas
Marx, Mitchell E (Mitch), ALABS wrote: I see the bugzilla ID: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33368 Anyone know if this is present in Tomcat 4.1.30? This is now fixed in CVS for TC4. Mark - To unsubscribe,

Re: Memory leak in tomcat 5.0.28

2005-02-08 Thread Mark Thomas
Marx, Mitchell E (Mitch), ALABS wrote: I see the bugzilla ID: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33368 Anyone know if this is present in Tomcat 4.1.30? Yes. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20758 is also present but is fixed in 4.1.31 Mark

Re: Memory leak in tomcat 5.0.28

2005-02-07 Thread Trond G. Ziarkowski
Thank you Robert!! Just wanna say thanks alot for sharing all your findings with the rest of us. I start my tomcat 5.0.28 server with -ms252m -mx512m and it was running for about 3-4 days before i got the OutOfMemoryError. Since i removed the swallowOutput from my context, my server has'nt been

Re: Memory leak in tomcat 5.0.28

2005-02-03 Thread Marx, Mitchell E \(Mitch\), ALABS
: Memory leak in tomcat 5.0.28 I've figured out my problem. I'm posting what I've discovered for the benefit of others. The SystemLogHandler uses a map called logs where the key is a ThreadWithAttributes and the value is a stack of CaptureLogs. The problem is that when a thread dies

RE: Memory leak in tomcat 5.0.28

2005-02-02 Thread Robert Wille
I've figured out my problem. I'm posting what I've discovered for the benefit of others. The SystemLogHandler uses a map called logs where the key is a ThreadWithAttributes and the value is a stack of CaptureLogs. The problem is that when a thread dies, the ThreadWithAttributes object lives

Re: Memory leak in tomcat 5.0.28

2005-02-02 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev
feel free to open a bug report, so that this issue can be tracked. - Original Message - From: Robert Wille [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 1:25 PM Subject: RE: Memory leak in tomcat 5.0.28 I've figured out my problem. I'm posting

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-21 Thread wsedio
On 20-05-2004 11:58, wsedio wrote: On 19-05-2004 23:15, Michiel Toneman wrote: We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19. Does Tomcat 5.0.24 fix this problem? We added this to the jk2.properties: request.registerRequests=false and the memory usage was normal again. Somewhat

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-21 Thread Michiel Toneman
wsedio wrote: On 20-05-2004 11:58, wsedio wrote: On 19-05-2004 23:15, Michiel Toneman wrote: We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19. Does Tomcat 5.0.24 fix this problem? I have no idea, haven't tried it out yet. No plans as yet to test/roll-out 5.0.24, so it will be a while before

RE: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-21 Thread Brian Beckham
-Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:09 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19 wsedio wrote: On 19-05-2004 23:15, Michiel Toneman wrote: We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19

RE: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-21 Thread Brian Beckham
21, 2004 8:53 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19 I added the request.registerRequests=false to jk2.properties yesterday, but I still do not have a definite confirmation on whether this problem is fixed. The JVM did grow to over 600MB, which is more that my Tomcat

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-21 Thread Remy Maucherat
Brian Beckham wrote: Ok, after adding that setting in jk2.properties I have had 2 lockups of tomcat on my production siteany help!!?!!? lockup doesn't mean anything to me. Details please :) Also, this property cannot possibly cause that (look in the code if in doubt). --

RE: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-21 Thread Brian Beckham
. Brian Beckham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: 770.924.6444 ext. 203 Mobile: 404.406.8355 -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:21 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19 Brian Beckham wrote: Ok, after adding

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-21 Thread Michiel Toneman
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:21 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19 Brian Beckham wrote: Ok, after adding that setting in jk2.properties I have had 2 lockups of tomcat on my production siteany help!!?!!? lockup doesn't mean anything

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-21 Thread Jeff Hoffmann
Brian Beckham wrote: Sorry bout that...got a little flustered :) I don't have any answers but I'd just like to chime in to say that I've had nearly identical problems when I was using 5.0.19. I've moved on to 5.0.24 now, but I found some error logs in one of my backups so I'm attaching them in

RE: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-21 Thread Brian Beckham
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 10:54 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19 Brian Beckham wrote: Sorry bout that...got a little flustered :) I don't have any answers but I'd just like to chime in to say that I've had nearly identical problems when I was using

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-21 Thread Jeff Hoffmann
Brian Beckham wrote: Jeff, Can you tell me more about your sitation? Did 5.0.24 help? So far I haven't had any problems with 5.0.24, although I've only been running it a couple of days. When I had the problem with 5.0.19, I jumped back to 5.0.16 until a couple of days ago when I went up to

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-20 Thread wsedio
On 19-05-2004 23:15, Michiel Toneman wrote: We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19. Does Tomcat 5.0.24 fix this problem? We added this to the jk2.properties: request.registerRequests=false and the memory usage was normal again. Somewhat non-obvious, I agree. It also gets rid of

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-20 Thread Emerson Cargnin
wsedio wrote: On 19-05-2004 23:15, Michiel Toneman wrote: We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19. Does Tomcat 5.0.24 fix this problem? We added this to the jk2.properties: request.registerRequests=false and the memory usage was normal again. Somewhat non-obvious, I agree. It also

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-20 Thread Emerson Cargnin
Someone could answer this question, please? Becouse my available memory is going down from 120 to 50 and to 10 megabytes to fast. And I'm not finding any leak in my apps... Sorry if I looked rude, didn't mean that :P Maybe this leak is solved in tomcat 5.0.24?? Emerson Cargnin wrote: wsedio

RE: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-20 Thread Shapira, Yoav
Hi, What if your webapp actually requires more than 120MB of memory under your load? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:09 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Memory leak

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-20 Thread Emerson Cargnin
actually requires more than 120MB of memory under your load? Yoav Shapira Millennium Research Informatics -Original Message- From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 1:09 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19 wsedio wrote: On 19

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-19 Thread Michiel Toneman
We were having severe memory problems too with 5.0.19. We added this to the jk2.properties: request.registerRequests=false and the memory usage was normal again. Somewhat non-obvious, I agree. It also gets rid of Error registering request messages in catalina.out. We are using mod_jk (1.2) with

RE: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-19 Thread Mike Curwen
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-userm=108304447126396w=2 ? -Original Message- From: Brian Beckham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 3:36 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19 I have a site that gets a fair amount of

Re: Memory leak with Tomcat 5.0.19

2004-05-19 Thread Tom Miller
We are runnning Tomcat 5.0.19 and experiencing the same problems. This is what we defined for the memory. Our tomcat is crawling at this point. We have to restart it everyday. CATALINA_OPTS=$CATALINA_OPTS -server -Xms1152M -Xmx1536M - Xincgc Thanks, Tom

RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-26 Thread Torstein P. Nilsen
Thanks, I will upgrade to 5.0.18 and see if it works ! /Torstein -Original Message- From: Allistair Crossley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22. januar 2004 11:44 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ? We had exactly the same problem. 2 users on 5.0.16 after

RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread Dale, Matt
There is a known memory leak in 5.0.16, I'd upgrade to 5.0.18 and see if this fixes your problem. Ta Matt -Original Message- From: Torstein Nilsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 January 2004 10:01 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ? I am developing an

Re: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Dale, Matt wrote: There is a known memory leak in 5.0.16, I'd upgrade to 5.0.18 and see if this fixes your problem. You should read his report. 1) I don't see how he would be affected, since he seems to have a rather small server; you need large variations in traffic to get the leak (and the

RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread Francois JEANMOUGIN
-Original Message- From: Dale, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:05 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ? There is a known memory leak in 5.0.16, I'd upgrade to 5.0.18 and see if this fixes your problem. Note

RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread Allistair Crossley
PROTECTED] Sent: 22 January 2004 10:19 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ? -Original Message- From: Dale, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:05 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16

Re: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread Remy Maucherat
Francois JEANMOUGIN wrote: There is a known memory leak in 5.0.16, I'd upgrade to 5.0.18 and see if this fixes your problem. Note that the download page on Jakarta.apache.org is not updated with this new release. You need to figure the good URL by yourself (not so hard). Before announcing

RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread Derek Mahar
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: January 22, 2004 5:44 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ? We had exactly the same problem. 2 users on 5.0.16 after 20 minutes the RAM consumed was 158MB and then it crashed. Upgraded to 5.0.18 yesterday and RAM is a steady 30MB. I

RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread Allistair Crossley
January 2004 14:58 To: Tomcat Users List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ? Out of curiosity, which JVM do you run? I run Tomcat 5.0.18, JVM 1.4.2_03 for Linux on Red Hat, and two instances of JSPWiki serving no more than 200 users. This combination consumes

RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread Ralph Einfeldt
: Thursday, January 22, 2004 4:06 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ? What puzzles me is the Windows task manager process memory as this never ever matches anywhere near the JProfiler reported memory. I know there may be some system overheads but the 30MB

Re: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread Filip Hanik
try setting maxSpareThreads==minSpareThreads==maxThreads in your connector, Filip - Original Message - From: Ralph Einfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 7:18 AM Subject: RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ? The heap size has

RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread Torstein Nilsen
] Sent: 22. januar 2004 18:58 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ? try setting maxSpareThreads==minSpareThreads==maxThreads in your connector, Filip - Original Message - From: Ralph Einfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

RE: memory leak in tomcat 5.0.16 ?

2004-01-22 Thread David Rees
On Thu, January 22, 2004 1at 0:25 am, Torstein Nilsen wrote: I have now upgraded to the latest tomcat release 5.0.18 but I'm afraid this didn't solve the problem - the tomcat-process is still growing. I have monitored the ressources used very closely with 5.0.18 and it shows a slow grow in