Re: RE: JK2 Installation

2002-11-14 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
At first, I was answering each of your emails individually, but thanks to POP-after-SMTP, I will try to get my answers across in one email instead. Many people are asking for help, because it isn't working. When people post in reply to "check the list" or "read the documentation", it doesn't

Re: RE: JK2 Installation

2002-11-14 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
Ok: 1) how to build mod_jk2 once we download the source -- at least on FreeBSD, I have not figured it out 2) none of the examples show how to use inprocess-jni 3) none of the examples show how this would work with multiple virtual hosts I don't know if more is missing, because I can't not get A

Re: RE: JK2 Installation

2002-11-14 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
I don't know about anyone else, but when reading this from the JK/JK2 page, I assumed that JK2 was a better solution since I am trying to use JDK1.4 and InProcess-JNI... >> What's the difference between JK and JK2 ? >> >> JK2 is a refactoring of JK and is much more powerfull. >> >> Even if it

Re: RE: Chicken and the egg

2002-11-14 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
Actually, he has a point. I have been trying to build jk2 and get it working for a few days now, posting questions here, looking at all the documentation. He simply asked if anyone knows how to do it. I personally would love ANYONE to be able to tell me how to build jk2 on FreeBSD to work with A

Tomcat4.1.12 + Apache2.0.35 + jk2

2002-10-05 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
I have Tomcat running successfully Standalone, but I am trying to link it via jk2/jni to Apache to speed it up a bit (even locally it is slow). I set it up as best I could via the documents on the www.apache.org website, but alas, I am stuck. [it is FreeBSd 4.6] LoadModule jk_module libexec/apa

Re: I need to run a servlet periodically

2002-10-05 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
Unless you are just trying to do refresh, in which case you could use the meta-tags to do auto-refresh and server-push. If you were trying to do a servlet that managed something always running, then you would want a daemon that could handle live-updates. Please be more clear on the usage. Mala

Re: Tomcat4.1.12 + Apache2.0.35 + jk2

2002-10-05 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
Does everyone else have jk2 working? Malachi 10/5/2002 3:46:33 AM, Malachi de AElfweald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have Tomcat running successfully Standalone, but I am trying to link it via jk2/jni >to Apache to speed it up a bit (even locally it is slow). > >I set it

Re: HOWTO for Apache 2.0.43 and Tomcat 4.1.12 using mod_jk2

2002-10-05 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
I did step 1, and even went into the jk directory and did "ant native" as well (per the jk/README.txt) just in case... I did step 2... Step 3 will not work on Apache2 according to the Apache2 documentation http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/upgrading.html : "The AddModule and ClearModuleList dir

Re: AW: HOWTO for Apache 2.0.43 and Tomcat 4.1.12 using mod_jk2

2002-10-05 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
ime before mod_ssl >was "built into" apache (IMO all closely dependent modules should be >integrated into apache, as they need to be modified with every apache >version). It was exactly the same situation, even most developers didn't >know which combination was stable. > >

Re: AW: HOWTO for Apache 2.0.43 and Tomcat 4.1.12 using mod_jk2

2002-10-05 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
tion, or that I need to somehow add that cmdline option to the connectors build somewhere? Any help would be GREATLY appreciated. Malachi 10/5/2002 3:02:01 PM, Malachi de AElfweald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >yeah, I just tried the jk/native2/configure script... it detected BSD ok, &g

Re: AW: HOWTO for Apache 2.0.43 and Tomcat 4.1.12 using mod_jk2

2002-10-05 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
hi 10/5/2002 3:42:00 PM, Malachi de AElfweald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Ok, I think I might have figured out WHAT the problem is, if someone >can lead me in the right direction to try it... > >it appears that you have to do "gcc -pthread" on BSD to link to pthreads >

Re: Double Tomcat!

2002-10-07 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
Can't you just specify a different CATALINA_BASE and then different ports in server.xml Malachi 10/7/2002 2:10:03 AM, Vincent Berruchon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, >is it possible to install two Tomcat server on the same machine, note >that I use FreeBSD (4.6) and the agoal woul

Re: RE: JK2 Installation

2002-10-07 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
Ok, I just read through 108 emails, mostly from this list. I saw 1 message from Dave, and many from John telling everyone that JK2 is in beta, not to be trusted, use something else, read the list, don't complain about the documentation, etc etc Yet, neither of you answered our questions. I

Re: TOmcat 4.0.1 and JDOM b8

2002-10-07 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
Also, make sure that an older version is not in $JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/ext cuz that would get used first Malachi 10/7/2002 1:14:36 PM, Padhu Vinirs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >JDOM is only a easy-to-use-wrapper for java programmers around standard >xml parsers. The 'SAXNotRecognizedOption" is an

Re: RE: RE: JK2 Installation

2002-10-07 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
orking on their >documents, and have posted the URLs to the list many times. Robert Sowders >has regularly posted a full list of HOWTOs for various platforms and >versions to supplement the "official" documentation. These posts can be >found in a search. If you want t

Re: RE: JK2 Installation

2002-10-07 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
Yes, I saw the JkMount option as well but, how would I have eoti.org/examples and corp.eoti.org/examples hosted by different workers in the same properties file? Or do I have to specify a different worker2.properties for each one? could I just make the URI in worker2.properties be something

Re: TOmcat 4.0.1 and JDOM b8

2002-10-07 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
lets.InvokerServlet.doGet(InvokerServlet.java:180) > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740) > at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) > >What do you think is still wrong? >Do I have to do something especially with TOmcat? >Thanks f

Re: RE: RE: JK2 Installation

2002-10-07 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
mcat together with the linux version of apache and the linux binary >version of mod_jk2?The linux emulation layer runs out of the kernel so >it should not be too much overhead. > >I wish FreeBSD did have a native port for JDK 1.4. > >rls > > > > >Malachi

Re: TOmcat 4.0.1 and JDOM b8

2002-10-08 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
ther? > >Regards, >Cyril. >___ > >Cyril Vidal >Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Web: http://www.planetexml.com >- Original Message - >From: "Malachi de AElfweald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Tomcat Users List" &

Re: AW: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost

2002-10-08 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
is jk2 still slow with inprocess-JNI, cuz that is why I want to use it. Malachi 10/8/2002 11:50:35 AM, "Michael Riess" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Thanks for the advice, but that doesn't work. I guess it's a bug, not a >feature ;-). For now I will use mod_jk until jk2 is stable. jk2 seemed a b

Re: TOmcat 4.0.1 and JDOM b8

2002-10-08 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
L PROTECTED] >Web: http://www.planetexml.com >- Original Message - >From: "Malachi de AElfweald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 6:25 PM >Subject: Re: TOmcat 4.0.1

Re: AW: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost

2002-10-08 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
I haven't tried mod_jk yet (since I am using JDK1.4 and want to use inprocess JNI), and have not got mod_jk2 working. I can get everything working with Tomcat in standalone mode, but not with the connectors. Malachi 10/8/2002 3:40:47 PM, Gustavo Vegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Michael, >

Re: Tomcat 4.0.4 on OS/390?

2002-10-08 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
It isn't Tomcat specific, but I have done some EBCDIC i/o in java on os/390 Let me know... Mal 10/8/2002 8:20:33 PM, jjnfg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >You are not alone. I am working in a similar direction. >I reported as a bug when Tomcat v4.1.12 complaining about >context URL when I tri

Re: RE: RE: JK2 Installation

2002-10-09 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
me. So I went with Solaris. Now I'm >doing it on (horror of horrors) windows. If they ever do get the bugs >worked out then I'll be the first to move to that platform. > >rls > > > > > >Malachi de AElfweald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >10/07/2002 08:41

Re: AW: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost

2002-10-09 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
How did you mangage to get jk2 to build? Malachi 10/9/2002 2:16:24 AM, "Robert L Sowders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I've been using it for sometime now. It doesn't feel any slower that no >using it. No testing has been done. > >rls > > > >

Re: AW: AW: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost

2002-10-09 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
sers List >> Betreff: Re: AW: jk2 uri mapping of SSL vhost >> >> >> I've been using it for sometime now. It doesn't feel any slower that no >> using it. No testing has been done. >> >> rls >> >> >> >> >> Malachi de AElfweald

Re: Tomcat 4.0.4 on OS/390?

2002-10-09 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
The problem, from what I remember, was that OS/390 required that, for Java, text files all be ASCII and binary files all be EBCDIC. Could be wrong there... but .properties, .java, .txt, whatever... UNLESS the program is written to use the codepage when loading the information then it can be i

Re: integrated or standalone ?

2002-10-09 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
I have Standalone working fine here, but as of yet have not been able to integrate them. On FreeBSD though. Malachi 10/9/2002 1:50:19 PM, Daniel Hellstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I have apache installed on my linux box and I am going to install tomcat >to be able to download midlets to m

Re: JSDK 1.3 or 1.4 on FreeBSD 4.1.1 - must I compile it?

2002-10-09 Thread Malachi de AElfweald
I am currently using /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14 on my FreeBSD 4.6 10/9/2002 3:01:05 PM, Nicholas Pappas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hello, >I want to install the JSDK 1.3 or 1.4 on Free BSD 4.1.1 in order to get >Tomcat 4.1 there, too. Now, I've searched the sun site and it appears >that t