Re: [VOTE] Move the Torque Bugtracker to JIRA

2005-08-03 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [X] +1 - Yes! Let's go JIRA [ ] 0 - I don't care [ ] -1 - No (Please give a justification) -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED]+49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ RedHat

Re: [VOTE] Move the Torque Bugtracker to JIRA

2005-08-03 Thread Henning P. Schmiedehausen
Thomas Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 0 - Not sure what to do I am not convinced we should move away from Scarab, because Scarab is one of the few Open Source Projects known to me which uses Torque internally, and I do think that we should support it by using it. That wouldn't be a real

Re: [VOTE] Move the Torque Bugtracker to JIRA

2005-08-03 Thread Thomas Fischer
Scott, ou are right, it is infrastructure who are doing the work, so if they decide that scarab will be switched off it is fine with me. It would be nice if we could get a database dump from scarab in order to take over at least the more important bugs. Thomas On Wed, 3 Aug 2005,

Re: [VOTE] Move the Torque Bugtracker to JIRA

2005-08-03 Thread Jorge Uriarte
Scott Eade wrote: There has in fact been some recent progress with Scarab over at Tigris - e.g. on their instance you can look at issues without logging in. The trouble is that to get the ASF instance upgraded will require more effort from those involved than can be justified. If there was

Re: [VOTE] Move the Torque Bugtracker to JIRA

2005-08-03 Thread Jorge Uriarte
Scott Eade wrote: There has in fact been some recent progress with Scarab over at Tigris - e.g. on their instance you can look at issues without logging in. The trouble is that to get the ASF instance upgraded will require more effort from those involved than can be justified. If there was