Re: [Trac] Store custom query as report?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Naturally, sometimes one can't see the trees in the forrest. thanks for the idea. Here is the reference for the TicketQuery macro: http://trac-hacks.org/wiki/TracQuery By the way, did anyone notice that some of these queries aren't working against the trac trunk?

Re: [Trac] Store custom query as report?

Christian Boos wrote: Gary Oberbrunner wrote: I get the same thing on some of my stored queries; I think it's the ones that return no results. Right, it should be fixed in r3613, thanks for the report! Wow, that was fast!! Thanks! -- Gary

Re: [Trac] MySQL Question

Hershel Robinson wrote: As far as DB support, we know and use MySQL. Presently 4.1 but we plan to upgrade to 5.1 as soon as it is released (a matter of months it seems, according to MySQL support). My humble opinion as a trac user: trac only uses its db to keep track of things internal to its

Re: [Trac] MySQL Question

zdennis wrote: Russ Brown wrote: On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 14:00 -0400, Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Hershel Robinson wrote: As far as DB support, we know and use MySQL. Presently 4.1 but we plan to upgrade to 5.1 as soon as it is released (a matter of months it seems, according to MySQL support

Re: [Trac] RSS feed no longer working on trunk?

Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Gary Oberbrunner wrote: XML Parsing Error: undefined entity ... It is choking on the undefined entity hellip;. It seems the rss feed from my trac (trunk, up to date as of today) produces bad description chunks like this: descriptionul class=changeslidiv

Re: [Trac] RSS feed no longer working on trunk?

Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Must be a config issue with my trac. It definitely started happening on the day I updated to the trunk. I just updated to the latest and still no joy. I downloaded the xml+rss file and loaded it into my Firefox, and it refuses to display it: XML Parsing Error

Re: [Trac] Flexible Workflow

to let you know what users are hoping for...) -- Gary Oberbrunner ___ Trac mailing list Trac@lists.edgewall.com http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman/listinfo/trac

[Trac] Templates for milestone pages?

Hi trac people. I'd like to have a template for new milestones that looks like this: DESCRIPTION HERE '''Open tickets:''' [[TicketQuery(milestone=THIS_MILESTONEstatus!=closed)]] '''Closed tickets:''' [[TicketQuery(milestone=THIS_MILESTONEstatus=closed)]] Ideally the milestone name would go

Re: [Trac] Templates for milestone pages?

Frazier, Stephen wrote: I may be missing something, but those queries are already there on both the roadmap and milestone page right below the progress bar. The progress bar itself has links to those queries, too. I like to see them all spelled out right on the milestone page, not have to

[Trac] Sorting report results by a numeric field

the report module that a column contains numeric data? Also will the ticket query module that replaces reports be able to do things like the above? thanks, -- Gary Oberbrunner ___ Trac mailing list Trac@lists.edgewall.com http://lists.edgewall.com/mailman

Re: [Trac] tracTags Macro

Aust, Christian wrote: Hi, anybody using the TracTags macro? I've installed it as described and it works, but using the ListTags macro I get an unordered list whose first element is always empty. [[ListTags(myTag)]] will render as ul lia title=Create

Re: [Trac] The 'severity' field is not present out-of-the-box

Célio Cidral Junior wrote: 2006/3/9, Matthew Good [EMAIL PROTECTED]: there's little distinction between priority and severity. After thinking again about priority vs. severity, I agree with you. These concepts are so related so that there's no reason to have them separated. Not to restart

Re: [Trac] The 'severity' field is not present out-of-the-box

Matthew Good wrote: Well, that's why there are custom fields. Different people have different needs for the ticket fields they need to track. For a lot of projects having type/priority/severity is redundant and confusing, so I don't think it's a good default field. If you need additional

Re: [Trac] difference between milestone and version

Giorgio Incantalupo wrote: Hi, does anybody know which is the difference between milestones and versions? Initially I thought a milestone was composed by many versions...it is not very clear. Is there anybody who can help me? A milestone is normally in the future, a version is in the past.

[Trac] Turn off italicizing of recently changed tickets in reports?

be nice if there were maybe a button to do it directly or something. -- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gary Oberbrunner[EMAIL PROTECTED] GenArts, Inc. Tel: 617-492-2888 955 Mass. Ave Fax: 617-492-2852 Cambridge, MA 02139 USA

Re: [Trac] Turn off italicizing of recently changed tickets in reports?

Chris Ryland wrote: I know you can go to some other report and then back and that cleans it up,... Doing a simple Update button press isn't easy enough? Ahem. Sorry, didn't realize that would do it. Thanks! -- Gary ___ Trac mailing list

Re: [Trac] Trac Multiple Project Support Proposal

Martin Tomes wrote: Andy Zimmerman wrote: On 1/24/06, *Martin Tomes* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are there issues with having one Trac and multiple separate repos? I cannot see the point in that, if you have multiple repos it implies independent projects. I know

Re: [Trac] Trac internal error file not found in bogus rev, related to svn copy

Gary Oberbrunner wrote: Hi, folks. I've been running a Trac svn version from about Dec. 2nd and all has been well until Friday, when I got this error when trying to use the timeline or browse source pages: Trac detected an internal error: (File not found: revision 10667, path '/trunk

Re: [Trac] Re: GraphvizMacro v0.3

Quick question: to get antialiased pngs, do I need anything except librsvg? (I'm using linux, fc3, which comes with librsvg2-2.8.1). Like do I need this cocoa backend, or can librsvg do the antialiasing itself? thanks, -- Gary ___ Trac mailing list