David Miller wrote:
DaveH wrote:
The soul is created at birth, when
the spirit joins a physical/mortal body.
This is interesting. Does this mean that Mormons do not believe that
abortion is murder?
Can you tell us the official Mormon position on
abortion and
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Vincent Fulton
wrote:Scripture is part of God's word (the only partto which we have
access) ...
dm: No offense, but this statement indicates Bibliolatry to me. It
meansthat the Bible has replaced the person of Jesus Christ.
jt: Arn't you one of those
The answer to this is to realize that nobody is saved by philosophy
ortheology. Your understanding has nothing directly to do with
salvation, jt: I don't know where the above
originated but it is only partially true.
Philosophy and theology are distractions but
understanding is everything.
From: "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy Taylor asks -Could it be an idol? I
understand why DaveH, Blaine, Lance, Bill and John may not agree with me and
that's OK;my understanding is that this is a forum where we
exchangeideas and discussTruth.
It's decent company,don't get
me wrong. But
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Perry
wrote: ... I have always questioned how FAR one can be from the
absolute truth, and still be "in the fold". For example, I consider the
LDS to not be "in the fold" because their doctrine is so far off from
that which is in the Bible. Now, the
Once youcommence speaking (typing) whether
quoting scripture or commenting on the scripture you quote Judy you've become
one of those you're criticizing. I'm not being caustic here but, you do see that
don't you? Sorry Judy but you're one of us even through your very denunciation.
Lance
He's sitting just over my right shoulder, he's in
my walkman, my MP3 player and, he talkin' a blue streak. Lance
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 16, 2004 20:17
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Nothing
"obtuse here" Amen
From: "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beep, beep, coming through,
What would you guys say tothe fool (gently
now, I'm talking about myself)
who says that it is not our theology (our
biblical,doctrinal,and systematic beliefs)
which save us;
jt: I'd agree with the above
statement. However,
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once youcommence speaking (typing) whether
quoting scripture or
commenting on the scripture you quote Judy you've
become one of those
you're criticizing. I'm not being caustic here but,
you do see that don't you?
Sorry Judy but you're one of us even
Throughout your correspondence at least that to
which I've been privy you scandalize such as The Church Fathers, Theology
Philosophy. Yet, while doing so you speak as a modern Church "Mother" and employ
both of the latter disciplines without seeming to understand what they are. Take
a
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Throughout your correspondence at least that to
which I've been privy
you scandalize such as The Church Fathers, Theology
Philosophy.
jt:Calling something irrelevant
so far as a walk with God is concerned
is the same as National Enquirer type
In a message dated 3/17/2004 1:07:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin Deegan wrote:
DAVEH: I don't think you've got that exactly right, but you are close
enough that it works for the purpose of this discussion. From my
perspective, the Lord reveals his will to his
Dave wrote:
Kevin Deegan wrote:
New Age christianity says we must all be a bunch of sweet buttercups.
Nobody should say anything negative! Don't be judgemental, DON'T you
CORRECT me! That strikes me as ridiculous. I can just see Moses
drawing the LINE in the sand and like the heretic in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/17/2004
1:07:46 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin Deegan wrote:
DAVEH: I don't think you've got that exactly
right, but you are close
enough that it works for the purpose of this discussion.
Judy wrote You, Lance, and John appear to be
immersed ina mixture of philosophy and theology with some scripture and
this combination seems to drawDavidM but is not what I am about.
You make a lot of assumptions here. One might think we
(the-three-of-us-and-David-sometimes) were joinedat
AMEN BILL! At the time of this mailing I haven't
read Judy's response but, why do I think that I and, perhaps others can
anticipate both the content and tone forthcoming? PS-Judy: Bill's really offered
you an Olive Branch in his communication so, why not accept it with thanks?
Lance.From:
Good point, Jim. I, too, have trouble following changing threads, especially
when they split into two or more different topics, all with the same
original Subject:!
To expand on what Jim is saying, as a general rule it is a good idea to pay
attention to the Subject: and, when the topic in a
In a message dated 3/17/2004 9:23:45 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Re:William takes Judy to the "woodshed"
Date:3/17/2004 9:23:45 AM Eastern Standard Time
From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent from the Internet
AMEN BILL! At the
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
From: Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Last Days
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 22:32:37 -0800
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
The RCC needed
These are those days past, present and future since
the Son ascended to the right hand of the Father. Attempts to make connections
between verses (any) and events (any)illustrate why "we" are so many in
number (26,000 counting). Lance
- Original Message -
From:
Dave
To:
From: "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Judy wrote You, Lance, and John appear to be
immersed ina mixture of philosophy and theology with some scripture and
this combination seems to drawDavidM but is not what I am about.
You make a lot of assumptions here. One might think we
Thanks, Lance
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 17, 2004 10:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:William takes
Judy to the "woodshed"--NEW HEADER POLICY
In a message dated
3/17/2004 9:23:45 AM Eastern Standard Time,
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AMEN BILL! At the time of this mailing I haven't
read Judy's response but,
why do I think that I and, perhaps others can
anticipate both the content
and tone forthcoming?
jt: Probably because you're so smart
Lance...
PS-Judy: Bill's really offered
- Original Message -
From: servant
of YHVH
Sent: 03/17/2004 10:57 AM
Subject: Patrick's "DAY"
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of YahShua [that's the name Jesus
was called by His mom, dad, brothers, sisters, disciples and others
who loved Him] :) !!
I
Great Meal, Chris. Thanks, Lance
- Original Message -
From:
Chris Barr
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 17, 2004 12:02
Subject: [TruthTalk] Patrick's
"DAY"
- Original Message -
From: servant of YHVH
Sent: 03/17/2004 10:57 AM
Subject:
Oscar nominated BdToro appears to be a silent
watcher of this site. Lighten up, Judy! Blessings, Lance
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 17, 2004 11:24
Subject: [TruthTalk] Lance reinforces
William taking Judy to the
How many other oneness people do we have out there?
How many others do not believe in the trinity?
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great Meal, Chris. Thanks, Lance
- Original Message -
From: Chris Barr
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 17, 2004 12:02
Subject: [TruthTalk]
Ya think? Oh and his TRINITARIAN views.
Lance
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: March 17, 2004 14:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Patrick's
"DAY"
CB says Oh, and back to the shamrock and trinity thing ...
Patrick was
Michael the archangel? The Spirit brother of
Lucifer? A different manifestation of the One God? These and other
"understandings" are proferred by groups on the periphory of Orthodox
Christianity. While wanting to stop short of hyperbole, I'd suggest that
nothing and no oneis more worthy of
We talked a while ago about RM's (Returned Missionaries)being failures.
I was wondering how many LDS missionaries do their 2 year stintin Muslim countries like Iraq?
4 Dead 1 in critical condition.
Notice that they were not on a 2 year "mission" they were real missionaries.
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of YahShua [that's the name Jesus
was called by His mom, dad, brothers, sisters, disciples and others
who loved Him] :) !!
A biography FROM THE LATIN?!?!?!?
The RCC couldn't make ANY inroads in Ireland for centuries. The
clean-food
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of YahShua [that's the name Jesus
was called by His mom, dad, brothers, sisters, disciples and others
who loved Him] :) !!
WWJD? Well, for starters, he would use His own Name:
YahShuaas inYahthe
Everlasting Father (Isaiah 9:6, John
The truth of the Trinitarian nature of God does not
stand or fall with PAT. However, one doesn't have to read his own position on
this in Latin. See "The Confession of Saint Patrick" Vintage 1998 Translated by
John Skinner You should only read this Chris, if you want toknow the
"real deal".
---BeginMessage---
SAINT PATRICK'S DAY
Patrick the sinner, an unlearned man to be sure. None should ever say that
it was my ignorance that accomplished any small thing, it was the gift of
God. --Patrick, Bishop of Armagh,
Missionary, Patron of Ireland, c.460. Prior to his death, Saint
Just out in today's paper ...
NATURALLY Speaking
By Christopher C. Barr
Public interest or private interest?
The FDA is all over the news with its idea to fight against obesity by asking
manufacturers to change their labels.
"Oh, please Mr. Food Processor, would you change your labels?
\o/ !HALALU Yah!
\o/
Greetings in the Matchless Name of YahShua [that's the name Jesus
was called by His mom, dad, brothers, sisters, disciples and others
who loved Him] :) !!
A biography FROM ENGLISH NOW?!?!?!? You sound like one of those "If
the KJV was good enough for Paul and
Blaine: Good point, Judy.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:37
PM
Subject: [TruthTalk]
Re:Language-Including "The Bible"
From: "Wm. Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jt wrote If they were kept in
Blaine: Ye!! Veeery
interesting! Let me know if you remember where to see more info.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 4:13
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Pearls before
swine?
In a
JS = Joseph Smith??
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 2:53
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Last
Days
In a
message dated 3/10/2004 12:01:14 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 5:31
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Old hebrew Coins
found in Kentucky?
In a
message dated 3/10/2004 4:23:12 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perry wrote:DavidM, would you go to the BoM to learn about Jesus? No,
you would go there to learn about the heresies of the
Mormons.
Blaine: Care to discuss some
specific heresies from the BoM Perry?
Are you confusing Oliver Cowdery with Sidney
Rigdon? Oliver was a school teacher first, later an attorney.
Sidney was , as indicated, a minister.
Blaine
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 7:28
PM
Blaine: I am not much of a scholar, Kevin old
buddy, but you seem to have a limited understandingof
verymuchbeyondyour favorite verses. You seem to speak
most often from the Traditional Christian point of view rather than from actual
scripture.
From: Kevin Deegan
To: [EMAIL
Blaine: Not so fast, Kevin, I was not
necessarily making that argument. And your comparison with Muslims is off,
too. Mormons are Christians, so the only fair comparison is with other
Christians.
But my question, is, Why are you so
defensive/offensive about this religion? You really get
44 matches
Mail list logo
