slade
in yaroq
I understood Slade's thoughtful
repose to be the result of nothing more than one who is thinking out
loud. In the end of this episode, Slade concludes his presentation
by admitting that " Since these questions both have two answers depending
upon the working mindset, they
Speaking as an 'interloper', I'd suggest that
all (I do mean ALL) are included in the 'second adam', ' the obedient
Israelite', the 'Incarnate Lord". THAT then is the sense in which I'd agree with
the 'child of God' reference including Hitler.(qualifier: 'as I see
it')
- Original
Lance, as usual, I have NO IDEA what you
are talking about. And I assume that, as
usual, you will refuse to explain it to me.. Izzy
Speaking as an 'interloper', I'd suggest that all (I do mean ALL) are included in the 'second
adam', ' the obedient Israelite', the 'Incarnate
\o/ !HALALU YAH! \o/Greetingsin the Matchless Name of YahShua!
Hitler was a puppet and pawn.
There would have been no "Hitler's Germany" if not for multinational
pharmaceutical/industrialist cartels.
From the lead U.S. prosecutor at the
Nuremberg War Crimes Trials:"... these IG Farben
There
would be no Hitler's Germany had it not been for Martin Luther. Hitler's early
plan for the Jewish people mirrored the "punishment" suggested by Luther in
The Jews and Their Lies.
There
is far more to the historicity of Hitler's Germany than IG Farben who (among
hundreds of other
In a message dated 7/5/2004 10:57:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Subj: RE: [TruthTalk] Divine Nature
Date: 7/5/2004 10:57:06 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent from the Internet
slade in yaroq
Thanks for the post, John. I
wont respond, as all my posts/questions lately are ignored anyway. Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 7:09
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Divine
Nature
Was just sitting here minding my own business, and a question popped
into my head. There is probably a simple answer, but I cannot think of
it, so any help will be appreciated.
The question is: Why was Jesus baptized? Certainly not to be saved, and
not for the remission of sins, so why?
In a message dated 7/5/2004 9:16:45 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The
question is: Why was Jesus baptized? Certainly not to be saved, and
not for the remission of sins, so
why?Terry
I always figured it was to set an example for believers. Probably too
simple!
In a message dated 7/5/2004 7:15:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks for the post, John. I wont respond, as all my posts/questions lately are ignored anyway. Izzy
izzy, I am working on a response to your post as we speak.
John
In a message dated 7/4/2004 8:42:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Izzys comments in red:
When was the last time you all read a lengthy and involved email from me? So give me some slack and allow this exception. You all are great. I have included the thread remarks of
DAVEH: Perhaps Jesus felt a need to keep the commandments, which (as
Laura said) should be an example to all.
Terry Clifton wrote:
Was just sitting here minding my own business, and a question popped
into my head. There is probably a simple answer, but I cannot think
of it, so any help will
12 matches
Mail list logo
