Could it be that such are the 'silly women' spoken
of in 2 Timothy 3? Let us hope not brethren and 'sistren'. There's never a
Debbie, Caroline, Lise, Tanya, Marina, Barb, Lydia etc. around when you need
one!
One would not have thought you so easily impressed,
Judy. Ya wants footnotes? May I suggest Karl Barth? I've met the 'Huntmeister'
and, we spoke. He's big into this 'end times' drivel. .
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 02, 2005 22:41
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Assuming 500 more years..
Lance,
Tell us, then, what you believe relative to Christ's promised return, and
his 1000
There are many ways to go with this.Your mission,
should you accept it
1. J. N. Darby and the end of the
world.
2. William Miller and the end of the world and, by
extension, Ellen G. White.
3. Hal Lindsay and the end of the
world.
4. Grant Jeffrey and the end of the
world.
5.
A Iz, how simple such distinctions are for
some. I see your political beliefs,as I have heard you express them, to
bebordering on the cultic BUT, I see you as one of the more sincere 'doers
of the Word' on TT.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To:
Footnotes?? Only if the original thought makes
any sense. Barf definitely would not qualify.
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 06:06:20 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One would not have thought you so easily
impressed, Judy. Ya wants footnotes? May I suggest Karl Barth? I've met the
This man served our Lord faithfully throughout his
life as did John Calvin. To take note of these truly shallow, petulant, and
uniformed caricatures is reprehensible. What 'spirit' inhabits such an one as
this? Take care Judy"
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To:
I am not in any position to judge Barf's personal life
and neither are you Lance. Calvins' was a bit more public.
And didn't you write the following "I've met the 'Huntmeister' and, we spoke. He's big into this 'end times'
drivel. . "
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, isn't the
Oh Lance, I forgot to mention that I can not take
credit for your descriptive subject line
It is an original Kevinism (if I remember correctly)
but after perusing some of the subject's
theological ideas I found it
appropriate.
Remember ad hom is against the person. I don't
know the man; my
I'm quite prepared to speak ill of him. Mind now,
I've often criticized Lance for doing the same thing. You see, I'm the exception
that proves the rule.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
I'll engage you on Dave Hunt, utilizing my
conversations with and those works of his that I've read. You engage me on Karl
Barth based upon those works of his that you've actually read. How's that for
fair? Thereafter we'll see whether either assessment stands.
- Original Message
Hi kids! Today's word is 'recuse'. Do any of you
know what it means? Does anyone know to whom it most applies? (Hint: he utilizes
three names)
Just because I have used a few of Hunt's footnoted
quotes in an online thread re John Calvin Geneva does
not mean that I am a follower of Dave Hunt or that I
interpret scripture according to his writings... so that won't fly.
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 08:10:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If this is what you read from me Lance, then it is no
wonder to me that we exchange words that are
void of any kind of communication. Kind of like
the one memorable post BillT sent that was a page filled
with words words words
words. I'd like to know how he didthat ...
Sat, 3 Dec 2005
And, speaking of what won't 'fly'; just what of
Karl Barth's own writings have you read? (primary source material)
footnote:Same question of John Calvin
footnote:Does it matter?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc:
Kindly clarify for me what it is that you think of:
John Calvin, Karl Barth, Michael Polanyi, Thomas F. Torrance, Dave Hunt, C. I.
Scofield, J. F. Dake? Which of the foregoing have you actually read? (I
mean a book of their's in your actual hands). For that matter, what primary
source
Why would I waste God's time reading some theologian
who with all his great learningdid not believe the scriptures to
be
inerrant? Obviously he was not led by the Spirit
of God. I understand why you like him though as TFT is one of his fans
and
they study him at Princeton - so his must be
She can speak ill of the saints of God without
having read a word of primary source material yet, our beloved MODERATOR gives
her a total 'pass'. Happily, David Miller did not. Kudos to you,
David.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Lance, although there is no reply in your response, I will assume (let me
know if I do so in error) that your subsequent post on the SDA indicates
thatyou are a SDA?
A few things in that description of SDAs struck me as interesting, not the
least of which is the statement ... Roman
Garden variety Christian am I. (How
yoda-like).
Okay, then the question remains why you posted the SDA stuff, and my
questions to you remain unanswered.
Perry
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: [TruthTalk] NO! Lance (doncha just love it when people speak of
Title: SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
I haven't a clue why Lance sent this, I asked him about
it myself.
Don't know what Dave Hunt is, if anything but I do know
he is NOT SDA and I don't believe Lance is either.
He couldn't be universalist if he were. I have a
friend who began attending a SDA
Yoda - you mean that little wizened up devil in the
Star Wars movies
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:39:10 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Garden variety Christian am I. (How
yoda-like).
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
The same that David Christine went to see in
SWIII. Ya him!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 09:47
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] NO! Lance
(doncha just love it when
I get the impression Perry that Lance thinks himself as
way above us on an intellectual
level and that most of the time he just plays with us
here on TT. jt
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 06:44:52 -0800 "Charles Perry Locke" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, then the question remains why you posted
Title: SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
Two words in one day, kids! Can we all say EVASIVE?
Keep this up Judy and you're going to change my mind concerning you and
'intentionality'. No, I don't think you'd care but, it'd say something quite
important about the 'reading' of you by John, Bill and
Like I said to you the other day Perry, ya gots ta learn to read for
meaning. It IS all in my post. Sadly, the word 'drivel' is the sum of it.
- Original Message -
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 09:44
Subject: RE:
Do you know why they went? Were they going for
sheer entertainment or to keep up with what is
important and relevant to the worldlings at the
University they are involved with. Either way it is
their business. Why do you bring it up? As
an accusation?
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:52:50 -0500
Didja ever see Tom Jerry?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 09:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] NO! Lance
(doncha just love it when people speak of themselves i
cd: I have come to realize my passion are to much for extended stay on TT. To my family on this site-you have a place in my heart.Bill Thank you for being a brother. Judy and Izzy you are the reason(s) I have been here as I wanted to help. David I want to be brothers with you and if we continue
Title: SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH
Lance why do you always have to bring others into what
you write; what do John, Bill, and Debbie have to do
with what goes on between you and I on this list.
If they want to be part of the conversation they are free to
interject on their own behalf. I am
Most assuredly NOT! I've also seen it and, didn't
much care for it. Didja ever think that you so readily assume the 'accusatory'
'cause that's what y'all do?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Vacuity thy name is
JUDY!
see ya .-Original Message-From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:03:01 -0500Subject: [TruthTalk] Thank You TT
cd: I have come to realize my passion are to much for extended stay on TT. To my family on this site-you have a place in my
Amen to this !!! -Original Message-From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:13:50 -0500Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:Judy asks 'DID YOU BRING IT UP AS AN ACCUSATION?"
Most assuredly NOT! I've also seen it and, didn't much care for it. Didja
Did you think this a nonad hominem Lance or don't
you really care??
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:16:44 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vacuity thy name is JUDY!
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His
Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
I asked you a question Lance, not having assumed
anything so you are working with a
false premise to begin with - which JD has very quickly
endorsed. Oh well!! It figures.
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:13:50 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Most assuredly NOT! I've also seen it and,
It would seem that way.
From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
CC: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] NO! Lance (doncha just love it when people speak
of themselves i
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:50:28 -0500
I
Oh Dean,
Tell me it isn't so I for one will really
miss you here and hope you will be back ASAP
judyt
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:03:01 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
cd:
I have come to realize my passion are to much for extended stay on TT. To my
family on this
Geez, Lance, all these different retorts to Judy via subject lines makes me wonder if the discussion is more about Judy than any theological issue. Or has Judy become the issue for you?::yawn::Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: She can speak ill of the saints of God without
It was wonderful to "meet" you, cd. I thoroughly enjoyed your stay on TT. Lord bless you! Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:cd: I have come to realize my passion are to much for extended stay on TT. To my family on this site-you have a place in my heart.Bill Thank you for being a
Your use of "Barf" is both a contradiction to your shallow claim thatyou do not judge Barth and a clear statement to the fact that you know nothing of what this man believes and the concerns he dealt with in his battle against liberal theologies (among otherconsiderations.) -Original
Christine:
Is there a great gap between what you say and who
you are? Seriously!
- Original Message -
From:
Christine
Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 10:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy WON'T
answer because SHE CANNOT WITHOUT
I know he would not pledge allegiance to Hitler which
is noteworthy but the very fact thatHitler and his occult socialist system
gainedthat much control in his country somewhat proves the impotency of
his message. He did teach at a University there - right? So he influenced
others with his
Total chunky style barnyard.By the same logic, I can call you Jezebel Taylor and Kevin "Dunce Deegan" and and so on.And "ad hom" has no such limitations except here on TT. Ad hom is an attack on the person or words of an individual "rather than an appeal to pure reason" (Webster's Encyclopedic
Lance,
You may think that your responses are deep and meaningful, but they are
too elusive for me to spend time on. I ask for your position on a few simple
issues from the Revelation, and you post a 2000 word treatise on SDA that
you copied from some web site without any explanation. Was I
Take note:
This is an excellent lesson in the art of "evasion" of
which Lance is the undisputed King
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:10:10 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Christine:
Is there a great gap between what you say and who
you are? Seriously!
From: Christine Miller
I think there is only one quality worse than hardness of heart, and that is
softness of head. -Theodore Roosevelt, 26th US President (1858-1919)
--
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain
My first post on this said it all, did it not? Why not go back and read it?
I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE SCRIPTURES PROVIDE US WITH ANY KIND OF AN END
TIMES PANORAMA OF EVENTS THAT LIE IN THE FUTURE. If you do then, bless you.
iS THIS SUFFICIENTLY UNCRYPTIC FOR YA?
FYI, I named William Miller
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 11:15
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy WON'T
answer because SHE CANNOT WITHOUT FALSIFICATION OR EMBARRASSMENT
Take note:
WHO? Judy, Linda, Christine, David, Dave, Lance,
John, Bill, Kevin, Dean (whoops! not any more), Dave..
WHAT? The matter under discussion.
Frankly, the most ridiculous criticism of Barth I have ever seen.
An absolutely laughable commentary.
Barth's regard for the scripture's far exceeds anything I have read in your post. He appeals to no other source of information. You criticize him for denying the infallibility of scripture
JD writes: By the same logic, I can call you Jezebel Taylor and Kevin "Dunce Deegan" and and so on.And "ad
hom" has no such limitations except here on
TT. Ad hom is an attack on the person or words
of an individual "rather than an appeal to pure reason" (Webster's
Encyclopedic
Dictionary.)
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:35:48 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frankly, the most ridiculous criticism of Barth I have ever
seen.
An absolutely laughable commentary.
It's a short note and hardly a commentary but have a
good laugh on me ...
Barth's regard for the
are you calling Webster "carnal?" Incredible. And what carnal quotation is yours?? I don't need to readyour submittal. Mine is quite adequate. This is what Webster's says and thatsettles it. The only reason why - the ONLY reason why you continue to debate this, why you want to elevate
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:45:39 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:35:48 -0500
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:18:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
She [maligns, maliciously--g] the saints of
God without having read a word of primary source material yet, our beloved
MODERATOR gives her a total 'pass'. Happily, David Miller did not. Kudos to
you, David.
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 12:40:34 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JD writes: Stop with the lie, Judy.
You have nothing to back up your claim but when has that slowed you down in
the past. You want Barth to be a threat THEREFORE
he is. He spent
his lifetime presenting the
The inerrancy debate and the search for Emus are on
a par with one another.(Extinction is the word)
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 12:54
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Oophs!! I forgot about you Gary but I can in good
conscience add you to the list of infected ones
since your affiliation sticks out like a sore thumb in
everything you write... and you defend both
Calvin and Barth .. even to the point of calling them
'saints'
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:39:37
Not hardly Lance;
Where did you get the idea that emus are in danger of
extinction? There are emu farms here in the US.
We visited one in Mississippi. So this is about
as factual as your views on scriptural "inerrancy" Oh well!
It's not as though we haven't beenwarned.
"He that is unjust,
John, there are many dimensions to the ad-hominem argument on which
Webster's does not elaborate. In fact, the way the ad hominem attack is most
often used on TT is to demean the opponent for 1) hoping to discredit them
to the point that their arguments seem untrustworthy, 2) to throw a red
Thanks, Lance. We're getting there! Now, I understand your position that you
DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THE SCRIPTURES PROVIDE US WITH ANY KIND OF AN END TIMES
PANORAMA OF EVENTS THAT LIE IN THE FUTURE. Since that is so, you must have
a different view of all those scriptures that OTHERS think refer
I would mind. It's a go nowhere conversation,
IMO.
How much have I made off LB series? A most
miniscule amount as I don't promote them.
L
Lance Muir wrote:
WHO? Judy, Linda, Christine, David,
Dave, Lance, John, Bill, Kevin, Dean (whoops! not any more),
Dave..
WHAT? The matter under discussion.
Tell us more about the bridge. Modern or covered? Free or toll? Is
it as blue as your car, or one of
Sorry about the bird (I meant to name the Dodo).
When one is untentionally funny Judy, people smileA
LOT!!
It is camouflage in color(s). Gun racks abound.
Price is totally negotiable. One wouldn't attempt to con an
ex-guard.
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 14:01
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] WHO is the
Lance,
I do not consider learning about you and your views as a go nowhere
conversation. Other than quoting the opinions of others you, for the most
part, seem to be very private with your personal views. Would you consider
answering them for me privately?
I do not promote LB either.
Perry
Perry,
The word itself , END, apparently has meaning. You and I will both arrive,
finally, at some sort of ..well...END (it is the death thingy)
Seriously Perry, ESCHATOLOGY as a subject for discussion, IMO. is a waste of
time. I've held a variety of eschatological positions over the
Filthiness is only a joke to those who lack
understanding Lance.
You and others plagued by what is known as the
"liberal" taint have been robbed blind by your mentors.
Jesus told His disciples that they were clean through
the Words he had spoken (they received them as is)
Paul also uses this
I'll take any day over the Judy(ian) brand of
s-called interpretation!!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 14:33
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Unjust?...Filthy?
Comments concerning Webster are correct, I am sure. But I included the only definitionWebster entertains in the referenced work. One simply cannot say that the writing "is just plain stupid" without casting doubt on the intellectual abilities of the author. "Barf" is not the man's name and Judy
I don't have an "interpretation" Lance so you are in no
danger there ... Why not allow God the Holy
Spirit to be your
interpreter?
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:48:54 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll take any day over the Judy(ian) brand of
s-called interpretation!!
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:54:27 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Comments concerning Webster are correct, I am
sure. But I included the only definitionWebster entertains
in the referenced work. One simply cannot say that the
writing "is just plain stupid" without casting doubt on
The ICBI is defunct, as far as I know. Your network copy skills have manifested themselves with abundance in the following. Hats off to Judy and the party line !
The fact of the matter is that no one offers any real evidence . You knownothing of Barth's personal battle against some
GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT IS CERTAINLY NOT YOUR
INTERPRETER Judy! The 'book' comes with no such guarantee.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 14:57
Subject: Re:
Lance wrote:
GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT IS CERTAINLY
NOT YOUR INTERPRETER Judy! The 'book'
comes with no such guarantee.
Please stop the blasphemy. Do you really think that your words carry more
authority than Jesus Christ or the apostle John?
John 16:13
(13) Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth,
ICBI-I read all of the collected/bound papers. I
still have all of the lectures on cassette delivered over the years. Seriously
Judy, your knowledge concerning so much is so remarkably uninformed and
hollow.
I'm prepared to recant should you be able to do
something beyond misquote
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:10:19 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The ICBI is defunct, as far as I
know.
The ppl involved have reorganized and I am not a part
ofthis; I used the fact that they organized to fight
this neo-orthodoxy in making a point tocounter
your constant
see my comments below. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 15:06:27 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005
Lance Muir wrote:
Sorry about the bird (I meant to
name the Dodo). When one is untentionally funny Judy, people smileA
LOT!!
We have a dodo farm near us.
If I'm correct then 1. You don't know how to interpret these Scriptures 2.
You are then, accusing a brother of blasphemy FALSELY!!
Please tell me David, is the truth Jesus or, your interpretation of the
words of Scripture? Are you, David, an inerrantist? Have you/do you EVER
Rikk Watts, NT professor at Regent College,
concluded his course on Biblical Exegesis by asking 'Why doesn't God make it
easier for us to understand Scripture?' Said he, 'I simply don't
know."
You've cited blasphemy on more than one occasion,
David. I believe you'd best reign yourself in!
Funny, I often get the imprression that he is.
jd-Original Message-From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 07:55:25 -0800Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] NO! Lance (doncha just love it when people speak of themselves i
It would seem
1 Tim 4 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; ... Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meatshttp://www.sdanet.org/atissue/books/qod/q18.htmSDA say Sunday
Your heretical ignorance of thefacts of scripturecoupled with your refusal to deal with the issues presented in past postings. The myth that you function off the Holy Spirit in the interpretation of scriptureis herein debunked. Adoptionism is not a bibllical doctrine when applied to Christ.
So
Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vacuity thy name is JUDY!From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:13:50 -0500Subject: [TruthTalk] Re:Judy asks 'DID YOU BRING IT UP AS AN ACCUSATION?"Most assuredly NOT! I've also seen it and,
Your "impressions" are not known to be very stable JD;
and neither are those you are
impressed by.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:30:17 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny, I often get the imprression that he is.
jd
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would seem
Adoptionism is a figment of your own extremely fertile
imagination JD
I have no part in any of it .. and no problems
here. jt
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:35:34 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your heretical ignorance of thefacts of scripturecoupled with
your refusal to deal with the
Hero of the FAITHless? "The Bible is God's Word so far as God lets it be his Word" (Barth, Church Dogmatics, I / 2, 123)"THE WORD WHICH ENTERS HUMAN EARS AND IS UTTERED BY HUMAN LIPS, IS THE WORD OF GOD--ONLY WHEN THE MIRACLE TAKES PLACE. OTHERWISE, IT IS JUST A HUMAN WORD LIKE ANY OTHER. ...
Thanks Kevin;
The Barthians have been at it all day today, so glad to
see you are still about... What an unbelieving mess
this is. I can not imagine anyone allowing this
man to mediate between himself and God. Can you??
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:49:36 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.christianitytoday.com/history/special/131christians/barth.html American evangelicals have been skeptical of Barth because he refused to consider the written Word "infallible" (he believed only Jesus was). Others gave up on Barth's theology because it overemphasized God's transcendance
Once sufficient doubt is cast upon the Bible as a body of
objective truth, it will cease to be either an instrument of faith or a standard
of practice. It can be cherished as literature, adorning our tables and filling
our libraries; yet it will be no more authoritative
than Aesop's
Does this make Barfh qualify as a Monstrous Miscreant?CD = Church DogmaticsLike all ancient literature the Old and New Testaments know nothing of the distinction of fact and value between history on the one hand and saga and legend on the other (CD I, 2, 509). In common with the
I am speaking as a pastor. I do agree that such conduct isharmful and wrong spirited. Ido notbelieve that Jezebel isa word that should be used with you in mind, for any reason. Now, withthat statement of fact in mind -- go back and see if youcan figure outwhat I am trying to accomplish in the
By the way has anyone out there accepted this "GIFT", the saturday sabbath? Or was it a different gift?Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1 Tim 4 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of
To the FAITHless it would seem of no big import to consider parts of the Bible as just "Legend".They are part of the many thatconsider the Bible as Saga Legend,whats the big deal?Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Kevin; The Barthians have been at it all day today, so glad to see
What do I think? Well, I still think both the barf reference and the
Jezebel reference are ad hominem references.
One aspect of the meaning on jezebel may include a characteristic that you
feel applies to Judy, but since there are many dimensions to the word, other
uses of the word will
Maybe you can trade that to Lance for his bridge.
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have a dodo farm near us.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you
John, can you explain heretical ignorance to me? I always thought heretics
claimed to more than others...not less! :-)
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Eternal Sonship and the Adoption heresey
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
