Excuse me Gary... It is in the NT. In fact Jesus
Himself said that unless one is born again they can not even see
the KOG much less be part of it... or haven't you read
this part of the Bible yet?
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:46:14 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (this ain't
in the NT;
e-From: Kevin Deegan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:44:20 -0800
(PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad
hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
I am speaking as a
pastor
and its oneobviousreaosn why there's an ACLU LOL Now that is funny! To SAVE US from the New Birth![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: myth (this ain't in the NT; its the fount ofAm Fundamentalist culticlegalism--its how legalism works to maintain partic racist exclusivity..its why evangelism in
please. jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor <
SPAN class=correction id="">jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 04:09:26 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
From: Judy Taylor
SPAN class=correction id=""jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005
04:09:26 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the
ad hom
(Barf
for Karl Barth)
Wha
again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
myth (this
ain't in the NT; its the fount ofAm Fundamentalist
culticlegalism--its how legalism works to maintain partic racist exclusivity..its
why evangelism in Fundamentalism equates to church s/hopping..and its
oneobviousreaosn why there's
conservative
constraint constrains comprehension, callit
constriction
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 04:07:46 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
unless one is born again they can not even see the KOG
--new birth of the Spirit..[is]
required..[to] have fellowship with others in the body
..like a bull snake
on a fat cat, ablack belt on th' butter
ball'sbaloney
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:23:01 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
conservative
constraint constrains comprehension, callit
constriction
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 04:07:46 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
..just thinkin'
howJCs word of Wisdom nourishes the soul (even of the
strangled and stranded:)
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:37:31 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..like a bull
snake on a fat cat, ablack belt on th' butter
ball'sbaloney
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:23:01 -0700 [EMAIL
:-)-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:23:01 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
conservative constraint constrains comprehension, callit constriction
On Sun, 4 Dec
This man served our Lord faithfully throughout his
life as did John Calvin. To take note of these truly shallow, petulant, and
uniformed caricatures is reprehensible. What 'spirit' inhabits such an one as
this? Take care Judy"
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To:
I am not in any position to judge Barf's personal life
and neither are you Lance. Calvins' was a bit more public.
And didn't you write the following "I've met the 'Huntmeister' and, we spoke. He's big into this 'end times'
drivel. . "
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, isn't the
Oh Lance, I forgot to mention that I can not take
credit for your descriptive subject line
It is an original Kevinism (if I remember correctly)
but after perusing some of the subject's
theological ideas I found it
appropriate.
Remember ad hom is against the person. I don't
know the man; my
al Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:46:22 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
I am not in any position to judge Barf's per
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:46:22
-0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf
for Karl Barth)
I am not in any position to judge Barf's personal life and neither are you
Lance. Calvins' was a bit more
public.
And
" (Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary.) -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:53:12 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
1@juno.com To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:10:40 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
I know he would not pledge allegiance to Hitler which is noteworthy but the very fact thatHitler and
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:35:48 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frankly, the most ridiculous criticism of Barth I have ever
seen.
An absolutely laughable commentary.
It's a short note and hardly a commentary but have a
good laugh on me ...
Barth's regard for the
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:45:39 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:35:48 -0500
@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf
for Karl Barth)
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:12:22 -0500
Total chunky style barnyard. By the same logic, I can call you Jezebel
Taylor and Kevin Dunce Deegan and and so on. And ad hom has
e.PerryFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:12:22
-0500Total chunky style barnyard. By the same logic, I can call you Jezebel Taylor and Kevi
reference I was surprised to find that it is, in some types of arguments,
regarded as an effective argument...and that was exclusively in political
debate.PerryFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject:
Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once
see my comments below. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 15:06:27 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14
and the concerns he dealt with in his battle against liberal theologies (among otherconsiderations.) -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:46:22 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy
rns he dealt with in his battle
against liberal theologies (among otherconsiderations.)
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:46:22
-0500Subject: Re: [
ripture and places his opinion above holy writ. -Original Message- From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.com To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:10:40 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl
d written word (CD I, 2, 528-529).[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:45:39 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf
ee my comments below. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 15:06:27 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 1
beral theologies (among otherconsiderations.) -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:46:22 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf
for Karl Barth)
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:54:27 -0500
Comments concerning Webster are correct, I am sure. But I included the
only definition Webster entertains in the referenced
Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:36:14 -0800Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)John, there are many dimensions to the
ad-hominem argument on which Webster's does not elaborate. In fact
BARTH.
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:44:20 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
I am speaking as a pastor. I do agree that such conduct
both a contradiction to your shallow claim thatyou do not judge Barth and a clear statement to the fact that you know nothing of what this man believes and the concerns he dealt with in his battle against liberal theologies (among otherconsiderations.) -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@
purpose? TO WIN AN ARGUMENT ABOUT BARTH.-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 14:44:20 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth) I am speaking as a pastor
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:54:27 -0500Comments concerning Webster are correct, I am sure. But I included the only definition Webster enter
(PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
I just posted your words.
It is then 'your' assessment that your words "besmurch" your "efforts"
Do you have a Ministry to "Judaizing punks"?
There is nothing in the
e of "Barf" is both a contradiction to your shallow claim thatyou do not judge Barth and a clear statement to the fact that you know nothing of what this man believes and the concerns he dealt with in his battle against liberal theologies (among otherconsiderations.)
-Original Message---
Deegan openairmission@yahoo.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:39:51 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)I just posted your words. It is then 'your' assessment that your words "besmurch" you
except here on
TT. Ad hom is an attack on the person
or words of an individual "rather than an appeal to pure reason"
(Webster's Encyclopedic
Dictionary.)-Original
Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
your house, no doubt, folding underwear. We are done.-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan openairmission@yahoo.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 16:39:51 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)I j
uot; has no such limitations except here on TT. Ad hom is an attack on the person or words of an individual "rather than an appeal to
pure reason" (Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary.)-Original Message-----From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: Truth
f an
individual "rather than an appeal to pure reason" (Webster's
Encyclopedic Dictionary.)
-----Original Message-----
From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.com
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
;
Sent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:53:12 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On J
an an appeal to pure reason" (Webster's Encyclopedic Dictionary.)-Original Message-----From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ;Sent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:53:12
-0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once a
to continue this? If you do, lets please write to me
privately.
Thanks,
Perry
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf
for Karl Barth)
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 19:40:30 -0500
xt." Think
about !!!
jd
-Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan openairmission@yahoo.comTo:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:49:36 -0800
(PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf
for Karl Barth
: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
AND?
If he cleans up his mouth and stops being "DIVISIVE" that alone will place him firmly within the Christian camp?
No need for a Conversion?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My comments and questions remain.
(among otherconsiderations.)
-Original Message-
From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.com
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sat, 3 Dec 2005 07:46:22 -0500
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
I
myth (this ain't in
the NT; its the fount ofAm Fundamentalist culticlegalism--its how
legalism works to maintain partic racist exclusivity..its why evangelism in
Fundamentalism equates to church s/hopping..and its oneobviousreaosn
why there's an ACLU)
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 23:50:51 -0500 Judy
9:51 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
I just posted your words.
It is then 'your' assessment that your words "besmurch" your "efforts"
Do you have a Ministry to "Judaizing punks"?
There is nothi
49 matches
Mail list logo
