RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-28 Thread Kevin Deegan
WRONG Guy Blaine
Read the Bible!

http://www.biblelight.net/hebrew-canon.htm
"... from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias"... . What could Jesus be referring to? Well, Abel was murdered in the book of Genesis, the first book of the Bible. And Zacharias? What book is his murder related in? Well let's look at our third text, a parallel passage, first:

Luke 11:51 From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias, which perished between the altar and the temple: verily I say unto you, It shall be required of this generation.Luke 11:52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.
Note that Jesus accuses the scribes and Pharisees of taking away the key of knowledge. What key is that? And what is God requiring of that generation? The answer is in the phrase "From the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias ...". Well, again, Abel was slain in the first book of the Bible (Gen 4:8). Now those Protestants who anticipate the answer might begin looking for the murder of Zacharias in the book of Malachi. Why? Because Jesus is again referring to the full breadth of the scriptures (the key of knowledge, the oracles of God), from the first book of the Old Testament, to the last book of the Old Testament. A Protestant therefore, might well open their Bible to search in the last book of the Old Testament, Malachi, for the martyrdom of Zacharias. However, Malachi is not the last book of the Hebrew TaNaKh! What? That is correct. The Hebrew Bible, though identical in content to the Protestant Old Testament, is not
 in the same order as Protestant or Catholic Bibles. In the Hebrew Bible the last book is the book of Chronicles. That is where we find the murder of Zechariah between the altar and the temple:

2 Chr 24:20 And the Spirit of God came upon Zechariah the son of Jehoiada* the priest, which stood above the people, and said unto them, Thus saith God, Why transgress ye the commandments of the LORD, that ye cannot prosper? because ye have forsaken the LORD, he hath also forsaken you.2 Chr 24:21 And they conspired against him, and stoned him with stones at the commandment of the king in the court of the house of the LORD.2 Chr 24:22 Thus Joash the king remembered not the kindness which Jehoiada his father had done to him, but slew his son. And when he died, he said, The LORD look upon it, and require it.

It is worth noting that while Abel was the first martyr, Zechariah is not the last in the Old Testament, chronologically speaking. That was the prophet Urijah, killed by king Jehoiakim in Jeremiah 26:20-23, more than a century after the martyrdom of Zechariah:

King Joash, who had Zechariah stoned within the temple's court (2 Chr 24:20-22), was the 13th king of the northern kingdom of Israel, and he ruled from 798-782 B.C. 
King Jehoiakim, who slew Urijah with a sword (Jer 26:20-23), was the 18th ruler of the southern kingdom of Judah, and he reigned from 609-598 B.C. 
Had Jesus been speaking chronologically, (from the first martyr to the last) He would have said - from the blood of Able unto the blood of Urijah, but that is not what He intended. He was clearly saying from the first book of scripture, to the last book of scripture. Therefore, in Matthew 23:35 and Luke 11:51, and in Luke 24:44, Jesus was explicitly referring to the order and divisions of the books in the Hebrew Bible as the complete span of scripture.
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then according to this, Kay, John's (the Baptist) father, righteous Zacharias, was a false prophet--so were many others.Matthew 23:34-35: "Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets,and wise men, and scribes, and some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute them from city to city.""That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of Righteous Abel to the blood of Zacharias, whom ye slew between the temple and the alter."BlaineRBI think Scripture says the false prophet is to be killedKay --"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an
 email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
		Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Then according to this, Kay, John's (the Baptist) father, righteous Zacharias,  
was a false prophet--so were many others.

Matthew 23:34-35:  
Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets,and wise men, and scribes, and 
some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them ye scourge in your 
synagogues, and persecute them from city to city.

That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the 
blood of Righteous Abel to the blood of Zacharias, whom ye slew between the 
temple and the alter.
BlaineRB


 I think Scripture says the false prophet is to be killed
 
Kay 

 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-14 Thread Slade Henson
Ummm...I think you have two different Zach's here, Blaine.

Kay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 14 January, 2005 10.25
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement




Then according to this, Kay, John's (the Baptist) father, righteous
Zacharias,  was a false prophet--so were many others.

Matthew 23:34-35:
Wherefore, behold, I send unto you prophets,and wise men, and scribes, and
some of them ye shall kill and crucify; and some of them ye scourge in your
synagogues, and persecute them from city to city.

That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from
the blood of Righteous Abel to the blood of Zacharias, whom ye slew between
the temple and the alter.
BlaineRB


 I think Scripture says the false prophet is to be killed

Kay




--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-13 Thread ShieldsFamily




















From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005
8:17 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement







Prophets who speak lies are very apt to
pull people away from the Holy One, therefore, may God never forget
theiniquity of ALLfalse prophets. That's why God says to kill
them.Should they repent and NEVER PROPHESY AGAIN nor CLAIM to be a
prophet, may G-d forgive them. Daniel Lee knows he falsely prophesies, yet he
claims he repents but HE CONTINUES TO DO IT! In fact, he gave over 70
prophesies in a month's time or so. Talk about being possessed! May God not
forget his iniquity. On the other hand, may God bring him to TRUE repentance.











Prophets, we are told, are to be obeyed
until they are proven wrong. When one claims to be a prophet, how are we to
gauge their prophetic calling? Do we do the christian thing and
say, By Jove! That man sez heez a proffet! He's gotta be rite until heez
rong? No we do not. What the prophet says will come true and will be
fact. It's not out of the question for proof of his prophesy. If anything, it's
honorable to ask for proof. It's dishonorable to hide behind misappropriated
Scripture.











n
Slade





Slade, that illustrates my point that repentance is not just
confession, but actually turning from evil and doing right. Talk is
cheap. BTW, I dont think Ive ever heard David Miller
prophesy anything, but then Im not part of his church fellowship where I
would expect his calling to operate. I always thought of a prophet of one
who does not just prophecy future events, but simply boldly speaks forth the
oracles of God to the unrepentant. What do you think? Izzy











Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-13 Thread David Miller
David Miller wrote:
 ... the Lord told me that I was functioning as a
 prophet ...

SLADE wrote:
 How clear was this message? Was it riddled
 with parables? Was the message clear, concise,
 and very much to the point?

The message was very clear, but perhaps not the absolute clearest revelation 
possible.  I have only had one experience where the Lord spoke to me 
audibly.  It was an experience very much like Samuel and happened before I 
had ever had any kind of revelatory experience.  At that time, he did not 
tell me anything about a call to be a prophet.  When this experience 
happened, I was at first thrilled that the Lord had spoken to me, but as 
time passed and I did not hear from him again, I began to seek him out in 
prayer, wondering why he maintained his silence.  There began to be times 
when the Lord visited me and spoke to me again, but it has never been in an 
audible way like that first encounter.  More often, it has been in a dream 
or vision.  I also have had experiences that required interpretation, but 
not in this particular case that we have been talking about.  In this 
particular case where he told me that I had been functioning as a prophet, 
it was a spiritual vision, not audible, but there was no allegory involved. 
He simply spoke it to me as I have relayed it to you.  I saw the Angel of 
the Lord standing in front of me in this vision, but that was it.  It 
probably lasted less than a minute, in my bedroom, as I was on the floor on 
my knees praying.

SLADE wrote:
 Interesting nonanswer. A teacher, a Rabbi, and that rare
 person with a Helping Heart are what they are because
 of what he/she receives from above; therefore your
 statement lends no support to your assertion.

Perhaps you make a bigger distinction between prophet and teacher than I do. 
For me, these terms are simply descriptions of different jobs.  Those who 
fill these jobs are meant to fit together in community and relationship. 
Human nature is to snub the apostolic and prophetic offices and to give 
greater honor to the teacher, but the Spirit more highly values these 
offices.

Slade wrote:
 Also, I did not ask for you to defend yourself, I
 simply requested that you give a proof to your claim.
 This request on my part is perfectly acceptable.
 You, yourself agree when you stated, The OT
 prophets would give a sign. This was the basis by
 which the Jews approached Jesus... they had a right
 to ask for such a sign. I claim that right as well,
 but the Newer Testament [wannabe] prophets deny
 this right. You have done the same.

I do not make the rules, Slade.  I have read the OT like you, but as I 
sought the Lord about it, he revealed to me that there has been a change 
between the OT and the NT.  I explained that change in my last post. 
Prophets, generally speaking, do not give signs that accompany their word. 
The Spirit itself bears witness within the heart of the believing hearer.

Slade wrote:
 If you are a prophet, you should not fear!

I don't fear.  I would love to give you what you want.  Hey, it would give 
me great satisfaction to give you a sign and have you look up to me as 
someone who is truthful.  The problem is that I am kind of in the position 
like Balaam, who seeks the Lord to try and give what is being asked of him, 
but when he returns, he can only give that which the Lord has given him.  If 
the Lord does not give me a sign to deliver to you, there really is nothing 
I can do about that.  If that causes you to conclude that I am a false 
prophet or that I fear being exposed, that is between you and the Lord. 
There is nothing I can do about it.

I did once hope very much that the Lord would prove himself through a sign. 
I was attending a Baptist church that did not believe in the gifts of the 
Holy Spirit, such as speaking in tongues.  They had a visiting minister from 
the Middle East who spoke five languages fluently.  The pastor there wanted 
me to get with him and this man and speak in tongues for them.  They 
believed that I was probably possessed by an evil spirit, and they wanted to 
use his linguistic knowledge to expose the spirit and show me that I was 
speaking things that were an abomination to God.  The other alternative was 
that they could use his knowledge of langauge to show me that I was just 
speaking gibberish.

Well, the results of their test ended up not being very conclusive.  I 
yielded myself to the Spirit and spoke in five different dialects, but the 
man did not understand any of the languages that I spoke.  He was able, 
however, to pick out some words here and there.  Their conclusion was that I 
was a very sincere follower of Christ.  Therefore, they dismissed the idea 
that I might be possessed by an evil spirit.  However, they did not accept 
that I was truly speaking by the Holy Spirit of God.  This linguist person 
said that he believed that I had, as a child, been exposed to various 
languages, and these languages were in my subconscious.  He 

RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-13 Thread Slade Henson
I just skimmed most of this. But I'm not understanding why God would
allegedly tell you something contrary to His Wordsuch as this age of
this and that. Sounds like dispensationalism to mewhich is clearly NOT
Scriptural. I'm not going to debate over this, but I ask...was it God you
heard from, or something else? We already have the foundation regarding
prophets laid for us. The SAME foundation is continued in the Newer
Covenant.
   Maybe I'm touchy about this subject since being stuck in a cult-group who
said much of the same things you're currently sayingthe Lord told me,
the Lord says...I had a dreamI had an awesome dream. I've been there,
done that, and don't care to do it again. We were taken  advantage of,
preyed upon, treated like crap, had FOOD cut off from us and the
children...including our own food, mind you, because we were wicked,
horrible people who wouldn't bow down to the leader and his prophet and
do what he said, no matter WHAT he said. Darn tootin' when someone says the
same types of thingsit makes my skin crawl and makes me want to RUN and
never return. Darn tootin' I would ask for PROOF of someone's proclamation
of a certain gift, any of the gifts. I can give many witnesses for my own
gifts...discernment, mercy, encouragement. So should you, David.
There's an old Yiddish word for it... bülshit.

K


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 14.29
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-13 Thread Terry Clifton
Slade Henson wrote:
I just skimmed most of this. But I'm not understanding why God would
allegedly tell you something contrary to His Wordsuch as this age of
this and that. Sounds like dispensationalism to mewhich is clearly NOT
Scriptural. I'm not going to debate over this, but I ask...was it God you
heard from, or something else? We already have the foundation regarding
prophets laid for us. The SAME foundation is continued in the Newer
Covenant.
  Maybe I'm touchy about this subject since being stuck in a cult-group who
said much of the same things you're currently sayingthe Lord told me,
the Lord says...I had a dreamI had an awesome dream. I've been there,
done that, and don't care to do it again. We were taken  advantage of,
preyed upon, treated like crap, had FOOD cut off from us and the
children...including our own food, mind you, because we were wicked,
horrible people who wouldn't bow down to the leader and his prophet and
do what he said, no matter WHAT he said. Darn tootin' when someone says the
same types of thingsit makes my skin crawl and makes me want to RUN and
never return. Darn tootin' I would ask for PROOF of someone's proclamation
of a certain gift, any of the gifts. I can give many witnesses for my own
gifts...discernment, mercy, encouragement. So should you, David.
There's an old Yiddish word for it... bülshit.
K
 

==
Just an observation.  I have never met a believer who did not believe 
that one of their gifts was discernment.
Terry

 

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-13 Thread Slade Henson
Some have it more than others. I can smell a rat from several states away,
too.

:)

Kay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Thursday, 13 January, 2005 18.15
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


Slade Henson wrote:

I just skimmed most of this. But I'm not understanding why God would
allegedly tell you something contrary to His Wordsuch as this age of
this and that. Sounds like dispensationalism to mewhich is clearly NOT
Scriptural. I'm not going to debate over this, but I ask...was it God you
heard from, or something else? We already have the foundation regarding
prophets laid for us. The SAME foundation is continued in the Newer
Covenant.
   Maybe I'm touchy about this subject since being stuck in a cult-group
who
said much of the same things you're currently sayingthe Lord told me,
the Lord says...I had a dreamI had an awesome dream. I've been there,
done that, and don't care to do it again. We were taken  advantage of,
preyed upon, treated like crap, had FOOD cut off from us and the
children...including our own food, mind you, because we were wicked,
horrible people who wouldn't bow down to the leader and his prophet and
do what he said, no matter WHAT he said. Darn tootin' when someone says the
same types of thingsit makes my skin crawl and makes me want to RUN and
never return. Darn tootin' I would ask for PROOF of someone's proclamation
of a certain gift, any of the gifts. I can give many witnesses for my own
gifts...discernment, mercy, encouragement. So should you, David.
There's an old Yiddish word for it... bülshit.

K


==
Just an observation.  I have never met a believer who did not believe
that one of their gifts was discernment.
Terry





--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-12 Thread Slade Henson



I 
think Scripture says the false prophet is to be killed

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  ShieldsFamilySent: Tuesday, 11 January, 2005 
  22.59To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement
  
  
  
  SLADE'S NEWEST 
RESPONSE...
  Your last response about the sign of Jonah is 
  the
  same argument made by the ridiculous false prophet 
  Daniel John Lee (may 
  God
  not forget his iniquity). 
  
  
  Slade, Im curiouswhy did you say that? 
  Arent we supposed to walk in forgiveness, etc, etc? Just wondering what your 
  take on it is. 
Izzy




RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-12 Thread ShieldsFamily








Thats fine with me. However
didnt Jesus say something else? Could Slade please respond also? Id
seriously like to know when we should ask God to judge someone vs when we
should forgive and forget. Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005
7:06 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement







I think Scripture says the false prophet
is to be killed











Kay





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 11 January, 2005
22.59
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement





SLADE'S NEWEST RESPONSE...

Your last response about the sign of Jonah is the

same argument made by the ridiculous false prophet Daniel John Lee (may God

not forget his iniquity). 



Slade, Im curiouswhy did you
say that? Arent we supposed to walk in forgiveness, etc, etc? Just
wondering what your take on it is. Izzy











Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-12 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/12/2005 5:08:10 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 I think Scripture says the false prophet is to be killed
 
Kay


:-)


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-12 Thread David Miller
SLADE wrote:
 How do you KNOW you are a prophet?

When I first began receiving revelation (dreams and visions), the Lord told 
me that I was functioning as a prophet but that I should not advertise that 
I was functioning in this way.  He instructed me to tell others that 
inquired who I was that I was a brother in Christ.  I kept it this way for 
many years, but after I matured and learned more about the different 
administrations in the body of Christ, the Lord released me to inform others 
that I was a prophet because many do not know what a prophet is.  As I began 
to teach others about the function of apostles, prophets, evangelists, 
pastors and teachers, it became useful for me to use myself as an example of 
the prophetic ministry.

SLADE wrote:
 Yeshua was tempted to prove his deity.
 You are not deity, therefore the comparison is lacking.

No, I am not deity, but a prophet is a prophet because of what he receives 
from above.  There is a similar character that God requires of those whom he 
anoints for such jobs, that character of not defending oneself nor pushing 
oneself forward as somebody.

Slade wrote:
 Your last response about the sign of Jonah is the
 same argument made by the ridiculous false prophet
 Daniel John Lee (may God not forget his iniquity).

I am kind of surprised he did not try to oblige you.  He has made many false 
predictions.

Slade wrote:
 We, the normal Joe in the universe is to be given
 something to prove that a prophet should be listened
 to and you deny us the right to that proof.

This is one difference that I have discerned between the OT prophets and the 
NT prophets.  The OT prophets would give a sign.  This was the basis by 
which the Jews approached Jesus and asked him for a sign to prove that he 
was that Prophet spoken of by Moses.  I have sought the Lord on this subject 
rather diligently, because based upon my study of the Hebrew Scriptures, 
they had a right to ask for such a sign.  The Spirit told me that because it 
is the age of grace and faith, and especially now because the Spirit has 
been poured out upon all, it is prudent not to focus upon signs.  Instead, 
signs generally come in response to faith.  My interpretation of this is 
that there really is no normal Joe that is distinct from prophets, but 
rather all of those in Christ are priests and prophets unto God.  The only 
reason that some are identified as prophets is because they have a personal 
responsibility toward God to continue to function in the revelatory gifts 
and be an example to the body in this way with the hope that all will walk 
in the Spirit of revelation.

David Miller wrote:
 If you think that I do not measure up to what a prophet
 ought to be, that is your decision.  What we are in the
 body of Christ is something we do not have to protect
 or defend.  We are who we are.  Jesus told me that those
 who receive me receive him, and those who reject me
 reject him.  Therefore, I leave it all in the hands of my Lord.

SLADE wrote:
 Yeshua spoke that in response to Himself and His relationship
 with God... AS THE ONLY MEDIATOR BETWEEN GOD
 AND MAN.

That is not the only context in which he spoke this (see Luke 10:16), but I 
was referring to a personal revelation, not to Scripture which I would apply 
to myself.

Slade wrote:
 You are nowhere even CLOSE to the majesty
 of Yeshua.

Are you saying that you do not believe that Christ lives in me and through 
me?

Slade wrote:
 You are hiding behind some of the worst Biblical
 interpretations I've seen on TruthTalk. You are not
 the mediator between man and Yeshua. If this is
 what you believe, I am in the wrong discussion group.

LOL.  I have never claimed to be a mediator between man and Yeshua.  Nobody 
needs me to follow Yeshua.  You misunderstand my Biblical interpretations 
and twist almost everything I say.  Why?  I kind of feel as if you are 
trying to catch me in my words to demonstrate some fault in me somewhere.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-12 Thread Slade Henson



Prophets who speak lies are very apt to pull people away from the Holy 
One, therefore, may God never forget theiniquity of ALLfalse 
prophets. That's why God says to kill them.Should they repent and NEVER 
PROPHESY AGAIN nor CLAIM to be a prophet, may G-d forgive them. Daniel Lee knows 
he falsely prophesies, yet he claims he repents but HE CONTINUES TO DO IT! In 
fact, he gave over 70 prophesies in a month's time or so. Talk about being 
possessed! May God not forget his iniquity. On the other hand, may God bring him 
to TRUE repentance.

Prophets, we are told, are to be obeyed until they are proven wrong. When 
one claims to be a prophet, how are we to gauge their prophetic calling? Do we 
do the "christian" thing and say, "By Jove! That man sez heez a proffet! He's 
gotta be rite until heez rong?" No we do not. What the prophet says will come 
true and will be fact. It's not out of the question for proof of his prophesy. 
If anything, it's honorable to ask for proof. It's dishonorable to hide behind 
misappropriated Scripture.

-- 
slade

  -Original Message-From: 
  ShieldsFamilySent: Tuesday, 11 January, 2005 
  22.59Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
  Movement
  
  
  SLADE'S NEWEST 
RESPONSE...
  Your last response about the sign of Jonah is 
  the
  same argument made by the ridiculous false prophet 
  Daniel John Lee (may 
  God
  not forget his iniquity). 
  
  
  Slade, Im curiouswhy did you say that? 
  Arent we supposed to walk in forgiveness, etc, etc? Just wondering what your 
  take on it is. 
Izzy




RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-12 Thread Slade Henson



-Original Message-From: David MillerSent: 
Wednesday, 12 January, 2005 18.45Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
the Messianic MovementDAVIDM...When I first 
began receiving revelation (dreams and visions), the Lord told me that I was 
functioning as a prophet but that I should not advertise that I was functioning 
in this way. He instructed me to tell others that inquired who I was that I was 
a brother in Christ. I kept it this way for many years, but after I matured and 
learned more about the different administrations in the body of Christ, the Lord 
released me to inform others that I was a prophet because many do not know what 
a prophet is. As I began to teach others about the function of apostles, 
prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers, it became useful for me to use 
myself as an example of the prophetic ministry.SLADE...How 
clear was this message? Was it riddled with parables? Was the message clear, 
concise, and very much to the point?

DAVID...No, I am not deity, but a prophet is a 
prophet because of what he receives from above. There is a similar character 
that God requires of those whom he anoints for such jobs, that character of not 
defending oneself nor pushing oneself forward as 
somebody.SLADE...Interesting nonanswer. A teacher, a Rabbi, 
and that rare person with a Helping Heart are what they are because of what 
he/she receives from above; therefore your statement lends no support to your 
assertion. Also, I did not ask for you to defend yourself, I simply requested 
that you give a proof to your claim. This request on my part is perfectly 
acceptable. You, yourself agree when you stated, The OT prophets would give a sign. This was the basis by 
which the Jews approached Jesus... they had a 
right to ask for such a sign. I claim that right as well, 
but the Newer Testament" [wannabe] prophets deny this right. You have done the 
same. If you are a prophet, you should not fear! The Spirit of the Holy One 
guards and guides your lips. Speak it forth, brother. If you are a prophet, let 
u all glory in God over this rare find. If not... the Spirit never spoke through 
you and you deceived not only yourself but others as well.

DAVID...This is one difference that I have 
discerned between the OT prophets and the NT prophets. The OT prophets would 
give a sign. This was the basis by which the Jews approached Jesus and asked him 
for a sign to prove that he was that Prophet spoken of by Moses. I have sought 
the Lord on this subject rather diligently, because based upon my study of the 
Hebrew Scriptures, they had a right to ask for such a sign. The Spirit told me 
that because it is the age of grace and faith, and especially now because the 
Spirit has been poured out upon all, it is prudent not to focus upon signs. 
Instead, signs generally come in response to faith. My interpretation of this is 
that there really is no "normal Joe" that is distinct from prophets, but rather 
all of those in Christ are priests and prophets unto God. The only reason that 
some are identified as prophets is because they have a personal responsibility 
toward God to continue to function in the revelatory gifts and be an example to 
the body in this way with the hope that all will walk in the Spirit of 
revelation.SLADE...Herein lies the problems. When Peter, the 
apostle to the Jewish people his letter, he wrote it to the exiles (the 
dispersion). Within this context, Peter mentions that the recipients of this 
letter are holy priesthood. There was no mention of prophet. You have 
erroneously inserted this. Your statement [and I paraphrase] that prophets are 
different in the NT than they were in the OT is justification to slide yourself 
into the office of prophet. Again, your statement that there really is no "normal Joe" that is distinct from 
prophets rings true for me because of the prophetic nuances of 
the Spirit I spoke of before. This, in itself, if NOT the prophetic 
gift.

DAVID MILLER wrote two emails ago...If you 
think that I do not measure up to what a prophet ought to be, that is your 
decision. What we are in the body of Christ is something we do not have to 
protect or defend. We are who we are. Jesus told me that those who 
receive me receive him, and those who reject me reject him. Therefore, I 
leave it all in the hands of my Lord.SLADE wrote two emails 
ago...Yeshua spoke that in response to Himself and His relationship with 
God... AS THE ONLY MEDIATOR BETWEEN GOD AND MAN.DAVID wrote...That is not the only context in which he spoke this (see Luke 
10:16), but I was referring to a personal revelation, not to Scripture which I 
would apply to myself.SLADE now says...Speak in His name, and 
I'll agree with you. STOP speaking in David Miller's name so I 
can stop disagreeing.

SLADE wrote...You are nowhere even CLOSE to the majesty of 
Yeshua.DAVID replied...Are you saying that you 
do not believe that Christ lives in me and through me?SLADE now 
responds...This is 

RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-11 Thread Slade Henson
-Original Message-
From: David Miller
Sent: Monday, 10 January, 2005 11.26
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

DAVIDM...
Well, I am not one of those kinds who says, I AM A PROPHET.  As I said
before, I tend to be one who runs from the call when it comes (like Jonah).
I try to find excuses why not to go or why somebody else should go.  I am
trying to do better, but I still have a lot of room for growth.

SLADE...
How do you KNOW you are a prophet?



SLADE PREVIOUSLY...
 So which are you!?! The never give a word type,
 an occasional word type, or the always a word
 type?
DAVID RESPONDED...
I don't recognize these different types that you have outlined.  There are
true prophets and false prophets, and I believe that I am of the true
variety.  Of course, it would be ridiculous to think that there exists a
prophet who never gives a word.  That's like saying there is a baker who
never bakes or a teacher who never teaches or an evangelist who never
evangelizes.

SLADE'S NEWEST RESPONSE:
Ok, you understand my point. However, I have never met a true prophet,
though I believe true prophets exist.



SLADE PREVIOUSLY...
 Are you willing to test the mettle of
 your prophetic gift?
DAVIDM RESPONDED...
No, not really. I don't want to tempt God. I take the temptation of Jesus
in the wilderness seriously. Satan challenged him on whether or not he
really was the son of God. Jesus was tempted to prove himself, but he did
not.  The Pharisees also asked him for a sign to prove who he was, and Jesus
said that an evil and adulterous generation seeks for such signs, but no
sign would be given them but the sign of Jonah.

SLADE'S NEWEST RESPONSE...
Yeshua was tempted to prove his deity. You are not deity, therefore the
comparison is lacking. Your last response about the sign of Jonah is the
same argument made by the ridiculous false prophet Daniel John Lee (may God
not forget his iniquity). We, the normal Joe in the universe is to be given
something to prove that a prophet should be listened to and you deny us the
right to that proof. I can only surmise that you are not what you claim, but
it's clear by your next statement that you don't care either.



DAVID M...
If you think that I do not measure up to what a prophet ought to be, that is
your decision.  What we are in the body of Christ is something we do not
have to protect or defend.  We are who we are.  Jesus told me that those who
receive me receive him, and those who reject me reject him.  Therefore, I
leave it all in the hands of my Lord.

SLADE...
Yeshua spoke that in response to Himself and His relationship with God... AS
THE ONLY MEDIATOR BETWEEN GOD AND MAN. You are nowhere even CLOSE to the
majesty of Yeshua. You are hiding behind some of the worst Biblical
interpretations I've seen on TruthTalk. You are not the mediator between man
and Yeshua. If this is what you believe, I am in the wrong discussion group.

-- slade

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-11 Thread ShieldsFamily












SLADE'S NEWEST RESPONSE...

Your last response about the sign of Jonah is the

same argument made by the ridiculous false prophet Daniel John Lee (may God

not forget his iniquity). 



Slade, Im curiouswhy did you
say that? Arent we supposed to walk in forgiveness, etc, etc? Just
wondering what your take on it is. Izzy








Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-10 Thread David Miller
Slade wrote:
 Here's where the problem arises. I know many
 who claim the prophetic gift, but never proclaim
 anything. I hear the declaration I AM A PROPHET
 as if they deserve my reverence, yet they never speak
 a word from the LORD.

Well, I am not one of those kinds who says, I AM A PROPHET.  As I said 
before, I tend to be one who runs from the call when it comes (like Jonah). 
I try to find excuses why not to go or why somebody else should go.  I am 
trying to do better, but I still have a lot of room for growth.

Slade wrote:
 So which are you!?! The never give a word type,
 an occasional word type, or the always a word
 type?

I don't recognize these different types that you have outlined.  There are 
true prophets and false prophets, and I believe that I am of the true 
variety.  Of course, it would be ridiculous to think that there exists a 
prophet who never gives a word.  That's like saying there is a baker who 
never bakes or a teacher who never teaches or an evangelist who never 
evangelizes.

Slade wrote:
 Are you willing to test the mettle of
 your prophetic gift?

No, not really.  I don't want to tempt God.  I take the temptation of Jesus 
in the wilderness seriously.  Satan challenged him on whether or not he 
really was the son of God.  Jesus was tempted to prove himself, but he did 
not.  The Pharisees also asked him for a sign to prove who he was, and Jesus 
said that an evil and adulterous generation seeks for such signs, but no 
sign would be given them but the sign of Jonah.

If you think that I do not measure up to what a prophet ought to be, that is 
your decision.  What we are in the body of Christ is something we do not 
have to protect or defend.  We are who we are.  Jesus told me that those who 
receive me receive him, and those who reject me reject him.  Therefore, I 
leave it all in the hands of my Lord.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-10 Thread David Miller
Slade wrote:
 ... there is a grace I can give since you are
 not a prophet ... You see, we all have Yeshua
 dwelling within us, and Yeshua IS the spirit of
 prophesy.

This is so true.  Prophets are not meant to be held on some ideological 
pedestal.  They serve as examples of one aspect of Christ, an aspect that 
exists within every believer who has the testimony of Christ.  Teachers 
serve as examples of teaching, but all believers may teach.  Evangelists 
serve as examples of evangelizing, but all believers may evangelize. 
Prophets serve as examples of prophesying, but all believers may prophesy.

What you should be careful about, however, is what Paul warned the 
Corinthians about.

1 Corinthians 12:20-23
(20) But now are they many members, yet but one body.
(21) And the eye cannot say unto the hand, I have no need of thee: nor again 
the head to the feet, I have no need of you.
(22) Nay, much more those members of the body, which seem to be more feeble, 
are necessary:
(23) And those members of the body, which we think to be less honourable, 
upon these we bestow more abundant honour; and our uncomely parts have more 
abundant comeliness.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-10 Thread David Miller
Slade wrote:
 Saying the Messianic Movement is of God makes
 no sense within the context of this message.

This comment tells me that you have misunderstood my post, because without 
this context, what I wrote could be easily twisted.  This thread began weeks 
ago.  Following is what I wrote on Dec. 23, 2004:

--
- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 10:04 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] The Messianic Movement

Slade wrote:
 You see Hebrew Mindset being placed on a pedestal.
 I see more people calling it cultic and dangerous.

People often ask me what I think of the Messianic movement.  I always start
my reply with the statement that I believe the Messianic movement is of God.
However, these days I find myself needing to follow it up with a warning of
dangerous elements within the movement.  There indeed are cultic and
dangerous elements there.  Sometimes I point out how the charismatic
movement was once mostly pure, but as it progressed, many false shepherds
entered it and made quite a quagmire out of it.  I suppose the same thing
can be said of Christianity in general, so we really should not be
surprised.

I have always appreciated studying the Hebrew mindset because it does at
times bring fresh light upon various passages of Scripture.  Nevertheless,
on TruthTalk there has been numerous comments to the effect that anyone who
expresses a Greek kind of thinking must be in error.  It is the rationality
of guilt by similarity, like saying, Hitler was a Lutheran Christian so all
Christians are like Hitler.  While it might be true that an overemphasis
upon Greek thought could lead some of us into error, exactly the same thing
could be said about an overemphasis upon Hebrew thinking.  This becomes
especially obvious when we realize that the Hebrew mind, for the most part,
rejected Yeshua HaMashiach.

snip

Therefore, I don't think Greek thinking is taboo, neither is Hebrew
thinking.  God has reached out to all of mankind, first to the Hebrews, then
to the Greeks.  Each culture has its perspective that makes different
aspects of God comprehensible.
--

Kay then asked me to clarify my sentence that mentioned dangerous elements 
within this move of God known as the Messianic Movement.

David Miller wrote:
 The dangerous aspects are those within the movement
 who emphasize shadows over reality.

Slade wrote:
 The problem with this statement is the subjectivity of
 your definition of shadows. You are clearly one who
 sees Newer Testament fulfillment of Older Testament
 shadows as nullifying these OT shadows in favor
 of NT realities.

I do not believe that observing shadows nullifies reality.  So your 
perception of me is false.

Slade wrote:
 Again, you make it clear that those of a different
 theological slant than you are considered dangerous.

No, I do not believe this at all.  What I consider dangerous are those 
extremists who emphasize the shadows OVER reality.

Imagine a statue which casts a shadow, and a group of people want to study 
and understand this statue.  Most start looking at the statue itself and 
handling it and describing it.  Someone in the group notices the shadow of 
the statue and wonders why everyone is ignoring it, so he goes over there 
and starts describing the shadow.  Nothing wrong with that, but suppose he 
begins to argue with the ones looking at the statue itself that there is no 
way they will ever understand the statue unless they come down there to 
where he is and study the shadow with him.  In fact, he insists that the 
actual statue is a distraction, and that all attention needs to shift 
immediately and permanently to the shadow.  At this point, I think that such 
a person would represent a danger to the groups goal of understanding the 
statue.  This would be analagous to what I was trying to say about those 
individuals within the Messianic movement who emphasize the shadow over 
reality.

Slade wrote:
 I hear obedience touted on this board a lot
 [by you and Judy Taylor], yet when one claims
 to be obedient, they are dangerous.

No, obedience is not dangerous, but there is danger in certain types of 
legalism.  You have taught this yourself.

Slade wrote:
 Are you are being double-minded or setting us
 up to fail? Again, this argument is rooted in ignorance.
 When Messiah returns, we will be celebrating the
 Sabbath, the New Moons, Feast of Tabernacles,
 etc., yet you oppose it.

I have never opposed celebrating these events.  Like I said, you 
misunderstand me.

Slade wrote:
 You are suggesting a schizoid faith I want no part of.
 I'd rather me pagan. Perhaps Dave Hanson and I have
 more in common than you and I.

Wow!  I did not realize that, but if you say so.

David Miller wrote:
 of circumcision of the flesh in addition to
 circumcision of the heart, etc.

Slade wrote:
 In addition to? Is there a 

Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-09 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/8/2005 7:34:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The dangerous aspects are those within the movement who emphasize shadows over reality.



News flash  Truth is "dangerous." The above comments, once again, have nothing to do with the actual debate itself. Whether an aspect of a movement is "dangerous" is of no logical consequence to the discussion at hand -- but, oh how we love to press our judgment as if that carried some weight in the determination of "truth." 

Christ's claims were considered "dangerous." So what ? !! It seems to me that a better use of script would be to simply stick to the subject. 

Jd



RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-09 Thread Slade Henson



Unfortunately DavidM decided this was a major reason that the Messianic 
Movement is dangerous. I am merely quoting DavidM in this manner. Please know 
that in my last email, the courier font was DavidM.

-- 
slade

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Sunday, 09 January, 2005 
  04.18To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic MovementIn a message dated 1/8/2005 7:34:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  The dangerous aspects are those within the movement who 
emphasize shadows over reality.News flash 
   Truth is "dangerous." The above 
  comments, once again, have nothing to do with the actual debate 
  itself. Whether an aspect of a movement is "dangerous" is of no 
  logical consequence to the discussion at hand -- but, 
  oh how we love to press our judgment as if that carried some weight in the 
  determination of "truth." Christ's claims were considered 
  "dangerous." So what ? !! It seems to me that a better use 
  of script would be to simply stick to the subject. 
Jd




RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-07 Thread Slade Henson


-Original Message-
From: David Miller
Sent: Wednesday, 05 January, 2005 10.00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

*slade snipped a bunch to talk about later*

DAVID M
I believe that a prophet who speaks in the name of the Lord must be error
free in the messages that he declares to be a word from the Lord.  A man or
woman who commits error in such a message is a false prophet.  Nevertheless,
prophets do not always speak in this way.  Prophets do not cease to be men
or women who no longer need to study, so the idea that they are always right
in their opinions or exegesis of Scriptures is not true.  I might note also
that some prophets do not even study the Scriptures.

There are many different types of prophets, both in OT and NT times.  The
prophets Abraham, Moses, David, Daniel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and John
the Baptist all functioned differently.  David ministered prophetically
primarily through song.  Ezekiel through pantomine.  Moses through
leadership and mighty miracles.  John the Baptist without either miracle or
many great prophetic statements concerning the future (other than the all
important one concerning the appearance of Messiah in his generation).




SLADE
In the first paragraph, you qualify a message given as the word from the
LORD must be error free. This is true. You then state prophets do not
always speak in this way. Lastly, you say that prophets are men who err. Ok.
I can agree to a point because even Elijah needed assurance from the LORD
that he was not the last of his kind (you know the story about the 4000 who
never bent a knee).

Here's where the problem arises. I know many who claim the prophetic gift,
but never proclaim anything. I hear the declaration I AM A PROPHET as if
they deserve my reverence, yet they never speak a word from the LORD. It's
easy to be error free if you never give a word. The, of course you have
the complete jag-off who throws the a word from the lord around like it's
candy at a parade and the consistency of their error is shocking! Those are
the JERKS that need to be stoned, wiped from the message boards, and
surgically altered to never speak or write again.

So which are you!?! The never give a word type, an occasional word type, or
the always a word type? Are you willing to test the mettle of your prophetic
gift?

Second paragraph later.

-- slade

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-07 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/7/2005 2:54:05 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Those are
the JERKS that need to be stoned, wiped from the message boards, and
surgically altered to never speak or write again.


LOL -- I gotta admit. 

John

"surgically altered" LOL


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-07 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/7/2005 5:10:17 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



LOL -- I gotta admit. 

John

"surgically altered" LOL 

I'm still laughing  maybe a red beer or two before you write that second paragraph. I did ask David what would be an acceptable test for his claim. Still waiting for an answer. Not a big deal to me, however. I have seen a number of prophets - they are numerous in the pentecostal tradition. Absolutely none of them were consisted correct in their several prophecies -- some were surprisingly accuratewhile others missed the mark entirely. Most "prophetic words" (actually, all such utterances I have heard over the years) given in a church settings are general words of praise or warning -- nothing specific. 

John


 


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-07 Thread Slade Henson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Wednesday, 05 January, 2005 10.00
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

DAVIDM
There are many different types of prophets, both in OT and NT times. The
prophets Abraham, Moses, David, Daniel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and John
the Baptist all functioned differently. David ministered prophetically
primarily through song. Ezekiel through pantomine. Moses through leadership
and mighty miracles. John the Baptist without either miracle or many great
prophetic statements concerning the future (other than the all important one
concerning the appearance of Messiah in his generation).



SLADE
You claim these prophets all functioned differently. Why? I see their
function as identical! You have spoken of Ezekiel's pantomime and David's
shirim. You see different function here while I understand this as different
modes/genres by which they prophesied. Their function -- the intent of the
prophesy -- is identical. THIS is the function you contradicted in your
email that prompted my response. (You will notice I have not elucidated the
function; this is an innate understanding in the prophet and I would like to
hear your take on this singular function of the prophet.)

However, there is a grace I can give since you are not a prophet [from my
limited understanding] and I do not wish to embarrass you or anyone else.
You see, we all have Yeshua dwelling within us, and Yeshua IS the spirit of
prophesy. This prophetic nuance of the Spirit of the Holy One can often
confuse a believer into thinking they are a prophet... when in fact, they're
feeling just what everyone else experiences... a nonverbal response to this
prophetic nuance.

-- slade

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-05 Thread Slade Henson



My wife thinks I was cruel in this post. Let 
me qualify... What a terrible thing 
to say

  This means, "What!?" I am shocked that you 
  would make such a claim! Do you believe everyone who doesn't share your 
  beliefs are dangerous... or is it just the JEWS??
 In this post, you have proven the 
falseness of your prophetic claim.

  Most people I know do not 
  understandhow the Prophetic Office is/was used by God. Most people who 
  claim to be prophets really aren't, but they certainly wish they were... as if 
  the Office affords them special privilege or elevates them above "Ordinary 
  Mortal." I certainly hope this is not you.
  When I look at the prophets in Scripture and 
  when I look at the function of the prophet as outlined by Moshe, your 
  statement against Messianics proves that you either do not understand your 
  office and have failed, or you are a false prophet, or what's outlined in the 
  next paragraph applies. I prefer to believe in your misunderstanding of the 
  office, but I also realize the possibility of the second.
  The difference in opinion [regarding the 
  Prophetic Office in the Older Testament vs. the Newer Testament] may be such 
  that we may be "speaking through" a perceived change in the office. What I 
  mean is that many people believe that much changed because of Messiah's death, 
  burial, and resurrection... and it's possible that they also believe the 
  Prophetic Office and how it functions in the Qahal/Ekklesia is different now 
  (for instance, many believe the Prophet does not need to be error free now). 
  Is this your belief? The "NewTestament" Prophet function differently 
  than the "Old Testament" prophet?
-- slade
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David MillerSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 
12.20To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
within the Messianic MovementSlade wrote: What a terrible 
thing to say. In this post, you have proven the falseness of your 
prophetic claim.Why? I hope you don't think prophets are perfect in 
knowledge. I hope youdon't think prophets are perfect 
communicators.Peace be with you.David Miller.




Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-05 Thread David Miller
Slade wrote:
 This means, What!? I am shocked that you
 would make such a claim! Do you believe
 everyone who doesn't share your beliefs are
 dangerous... or is it just the JEWS??

I think you very much have misunderstood my post.  I testified that the 
Messianic movement is of God, but qualified that with the observation that 
like all movements of God, there are some dangerous elements within it. 
These would be those who function like the Judaizers in Paul's day.  Kay 
asked for clarification on that statement and this is the context in which 
my post ought to be understood.

Slade wrote:
 Most people I know do not understand how the Prophetic
 Office is/was used by God. Most people who claim to be
 prophets really aren't, but they certainly wish they were...
 as if the Office affords them special privilege or elevates them
 above Ordinary Mortal. I certainly hope this is not you.

I have no desire to be a prophet.  If I desired anything, it would be to be 
an apostle of Christ because they are my heroes.  The truth is that I have 
no more chosen to be a prophet than I have chosen to be born a male. 
Unfortunately, I have acted in the past very much like Jonah in fleeing the 
call.  This is one reason why I am least among God's prophets, probably not 
fit to be called one, and a speck in the ocean of time.

Slade wrote:
 When I look at the prophets in Scripture and when
 I look at the function of the prophet as outlined by
 Moshe, your statement against Messianics proves
 that you either do not understand your office and
 have failed, or you are a false prophet, or what's
 outlined in the next paragraph applies.

Or, perhaps I am a poor communciator and you have misunderstood what I was 
trying to communicate in that post.  :-)

Slade wrote:
 I prefer to believe in your misunderstanding of
 the office, but I also realize the possibility of the
 second. ... many believe the Prophet does not
 need to be error free now). Is this your belief?
 The New Testament Prophet function differently
 than the Old Testament prophet?

I believe that a prophet who speaks in the name of the Lord must be error 
free in the messages that he declares to be a word from the Lord.  A man or 
woman who commits error in such a message is a false prophet.  Nevertheless, 
prophets do not always speak in this way.  Prophets do not cease to be men 
or women who no longer need to study, so the idea that they are always right 
in their opinions or exegesis of Scriptures is not true.  I might note also 
that some prophets do not even study the Scriptures.

There are many different types of prophets, both in OT and NT times.  The 
prophets Abraham, Moses, David, Daniel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and John 
the Baptist all functioned differently.  David ministered prophetically 
primarily through song.  Ezekiel through pantomine.  Moses through 
leadership and mighty miracles.  John the Baptist without either miracle or 
many great prophetic statements concerning the future (other than the all 
important one concerning the appearance of Messiah in his generation).

I hope these comments help us communicate better.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-05 Thread Slade Henson
No, they didn't call themselves Messianic. I was mistaken in my earlier post
of thinking they may have. I know now what they called themselves...did a
little research.

Kay



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 17.26
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


Kay, If I remember correctly, they didn't call themselves Messianic. I can't
remamber what they did call themselves though. On the other hand, I don't
care either! I'm just glad I only spent a week with the wackos! It was more
than enough for me.
Jeff

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-05 Thread Jeff Powers
Apostolic Pentacostal Seventh day Holiness brotherhood, yada, yada? Been 
trying to remember myself. I wish I could remember. And no folks, I'm not 
picking on anyone here if it seems like it. Those people were very weird!
Jeff
- Original Message - 
From: Slade Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 10:08
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


No, they didn't call themselves Messianic. I was mistaken in my earlier 
post
of thinking they may have. I know now what they called themselves...did a
little research.

Kay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 17.26
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement
Kay, If I remember correctly, they didn't call themselves Messianic. I 
can't
remamber what they did call themselves though. On the other hand, I don't
care either! I'm just glad I only spent a week with the wackos! It was 
more
than enough for me.
Jeff

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson
What a terrible thing to say. In this post, you have proven the falseness of
your prophetic claim.

-- slade

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 15.35
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


Kay wrote:
 I'm also waiting for your answer as to what
 aspects of the Messianic Movement you feel
 may be dangerous are, David.

The dangerous aspects are those within the movement who emphasize shadows
over reality.  For example, those who think that keeping Torah commandments
that deal with shadows is the only way to be pleasing to God.  This would
include the practice of killing a lamb in addition to faith in Yeshua, of
observing the moedim in addition to remembering that to which they point, of
sabbath observance in addition to entering the kingdom of God, of
circumcision of the flesh in addition to circumcision of the heart, etc.
Also, those who insist upon using Hebrew names, of denouncing the Trinity,
etc.  Generally, the Judaizing elements are causes of concern.  The letter
kills but the spirit gives life.

Peace be with you.
David Miller.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Lance Muir



It is becoming clear that 'othodox trinitarians' 
are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff believe as you on this? 


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Slade 
  Henson 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 03, 2005 19:32
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
  the Messianic Movement
  
  God 
  is one, Scripture says so. God has many different aspects or 
  manifestations
  
  I 
  still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. What I truly think 
  is that some dude tried to make God more understandable to our very limited 
  minds and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me to make a 
  midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd like to know when the trinity 
  concept actually came into being with Christians. I know Judaism has an aspect 
  of it somewhere way back in time
  
  Kay
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
[TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
MovementIn a message dated 1/3/2005 
1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a 
  Biblical term in thefirst place.I think David 
has a problem here. If you are not denying God in Trinity 
by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal Son, how can we 
say that Messianics deny God the Reality by asserting the oneness of 
God? John 


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Judy Taylor



What kind of species is an "orthodox 
trinitarian?"

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 05:36:21 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  It is becoming clear that 'othodox trinitarians' 
  are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff believe as you on this? 
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Slade 
Henson 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: January 03, 2005 19:32
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
within the Messianic Movement

God is one, Scripture says so. God has many different aspects or 
manifestations

I 
still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. What I truly 
think is that some dude tried to make God more understandable to our very 
limited minds and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me to 
make a midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd like to know when 
the trinity concept actually came into being with Christians. I know Judaism 
has an aspect of it somewhere way back in time

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
  MovementIn a message dated 
  1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a 
Biblical term in thefirst place.I think David 
  has a problem here. If you are not denying God in 
  Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal Son, how 
  can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality by asserting the oneness 
  of God? John 
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Lance Muir



One that occupies a 'space' outside of the 'space' 
you occupy. 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 04, 2005 05:47
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
  the Messianic Movement
  
  What kind of species is an "orthodox 
  trinitarian?"
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 05:36:21 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  
It is becoming clear that 'othodox 
trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff believe as you on 
this? 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Slade Henson 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 03, 2005 19:32
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  
  God is one, Scripture says so. God has many different aspects or 
  manifestations
  
  I still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. What I 
  truly think is that some dude tried to make God more understandable to our 
  very limited minds and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me 
  to make a midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd like to know 
  when the trinity concept actually came into being with Christians. I know 
  Judaism has an aspect of it somewhere way back in 
  time
  
  Kay
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
[TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
MovementIn a message dated 
1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a 
  Biblical term in thefirst place.I think 
David has a problem here. If you are not denying God 
in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal 
Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality by 
asserting the oneness of God? John 
  



RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



I 
think Slade has his thoughts on it more "thought out"...does that make sense? 
He's studied the issue in depth due to some anti-missionary problems we've run 
into in the past. I don't knowwhat Jeff's thoughts 
are.

K.

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
  MuirSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 05.36To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  It is becoming clear that 'othodox trinitarians' 
  are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff believe as you on this? 
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Slade 
Henson 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: January 03, 2005 19:32
    Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
within the Messianic Movement

God is one, Scripture says so. God has many different aspects or 
manifestations

I 
still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. What I truly 
think is that some dude tried to make God more understandable to our very 
limited minds and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me to 
make a midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd like to know when 
the trinity concept actually came into being with Christians. I know Judaism 
has an aspect of it somewhere way back in time

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
  MovementIn a message dated 
  1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a 
Biblical term in thefirst place.I think David 
  has a problem here. If you are not denying God in 
  Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal Son, how 
  can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality by asserting the oneness 
  of God? John 




Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Lance Muir



I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' 
(read theologically flexible) than most of His disciples.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Slade 
  Henson 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 04, 2005 06:32
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
  the Messianic Movement
  
  I 
  think Slade has his thoughts on it more "thought out"...does that make sense? 
  He's studied the issue in depth due to some anti-missionary problems we've run 
  into in the past. I don't knowwhat Jeff's thoughts 
  are.
  
  K.
  
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
MuirSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 05.36To: 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
within the Messianic Movement
It is becoming clear that 'othodox 
trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff believe as you on 
this? 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Slade Henson 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 03, 2005 19:32
  Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  
  God is one, Scripture says so. God has many different aspects or 
  manifestations
  
  I still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. What I 
  truly think is that some dude tried to make God more understandable to our 
  very limited minds and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me 
  to make a midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd like to know 
  when the trinity concept actually came into being with Christians. I know 
  Judaism has an aspect of it somewhere way back in 
  time
  
  Kay
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
[TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
MovementIn a message dated 
1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a 
  Biblical term in thefirst place.I think 
David has a problem here. If you are not denying God 
in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal 
Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality by 
asserting the oneness of God? John 
  


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



I agree with that. I know of some who say...can't 
dance, can't drink, can't smoke, can't go to the movies...or you go to hell! And 
others who say...you better call Him by the RIGHT name...or you go to hell. I 
think some of it gets pretty ridiculous. I don't think those are salvation 
issues. I think G-d has expectations of us...the same as I have expectations of 
my children.

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
  MuirSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 06.41To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' 
  (read theologically flexible) than most of His 
disciples.




RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



Hehehehe

K.

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 
  00.58To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic MovementIn a message dated 1/3/2005 5:16:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  I think there's a Scripture that says not to mix beer and 
tea...or maybe that's tradition! :) KayYou are correct, my 
  dear. It is found in 2 Thought 10:4 next to the passage that 
  allows for tomato juice mixer. I know it is there somewhere 
  because of it's divine 
taste.John




Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Judy Taylor



Tell that to the man who was out there picking up 
sticks on the Sabbath.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' 
(read theologically flexible) than most of His disciples.

  
From: Slade Henson 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

I think Slade has his thoughts on it more 
"thought out"...does that make sense? He's studied the issue in depth due to 
some anti-missionary problems we've run into in the past. I don't 
knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. K.

  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
  MuirIt is becoming clear that 'othodox 
  trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff believe as you 
  on this? 
  
From: Slade Henson 
God is one, Scripture says so. God has 
many different aspects or manifestations

I still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. What 
I truly think is that some dude tried to make God more understandable to 
our very limited minds and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense 
to me to make a midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd like to 
know when the trinity concept actually came into being with Christians. 
I know Judaism has an aspect of it somewhere way back in 
time

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
  MovementIn a message dated 
  1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a 
Biblical term in thefirst place.I think 
  David has a problem here. If you are not denying God 
  in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal 
  Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality 
  by asserting the oneness of God? John 
  
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Lance Muir



No Judy, you tell 'em. Remember, he's got a stick 
in his hand.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 04, 2005 07:06
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
  the Messianic Movement
  
  Tell that to the man who was out there picking up 
  sticks on the Sabbath.
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' 
  (read theologically flexible) than most of His disciples.
  

  From: Slade 
  Henson 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  I think Slade has his thoughts on it more 
  "thought out"...does that make sense? He's studied the issue in depth due 
  to some anti-missionary problems we've run into in the past. I don't 
  knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. K.
  
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
MuirIt is becoming clear that 
'othodox trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff 
believe as you on this? 

  From: Slade Henson 
  God is one, Scripture says so. God has 
  many different aspects or manifestations
  
  I still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. 
  What I truly think is that some dude tried to make God more 
  understandable to our very limited minds and taught us about the three 
  in one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of something hard to 
  understand. I'd like to know when the trinity concept actually came 
  into being with Christians. I know Judaism has an aspect of it 
  somewhere way back in time
  
  Kay
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: 
Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
MovementIn a message dated 
1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a 
  Biblical term in thefirst place.I think 
David has a problem here. If you are not denying 
God in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal 
Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality 
by asserting the oneness of God? John 




RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



The 
man picking up sticks was probably doing it to flip the bird to God.That's 
very different than attempting to beautify the campground.


K.

-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
TaylorSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 07.07To: 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
the Messianic Movement

  Tell that to the man who was out there picking up 
  sticks on the Sabbath.
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' 
  (read theologically flexible) than most of His disciples.
  

  From: Slade 
  Henson 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  I think Slade has his thoughts on it more 
  "thought out"...does that make sense? He's studied the issue in depth due 
  to some anti-missionary problems we've run into in the past. I don't 
  knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. K.
  
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
MuirIt is becoming clear that 
'othodox trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff 
believe as you on this? 

  From: Slade Henson 
  God is one, Scripture says so. God has 
  many different aspects or manifestations
  
  I still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. 
  What I truly think is that some dude tried to make God more 
  understandable to our very limited minds and taught us about the three 
  in one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of something hard to 
  understand. I'd like to know when the trinity concept actually came 
  into being with Christians. I know Judaism has an aspect of it 
  somewhere way back in time
  
  Kay
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: 
Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
MovementIn a message dated 
1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a 
  Biblical term in thefirst place.I think 
David has a problem here. If you are not denying 
God in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal 
Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality 
by asserting the oneness of God? John 






RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



Is 
that wherewalk softly and carry a big stick comes from??

K.

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
  MuirSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 07.12To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  No Judy, you tell 'em. Remember, he's got a stick 
  in his hand.
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Judy 
Taylor 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: January 04, 2005 07:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
within the Messianic Movement

Tell that to the man who was out there picking up 
sticks on the Sabbath.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' 
(read theologically flexible) than most of His disciples.

  
From: Slade Henson 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

I think Slade has his thoughts on it 
more "thought out"...does that make sense? He's studied the issue in 
depth due to some anti-missionary problems we've run into in the past. I 
don't knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. K.

  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
  MuirIt is becoming clear that 
  'othodox trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff 
  believe as you on this? 
  
From: Slade Henson 
God is one, Scripture says so. God 
has many different aspects or manifestations

I still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. 
What I truly think is that some dude tried to make God more 
understandable to our very limited minds and taught us about the 
three in one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of something 
hard to understand. I'd like to know when the trinity concept 
actually came into being with Christians. I know Judaism has an 
aspect of it somewhere way back in time

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: 
  Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
  MovementIn a 
  message dated 1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such 
a Biblical term in thefirst place.I 
  think David has a problem here. If you are not 
  denying God in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the 
  Eternal Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God 
  the Reality by asserting the oneness of God? 
  John 
  




Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Judy Taylor




What if I don't believe that God is "open 
structured and theologically flexible?" even though He is unwilling for 
any to perish and even if His mercy does 
endure forever... He don't play - He says what He means and means what He says 
so whyplay fast and loose with His Words.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:11:58 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No Judy, you tell 'em. Remember, he's got a stick 
in his hand.

  
From: Judy Taylor 
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
within the Messianic Movement

Tell that to the man who was out there picking up 
sticks on the Sabbath.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' 
(read theologically flexible) than most of His disciples.

  
From: Slade Henson 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

I think Slade has his thoughts on it 
more "thought out"...does that make sense? He's studied the issue in 
depth due to some anti-missionary problems we've run into in the past. I 
don't knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. K.

  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
  MuirIt is becoming clear that 
  'othodox trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff 
  believe as you on this? 
  
From: Slade Henson 
God is one, Scripture says so. God 
has many different aspects or manifestations

I still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. 
What I truly think is that some dude tried to make God more 
understandable to our very limited minds and taught us about the 
three in one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of something 
hard to understand. I'd like to know when the trinity concept 
actually came into being with Christians. I know Judaism has an 
aspect of it somewhere way back in time

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: 
  Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
  MovementIn a 
  message dated 1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such 
a Biblical term in thefirst place.I 
  think David has a problem here. If you are not 
  denying God in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the 
  Eternal Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God 
  the Reality by asserting the oneness of God? 
  John 
  
  


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



Then 
why not obey His perfect Law?? If He doesn't play and He says what He 
meanswhen He says DON'T, why do we say...oh, that was for then but not now? 
If He says DO, why don't we? If He says those things, would He be setting us up 
to fail at something He knows we simply can't do?

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  TaylorSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 07.25To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  
  What if I don't believe that God is "open 
  structured and theologically flexible?" even though He is unwilling for 
  any to perish and even if His mercy does 
  endure forever... He don't play - He says what He means and means what He says 
  so whyplay fast and loose with His Words.
  




Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Judy Taylor





Surely he wasn't that "nutty" - I see him as 
someone who was lacked the fear of God [like Korah] and followed after his 
fleshwhich the Law was there to curb. It's human nature to want to 
be on top of the game or two steps ahead of everyone else so this fellow was 
pushing the envelope and I don't think he really believed that God was going to 
do anything about it; I heard someone once say 'you know if he was getting wood 
that he had a fire going somewhere and so that's probably not all he was 
doing. jt

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:19:17 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
The 
man picking up sticks was probably doing it to flip the bird to God.That's 
very different than attempting to beautify the campground. K.

  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  Taylor
  Tell that to the man who was out there picking up 
  sticks on the Sabbath.
  

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' 
(read theologically flexible) than most of His disciples.

  
From: Slade Henson 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

I think Slade has his thoughts on it 
more "thought out"...does that make sense? He's studied the issue in 
depth due to some anti-missionary problems we've run into in the past. I 
don't knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. K.

  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
  MuirIt is becoming clear that 
  'othodox trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff 
  believe as you on this? 
  
From: Slade Henson 
God is one, Scripture says so. God 
has many different aspects or manifestations

I still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. 
What I truly think is that some dude tried to make God more 
understandable to our very limited minds and taught us about the 
three in one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of something 
hard to understand. I'd like to know when the trinity concept 
actually came into being with Christians. I know Judaism has an 
aspect of it somewhere way back in time

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: 
  Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
  MovementIn a 
  message dated 1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such 
a Biblical term in thefirst place.I 
  think David has a problem here. If you are not 
  denying God in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the 
  Eternal Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God 
  the Reality by asserting the oneness of God? 
  John 
  
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Lance Muir



Actually, slowly once again, I'm coming to 
understand that what God MEANS is what you  David say he MEANS. i AM 
TEACHABLE, YOU KNOW.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 04, 2005 07:25
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
  the Messianic Movement
  
  
  What if I don't believe that God is "open 
  structured and theologically flexible?" even though He is unwilling for 
  any to perish and even if His mercy does 
  endure forever... He don't play - He says what He means and means what He says 
  so whyplay fast and loose with His Words.
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:11:58 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  No Judy, you tell 'em. Remember, he's got a stick 
  in his hand.
  

  From: Judy Taylor 
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  
  Tell that to the man who was out there picking up 
  sticks on the Sabbath.
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  I do believe that G_d is more 'open 
  structured' (read theologically flexible) than most of His 
  disciples.
  

  From: Slade Henson 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  I think Slade has his thoughts on it 
  more "thought out"...does that make sense? He's studied the issue in 
  depth due to some anti-missionary problems we've run into in the past. 
  I don't knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. K.
  
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
MuirIt is becoming clear that 
'othodox trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff 
believe as you on this? 

  From: Slade Henson 
  God is one, Scripture says so. God 
  has many different aspects or 
  manifestations
  
  I still haven't found any reference to trinity in 
  Scripture. What I truly think is that some dude tried to make God 
  more understandable to our very limited minds and taught us about 
  the three in one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of 
  something hard to understand. I'd like to know when the trinity 
  concept actually came into being with Christians. I know Judaism 
  has an aspect of it somewhere way back in 
  time
  
  Kay
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
18.22To: 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
Judaizers within the Messianic 
MovementIn a 
message dated 1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was 
  such a Biblical term in thefirst 
place.I think David has a problem 
here. If you are not denying God in Trinity by 
refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal Son, how 
can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality by asserting the 
oneness of God? John 
  




Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Judy Taylor




I hear you Kay and I do seek to obey the Royal 
Law through Christ. I know you and Slade see things differently right now. I 
don't know your testimony but can empathize if you have experiencedcultish 
groups because I've been through that and have observed some of the same. 
Realunder Shepherds who lead rather than drive or control are few and far 
between butthere is a real and walking after the Spirit is not just an 
illusion.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:29:21 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
Then 
why not obey His perfect Law?? If He doesn't play and He says what He 
meanswhen He says DON'T, why do we say...oh, that was for then but not now? 
If He says DO, why don't we? If He says those things, would He be setting us up 
to fail at something He knows we simply can't do? Kay

  
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
TaylorWhat if I don't believe that God 
is "open structured and theologically flexible?" even though He is unwilling 
for any to perish and even if His mercy 
does endure forever... He don't play - He says what He means and means what 
He says so whyplay fast and loose with His Words.

  


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



I 
think he very could be that nutty. We see nuttiness like that every day. It's 
called rebellion. We do things everyday just because our parents say no, our 
doctor says no, etc. Doc says...no more cantaloupe...you'll have a severe 
reaction and what happens? We crave cantaloupe. Mom says: Don't smoke dope, your 
brain will go mushy. We say...REALLY? Let's find out
The 
reference to the fire going is very goodhowever, the command on that is not 
to KINDLE a fire on the Sabbath. If he already had a fire going, it would be 
okay to keep it going, especially if it was cold. Scenario: It's cold and a baby 
was just born in the camp. It happens to be Sabbath. Dad wants to be able to 
keep his newborn babe warm and goes and gathers sticks. If baby isn't kept warm, 
he will die. I don't think God would kill dadsaving life supercedes Sabbath 
law. I also believe GIVING (I don't know if that's the right word I want) life 
supercedes. I've had several of my children born on Sabbath. That's certainly 
work to mebut there's absolutely nothing you can do to stop labor once it's 
started!

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  TaylorSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 07.33To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  
  
  Surely he wasn't that "nutty" - I see him as 
  someone who was lacked the fear of God [like Korah] and followed after his 
  fleshwhich the Law was there to curb. It's human nature to want to 
  be on top of the game or two steps ahead of everyone else so this fellow was 
  pushing the envelope and I don't think he really believed that God was going 
  to do anything about it; I heard someone once say 'you know if he was getting 
  wood that he had a fire going somewhere and so that's probably not all he was 
  doing. jt
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:19:17 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  The 
  man picking up sticks was probably doing it to flip the bird to 
  God.That's very different than attempting to beautify the campground. 
  K.




Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Judy Taylor



Teachable and unreachable must be one and the 
same in your economy Lance because you reject everything but trinitarian 
orthodoxy and give no scriptural reason why. Jesustold us His Word 
is what will bear eternal fruit.He is our example and during His earthly 
ministry He didn't appear to be very open 
structured and theologically flexible to me..

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:37:04 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually, slowly once again, I'm coming to 
understand that what God MEANS is what you  David say he MEANS. i AM 
TEACHABLE, YOU KNOW.

  
From: Judy Taylor 
What if I don't 
believe that God is "open structured and theologically flexible?" even 
though He is unwilling for any to perish 
and even if His mercy does endure forever... He don't play - He says what He 
means and means what He says so whyplay fast and loose with His 
Words.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:11:58 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
No Judy, you tell 'em. Remember, he's got a 
stick in his hand.

  
From: Judy 
        Taylor 
    Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
    within the Messianic Movement

Tell that to the man who was out there picking 
up sticks on the Sabbath.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
I do believe that G_d is more 'open 
structured' (read theologically flexible) than most of His 
disciples.

  
From: Slade Henson 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

I think Slade has his thoughts on it 
more "thought out"...does that make sense? He's studied the issue in 
depth due to some anti-missionary problems we've run into in the 
past. I don't knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. 
K.

  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  Lance MuirIt is becoming 
  clear that 'othodox trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do 
  Slade and Jeff believe as you on this? 
  
From: Slade Henson 
God is one, Scripture says so. God has many different 
aspects or manifestations

I still haven't found any reference to 
trinity in Scripture. What I truly think is that some dude tried 
to make God more understandable to our very limited minds and 
taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me to make a 
midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd like to know 
when the trinity concept actually came into being with 
Christians. I know Judaism has an aspect of it somewhere way 
back in time

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  18.22To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
  Judaizers within the Messianic 
  MovementIn a 
  message dated 1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was 
such a Biblical term in thefirst 
  place.I think David has a problem 
  here. If you are not denying God in Trinity 
  by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal Son, 
  how can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality by 
  asserting the oneness of God? John 
  
  
  
  


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



I 
experienced one cultish group within the past couple of years. On one hand, I'm 
grateful, because I learned alot and it's helped me first recognize and second 
avoid others of the same mindset. I'm also grateful because for some reason, we 
weren't sucked into that weirdness. I believe it's because of our firm 
foundation in Torah that "saved" us form the mess. It also honed my discernment 
and I learned to listen to that discerning quality more frequently. I wish we 
didn't go through it because it was a REALLY bad time in my 
life.
Slade 
and I have seen things differently on obeying God for quite awhile now and it 
hasn't changed. If anything, understanding has become clearer and we have become 
free.

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  TaylorSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 07.43To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  
  I hear you Kay and I do seek to obey the Royal 
  Law through Christ. I know you and Slade see things differently right now. I 
  don't know your testimony but can empathize if you have 
  experiencedcultish groups because I've been through that and have 
  observed some of the same. Realunder Shepherds who lead rather than 
  drive or control are few and far between butthere is a real and walking 
  after the Spirit is not just an illusion.
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:29:21 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  Then 
  why not obey His perfect Law?? If He doesn't play and He says what He 
  meanswhen He says DON'T, why do we say...oh, that was for then but not 
  now? If He says DO, why don't we? If He says those things, would He be setting 
  us up to fail at something He knows we simply can't do? Kay
  

  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  TaylorWhat if I don't believe that 
  God is "open structured and theologically flexible?" even though He is 
  unwilling for any to perish and even if 
  His mercy does endure forever... He don't play - He says what He means and 
  means what He says so whyplay fast and loose with His 
  Words.
  





Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Judy Taylor



Good food for thought Kay - I know there is 
nothing we can do about when babies decide to make an appearance but don't you 
think that if dad knows the birth is any day now that he could prepare? God 
doesn't require of us more than we can give and there was another aspect to the 
Sabbath for Israel and this is the Covenant with Moses; the Sabbath was given 
for a sign so that man was a Covenant breaker also. It was God who said he 
should be stoned after the ppl had apprehended him not knowing what to do. 
So it appears as though he was made a public example of what not to do. Is 
this called "control by fear?" I've experienced rebellion first hand also 
and think seeing a public stoning would have had an impact. WDYT?

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:43:08 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

I 
think he very could be that nutty. We see nuttiness like that every day. It's 
called rebellion. We do things everyday just because our parents say no, our 
doctor says no, etc. Doc says...no more cantaloupe...you'll have a severe 
reaction and what happens? We crave cantaloupe. Mom says: Don't smoke dope, your 
brain will go mushy. We say...REALLY? Let's find outThe reference to 
the fire going is very goodhowever, the command on that is not to KINDLE a 
fire on the Sabbath. If he already had a fire going, it would be okay to keep it 
going, especially if it was cold. Scenario: It's cold and a baby was just born 
in the camp. It happens to be Sabbath. Dad wants to be able to keep his newborn 
babe warm and goes and gathers sticks. If baby isn't kept warm, he will die. I 
don't think God would kill dadsaving life supercedes Sabbath law. I also 
believe GIVING (I don't know if that's the right word I want) life supercedes. 
I've had several of my children born on Sabbath. That's certainly work to 
mebut there's absolutely nothing you can do to stop labor once it's started! 
Kay

  
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
Taylor
Surely he wasn't that "nutty" - I see him as 
someone who was lacked the fear of God [like Korah] and followed after his 
fleshwhich the Law was there to curb. It's human nature to want 
to be on top of the game or two steps ahead of everyone else so this fellow 
was pushing the envelope and I don't think he really believed that God was 
going to do anything about it; I heard someone once say 'you know if he was 
getting wood that he had a fire going somewhere and so that's probably not 
all he was doing. 
jt

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:19:17 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
The man picking up sticks was probably doing it to flip the bird to 
God.That's very different than attempting to beautify the campground. 
K.
  


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



I 
don't know if dad would have known when baby was going to decide to make an 
appearance. Even today, we give an estimated due date. I've never delivered on 
any of my given due dates; I've always been late. Sometimes women labor for 
hours...maybe mom began labor Friday afternoon and was still laboring way into 
the night and into the early morning hours.
Some 
7th Day Adventists would say that the Sabbath was given for a sign as well, and 
if you don't have that Sabbath keeping sign or "mark", you go to hell. Sabbath 
was made for man.
I 
don't think it's called control by fear. I think it's called curse for 
disobedience. Sometimes the curse, or correction, has a high price, even 
today.

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  TaylorSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 08.16To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  Good food for thought Kay - I know there is 
  nothing we can do about when babies decide to make an appearance but don't you 
  think that if dad knows the birth is any day now that he could prepare? God 
  doesn't require of us more than we can give and there was another aspect to 
  the Sabbath for Israel and this is the Covenant with Moses; the Sabbath was 
  given for a sign so that man was a Covenant breaker also. It was God who 
  said he should be stoned after the ppl had apprehended him not knowing what to 
  do. So it appears as though he was made a public example of what not to 
  do. Is this called "control by fear?" I've experienced rebellion 
  first hand also and think seeing a public stoning would have had an impact. 
  WDYT?
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:43:08 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
  I 
  think he very could be that nutty. We see nuttiness like that every day. It's 
  called rebellion. We do things everyday just because our parents say no, our 
  doctor says no, etc. Doc says...no more cantaloupe...you'll have a severe 
  reaction and what happens? We crave cantaloupe. Mom says: Don't smoke dope, 
  your brain will go mushy. We say...REALLY? Let's find 
  outThe reference to the fire going is very 
  goodhowever, the command on that is not to KINDLE a fire on the Sabbath. 
  If he already had a fire going, it would be okay to keep it going, especially 
  if it was cold. Scenario: It's cold and a baby was just born in the camp. It 
  happens to be Sabbath. Dad wants to be able to keep his newborn babe warm and 
  goes and gathers sticks. If baby isn't kept warm, he will die. I don't think 
  God would kill dadsaving life supercedes Sabbath law. I also believe 
  GIVING (I don't know if that's the right word I want) life supercedes. I've 
  had several of my children born on Sabbath. That's certainly work to mebut 
  there's absolutely nothing you can do to stop labor once it's started! 
  Kay
  

  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  Taylor
  Surely he wasn't that "nutty" - I see him 
  as someone who was lacked the fear of God [like Korah] and followed after 
  his fleshwhich the Law was there to curb. It's human nature to 
  want to be on top of the game or two steps ahead of everyone else so this 
  fellow was pushing the envelope and I don't think he really believed that 
  God was going to do anything about it; I heard someone once say 'you know 
  if he was getting wood that he had a fire going somewhere and so that's 
  probably not all he was doing. jt
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:19:17 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  The man picking up sticks was probably doing it to flip the bird to 
  God.That's very different than attempting to beautify the 
  campground. K.





Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/4/2005 4:28:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
What if I don't believe that God is "open structured and theologically flexible?" even though He is unwilling for any to perish and even if His mercy does endure forever... He don't play - He says what He means and means what He says so why play fast and loose with His Words.


True -- and He meant what He said when He said we are saved by grace .

JD


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Judy Taylor



I understand about having babies and don't know 
if God would consider that breaking the Sabbath (though we might). However, I 
don't see preparing to rest one day a weektoo much to ask. Jesus did 
say that the Sabbath was made for man and I've heard that expounded on quite 
often - how we need the rest and this is true. However in Exodus 31:14 
where God gives the command to Moses he says "it's a sign between Him and Israel 
for their generations" I don't see the7th Day Adventists included in there 
though. I believethey verge on cultism. I have a good friend who joined 
them recently and she's gotten rid of all jewelry [including her wedding rings] 
and suddenly everything revolves around the Sabbath for her. I love her and we 
still talk but we've lostthesweet fellowship around God's Word that 
we used to enjoy. Doctrines like these are sodivisive.

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:26:39 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
I 
don't know if dad would have known when baby was going to decide to make an 
appearance. Even today, we give an estimated due date. I've never delivered on 
any of my given due dates; I've always been late. Sometimes women labor for 
hours...maybe mom began labor Friday afternoon and was still laboring way into 
the night and into the early morning hours. Some 7th Day 
Adventists would say that the Sabbath was given for a sign as well, and if you 
don't have that Sabbath keeping sign or "mark", you go to hell. Sabbath was made 
for man. I don't think it's called control by fear. I think it's 
called curse for disobedience. Sometimes the curse, or correction, has a high 
price, even today. Kay

  
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
Taylor
Good food for thought Kay - I know there is 
nothing we can do about when babies decide to make an appearance but don't 
you think that if dad knows the birth is any day now that he could prepare? 
God doesn't require of us more than we can give and there was another aspect 
to the Sabbath for Israel and this is the Covenant with Moses; the Sabbath 
was given for a sign so that man was a Covenant breaker also. It was 
God who said he should be stoned after the ppl had apprehended him not 
knowing what to do. So it appears as though he was made a public 
example of what not to do. Is this called "control by fear?" 
I've experienced rebellion first hand also and think seeing a public stoning 
would have had an impact. WDYT?

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:43:08 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

I 
think he very could be that nutty. We see nuttiness like that every day. 
It's called rebellion. We do things everyday just because our parents say 
no, our doctor says no, etc. Doc says...no more cantaloupe...you'll have a 
severe reaction and what happens? We crave cantaloupe. Mom says: Don't smoke 
dope, your brain will go mushy. We say...REALLY? Let's find 
outThe reference to the fire going is very 
goodhowever, the command on that is not to KINDLE a fire on the Sabbath. 
If he already had a fire going, it would be okay to keep it going, 
especially if it was cold. Scenario: It's cold and a baby was just born in 
the camp. It happens to be Sabbath. Dad wants to be able to keep his newborn 
babe warm and goes and gathers sticks. If baby isn't kept warm, he will die. 
I don't think God would kill dadsaving life supercedes Sabbath law. I 
also believe GIVING (I don't know if that's the right word I want) life 
supercedes. I've had several of my children born on Sabbath. That's 
certainly work to mebut there's absolutely nothing you can do to stop 
labor once it's started! Kay

  
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
Taylor
Surely he wasn't that "nutty" - I see 
him as someone who was lacked the fear of God [like Korah] and followed 
after his fleshwhich the Law was there to curb. It's human 
nature to want to be on top of the game or two steps ahead of everyone 
else so this fellow was pushing the envelope and I don't think he really 
believed that God was going to do anything about it; I heard someone 
once say 'you know if he was getting wood that he had a fire going 
somewhere and so that's probably not all he was doing. jt

On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:19:17 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
The man picking up sticks was probably doing it to flip the bird 
to God.That's very different than attempting to beautify the 
campground. K.
  
  


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



I 
would agreeit is a sign between and Israel. I would expound on that to 
include those grafted in, which would include Believers. I would think the 7th 
Dayers are included as Believers. I agree they put quite a bit of emphasis on 
the Sabbath. I find it interesting that they focus so much on ONE aspect of 
God's holy days...they generally don't celebrate the other Holy days God gave 
us. I think there are "Judaizers" in all walks of 
Christianity.
On 
preparing to rest one day a week...I think it should be the one day God said. He 
said so for a reason. I see nowhere that it was changed, except for what the men 
in the Catholic church changed. That was man changing, not God. I see man 
proclaiming ...tomorrow will be a feast unto the Lord...and God saying, Oh, no 
you don't, that's not any day I said...and many were killed for disobeying and 
worshipping a golden calf. Curse for disobedience.
Too 
bad about your friend. I've seen several go off into lala-land as 
well.

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  TaylorSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 08.45To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  I understand about having babies and don't 
  know if God would consider that breaking the Sabbath (though we might). 
  However, I don't see preparing to rest one day a weektoo much to 
  ask. Jesus did say that the Sabbath was made for man and I've heard that 
  expounded on quite often - how we need the rest and this is true. 
  However in Exodus 31:14 where God gives the command to Moses he says "it's a 
  sign between Him and Israel for their generations" I don't see the7th 
  Day Adventists included in there though. I believethey verge on cultism. 
  I have a good friend who joined them recently and she's gotten rid of all 
  jewelry [including her wedding rings] and suddenly everything revolves around 
  the Sabbath for her. I love her and we still talk but we've 
  lostthesweet fellowship around God's Word that we used to enjoy. 
  Doctrines like these are sodivisive.
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 08:26:39 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  I 
  don't know if dad would have known when baby was going to decide to make an 
  appearance. Even today, we give an estimated due date. I've never delivered on 
  any of my given due dates; I've always been late. Sometimes women labor for 
  hours...maybe mom began labor Friday afternoon and was still laboring way into 
  the night and into the early morning hours. Some 7th Day 
  Adventists would say that the Sabbath was given for a sign as well, and if you 
  don't have that Sabbath keeping sign or "mark", you go to hell. Sabbath was 
  made for man. I don't think it's called control by fear. I 
  think it's called curse for disobedience. Sometimes the curse, or correction, 
  has a high price, even today. Kay




Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Lance Muir



I'm beginning to wonder just how representative TT 
is 'theologically'. There's a book in here somewhere. I've stopped thinking 
-'no, that's one person who believes THAT'

- Original Message - 

  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 04, 2005 07:49
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
  the Messianic Movement
  
  Teachable and unreachable must be one and the 
  same in your economy Lance because you reject everything but trinitarian 
  orthodoxy and give no scriptural reason why. Jesustold us His Word 
  is what will bear eternal fruit.He is our example and during His earthly 
  ministry He didn't appear to be very open 
  structured and theologically flexible to me..
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:37:04 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  Actually, slowly once again, I'm coming to 
  understand that what God MEANS is what you  David say he MEANS. i AM 
  TEACHABLE, YOU KNOW.
  

  From: Judy Taylor 
  What if I don't 
  believe that God is "open structured and theologically flexible?" even 
  though He is unwilling for any to perish 
  and even if His mercy does endure forever... He don't play - He says what 
  He means and means what He says so whyplay fast and loose with His 
  Words.
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:11:58 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  No Judy, you tell 'em. Remember, he's got a 
  stick in his hand.
  

  From: Judy 
      Taylor 
      Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
  Judaizers within the Messianic Movement
  
  Tell that to the man who was out there 
  picking up sticks on the Sabbath.
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  I do believe that G_d is more 'open 
  structured' (read theologically flexible) than most of His 
  disciples.
  

  From: Slade Henson 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  I think Slade has his thoughts on 
  it more "thought out"...does that make sense? He's studied the 
  issue in depth due to some anti-missionary problems we've run into 
  in the past. I don't knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. 
  K.
  
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
Lance MuirIt is becoming 
clear that 'othodox trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do 
Slade and Jeff believe as you on this? 

  From: Slade Henson 
  God is one, Scripture says so. God has many different 
  aspects or manifestations
  
  I still haven't found any reference to 
  trinity in Scripture. What I truly think is that some dude 
  tried to make God more understandable to our very limited 
  minds and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me 
  to make a midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd 
  like to know when the trinity concept actually came into being 
  with Christians. I know Judaism has an aspect of it somewhere 
  way back in time
  
  Kay
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 
2005 18.22To: 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
[TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic 
MovementIn a message dated 1/3/2005 
1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there 
  was such a Biblical term in thefirst 
place.I think David has a problem 
here. If you are not denying God in 
Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal 
Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God the 
Reality by asserting the oneness of God? 
John 





Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Lance Muir



Are you putting yourself forward as a candidate, 
Judy?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: January 04, 2005 08:15
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
  the Messianic Movement
  
  Good food for thought Kay - I know there is 
  nothing we can do about when babies decide to make an appearance but don't you 
  think that if dad knows the birth is any day now that he could prepare? God 
  doesn't require of us more than we can give and there was another aspect to 
  the Sabbath for Israel and this is the Covenant with Moses; the Sabbath was 
  given for a sign so that man was a Covenant breaker also. It was God who 
  said he should be stoned after the ppl had apprehended him not knowing what to 
  do. So it appears as though he was made a public example of what not to 
  do. Is this called "control by fear?" I've experienced rebellion 
  first hand also and think seeing a public stoning would have had an impact. 
  WDYT?
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:43:08 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  
  I 
  think he very could be that nutty. We see nuttiness like that every day. It's 
  called rebellion. We do things everyday just because our parents say no, our 
  doctor says no, etc. Doc says...no more cantaloupe...you'll have a severe 
  reaction and what happens? We crave cantaloupe. Mom says: Don't smoke dope, 
  your brain will go mushy. We say...REALLY? Let's find 
  outThe reference to the fire going is very 
  goodhowever, the command on that is not to KINDLE a fire on the Sabbath. 
  If he already had a fire going, it would be okay to keep it going, especially 
  if it was cold. Scenario: It's cold and a baby was just born in the camp. It 
  happens to be Sabbath. Dad wants to be able to keep his newborn babe warm and 
  goes and gathers sticks. If baby isn't kept warm, he will die. I don't think 
  God would kill dadsaving life supercedes Sabbath law. I also believe 
  GIVING (I don't know if that's the right word I want) life supercedes. I've 
  had several of my children born on Sabbath. That's certainly work to mebut 
  there's absolutely nothing you can do to stop labor once it's started! 
  Kay
  

  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  Taylor
  Surely he wasn't that "nutty" - I see him 
  as someone who was lacked the fear of God [like Korah] and followed after 
  his fleshwhich the Law was there to curb. It's human nature to 
  want to be on top of the game or two steps ahead of everyone else so this 
  fellow was pushing the envelope and I don't think he really believed that 
  God was going to do anything about it; I heard someone once say 'you know 
  if he was getting wood that he had a fire going somewhere and so that's 
  probably not all he was doing. jt
  
  On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 07:19:17 -0500 "Slade Henson" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  The man picking up sticks was probably doing it to flip the bird to 
  God.That's very different than attempting to beautify the 
  campground. K.



RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








Keep in mind that just because something
is not a salvation issue does not mean it is unimportant.
Everything we allow into our lives is important, as it makes us who we are. The
prudent walk on the side of caution, realizing we have a sneaky and powerful
enemy. We should walk humbly aware of our own weaknesses. We should be single minded
in our pursuit of holiness. We can still live a joyful and exuberant life at
the same time. Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005
5:57 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement







I agree with that. I know of some
who say...can't dance, can't drink, can't smoke, can't go to the movies...or
you go to hell! And others who say...you better call Him by the RIGHT name...or
you go to hell. I think some of it gets pretty ridiculous. I don't think those
are salvation issues. I think G-d has expectations of us...the same as I have
expectations of my children.











Kay





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005
06.41
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement



I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' (read
theologically flexible) than most of His disciples.













RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








How about the guy who got struck down for
reaching out to steady the ark of the covenant? Izzy











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005
6:19 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement







The man picking up sticks was probably
doing it to flip the bird to God.That's very different than attempting to
beautify the campground.

















K.











-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005
07.07
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement







Tell that to the man who was out there
picking up sticks on the Sabbath.











On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:





I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' (read
theologically flexible) than most of His disciples.









From: Slade
Henson 





To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org






I think Slade has his thoughts on it more
thought out...does that make sense? He's studied the issue in depth
due to some anti-missionary problems we've run into in the past. I don't
knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. K.





From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
It is becoming clear that 'othodox trinitarians' are a minority on TT.
Kay: Do Slade and Jeff believe as you on this? 





From: Slade
Henson 





God is one, Scripture says so. God has
many different aspects or manifestations











I still haven't found any reference to
trinity in Scripture. What I truly think is that some dude tried to make God
more understandable to our very limited minds and taught us about the three in
one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of something hard to understand.
I'd like to know when the trinity concept actually came into being with
Christians. I know Judaism has an aspect of it somewhere way back in time











Kay





-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005
18.22
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement

In a message dated 1/3/2005 1:26:04
PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:





Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a Biblical term in the
first place.



I think David has a problem here. If you are not denying God
in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal Son, how
can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality by asserting the oneness of
God? 

John 



























RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



I 
don't know. I guess it sucked to be him. How about Aaron's sons who brought 
strange fire before the Lord?

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  ShieldsFamilySent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 
  10.03To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement
  
  How about the guy who 
  got struck down for reaching out to steady the ark of the covenant? 
  Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Slade 
  HensonSent: Tuesday, January 
  04, 2005 6:19 AMTo: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
  the Messianic Movement
  
  
  The man picking up 
  sticks was probably doing it to flip the bird to God.That's very 
  different than attempting to beautify the 
  campground.
  
  
  
  
  
  K.
  
  
  
  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy TaylorSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 
  07.07To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
  the Messianic Movement
  

Tell that to the man who was out 
there picking up sticks on the Sabbath.



On Tue, 4 Jan 2005 06:40:45 -0500 "Lance Muir" 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

I do believe that G_d is more 
'open structured' (read theologically flexible) than most of His 
disciples.

  

From: Slade Henson 


To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 


I think Slade 
has his thoughts on it more "thought out"...does that make sense? He's 
studied the issue in depth due to some anti-missionary problems we've 
run into in the past. I don't knowwhat Jeff's thoughts are. 
K.

  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance 
  MuirIt is becoming clear that 
  'othodox trinitarians' are a minority on TT. Kay: Do Slade and Jeff 
  believe as you on this? 
  

From: 
Slade Henson 


God is one, 
Scripture says so. God has many different aspects or 
manifestations



I still 
haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. What I truly 
think is that some dude tried to make God more understandable to our 
very limited minds and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense 
to me to make a midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd 
like to know when the trinity concept actually came into being with 
Christians. I know Judaism has an aspect of it somewhere way back in 
time



Kay

  -Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 
  2005 18.22To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] 
      Judaizers within the Messianic 
  Movement
  In a message dated 
  1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  writes:
  Denouncing 
  trinity? I didn't know there was such a Biblical term in 
  thefirst place.
  I think David 
  has a problem here. If you are not denying God 
  in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal 
  Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God the 
  Reality by asserting the oneness of God? 
  John 

  
  




RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson



Sosometimes the prudent do nothing but sit in a chair in a strait 
jacket, too, because of all the CAN'Ts they can't do

K. 
:)

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  ShieldsFamilySent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 
  10.00To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement
  
  Keep in mind that 
  just because something is not a salvation issue does not mean it is 
  unimportant. Everything we allow into our lives is important, as it 
  makes us who we are. The prudent walk on the side of caution, realizing 
  we have a sneaky and powerful enemy. We should walk humbly aware of our own 
  weaknesses. We should be single minded in our pursuit of holiness. 
  We can still live a joyful and exuberant life at the same time. 
  Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Slade 
  HensonSent: Tuesday, January 
  04, 2005 5:57 AMTo: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within 
  the Messianic Movement
  
  
  I agree with 
  that. I know of some who say...can't dance, can't drink, can't smoke, can't go 
  to the movies...or you go to hell! And others who say...you better call Him by 
  the RIGHT name...or you go to hell. I think some of it gets pretty ridiculous. 
  I don't think those are salvation issues. I think G-d has expectations of 
  us...the same as I have expectations of my 
  children.
  
  
  
  Kay
  
-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance MuirSent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 
06.41To: 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
within the Messianic Movement

I do believe that G_d is more 
'open structured' (read theologically flexible) than most of His 
disciples.




RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread ShieldsFamily












but don't you think that if dad knows the birth is any day now that he
could prepare?



Judy, that statement cracks me up as I
remember in October my DIL (a week overdue) having labor pains as my son
removes the back door and paints the frame and saying, Dont you
think we should wait and see if its REAL labor? As they
spent the night at the hospital I got to stay home and fight the
mosquitoes. J Izzy










RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








LOL! I guess some on TT knows how
that feels. (Not me!!!) J Izzy



PS I think God just put a big electric
charge on the arc and the poor guy grounded it. Strange fire was
rebellion plain and simple.











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005
9:07 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement







I don't know. I guess it sucked to be him. How about Aaron's sons who
brought strange fire before the Lord?











Kay





























RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread ShieldsFamily








There are a whole lot more CANS. (Ask Builder
Bob) Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005
9:10 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement







Sosometimes the prudent do nothing but
sit in a chair in a strait jacket, too, because of all the CAN'Ts they can't
do











K. :)





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of ShieldsFamily
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005
10.00
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement

Keep in mind that just because something
is not a salvation issue does not mean it is unimportant.
Everything we allow into our lives is important, as it makes us who we
are. The prudent walk on the side of caution, realizing we have a sneaky
and powerful enemy. We should walk humbly aware of our own weaknesses. We
should be single minded in our pursuit of holiness. We can still live a
joyful and exuberant life at the same time. Izzy











From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005
5:57 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement







I agree with that. I know of some
who say...can't dance, can't drink, can't smoke, can't go to the movies...or
you go to hell! And others who say...you better call Him by the RIGHT name...or
you go to hell. I think some of it gets pretty ridiculous. I don't think those are
salvation issues. I think G-d has expectations of us...the same as I have
expectations of my children.











Kay





-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005
06.41
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement



I do believe that G_d is more 'open structured' (read
theologically flexible) than most of His disciples.















Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread David Miller
Kay wrote:
 I experienced one cultish group within 
 the past couple of years.

Was it a Messianic cult?

What made it cult-like?

Peace be with you.
David Miller.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread David Miller
Slade wrote:
 What a terrible thing to say. In this post, you
 have proven the falseness of your prophetic claim.

Why? I hope you don't think prophets are perfect in knowledge.  I hope you 
don't think prophets are perfect communicators.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson
I would say they claimed to be Messianic. However, I would not consider them
Messianic. They are like no Messianics I know now or have known in the past.
They were of their own breed, I guess.

The control issues, the manipulations, the twisting words and Scripture,
sometimes outright lies, the self-righteous stuff, the way others were
treated, and definitely piety. That's all I can think of off the top of my
head right now.

Kay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 12.14
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


Kay wrote:
 I experienced one cultish group within
 the past couple of years.

Was it a Messianic cult?

What made it cult-like?

Peace be with you.
David Miller.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson
Yanno, on second thought, no, I don't think claimed to be Messianic. Sorry
about that. My mistake.

Kay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 12.21
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


I would say they claimed to be Messianic. However, I would not consider them
Messianic. They are like no Messianics I know now or have known in the past.
They were of their own breed, I guess.

The control issues, the manipulations, the twisting words and Scripture,
sometimes outright lies, the self-righteous stuff, the way others were
treated, and definitely piety. That's all I can think of off the top of my
head right now.

Kay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 12.14
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


Kay wrote:
 I experienced one cultish group within
 the past couple of years.

Was it a Messianic cult?

What made it cult-like?

Peace be with you.
David Miller.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread David Miller
Kay wrote:
 I would say they claimed to be Messianic.
 However, I would not consider them
 Messianic.

This sounds like the kind of example I was trying to describe for you 
before.  When I say Messianic or Messianic Movement, I am talking about 
those who associate themselves with that label.  In other words, I am 
talking about folks like these you encountered who claim to be Messianic. 
Maybe that will help you understand my past comments better.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson
Well, I re-posted saying  I had a second thought. I've thought more about it
and don't remember one time they called themselves Messianic. I think I as
mistaken. I think there were some Messianic beliefs in their system of
beliefs...like feasts and eating properly...but that would be about it. 7th
Day believers have Messianic Beliefs in their system, too.

K.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 12.44
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


Kay wrote:
 I would say they claimed to be Messianic.
 However, I would not consider them
 Messianic.

This sounds like the kind of example I was trying to describe for you
before.  When I say Messianic or Messianic Movement, I am talking about
those who associate themselves with that label.  In other words, I am
talking about folks like these you encountered who claim to be Messianic.
Maybe that will help you understand my past comments better.

Peace be with you.
David Miller.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Terry Clifton




ShieldsFamily wrote:

  
  

  
  
  Keep in mind
that just because something
is not a salvation issue does not mean it is unimportant.
Everything we allow into our lives is important, as it makes us who we
are. The
prudent walk on the side of caution, realizing we have a sneaky and
powerful
enemy. We should walk humbly aware of our own weaknesses. We should be
single minded
in our pursuit of holiness. We can still live a joyful and exuberant
life at
the same time. Izzy
  
  
  
  
  
  

Amen to all the above.
Terry





Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread David Miller
Kay wrote:
 just did a little research and found both
 of them were Catholics.

Do you mean Roman Catholics?  Careful.  While Roman Catholics might want to 
claim a pedigree to the first apostles and therefore claim these men 
(Tertullian and Athanasius) as being fathers in Roman Catholicism, the truth 
is that Roman Catholicism did not begin until the 11th century.  Prior to 
1054, there were no separate denominations in Christianity.  The Roman 
Catholic Church was the first denomination.  The reason that few of us have 
this sense of history is because our educational system has descended from 
Roman Catholicism and is therefore biased by their slant on history.  If you 
consult with historians from Eastern Orthodoxy, they claim that they 
represent the oldest church.  The fact is that Roman Catholicism did not 
exist as we know it until the final split they made from the Eastern 
churches when they claimed that their Bishop in Rome had supremacy over all 
the churches of the world.

Furthermore, both Tertullian and Athanasius lived and belonged primarily to 
churches in Africa.  While they both visited Rome at times during their 
lives, they were not very much part of the church there.  Athanasius was in 
Rome when he was forced into exile from the church, and returned to Egypt 
when his banishment was lifted.  When he was banished several times again, 
he sought refuge in Northern Egypt or the outskirts of Alexandria, not Rome. 
Clearly he was not a close adherent to the church powers of Rome, though he 
was least rejected by the rulers there at the time.

Kay wrote:
 The dude who also came up with the pre-trib
 rapture theory was also a Catholic a Jesuit priest
 who claimed to be a Jew.) I can't remember his name.

This guys name was Manuel Lacunza, who wrote under the name, Juan Josafat 
Ben-Ezra, but I think it inappropriate to identify him as the originator of 
the pre-trib rapture.  You might want to read the article at the following 
website:
http://www.preteristarchive.com/PartialPreterism/macpherson-dave_dd_04.html

The article referenced above indicates that Lacunza never taught the 
pre-trib rapture.

I think John Darby gets the real credit, though I realize others want to 
credit Margaret MacDonald or Edward Irving.  They were all three associated 
with each other at some point, but Darby really articulated and put forth 
the viewpoint as a theologian.  This happened around 1830, the same time 
Joseph Smith was introducing new Scriptures and a new church here in the 
United States.  :-)

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Lance Muir
Was he jumpin' G's brother?


- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 04, 2005 14:14
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


 Kay wrote:
  just did a little research and found both
  of them were Catholics.

 Do you mean Roman Catholics?  Careful.  While Roman Catholics might want
to
 claim a pedigree to the first apostles and therefore claim these men
 (Tertullian and Athanasius) as being fathers in Roman Catholicism, the
truth
 is that Roman Catholicism did not begin until the 11th century.  Prior to
 1054, there were no separate denominations in Christianity.  The Roman
 Catholic Church was the first denomination.  The reason that few of us
have
 this sense of history is because our educational system has descended from
 Roman Catholicism and is therefore biased by their slant on history.  If
you
 consult with historians from Eastern Orthodoxy, they claim that they
 represent the oldest church.  The fact is that Roman Catholicism did not
 exist as we know it until the final split they made from the Eastern
 churches when they claimed that their Bishop in Rome had supremacy over
all
 the churches of the world.

 Furthermore, both Tertullian and Athanasius lived and belonged primarily
to
 churches in Africa.  While they both visited Rome at times during their
 lives, they were not very much part of the church there.  Athanasius was
in
 Rome when he was forced into exile from the church, and returned to Egypt
 when his banishment was lifted.  When he was banished several times again,
 he sought refuge in Northern Egypt or the outskirts of Alexandria, not
Rome.
 Clearly he was not a close adherent to the church powers of Rome, though
he
 was least rejected by the rulers there at the time.

 Kay wrote:
  The dude who also came up with the pre-trib
  rapture theory was also a Catholic a Jesuit priest
  who claimed to be a Jew.) I can't remember his name.

 This guys name was Manuel Lacunza, who wrote under the name, Juan Josafat
 Ben-Ezra, but I think it inappropriate to identify him as the originator
of
 the pre-trib rapture.  You might want to read the article at the following
 website:

http://www.preteristarchive.com/PartialPreterism/macpherson-dave_dd_04.html

 The article referenced above indicates that Lacunza never taught the
 pre-trib rapture.

 I think John Darby gets the real credit, though I realize others want to
 credit Margaret MacDonald or Edward Irving.  They were all three
associated
 with each other at some point, but Darby really articulated and put forth
 the viewpoint as a theologian.  This happened around 1830, the same time
 Joseph Smith was introducing new Scriptures and a new church here in the
 United States.  :-)

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller.


 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Jeff Powers
Kay, If I remember correctly, they didn't call themselves Messianic. I can't 
remamber what they did call themselves though. On the other hand, I don't 
care either! I'm just glad I only spent a week with the wackos! It was more 
than enough for me.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 12.21
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement
I would say they claimed to be Messianic. However, I would not consider 
them
Messianic. They are like no Messianics I know now or have known in the 
past.
They were of their own breed, I guess.

The control issues, the manipulations, the twisting words and Scripture,
sometimes outright lies, the self-righteous stuff, the way others were
treated, and definitely piety. That's all I can think of off the top of my
head right now.
Kay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 12.14
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement
Kay wrote:
I experienced one cultish group within
the past couple of years.
Was it a Messianic cult?
What made it cult-like?
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Slade Henson
Maybe I've blocked that from my mind... It's probably a symptom of
cult-shock!

Hey JD: I might need some counseling...or another beer!

Kay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 17.26
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


Kay, If I remember correctly, they didn't call themselves Messianic. I can't
remamber what they did call themselves though. On the other hand, I don't
care either! I'm just glad I only spent a week with the wackos! It was more
than enough for me.
Jeff
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Slade Henson
 Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 12.21
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


 I would say they claimed to be Messianic. However, I would not consider
 them
 Messianic. They are like no Messianics I know now or have known in the
 past.
 They were of their own breed, I guess.

 The control issues, the manipulations, the twisting words and Scripture,
 sometimes outright lies, the self-righteous stuff, the way others were
 treated, and definitely piety. That's all I can think of off the top of my
 head right now.

 Kay

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
 Sent: Tuesday, 04 January, 2005 12.14
 To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


 Kay wrote:
 I experienced one cultish group within
 the past couple of years.

 Was it a Messianic cult?

 What made it cult-like?

 Peace be with you.
 David Miller.

 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
 know
 how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
 know
 how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

 --
 Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may
 know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
 http://www.InnGlory.org

 If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
 friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.



--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-04 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/4/2005 2:41:50 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Hey JD: I might need some counseling...or another beer!


Go with the beer. 

Here for ya,

John


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread David Miller
Kay wrote:
 I'm also waiting for your answer as to what
 aspects of the Messianic Movement you feel
 may be dangerous are, David.

The dangerous aspects are those within the movement who emphasize shadows 
over reality.  For example, those who think that keeping Torah commandments 
that deal with shadows is the only way to be pleasing to God.  This would 
include the practice of killing a lamb in addition to faith in Yeshua, of 
observing the moedim in addition to remembering that to which they point, of 
sabbath observance in addition to entering the kingdom of God, of 
circumcision of the flesh in addition to circumcision of the heart, etc. 
Also, those who insist upon using Hebrew names, of denouncing the Trinity, 
etc.  Generally, the Judaizing elements are causes of concern.  The letter 
kills but the spirit gives life.

Peace be with you.
David Miller. 


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Slade Henson
I don't know of anyone who emphasizes the shadows over reality. Maybe I'm
not understanding what you mean.

Killing a lamb as in sacrificing a lamb?? I know of no Messianic Believer
who does this.

Observing the moadim...please elaborate. Observance of the Holy days are
commanded, Sabbath observance is a command, as well as circumcision.

Those who insist on using Hebrew names are called Sacred Name people. (We
are not)

Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a Biblical term in the
first place.

The Spirit gives life, true. Outward actions of a Believer will show by
obeying the commands of God, to please Him, honor Him, and obey Him. There
are blessings for obedience, curses for disobedience. I choose to receive
the blessing rather than the curse. It does please God, He says so when He
says...Be holy, because I'm Holy...this is how you be holy.

Kay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Miller
Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 15.35
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


Kay wrote:
 I'm also waiting for your answer as to what
 aspects of the Messianic Movement you feel
 may be dangerous are, David.

The dangerous aspects are those within the movement who emphasize shadows
over reality.  For example, those who think that keeping Torah commandments
that deal with shadows is the only way to be pleasing to God.  This would
include the practice of killing a lamb in addition to faith in Yeshua, of
observing the moedim in addition to remembering that to which they point, of
sabbath observance in addition to entering the kingdom of God, of
circumcision of the flesh in addition to circumcision of the heart, etc.
Also, those who insist upon using Hebrew names, of denouncing the Trinity,
etc.  Generally, the Judaizing elements are causes of concern.  The letter
kills but the spirit gives life.

Peace be with you.
David Miller.


--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6)
http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/3/2005 12:37:19 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

The dangerous aspects are those within the movement who emphasize shadows 
over reality. For example, those who think that keeping Torah commandments
that deal with shadows is the only way to be pleasing to God. the Gentile brethren often stress commandment keeping as the avenue to righteousness and salvation -- a very popular opinion This would 
include the practice of killing a lamb in addition to faith in Yeshua, of 
observing the moedim in addition to remembering that to which they point, of 
sabbath observance in addition to entering the kingdom of God, of 
circumcision of the flesh in addition to circumcision of the heart, etc. 
Also, those who insist upon using Hebrew names, of denouncing the Trinity, 
etc. the Gentile church will often press modern day lingo as well -- sinners prayer, Trinity, Spirit baptism with evidence of speaking in tongues, rapture, accepting Christ as your personal Savior, and the like. Generally, the Judaizing elements are causes of concern. As is their counterparts - The Bentile Legalist. The letter kills but the spirit gives life


I am not challenging David, here, but it is interesting that nearly exact parallels can be seen in the Gentile Church. Note the bold print wording above.

JD


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a Biblical term in the
first place.


I think David has a problem here. If you are not denying God in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality by asserting the oneness of God? 

John


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Slade Henson



The 
Bentile Legalist? What's that mean? Bent people?

Kay 
:)

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  18.18To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic MovementIn a message dated 1/3/2005 12:37:19 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  The dangerous aspects are those within the movement who 
emphasize shadows over reality. For example, those who think that 
keeping Torah commandmentsthat deal with shadows is the only way to be 
pleasing to God. the Gentile brethren often stress commandment keeping as 
the avenue to righteousness and salvation -- a very 
popular opinion This would include the practice of 
killing a lamb in addition to faith in Yeshua, of observing the moedim 
in addition to remembering that to which they point, of sabbath 
observance in addition to entering the kingdom of God, of circumcision 
of the flesh in addition to circumcision of the heart, etc. Also, those 
who insist upon using Hebrew names, of denouncing the Trinity, etc. 
the Gentile church will often press modern day lingo as well 
-- sinners prayer, Trinity, Spirit baptism with evidence of 
speaking in tongues, rapture, accepting Christ as 
your personal Savior, and the like. Generally, the Judaizing 
elements are causes of concern. As is their counterparts - The Bentile 
Legalist. The letter kills but the spirit gives 
  lifeI am not challenging David, here, but it is 
  interesting that nearly exact parallels can be seen in the Gentile 
  Church. Note the bold print wording 
above.JD




RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Slade Henson



God is 
one, Scripture says so. God has many different aspects or 
manifestations

I 
still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. What I truly think is 
that some dude tried to make God more understandable to our very limited minds 
and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of 
something hard to understand. I'd like to know when the trinity concept actually 
came into being with Christians. I know Judaism has an aspect of it somewhere 
way back in time

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  18.22To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic MovementIn a message dated 1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a Biblical 
term in thefirst place.I think David has a 
  problem here. If you are not denying God in Trinity by 
  refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal Son, how can we say 
  that Messianics deny God the Reality by asserting the oneness of 
  God? John 




Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/3/2005 4:21:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



The Bentile Legalist? What's that mean? Bent people?
 
Kay :)


Dang me !! Let's try Gentile Legalist. I really need to proof read more carefully. but I get excited, start typing, and BAM  I have fathered another misspelling. 

John


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/3/2005 4:35:00 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


God is one, Scripture says so. God has many different aspects or manifestations
 
I still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. What I truly think is that some dude tried to make God more understandable to our very limited minds and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd like to know when the trinity concept actually came into being with Christians. I know Judaism has an aspect of it somewhere way back in time
 
Kay
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 18.22
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement


In a message dated 1/3/2005 1:26:04 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


Denouncing trinity? I didn't know there was such a Biblical term in the
first place.


I think David has a problem here. If you are not denying God in Trinity by refusing to consider Christ as the Eternal Son, how can we say that Messianics deny God the Reality by asserting the oneness of God? 

John 


Actually, I agree and have made this very point in the past. But here, I'm trying to make a very different point so I went with an unchallenged error, presenting an illustrative parallel, setting up a of contrast of paradigms and forcing the reader to agree with what can only be called absolute proof. Tea anyone?

John Boy


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Slade Henson



I 
thought you were purposely being funny...

K.

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  20.00To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic MovementIn a message dated 1/3/2005 4:21:33 PM Pacific Standard Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  The Bentile Legalist? What's that mean? Bent 
people? Kay :)Dang me !! Let's try 
  Gentile Legalist. I really need to proof read more 
  carefully. but I get excited, start typing, and BAM 
   I have fathered another misspelling. 
  John 




RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Slade Henson



I 
think there's a Scripture that says not to mix beer and tea...or maybe that's 
tradition! :)

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 
  20.08To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: 
  [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic MovementActually, I agree and have made this very point in the 
  past. But here, I'm trying to make a very different 
  point so I went with an unchallenged error, presenting an illustrative 
  parallel, setting up a of contrast of paradigms and forcing the reader to 
  agree with what can only be called absolute proof. Tea 
  anyone?John Boy 




Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Judy Taylor




In a message dated 1/3/2005 4:35:00 PM Pacific 
Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:God is one, Scripture says so. God has many different aspects or 
manifestations I 
still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. What I truly think is 
that some dude tried to make God more understandable to our very limited minds 
and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me to make a midrash out of 
something hard to understand. I'd like to know when the trinity concept actually 
came into being with Christians. I know Judaism has an aspect of it somewhere 
way back in timeKay

Tertullian was the 
one who came up with the Trinity and Athanasius later came up with the "eternal 
Son of God concept"
Neither are in either 
Old or New Testaments and neither were taught by the 
Apostles.

I think you've hit 
the nail on the head so to speak Kay because God did not instruct an elite group 
to tell us what the scriptures mean.
We are individually 
responsible to study to show ourselves approved unto God as a workman who need 
not be ashamed, rightly
dividing the Word of 
Truth.

Makes sense to me 
also... judyt


  


RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Slade Henson



Thanks, Judy. Hmmm...just did a little research and found both of them 
were Catholics. Small wonder. The dude who also came up with the pre-trib 
rapture theory was also a Catholic a Jesuit priest who claimed to be a Jew.) I 
can't remember his name. Very interesting indeed.
Again, 
thanks, Judy. Made me more solid in my beliefs.

Kay

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy 
  TaylorSent: Monday, 03 January, 2005 20.21To: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: 
  TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers 
  within the Messianic Movement
  
  In a message dated 1/3/2005 4:35:00 PM Pacific 
  Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:God is one, Scripture says so. God has many different aspects 
  or manifestations I still haven't found any reference to trinity in Scripture. 
  What I truly think is that some dude tried to make God more understandable to 
  our very limited minds and taught us about the three in one. Makes sense to me 
  to make a midrash out of something hard to understand. I'd like to know when 
  the trinity concept actually came into being with Christians. I know Judaism 
  has an aspect of it somewhere way back in timeKay
  
  Tertullian was the 
  one who came up with the Trinity and Athanasius later came up with the 
  "eternal Son of God concept"
  Neither are in 
  either Old or New Testaments and neither were taught by the 
  Apostles.
  
  I think you've hit 
  the nail on the head so to speak Kay because God did not instruct an elite 
  group to tell us what the scriptures mean.
  We are individually 
  responsible to study to show ourselves approved unto God as a workman who need 
  not be ashamed, rightly
  dividing the Word 
  of Truth.
  
  Makes sense to me 
  also... judyt
  
  





Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Terry Clifton




[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/3/2005 4:21:33 PM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
  
  

The
Bentile Legalist? What's that mean? Bent people?
 
Kay
:)

  
  
Dang me !! Let's try Gentile Legalist. I really need to proof read
more carefully. but I get excited, start typing, and BAM
 I have fathered another misspelling. 
  
John
==
We bin meenin' to talk to you about that.





RE: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread ShieldsFamily




















From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005
7:00 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers
within the Messianic Movement





In a message dated 1/3/2005 4:21:33 PM Pacific Standard
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:






The Bentile Legalist? What's that mean?
Bent people?
 
Kay :)



Dang me !! Let's try Gentile Legalist. I really need to
proof read more carefully. but I get excited, start typing, and
BAM  I have fathered another misspelling. 

John



Without a mother??? Izzy








Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/3/2005 5:16:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


I think there's a Scripture that says not to mix beer and tea...or maybe that's tradition! :)
 
Kay 


You are correct, my dear. It is found in 2 Thought 10:4 next to the passage that allows for tomato juice mixer. I know it is there somewhere because of it's divine taste.

John


Re: [TruthTalk] Judaizers within the Messianic Movement

2005-01-03 Thread Knpraise
In a message dated 1/3/2005 6:53:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:



Dang me !! Let's try Gentile Legalist. I really need to proof read more carefully. but I get excited, start typing, and BAM  I have fathered another misspelling. 

John

 

Without a mother??? Izzy



A. I see your point, now. Thanks. "Father," even when applied to the heavenly Whoever, is just a play on words like the one I used above. Whoa, you got me. So who is that masked man and the one who sits at His right hand -- ops, maybe "right hand," and "sits" are simply manifestations of .. whoever those two or three or four or five persons/people/whatchamacallits. 


What if i called Him (or her or ?) the Eternal Whatchamacallits and we can plug in god, father, son, h.g., lord, savior, and the like -- you know, words that help define the Great Whatchmacallits (notice the plurality of being) but have nothing at all to do with his/her nature, essence, existence or purpose. 

Actually, I think I will stay with Almighty and Eternal Father  it sounds so much more reasonable than Whatchamacallits. 

John the bishop of whatever