framework should use
scope provided since SdoBundleActivator is only used when SDO is running
inside an OSGi container, and the framework classes are provided by the
container.
On 6/3/08, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a thought, would I be right in guessing that if ever our
mentioned before on this thread [1] where
I added a new repository ? It was actually for other jars, but might
help in this case as well...
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg31727.html
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:56 AM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:02 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This failure also occurs with the 2.1 version and the 2.2-beta-1 version.
The current trunk version is 2.2-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, which I haven't found
in
a repository yet, so the only version that seems ever to have
=revrev=620763
2008/6/3 kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The required libraries are
sample-sdo-%RELEASE%.jar
sdo-api-r2.1-%RELEASE%.jar
tuscany-sdo-lib-%RELEASE%.jar
tuscany-sdo-impl-%RELEASE%.jar
tuscany-sdo-tools-%RELEASE%.jar
codegen-ecore-2.2.3.jar
codegen-2.2.3.jar
ecore-2.2.3.jar
in the
binary distro. Rajini's going to take a look when she gets some time.
Kelvin.
2008/6/3 kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The felix jars were introduced in the fix for SDO does not work with
OSGi [1] in commit 620763 [2]. I don't know if this is expected
behaviour, not being an OSGI expert
declaring a provided scope for the felix dependency
would be the right way to do things
Kelvin.
2008/6/3 kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Ant, that looks like progress, but the felix framework jar is now
not in the list of distributed jars.
Kelvin.
2008/6/3 ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED
-sdo-tools-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
wstx-asl-3.2.1.jar
xsd-2.2.3.jar
...ant
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I had an offline chat with Rajini. It seems we need just the framework
jar
of felix in the distro, but if the dependency on felix
, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just a thought, would I be right in guessing that if ever our
SdoBundleActivator is touched in the runtime, then the environment would
be
expected to provide the classes to satisfy
import org.osgi.framework.BundleActivator;
import
As mentioned elsewhere on this list in the discussion about respinning the
SDO 1.1.1 RC, I'm hoping to drop the incubating tag in the release name.
This has led me to look at the parent pom, and I guess we need a new
version of parent pom that doesn't reference the incubator repo, and then
open
Sounds good to me.
Kelvin.
2008/6/3 ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:24 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As mentioned elsewhere on this list in the discussion about respinning
the
SDO 1.1.1 RC, I'm hoping to drop the incubating tag in the release
name
version we should be using please pipe up.
Kelvin.
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?r1=628691r2=642349pathrev=642349diff_format=h
Kelvin.
2008/5/19 kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the samples at the moment.
Also
, but
it's hard to trawl that since so many JIRAs reference the word dependency.
It's not clear to me whether we benefited from a freak bug that was to our
advantage in the 2.2-SNAPSHOT version or whether all the other versions have
a bug/bugs.
Kelvin.
2008/6/2 kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED
2008/5/22 ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:31 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Scott Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That 'generate-sdo' only generates the Java types from the schema types,
right?
It's the WSDL2Java
I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the samples at the moment.
Also, I found that with a combination of using IBM JDK 1.5 and maven 2.0.7 I
got hit by http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-135 when trying to build
from the top. We say in our BUILDING doc that 2.0.7 is OK, perhaps if
* Ignacio Silva-Lepe isilval at apache dot org
* Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelfino at apache dot org
* kelvin goodson kelvingoodson at apache dot org
* Luciano Resende lresende at apache dot org
* Mark Combellack mcombellack at apache dot org
* Matthieu Riou mriou at apache dot org
I find the RSS feed facility for customised JIRA queries a very helpful way
of keeping up with JIRAs. It gives much more control than a mail filter
does. I still get the notifications in my inbox, but when I want to get a
quick overview of recent activity the RSS feed is preferable.
If you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-2110.
-
Resolution: Invalid
If you set the containment of parentProp2 to true the test passes
I traced back the origins of the commented out line [1], and it was
introduced in commented out form (in a different file). That would tend to
suggest that it was there as a reminder of the right thing to do one other
infrastructure was in place, rather than being commented out because it
-Original Message-
From: Kelvin Goodson (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:03 AM
To: Miro Kandic (mkandic)
Subject: [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (TUSCANY-1725) XSD2JavaGenerator
has a problem with associations navigable from both sides
[
https
.
Kelvin.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg28403.html
On 29/02/2008, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote to release the 1.1-incubating release of Tuscany
SDO for Java
The distribution files are at [1]
Maven artifacts for the release
Sorry, in my recent post I gave the wrong link for the general thread -- it
should have been
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16971.html
Kelvin.
On 18/03/2008, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This release candidate turned out to have a few issues when I took
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-2098.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
Surinder, you have uncovered a known problem. It was reported
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12529388#action_12529388
]
kgoodson edited comment on TUSCANY-1725 at 3/18/08 5:03 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-2080.
-
Resolution: Later
The implementation is behaving as per the 2.1 spec.
There is a spec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12578643#action_12578643
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2080:
-
This symptom is seen when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12578666#action_12578666
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2080:
-
I just re-read your report, and see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12578674#action_12578674
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2080:
-
I knocked up a quick test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12578823#action_12578823
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2080:
-
This issue seems to be restricted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12578823#action_12578823
]
kgoodson edited comment on TUSCANY-2080 at 3/14/08 8:59 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12576145#action_12576145
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2058:
-
Having consulted, it seems
On 05/03/2008, Scott Kurz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I didn't follow all of the discussion about removing SDO from the Tuscany
charter... but if SDO is no
longer a special part of the Tuscany project then what would happen to the
W2J/J2W tools built around
SDO support?
The WSDL/WSDL tools
One possibility in the SDO domain that I have heard a request for recently
from more than one source is an ECMAScript/JavaScript implementation of
SDO. This could be started by a GSoC activity. I opened a Wish List item
for it a few days ago as TUSCANY-2065. I don't have deep skills in this
I believe it's important when entering a community to try as best you can to
adopt its culture. I believe both things are important. I can't say in
general I've deliberated long enough to come to a personal conclusion about
which is more important, but in no light hearted fashion I am happy to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-2062:
Component/s: (was: Java SDO Tools)
Java SCA Tools
WSDL2Java code
An ECMAScript version of SDO
Key: TUSCANY-2065
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2065
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Wish
Reporter: Kelvin Goodson
--
This message is automatically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-2065:
Component/s: Java SDO Implementation
An ECMAScript version of SDO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-2031.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Suspect user error as per comment above.
Error encountered when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12575008#action_12575008
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2031:
-
Hello Joseph. I'm sorry that I didn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12575016#action_12575016
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2058:
-
This makes me wonder whether the spec
dot org
kelvin goodson kelvingoodson at apache dot org
Luciano Resende lresende at apache dot org
Mike Edwards edwardsmj at apache dot org
Pete Robbinsrobbinspg at apache dot org
Raymond Feng rfeng at apache
I have restarted this vote as requested.
Kelvin.
On 29/02/2008, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kelvin goodson wrote:
Please vote to alter the wording of the existing draft Tuscany charter
as
discussed in
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200802
?
- Venkat
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kelvin goodson wrote:
Implicit in this rewording is the understanding within the Tuscany
community
that there would be one Apache home for SDO Java development. When
this
thread
Amita,
such a shame when you are so nearly there, however, I am happy to pick
it up from here. Many thanks for getting it so far.
Kelvin.
On 29/02/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I will not be able to continue doing the release management activities
from
now on
member section,
and related technologies.
2) Andy Grove removed as initial member as per his request to step down from
PPMC
3) Mark Combellack added as member by virtue of PPMC membership
Kelvin.
On 28/02/2008, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kelvin goodson wrote:
Please vote to alter
to be prepared to act in the spirit of these discussions,
if the new project is to stand a chance of being accepted into incubation.
Kelvin.
On 28/02/2008, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kelvin goodson wrote:
Implicit in this rewording is the understanding within the Tuscany
to implement SDO anymore --- yes
- and still allows Tuscany to implement SDO --- yes
- and still allows Tuscany to use SDO or any other related technology? ---
yes
Kelvin.
On 25/02/2008, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kelvin goodson wrote:
There's been a discussion thread going
frankb at apache dot org
Ignacio Silva-Lepe isilval at apache dot org
Jean-Sebastien Delfino jsdelfino at apache dot org
kelvin goodson kelvingoodson at apache dot org
Luciano Resende lresende at apache dot org
Mike Edwards
There's been a discussion thread going for a while [1] in the Tuscany
community with regards to shifting the Apache home for SDO Java work to a
new project. This has been going on in parallel to the discussion on the
incubator general list on establishing a new project, originally aimed to
be
There has been a few occasions in the SDO spec meetings where issues
associated with raising exceptions have been resolved in favour of not
requiring the implementer to incur the performance overhead of exception
translation or decoration. There are no exceptions defined by the SDO API,
and only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1079:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-1.1)
Java-SDO-CTS-Next
Possible
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-829:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-1.1)
Java-SDO-CTS-Next
Investigate
oops, I see you have removed them from the notes, sorry, however, it's
better that they are now tidied up in JIRA too ;-)
On 20/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: amita
Date: Wed Feb 20 01:49:40 2008
New Revision: 629397
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1272:
Component/s: (was: Java DAS RDB)
Java SDO Implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1063.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Added print stack trace for any Exception (note one mod
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568499#action_12568499
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
The patch seems to have fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568126#action_12568126
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
I have applied your 2nd patch, after
This commit seems to be causing problems in continuum and elsewhere, but
not in my env. See comments in the JIRA (1293) Investigating.
On 12/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: kelvingoodson
Date: Tue Feb 12 03:13:53 2008
New Revision: 620763
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568064#action_12568064
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-257:
Thanks Amita, I took a scan of the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1293.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the patch Rajini.
SDO does not work with OSGi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12568083#action_12568083
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
Amita, I get clean build from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567667#action_12567667
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
Rajini,
sorry to take so long to get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1688:
I did a check for EMF bugs raised for this issue, but couldn't find one. Do
you know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1689:
I did a check for EMF bugs raised for this issue, but couldn't find one. Do
you know
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567578#action_12567578
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1831:
-
I guess we could parallel the way
The chat will take as input the fruits of Amita's and my recent labours
documented at ...
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SDO+Java+Project
and give you a chance to adjust the priorities we placed on issues, and to
say where you can contribute to help make this a useful
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-182:
---
Component/s: Java SCA Assembly Model
There's too much assumed context in this JIRA
[I'm cross posting to tuscany-dev and tuscany-user again, to be sure all the
Tuscany community sees this. Please usereply rather than reply-all so
that we keep responses to the user list, to help make following the thread
easier and continue to reach the wider audience]
Some of you may be aware
I like to be able to look at a JIRA and readily find the discussion relating
to it, so I find having technical discussion as a series of comments in the
JIRA helpful. In this pattern it makes sense to copy JIRA comments to the
dev list, as it forms the substance of our technical communication. I
My top 3 in
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Graduation+Next+Stepsare
11,12,13,19,22,32/33,38 and 18 but modified to have a policy of being
vocal early when no-one has the bandwidth to address an incoming JIRA. I
know that's not 3, but hey!
I can't see on the wiki page
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1514:
Component/s: (was: Java DAS RDB)
Java SDO Implementation
This JIRA
This is a follow-up invitation for you to influence the current SDO Java
release content that Amita is managing. We tried having an IRC slot in
Amita's working day (actually starting at 9:30PM her time; summary posted
at [1]), but didn't get participation, which may have been due to the
early
Looks fine to me
On 1 Feb 2008, at 16:09, Mike Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm looking at copying the 1.1 release artifacts up onto the new
distribution infrastructure at
www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
We need to make a decision about how this will be
I had an instant messaging chat with Amita, covering issues of release
management, including
license compliance, cutting tags/branches, sample programs, using the
distribution project, building and deploying a release candidate, pgp
signing, maven staging repositories
appended is the transcript
Having seen the version from sebb I note there's just a [miscellany]
introducer required. I'll fix it.
Kelvin.
On 29/01/2008, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Substituting the contents of this file into my config file causes the
error
svn: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator
Substituting the contents of this file into my config file causes the error
svn: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application
Data\Subversion\config:4: Section header expected
when using svn command line version ...
svn, version 1.4.5 (r25188)
compiled Aug 22 2007, 20:56:15
or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1293:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
SDO does not work with OSGi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561997#action_12561997
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1483:
-
Your most recent patch ( 1483
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12561304#action_12561304
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2009:
-
I'm surprised that the Ecore equality
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1026.
-
Resolution: Invalid
The passage of time has made this JIRA invalid. Improvements
On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating and
keeping
ref. to the
old mail thread -
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg27168.html.
I am starting a new thread now.
Web Site documentation:- I
far in above which can be
included?
===
Regards,
Amita
On Jan 16, 2008 1:47 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Amita,
that's great! I guess collating the state of the fixed and unfixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12559045#action_12559045
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1483:
-
Amita, thanks for looking
/2007, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What should we be concentrating our efforts on in SDO Java. I posted
a while back to suggest we think about the content of a next release.
We've had a few fixes go in recently, but I'd like to see more
consideration of release content before we
Amita, that sounds great thanks. It would be good to have more people
understanding this stuff. I'm happy with javajet setup to help if you need
it. There's an FAQ in the SDO Java part of the website for getting started
that you may have already found.
Kelvin.
On 11/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar
as is, and remove the code that modifies the
manifest entries in the EMF jars when the issue is resolved.
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 1/9/08, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rajini, I think you are right. I'll apply the patch as is, and we
can
tackle the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1935.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied, thanks David.
Conversion of Bytes to/from String
)
{
property = SDOUtil.createOpenContentProperty(hc, uri, name,
((ModelFactoryImpl)ModelFactory.INSTANCE).getString());
}
}
return property;
}
Regards,
Amita
On Dec 21, 2007 4:31 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Amita,
I'm a little
. If
there is a wider interest in running SDO under Felix, an alternative may
be
needed. Redistributing EMF with SDO with different manifest entries
doesn't
seem a good option.
Suggestions?
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 1/4/08, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rajini,
Now
.
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 12/10/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd kind of hoped to be in a position to have a release before the end
of
the year. The JIRA query [1] shows that we have 34 JIRAs in resolved
state
with a fix version of SDO-Next, but I think
() checks for enum and
does
SDOUtil.createOpenContentProperty() for Strings.
Suggestions?
Regards,
Amita
On Dec 17, 2007 4:10 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita,
I think Frank's note in this thread is key to the solution, in that
the
line ...
return
Hi,
I have inspected the two svn version of the sdo files you reference,
and both are as I would expect; no inserted script tags etc. I have
created md5 sum CRC digests of the files. If you could repeat these checks
and verify you get the same answer then I think your virus checker is
to be the whole answer, since others of the files are under the src
hierarchy.
Kelvin.
On 20/12/2007, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have inspected the two svn version of the sdo files you reference,
and both are as I would expect; no inserted script tags etc. I have
that's a big gap. I guess its not so obvious because of the java reflection
that's used to get to the methods in question. If you could go some way to
fill in the gap that would be great.
Kelvin.
On 19/12/2007, David Adcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The unit test case
patternFacet too in same way.
Regards,
Amita
On Dec 12, 2007 3:40 PM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, until the wiki has been used to update the websitre then the
FAQ
can be seen at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Tuscany+SDO+Java+-+FAQ
Kelvin
look.
Thank you...
Regards,
Rajini
On 12/10/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd kind of hoped to be in a position to have a release before the end
of
the year. The JIRA query [1] shows that we have 34 JIRAs in resolved
state
with a fix version of SDO-Next, but I think
It occurred to me that there's a bit of a knack to debugging into EMF code,
so I just wrote an FAQ to describe how to do this. Comments are welcome on
its clarity or accuracy.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 11/12/2007, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita,
It feels like option 1 is the easy
By the way, until the wiki has been used to update the websitre then the FAQ
can be seen at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Tuscany+SDO+Java+-+FAQ
Kelvin.
On 12/12/2007, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It occurred to me that there's a bit of a knack to debugging
Hi Amita,
thanks for looking at this. I'm a bit surprised, on digging a little way
in, that the enumeration Property is isMany==false. I'll dig a bit
further, but I had expected to be able to find the Property named
enumeration and get a list of entries.
Kelvin.
On 11/12/2007, Amita
Amita,
It feels like option 1 is the easy way to do things, and option 2 is the
right way given the introduction of instance properties on metadata provided
for this purpose (but doesn't currently work).
Here's the results of my digging around. Let's start with what I found last
since it might
On 29/11/2007, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David,
thanks for the fixes. I'll apply them as soon as I can get to
them. I've been away unwell for most of the last weeks so I have some
catching up to do. Anything you can do to reduce the JIRA backlog
further would be great
1 - 100 of 1010 matches
Mail list logo
