Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to
both lists)
Hi Simon,
Comments inline.
On 7/5/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu
more comments in line
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL
: Friday, July 06, 2007 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
Hi Simon,
Comments inline.
On 7/5/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu
more comments in line
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi Manu, I'm away this week but here are a few more thoughts for now.
On 7/6/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
Comments inline.
On 7/5/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu
more comments in line
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Simon,
Comments inline.
On 7/5/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu
more comments in line
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
In one of the previous mails Sebastien proposed two
ways of how the SCADomain should
@ws.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
Hi Simon,
Comments inline.
On 7/5/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu
more comments in line
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Comments in-line...
On 7/6/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jacek,
Comments inline
On 7/5/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you are right. But if you see the Tuscany samples it supports SCA
modules that don't have
Hi Manu
more comments in line
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
In one of the previous mails Sebastien proposed two
ways of how the SCADomain should exist in geronimo
(a) one instance of SCADomain per component running on the server,
loaded with a
Sorry for jumping on this thread a little late, but I would like to
cover your question around data sources and connection pools you had
in item B). Comments inline...
On 6/29/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
I have put the comments inline.
Vamsavardhana
Hi Jacek,
Glad that you could join this discussion. Welcome :). We
need more participants like you to join this dicussion to come out
with the best approach. I have added my comments inline on my
understanding on why we should be doing this. This is actually based
on the JEE SCA
7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
Hi ,
From Paul's mail I guess a Geronimo plugin would be
the way forward. I am going to list down a few more questions on the
scenarios that Sebastien has explained. The scenarios are given first
Hi Simon,
In one of the previous mails Sebastien proposed two
ways of how the SCADomain should exist in geronimo
(a) one instance of SCADomain per component running on the server,
loaded with a subset of the distributed SCA domain composite
representing that component and enough
Hi Jacek,
The spec also says in 1.10.2.2.
The contribution optionally contains a document that declares runnable
composites, exported definitions and imported definitions. The
document is found at the path of META-INF/sca-contribution.xml
relative to the root of the contribution.I
Hi ,
From Paul's mail I guess a Geronimo plugin would be
the way forward. I am going to list down a few more questions on the
scenarios that Sebastien has explained. The scenarios are given first
and then my understanding, approach and issues. I would be just
listing two of the
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
Hi
On 7/3/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
I have put the comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany modules
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany modules into
Geronimo and use the deployed services by looking up in JNDI. I have
put the code in
Comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany modules into
Geronimo and use the deployed services by
18 matches
Mail list logo
