Jeremy,
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 18:51, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On 4/26/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops! i meant EPL
On 4/26/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien,
Just checked with Cliff. CDDL jars are ok both for inclusion in our
SVN
Jim Marino wrote:
Just a friendly reminder to those working on the core or model to
please include celtix in their refactorings. I accidentally forgot to
check in my refactors (sandbox is separate) and run the checkstyle
tests from celtix/binding.celtix resulting in Dan having a broken demo
oops! i meant EPL
On 4/26/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien,
Just checked with Cliff. CDDL jars are ok both for inclusion in our
SVN and as part of a distribution. So +1 from me.
-- dims
On 4/26/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Marino
On 4/26/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops! i meant EPL
On 4/26/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien,
Just checked with Cliff. CDDL jars are ok both for inclusion in our
SVN and as part of a distribution. So +1 from me.
Although Celtix itself
On Wednesday 26 April 2006 18:51, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On 4/26/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops! i meant EPL
On 4/26/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien,
Just checked with Cliff. CDDL jars are ok both for inclusion in our
SVN and as
Daniel Kulp wrote:
The Sun binary license allows complete re-distribution as part of a full
product distribution. It just doesn't allow you to distribute the jars
individually. Thus, the tuscany distribution should be fine. We just
cannot check them into the apache svn repository.
+1 Dan submitted a patch with testcases so I think it should go into
the build process with that patch applied. Thanks Dan!
Jim
On Apr 26, 2006, at 11:42 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Jim Marino wrote:
Just a friendly reminder to those working on the core or model to
please include
