On 9/14/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 1.0 RC1 tag has been taken and is available for checking out and
building:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0-incubating/
If you don't want to build it yourself the distributions are up loading
to:
And now a 1.0 RC1b at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.0-RC1bhttp://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.0-RC1/
(thats still uploading)
And a tag if you want to try checking out and building yourself:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0-RC1b/
Guys, there's a *lot* of development and code changes still going on in the
1.0 branch but hardly any sample and doc fixes happening . I know everyone
wants to get their last minute fixes in but there will be other releases
after 1.0 . If we don't review and fix the samples, build scripts and doc
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys, there's a *lot* of development and code changes still going on in
the
1.0 branch but hardly any sample and doc fixes happening . I know everyone
wants to get their last minute fixes in but there will be other releases
after 1.0 . If we
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl instead
of SCAdomain?
To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new way exactly?
Currently things do:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build.
Could you paste in the log of the OSGi failures you get?
...ant
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl
instead
of SCAdomain?
To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new way exactly?
Currently things do:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build.
Could you paste in the log of the OSGi failures you get?
...ant
yep, will do. Just building again now
Simon
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build.
Could you paste in the log of the OSGi failures you get?
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I'm also still getting BPEL and OSGi failures in the branch build.
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl
instead
of SCAdomain?
To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new way exactly?
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl
instead
of SCAdomain?
To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new way
Simon Nash wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl
instead
of SCAdomain?
To save digging around in the code / ML, what is the new
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A question though is should we flip the samples over to use NodeImpl
instead
of SCAdomain?
To save digging around in
On 9/17/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/16/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/16/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
A question though is should we flip the samples
Thanks for noticing. Not sure how that happened as as i used a tool to do
the global change.
...ant
On 9/15/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The pom for implementation-java-runtime in the tag has
1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
instead of 1.0-incubating. The other poms seem OK.
Simon
ant elder ha scritto:
Thanks for noticing. Not sure how that happened as as i used a tool to do
the global change.
...ant
ant, i've tried to compile it on Linux/JDK1.5 but when it starts
Calculator sample test,
i got a NPE.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tuscany-1.0RC/1.0-incubating$ mvn
Not yet, but there's a blocking JIRA so it will get done:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1709. If you'd like to run it
that would be great.
...ant
On 9/15/07, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did anybody try RAT [1] (the tool the IPMC usually use to check releases)
on
There's also now an RC1a with the changes since yesterday at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.0-RC1a/http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.0-RC1/
...ant
On 9/14/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 1.0 RC1 tag has been taken and is available for checking out and
On 9/15/07, Giorgio Zoppi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder ha scritto:
Thanks for noticing. Not sure how that happened as as i used a tool to
do
the global change.
...ant
ant, i've tried to compile it on Linux/JDK1.5 but when it starts
Calculator sample test,
i got a NPE.
I am using mvn 2.04.
I ran calculator sample and ant works fine. I get a fatal error with mvn
build. This used to work before for me.
C:\tuscany-new\sca-dist\tuscany-sca-1.0-incubating\samples\calculatormvn
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
Downloading:
The samples in the binary distribution wont build with mvn till we actually
release and the artifacts get published to the live maven repository. To
test things now you can bypass this by setting up a mirror pointing to the
release candidate maven repository. You do that by adding the following to
Thanks. that fixed it.
On 9/15/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The samples in the binary distribution wont build with mvn till we
actually
release and the artifacts get published to the live maven repository. To
test things now you can bypass this by setting up a mirror pointing to
a quick update before I stop for today..
I ran the following samples and demos and they work fine with my
configuration: Windows xp, JDK 1.5, mvn 2.04, tomcat 6.0.14
Samples:
- calculator
- calculator-script
- calculator-webapp
- calculator-ws-webapp
demos:
-mortgage-account
-bigbank
Cheers,
The 1.0 RC1 tag has been taken and is available for checking out and
building:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0-incubating/
If you don't want to build it yourself the distributions are up loading to:
The pom for implementation-java-runtime in the tag has 1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT
instead of 1.0-incubating. The other poms seem OK.
Simon
ant elder wrote:
The 1.0 RC1 tag has been taken and is available for checking out and
building:
26 matches
Mail list logo
