[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1241) Provide CTS Updates for HelperContext and a new DO creation mechanism

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brian Murray updated TUSCANY-1241: -- Attachment: TuscanyLeak.zip The seperation of the vendor specific (Tuscany) classes was not

Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

On 5/3/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ BTW We still have the issue that many of us don't see any test run under maven, which is not a show-stopper but would be nice to fix. Has anyone who has this running thought of any extra steps they took to configure their environment?

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1243) Update Axis2 binding for new runtime SPIs

Update Axis2 binding for new runtime SPIs - Key: TUSCANY-1243 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1243 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1244) Update RMI binding for new runtime SPIs

Update RMI binding for new runtime SPIs --- Key: TUSCANY-1244 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1244 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1245) Update Script implementation for new runtime SPIs

Update Script implementation for new runtime SPIs - Key: TUSCANY-1245 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1245 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions:

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1246) Refactor package names to org.apache.tuscany.sca

Refactor package names to org.apache.tuscany.sca Key: TUSCANY-1246 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1246 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1247) Write release notes for 0.90 release

Write release notes for 0.90 release Key: TUSCANY-1247 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1247 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90 Reporter:

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1248) Write readme files for the samples

Write readme files for the samples --- Key: TUSCANY-1248 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1248 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: Java-SCA-0.90 Reporter: ant

[jira] Created: (TUSCANY-1249) SDO CTS executes 0 tests when run in mvn

SDO CTS executes 0 tests when run in mvn Key: TUSCANY-1249 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1249 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Bug Components: Java SDO Community Test Suite

RE: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

And for some reason, I get this output - most of the SequenceAdd*Test tests are failing for me. There certainly seems to be an element of randomness in the whole thing when run using mvn. Tests run: 398, Failures: 5, Errors: 29, Skipped: 3 -Original Message- From: ant elder

Status of Java SCA 0.90 release

There's been a lot of progress, things are starting to look good and most things on the wiki page ( http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents) look like they're nearing completion. So I think what we should do is aim at creating an SVN branch for the

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1245) Update Script implementation for new runtime SPIs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ant elder reassigned TUSCANY-1245: -- Assignee: ant elder Update Script implementation for new runtime SPIs

RE: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

I tried deleting my maven repository directory and then re-ran the tests. I got different results - not very different, but presumably this shouldn't have made any difference at all so it might be worth others trying the same thing. I now get: Tests run: 398, Failures: 7, Errors: 29, Skipped: 3

Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

Hmmm, I'm can't offer any insights into mavens behaviour, as I consistently get 0 tests run, however, I have updated the wiki page [1] to show how to set up Eclipse to run the test in the way I described above. Any comments on the update would be most welcome. I alos opened a Jira and

Re: Webapp support in this release

So we have a calculator webapp sample going now, is this enough for the 0.90release or are there more things we need to do for webapp support? One thing I wondered about was supporting the Tuscany ServletHost within a webapp, I don't think that will work right now so we don't support services

[Native] New DeveloperWorks article

Hi all, In the inevitable way that these things work out, my latest DeveloperWorks article, based on the C++ M2 release, has been published a day after the M3 release is announced! It's at [1] and is titled Build a simple C++ service component, Part 2: Using Python, Ruby, and Web services with

Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

Another Hmmm moment, the only insight I can offer, is that the source attachment that I have registered against my EMF 2.2.2 jars (which I'm pretty sure is the source distribution associated with the 2.2.2 release) shows the top level caller in the stack frame snippet you provided as being a

Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

Ah, of course the BasicSequence belongs to Tuscany, so the EMF source code attachment was a red herring sorry, but it still remains the fact that we have differnet version of that code. Kelvin. On 04/05/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another Hmmm moment, the only insight I can

[SDO C++] JIRA status

I've recently spent some time reviewing all the JIRAs that have originated from the PHP project. All the problems which remain in Open state raised by myself, Matthew Peters or Graham Charters are genuine current issues. Also I've verified and closed off all the issues from the PHP project

Re: [Java SDO CTS] running the CTS inside eclipse

Andy, I think you are seeing this because I have taken the optional route in the CTS eclipse setup instructions to run the tests against my Tuscany SDO implementation eclipse project, which has the fix for http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1216 in it. Regards, Kelvin. On 04/05/07,

Scheme validation

My understanding is that Tuscany does not currently validate SCDL against the schemas. Assuming that this is correct, when do you think such functionality will be introduced? Thanks Nick Williams Information contained in this e-mail and any attachments are intended for the use of the

[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1241) Provide CTS Updates for HelperContext and a new DO creation mechanism

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12493643 ] Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1241: - Brian, thanks for the update. I merged the updates you

Re: [Proposal] Clean up the code base

+1 for cleaning rightaway and temporarily commenting out modules that break. Thanks - Venkat On 5/4/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As you might have known from the mailing list that we have made good processes in refining the extension interfaces and simplifying the runtime.

[jira] Assigned: (TUSCANY-1244) Update RMI binding for new runtime SPIs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Venkatakrishnan reassigned TUSCANY-1244: Assignee: Venkatakrishnan Update RMI binding for new runtime SPIs

Re: Throwable Input2InputTransformer.java (179) IndexOutOfBoundsException

I am not certain if that is the way. 2007/5/4, Paulo Henrique Trecenti [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have seen various discussions around the databinding and I don't know if my suggestions can maybe many differents but i have some modifications in the ElementInfo and XMLType to store the attributes

Re: Throwable Input2InputTransformer.java (179) IndexOutOfBoundsException

And I'm hating OMElement :) 2007/5/4, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks Paulo, please create a Jira and provide a patch when you have something working, and Raymond or I could review and apply your patch. On 5/2/07, Paulo Henrique Trecenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I can work in

Re: [Vote] release Java SDO beta1

+1 again. Frank. kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/01/2007 12:56:07 PM: Thanks ant. Here's my own +1, so having made an update to the artifact set I guess I need either one of Kevin or Frank to reaffirm their +1s after taking a look at the newly added repo artifacts [1], or

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1244) Update RMI binding for new runtime SPIs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Venkatakrishnan resolved TUSCANY-1244. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in r 535224. Update RMI binding for new runtime SPIs

Subscribe to Tuscany Developement

Subscribe

Re: Subscribe to Tuscany Developement

Hello. To subscribe to the dev list send a note here: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Include subscribe in the subject. Subscription info for other project lists can be found here: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Mailing+Lists Thanks for your interest. --Kevin On 5/4/07, zbchen [EMAIL

Re: Interfaces for implementation/binding extensions to provide runtime behaviors

At the moment these interfaces are in the org.apache.tuscany.core package. This package name is also used by core implementation code, which is confusing. Is it the intention to change the package name for these SPI interfaces to something else to avoid confusion between SPIs and

Re: [Proposal] Clean up the code base

+1 to this proposal. Simon Venkata Krishnan wrote: +1 for cleaning rightaway and temporarily commenting out modules that break. Thanks - Venkat On 5/4/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, As you might have known from the mailing list that we have made good processes in

SCARuntimeActivator and multiple .composite files

I've a problem using SCARuntimeActivator with implementation-script tests as it fails saying there are components with duplicate names. This looks like its because there are multiple .composite files for all the various testcases which do use the same component names and they're all getting

Re: Status of Java SCA 0.90 release

ant elder wrote: There's been a lot of progress, things are starting to look good and most things on the wiki page ( http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents) look like they're nearing completion. So I think what we should do is aim at creating an SVN

Re: SCARuntimeActivator and multiple .composite files

Hi, With SCARuntimeActivator, we use the contribution service to discover all the composites in the default contribution which is the jar/folder that contains the composite path from the start() method. If there is META-INF/contribution-metadata.xml that lists the deployable composites, then

Re: [Proposal] Clean up the code base

It seems that we agree to go ahead to clean up the code base. Meanwhile, Ant and Venkat have made good processes porting the code over. I'll start the cleanup. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, May 04,

Re: Interfaces for implementation/binding extensions to provide runtime behaviors

The script implementation has now been ported over to these new SPIs and all seems to be ok and the calculator-script sample works now. The new SPIs seem to me vastly better than what we had before. There's still some things I think could be done to make it even easier to write an implementation,

Re: Scheme validation

Nicholas Williams wrote: My understanding is that Tuscany does not currently validate SCDL against the schemas. Assuming that this is correct, when do you think such functionality will be introduced? Thanks Nick Williams Good idea. We should validate

Re: Interfaces for implementation/binding extensions to provide runtime behaviors

Simon Nash wrote: At the moment these interfaces are in the org.apache.tuscany.core package. This package name is also used by core implementation code, which is confusing. Is it the intention to change the package name for these SPI interfaces to something else to avoid confusion between SPIs

Re: Scheme validation

On 5/4/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nicholas Williams wrote: My understanding is that Tuscany does not currently validate SCDL against the schemas. Assuming that this is correct, when do you think such functionality will be introduced? Thanks Nick Williams Good

Re: SCARuntimeActivator and multiple .composite files

Some comments inline. Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, With SCARuntimeActivator, we use the contribution service to discover all the composites in the default contribution which is the jar/folder that contains the composite path from the start() method. If there is META-INF/contribution-metadata.xml

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1223) XSD base64Binary type mapping to wrong SDO type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1223. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in revision 535315. I found a much simpler way to do this:

Re: Interfaces for implementation/binding extensions to provide runtime behaviors

On 5/4/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Nash wrote: At the moment these interfaces are in the org.apache.tuscany.core package. This package name is also used by core implementation code, which is confusing. Is it the intention to change the package name for these

Re: InterfaceContract is not correctly set for a component service if the component is implemented by a composite

Raymond Feng wrote: Hi, I ran into an issue with the following assembly: ComponentA is implemented by Composite1. Composite1 defines a CompositeService Service1 which promotes ComponentB.Service1. Only Component.Service1 has a java interface defined. From the debugger, I observed that the

Re: Interfaces for implementation/binding extensions to provide runtime behaviors

I'll make the changes after I clean up the code. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 9:32 AM Subject: Re: Interfaces for implementation/binding extensions to provide runtime behaviors On

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1212) SDO 2.1 feature: Property.isNullable() and Property.isOpenContent()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1212?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1212. - Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 535331. SDO 2.1 feature: Property.isNullable()

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-1214) SDO 2.1 feature: XMLHelper.load(Source) and XMLHelper.save(Result)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1214. - Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 535343. SDO 2.1 feature: XMLHelper.load(Source)

[jira] Resolved: (TUSCANY-993) Problems with sdoModelExtended.xsd

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-993. Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 535350. Problems with sdoModelExtended.xsd

[jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-1241) Provide CTS Updates for HelperContext and a new DO creation mechanism

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brian Murray updated TUSCANY-1241: -- Attachment: cts.patch Attaching a new version of cts.patch. This version includes a

Re: svn commit: r535374 - in /incubator/tuscany/java/sca: itest/extended-api/src/test/java/org/apache/tuscany/sca/test/extended/ServiceLocateTestCase.java modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/tuscany

The new SCARuntimeActivator.locateService API was throwing an NPE when the provided componentName was not found in the Domain. I changed this to throw IllegalArgumentException with an explanatory message. I can easily back this out or change it if some other behavior is preferable. Thanks,

Re: WirePostProcessor needs more context

On 5/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: More comments inline. Greg Dritschler wrote: Replies within. On 4/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm thinking about policy, but why limit it? Shouldn't it have access to the complete model and sufficient

How to enable logging in samples environment ? log4j?

I'm playing around with the HWWS samples and blowing up in AXIOM. I didn't seem to have any luck getting AXIOM to log its debug messages using the instructions here: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/guide.html#Configuring_Log4J I'm following the earlier suggestion of unzipping the

Re: [Proposal] Clean up the code base

Hi, I just checked in the changes to clean up the code under r535430. By disabling the binding-ws-axis2, all the other modules are built successfully. Please note there are still test case failures. Some of them depend on the axis2 binding, some of them are due to the nested interface

Re: Status of Java SCA 0.90 release

Hi.. .what about the workitem related to renaming the core-spi to include 'sca' for packages. Is it a good time to do this ? Thanks - Venkat On 5/4/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/4/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ant elder wrote: There's been a lot of