On 08/12/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/7/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/12/06, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete is right about how it works and that it is kind of ugly. We have
an
internal way of doing it more easily, but the only way an SDO
DataObject assigned into open property goes missing
---
Key: TUSCANY-980
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-980
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Components: C++ SDO
On 12/7/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/12/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/7/06, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you use
In the Java implementation we do the following:
1. If a sequenced type is created programatically, we map all the
properties to XML elements - so any property can be added to the sequence.
2. If a sequenced XSD-based type, then only properties that map to
elements can be added to the sequence.
On 07/12/06, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Java implementation we do the following:
1. If a sequenced type is created programatically, we map all the
properties to XML elements - so any property can be added to the sequence.
That sounds right.
2. If a sequenced XSD-based
On 07/12/06, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that Frank. When a data object has an XSD based type is there
are way of getting all of it's properties which the XSD says are
attributes.
This is where it gets a bit ugly. It's ok if you know what the attribute
names are as you
Can you confirm that for a sequenced DataObject if I set a property
using
e.g. setString(prop, text) then that setting will added to the
sequence
as if getSequence().add(prop, text) was used?
Right (but only if the property maps to an XML element).
Pete is right about how it works and that it is kind of ugly. We have an
internal way of doing it more easily, but the only way an SDO client can
do it is the way Pete said. Maybe we need to open an SDO 3 spec issue for
adding a convenient way to access non-sequenced properties of a
sequenced
On 07/12/06, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you confirm that for a sequenced DataObject if I set a property
using
e.g. setString(prop, text) then that setting will added to the
sequence
as if getSequence().add(prop, text) was used?
Right (but only if the property maps to an
On 07/12/06, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete is right about how it works and that it is kind of ugly. We have an
internal way of doing it more easily, but the only way an SDO client can
do it is the way Pete said. Maybe we need to open an SDO 3 spec issue for
adding a convenient
10 matches
Mail list logo
