Re: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release

2007-07-16 Thread kelvin goodson
Another summary -- A first release candidate was posted last Tuesday. Apart from naming issues for the maven artifacts for the SDO API here are no show stoppers in the comments to that release. I plan to address all of ant's points in the next release candidate. There's an open issue we need

Re: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release

2007-06-14 Thread kelvin goodson
On 12/06/07, Frank Budinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip/ By the way, that reminds me that we need someone to be release manager for this release. Any volunteers? If not, maybe Kelvin, you would be willing to do it, since you've already been doing lots of the prep work. Yes, in the absence

Crimson parser support -- was Re: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release

2007-06-14 Thread kelvin goodson
Amita, yes this is a known problem, here's the answer ... http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-user/200701.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Regards, Kelvin. On 14/06/07, Amita Vadhavkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was browsing through the SDO JIRAs and as a couple of them have to

Re: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release

2007-06-12 Thread Frank Budinsky
This sounds good to me. I assume Christian's suggestion for additional SDOUtil methods, and Bert/Steffen's request for notification support, are two more candidates for 1.0. Christian and Bert/Steffen, are you planning to open JIRAs for those? I'm worried about how many things are really

Re: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release

2007-06-11 Thread kelvin goodson
[I inadvertently sent a reply to tuscany-dev when this thread belongs on tuscany-user, so copying my response here ...] Good suggestion Steffen. If you were able to open a Jira and dump into it any thoughts you may have had about the details of how you see this working that would be great.

RE: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release

2007-06-11 Thread Christian Landbo Frederiksen
] Sent: 8. juni 2007 19:02 To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release I'd like to draw the communities attention to this issue again please. Thanks to David for responding with his requirements and with the fix for 1223. I have some thoughts

Re: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release

2007-06-09 Thread Steffen Glomb
i would like to see support for typesafe collections in the xsd2java generator. regards Steffen On 6/8/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to draw the communities attention to this issue again please. Thanks to David for responding with his requirements and with the fix for

Re: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release

2007-06-08 Thread kelvin goodson
I'd like to draw the communities attention to this issue again please. Thanks to David for responding with his requirements and with the fix for 1223. I have some thoughts that I'm structuring at the moment on what's important for a next release from my perspective that I'll post soon, but in

Re: [SDO Java DISCUSS] Contents of the next SDO release

2007-05-23 Thread David Adcox
Kelvin, I would like to see the multiple namepace issue resolved in the XSD2JavaGenerator tool. This issue is covered in JIRA 1223. Optionally, making it available to the plugin (JIRA 303) would be nice. JIRA 1143 is something that I need fixed, as well. So any focus that can be given to that