hi,
I wrote some code on
@ConversationAttributes(maxIdleTime=1 seconds,
maxAge=2 seconds,
singlePrincipal=false)
feature and found below error message:
java.io.NotSerializableException:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.core.context.ConversationImpl
Anybody can give me some hints? Thanks!
I've had little luck with my remaining problem, however, any idea what
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Class 'CUSTOMER' does not have a
feature named 'ID' means I've done?
It's creating the database, but perhaps never correctly constructing the
data graph?
If you notice, the program output
Additional progress:
Making the following additional changes to the Customers.xml file
allowed the program to create the graph it seems, at least it is
displaying the select all customers results now in the console:
Command name=AllCustomers SQL=select * from CUSTOMER
Hey Eric
I had it working in my environment yesterday, and I thought you had
it too after the changes on the connection info. In my case, I have a
dastest user in mySQL, I created the empty database in mySQL and
granted all the permissions to the dastest user. After that the
customer sample
Correct, that is the only error. I've been logging using root with all
access so I don't imagine that is the problem, though I'll try that too.
I've verified that it is correctly generating the table also (using
mysql toolset), also the Customer example correctly displays the SQL
Select results
Well I found the issue...
Once again in my Config file:
I had:
ResultDescriptor columnName=ID tableName=MYCUSTOMER
columnType=commonj.sdo.Int/
Changed it to:
ResultDescriptor columnName=ID tableName=CUSTOMER
columnType=commonj.sdo.Int/
And SUCCESS!!
Is it really necessary for mysql to
Great !!! But just to be clear, the original config file [1] is not
using ResultDescriptor, right ?
[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/das/samples/customer/src/main/resources/Customers.xml
On 9/5/07, Eborn, Eric D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well I found the issue...
This is correct
-Original Message-
From: Luciano Resende [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 9:53 AM
To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with Tuscany Customer's Demo using MySQL
Great !!! But just to be clear, the original config file [1] is
Great !!! I have also already applied the suggested changes for the
config file connection info under the latest version in trunk. Thanks
for finding that... and let me know if you find anything else, or have
any other questions.
On 9/5/07, Eborn, Eric D [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is correct
No, thank you for volunteering you assistance. I don't have access to
outside svn's, would you mind posting the new Customer.xml file so I can
verify its contents?
-Original Message-
From: Luciano Resende [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 10:16 AM
To:
Sure, contents from [1]
Config xmlns=http:///org.apache.tuscany.das.rdb/config.xsd;
!--Uncomment below for derby test--
ConnectionInfo
ConnectionProperties
driverClass=org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedDriver
Yeah that looks fine, as mentioned below, I just had to modify the
Command and Table Tags with additional attributes. (although it seems
you did not)
-Original Message-
From: Luciano Resende [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 11:07 AM
To:
Two comments inline.
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
The policy framework implementation is underway. We have some basic things
in place which allows the inclusion of policy intents and policysets into an
assembly model. There is simply sample policy that we have put in place
along with the
Jeff,
Thank you for your valuable feedback. With the work going on for release .99
and release 1.0 this email might not have been noticed.
I have created JIRAs 1666 through 1669 for your requested features. I will
also add the JIRAs to release discussion page for 1.0 [1], although some of
these
Hi Jeff, Thanks for some very good and useful input!
I added some comments inline.
[snip]
Anderson, Jeff T (CA - Toronto) wrote:
This is great news, that ties into an e-mail that I was just formulating this
morning concerning additional features that have been requested for our client
the
Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to
support SDO 2.1 specification and to be compatible with SDO 1.0
release. I'd like to start to work on a new release in the next couple
days, and if we make it on time, we could still have a chance to
include DAS in the SCA 1.0
Jean-Sebastian ,
thanks so much for commenting on this. It's good to know that much of these
features are under consideration for Tuscany. I didn't actually have a
specific Use Case around the @fedactiv notation, I was just trying to use that
as a illustrative purpose. I'll take a look at
sounds good to me.
On 9/6/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good, looks like we have most (if not all) the updates necessary to
support SDO 2.1 specification and to be compatible with SDO 1.0
release. I'd like to start to work on a new release in the next couple
days, and if we
18 matches
Mail list logo
