uri of binding.ws should be used restrictedly

Hello every one, uri attribute of binding.ws/ is much convenient to attach a WS in. But it works only within a few circumstances, such as another java generated WS provided by Tuscany, JAXWS. But much more WS is complecated, such as JBoss or even a Tuscany WS when the wsdl becomes delicate.

Re: jax-ws instead of axis2

Hi, here is some of my vision: Performance: It seems jaxws is faster than axis2, at this point, I agree jaxws should be part of Tuscany. Another hand, we use axiom for axis2's databinding model, in fact this model is slower than ADB, so change axiom into ADB might be another thing we should do.

Re: Tuscany Java2WSDL

Hi, this tool and other tools in Tuscany are distributed as maven plugins. It's not of any value to set them in Tuscany's release. Another word, they should be in maven's repository ready for download. Good Luck Radim Kolarik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I noticed that there is a Java2WSDL

Re: Injecting servlet context into component

My oppinion is that service is something independent to any environment, such as servlet container, against your question, I thing you'd better walk around it, it seems you made a wrong design now. Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Robert Young wrote: On a slightly

Re: BindException when re-deploying webapp

binding.ws in Tuscany must rely on embedded jetty or tomcat engine, this is generaly used in stand along application, so you saw the address in use error. To avoid this error, just change the binding.ws uri=[different port]. Good luck. Robert Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I

Re: Using Tuscany for dynamic component loading

Write your own composite files then. SCADomain looks for them in you classpaths. Dynamc is something you could do with Tuscany, but not recommended, that is out of the scope of SCA. Peizhao Hu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I am wondering whether the Tuscany is able to perform dynamic

Re: puzzle from a fresh

versions: 0.90-incubating and 1.0-incubator-M2. The fact is that 0.90-incubating is newer than 1.0-incubator-M2. Please use version 0.90-incubating. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: shaoguang geng To: Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 1:33 AM Subject: puzzle from a fresh A little

Re: Can anyone show me example of a simple scenario?

Hi, around your question, I may suggest the samples/calculator to you. It is very easy to enjoy. Since your scenario is not clear, I can not write more info here. Any way, samples/calculator is to be used in one JVM, if you are working in a distributed environment, I may suggent you something

puzzle from a fresh

A little confused: svn structure just like version 0.9 src, but 1.0-M2 likes a new file structure! When I compile bigbank sample from svn, O, beside of a lot of mis versioning, the very problem is that the generated java codes imports org.apache.tuscany.api.annotation.DataType, which is

Re: DAS build problems compiling SDO code-generated classes

I did not deal with SDA,before, today I tried it, with succeed. And without any change to pom.xml, and every dependency downloaded well. May be you try again, from svn, then you get it. Ron Gavlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I am building both from trunk. If I change the das-rdb pom by

Re: What is the minimum set of jar files for the calculator example?

I have this minum jar set, for calculator sample, ohter samples needs more than this. The way I got this result, was when I test then SCA java svn code, not the release code. stax-1.2.0.jar stax-api-1.0.1.jar class files of Calculator it self module jars sca api tuscany