On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 8:12 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
1.3 sounds good to me. I'm assuming that we'll cut that branch out of
trunk?
I'm asking because I'm interested in working on
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 April 2008 12:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SCA 2.0, was Re: Next SCA release
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:01 PM, Simon Laws
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Version 2.x will be the main focus
* Most of the development effort happens on Version 2.x
* We will make API changes which means that it will not be backwards
compatible with version 1
* Version
Comments inline.
Simon
Simon Laws wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Mark Combellack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: ant elder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 April 2008 12:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SCA 2.0, was Re: Next SCA release
On Thu
haleh mahbod wrote:
1 - [] Put V2 doc changes in V1 pages and mark them as such
2 - [] Create SCA Java 1.x/ SCA Java 2.x documentation pages on our current
site wiki
3 - [] Create separate SCA Java 1.x/ SCA Java 2.x wiki spaces
Option 2 seems reasonable. Option 3 can be considered in the
