Dear Mike Frysinger,
Am 10.11.2010 07:57, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
On Monday, November 08, 2010 17:04:32 Sebastien Carlier wrote:
the config.mk looks weird:
+cmd_link_o_target = $(if $(strip $1),\
+ $(LD) -r -o $@ $1 ,\
+ rm -f $@; $(AR) rcs $@ )
Dear Mike,
On 2010-11-10 01:57:30, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, November 08, 2010 17:04:32 Sebastien Carlier wrote:
This commit changes all Makefiles to use partial linking (ld -r) instead of
creating library archives, which forces all symbols to participate in
linking, allowing
Scott,
looks like I made a mistake on current MPC8377 NAND wiring.
Nand-Flash write enable is wired to LFWE1 ... I connected each WE to
its corresponding CS, i.e. :
- CS0/WE0 - Nor Flash
- CS1/WE1 - Nand Flash
- CS2/WE2 - MRAM
Am I assuming right that FCM can only use WE0 ?
I
Sebastien,
I also don't understand why ftd.c is not depending on CONFIG_QE.
That's another question ... but leads to error having your patch applied.
Right, fdt.c should not be included in the build unless both CONFIG_QE
and CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT are defined. Previously this issue was
On Monday, October 11, 2010 12:06:46 Daniel Hobi wrote:
This patch makes tools/env/Makefile more similar to tools/imls:
- define HOSTSRCS and HOSTCPPFLAGS, so that .depend generation works.
- include U-Boot headers using -idirafter to prevent picking up
u-boot/include/errno.h.
these things
The following changes since commit 0c0892be0d93a5a892b93739c5eb3bf692fed4ff:
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-marvell (2010-10-29
22:03:00 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-blackfin.git sf
Reinhard Meyer (1):
sf: ramtron:
Hi Albert,
On 09.11.2010 19:47, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 09/11/2010 19:24, Daniel Hobi a écrit :
Thank you. This patch is required to get Kirkwood-based boards working
again when using the CodeSourcery 2009q3 toolchain.
(can't find the 2010q3 Lite toolchain on CodeSourcery's site, latest is
Dear Reinhard
thank you for your review. I know that post the patches on an
webserver isn't the common path but this time this was really a wip
work...
2010/11/9 Reinhard Meyer u-b...@emk-elektronik.de:
Dear Claudio,
2010/11/8 Andreas Bießmannandreas.de...@googlemail.com:
There where some
Hi,
I have been trying to build Uboot for an at91sam9263ek board and been
observing the following error while building the uboot code( using the
UBOOT version: u-boot-2009.11.1.tar.bz2)
/home/wd/git/u-boot/work/lib_generic/crc32.c:157: error: conflicting
types for 'crc32'
Hi Mike,
On 10.11.2010 10:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, October 11, 2010 12:06:46 Daniel Hobi wrote:
- use the cross compiler again (fw_printenv is intended for a
hosted environment on the target).
the cross-compiler used to create u-boot has no guarantee that it'll produce
On 2010-11-10 03:55:21, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 03:07:08 Sebastien Carlier wrote:
On 2010-11-10 01:57:30, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the config.mk looks weird:
+cmd_link_o_target = $(if $(strip $1),\
+ $(LD) -r -o $@ $1 ,\
+
On Monday, November 08, 2010 13:15:38 Detlev Zundel wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Convert the tools/env/Makefile to use the same host tool syntax as the
other tool subdirs.
Applied to next branch. Thanks
It just occurred to me that this will no longer cross compile the fw_env
tool -
Timur Tabi wrote:
Wood Scott-B07421 wrote:
To be totally safe, we probably want to do a readback plus twi (to turn
a data dependency into a flow dependency) before the isync.
twi == trap word immediate?
Yes.
If so, I don't see how that will turn a data dependency into a flow
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 03:07:08 Sebastien Carlier wrote:
On 2010-11-10 01:57:30, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the config.mk looks weird:
+cmd_link_o_target = $(if $(strip $1),\
+ $(LD) -r -o $@ $1 ,\
+ rm -f $@; $(AR) rcs $@ )
why do you
Ping?
The fixup procedure just stored a constant value in the
fixup table rather than just adjusting the table.
Although that doesn't seem to do any harm, it prevents
relocation more that once.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se
---
Le 10/11/2010 13:31, Daniel Hobi a écrit :
Since all ARM boards are broken when using a recent toolchain, the patch
should go in as fast as possible.
But shouldn't this change be applied to all ARM linker scripts, ie
arch/arm/cpu/*/u-boot.lds?
Yes, it should. :)
Can you please provide
Dear concerned,
- Move static variables to struct global_data, so they can be used
before relocation. Used by AT91 timers and proposed for A320 and
S3C64xx in:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/88095
This patch makes tools/env/Makefile more similar to tools/imls:
- define HOSTSRCS and HOSTCPPFLAGS, so that .depend generation works.
- include U-Boot headers using -idirafter to prevent picking up
u-boot/include/errno.h.
- use HOSTCFLAGS_NOPED (fw_env.c does not conform to -pedantic).
In order
Dear Claudio,
Dear Reinhard
thank you for your review. I know that post the patches on an
webserver isn't the common path but this time this was really a wip
work...
0003-AT91-fix-compile-error-after-f5571dc9.patch
[at91sam9260_devices.c]
That include can not be necessary for your final
On 10.11.2010 13:48, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 10/11/2010 13:31, Daniel Hobi a écrit :
But shouldn't this change be applied to all ARM linker scripts, ie
arch/arm/cpu/*/u-boot.lds?
Yes, it should. :)
Can you please provide such a patch?
I could, but I tend to provide patches only for
Hi Prafulla,
In commit 0b20ed76 (Kirkwood: Changes specific to ARM relocation
support), you set CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR to 0xC8012000 which is
supposed to lie within the internal Security SRAM.
However, the Kirkwood Functional Specification (chapter 2.13 Default
Address Map) and
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h |1 +
include/configs/MPC8572DS.h |1 +
include/configs/P1022DS.h|1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h b/include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h
When P2020DS DDR2 was merged it was merged incorrectly and propogated to
boards.cfg. Fix this by moving DDR2 config to be associated with
P2020DS and not P1_P2_RDB.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
boards.cfg |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Hello Daniel,
Daniel Hobi wrote:
In commit 0b20ed76 (Kirkwood: Changes specific to ARM relocation
support), you set CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR to 0xC8012000 which is
supposed to lie within the internal Security SRAM.
However, the Kirkwood Functional Specification (chapter 2.13 Default
Address
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:53:03AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Can you make the ELF images available? I'll do the readlf/objdump
analysis and feed back on what I find.
I've uploaded them here:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ecc/u-boot.{good,bad}
Thanks.
--
Eric Cooper e c c @ c m u
Hi Heiko,
On 10.11.2010 15:15, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Daniel Hobi wrote:
@Heiko: include/configs/km_arm.h may have the same problem.
I made a patch for this, see:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-November/081275.html
Reading your patch, I noticed that we don't align the early
Hello Daniel,
Daniel Hobi wrote:
Hi Heiko,
On 10.11.2010 15:15, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Daniel Hobi wrote:
@Heiko: include/configs/km_arm.h may have the same problem.
I made a patch for this, see:
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-November/081275.html
Reading your patch, I
IT Service,
You have exceeded the limit of your mailbox set by your IT service provider,
you will be unable to receive new emails. Just before this message was sent,
you are Currently running on 91624 KB, You have has exceeded the storage limit
which is 20GB. To prevent this, please click to
Hi Heiko,
On 10.11.2010 16:02, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Daniel Hobi wrote:
Reading your patch, I noticed that we don't align the early stack
pointer to an 8-byte boundary which may lead to the problem described here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/69342
This article
Hi Kumar,
--- On Wed, 11/10/10, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
From: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/8xxx: Enable e1000 driver on some FSL boards
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 12:09 PM
Signed-off-by: Kumar
Hello Daniel,
Daniel Hobi wrote:
On 10.11.2010 16:02, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Daniel Hobi wrote:
Reading your patch, I noticed that we don't align the early stack
pointer to an 8-byte boundary which may lead to the problem described here:
Hi Heiko,
On 10.11.2010 16:40, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Daniel Hobi wrote:
But you also added assembly code to setup the initial stack pointer in
arch/arm/cpu/*/start.S (ie commit ab86f72c for arm926ejf) which reads:
/* Set stackpointer in internal RAM to call board_init_f */
Le 10/11/2010 16:46, Daniel Hobi a écrit :
Hi Heiko,
On 10.11.2010 16:40, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Daniel Hobi wrote:
But you also added assembly code to setup the initial stack pointer in
arch/arm/cpu/*/start.S (ie commit ab86f72c for arm926ejf) which reads:
/* Set stackpointer in internal
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:09 AM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h | 1 +
include/configs/MPC8572DS.h | 1 +
include/configs/P1022DS.h | 1 +
There's nothing wrong with the on-board
whN Vk6AES 9Pd zgXZi pjv
Hi Sir and Madam,
We are currently having a special offer on the newest designed Trendy Duffle.
Please kindly see the flyer
and the quotation below.
Item: Trendy Duffle(#4650-25)
Price: FOB Xiamen, China. US$2.10/pc for 3,000 pcs
FOB Xiamen,
Hello Daniel,
Daniel Hobi wrote:
On 10.11.2010 16:40, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Daniel Hobi wrote:
But you also added assembly code to setup the initial stack pointer in
arch/arm/cpu/*/start.S (ie commit ab86f72c for arm926ejf) which reads:
/* Set stackpointer in internal RAM to call
Hi Albert and Heiko,
On 10.11.2010 17:46, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Daniel Hobi wrote:
Why not add alignment to start.S?
/* Set stackpointer in internal RAM to call board_init_f */
call_board_init_f:
ldr sp, =(CONFIG_SYS_INIT_SP_ADDR)
+bic sp, sp, #7
Hmm.. because we do
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 14:22 -0400, Haiying Wang wrote:
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:36 -0700, Peter Tyser wrote:
Glad to hear. I'll submit an official patch shortly. Just to make
sure, have you tried running one of the nand-spl images after the
patch
I sent yesterday? It'd be good to get
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
Fix u-boot-nand.lds and u-boot-nand_spl.lds according to:
Author: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com
Date: Wed Sep 29 14:05:56 2010 -0500
commit fbe53f59bd40b3b1ab66dc98859e26589d64d1b7
85xx: Use gc-sections to reduce image size
Signed-off-by:
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S | 12
include/configs/MPC8536DS.h |8 ++--
include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h | 10 +++---
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message 1289343709-11793-1-git-send-email-ti...@freescale.com you wrote:
U-Boot uses macros to determine where devices should be located in physical
memory, and Linux uses the device tree to determine where the devices are
actually located. However, U-Boot does not update
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201011100419.10315.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
Mike, what _exactly_ was the reason to drop cross compilation?
nothing was dropped. you need to set your HOSTCC correctly for the host on
which you want tools to compile.
But it is WRONG to use HOSTCC for
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201011100423.13449.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
- use the cross compiler again (fw_printenv is intended for a
hosted environment on the target).
the cross-compiler used to create u-boot has no guarantee that it'll produce
executables useful for the
Dear Asokan, Shyama Trikkadeeri,
In message
575ed9d63b7e244bbb3786a299acbba08af...@ie10ev813.global.ds.honeywell.com you
wrote:
It looks like there has been a mail chain regarding this compile error
and it has also been fixed. Can someone let me know which uboot version
has this fixed?
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4cdabcf8@denx.de you wrote:
Then we should add this alignment into the generation of
GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE.
No. GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE is just a size. As you don't really know
the alignment of the base address that GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE is
added to
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4cdacc7c.3040...@denx.de you wrote:
looked in the generation of GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE:
./lib/asm-offsets.c
/* Round up to make sure size gives nice stack alignment */
DEFINE(GENERATED_GBL_DATA_SIZE,
(sizeof(struct
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
---
v2 change: remove 8569 CONFIG_MMC change which should not be in this patch.
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S | 12
include/configs/MPC8536DS.h |
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
I understand that you can reasonably check these addresses only in
this specific case (i. e. a 36 bit DT and a 32 bit U-Boot) ?
That was just an example, albeit a very common one. This code can check for any
mismatch in CCSR device physical addresses between the U-Boot
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 15:21:27 -0500
haiying.w...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
---
v2 change: remove 8569 CONFIG_MMC change which should not be in this patch.
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message 4cdafc37.40...@freescale.com you wrote:
It's more than that. Any mismatch in the CCSR base address, serial device
offsets, or PCI addresses will be caught. For instance, if you put the PCIE1
memory range at ff80 in the device tree, but ff600 in U-Boot,
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
---
v3 change: %s/CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE/CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE/g
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S | 18 +-
include/configs/MPC8536DS.h |8
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message 4cdafc37.40...@freescale.com you wrote:
It's more than that. Any mismatch in the CCSR base address, serial device
offsets, or PCI addresses will be caught. For instance, if you put the PCIE1
memory range at ff80 in the device tree, but
On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:22:26 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20101109155225.183a3...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
What, semantically, is the difference between the CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
and CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE? Just that one is used
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 07:24:51 Sebastien Carlier wrote:
I was wondering whether config.mk is the right place for this function;
would it be better in rules.mk instead? Both config.mk and rules.mk end
up being included in all Makefile's.
for now, keep it with the other compiler
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 21:34:51 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message 4cdafc37.40...@freescale.com you wrote:
It's more than that. Any mismatch in the CCSR base address, serial device
offsets, or PCI addresses will be caught. For instance, if you put the
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message 4cdb0686@freescale.com you wrote:
Well, I really do think it should be done at every boot by default, but I
would
be willing to consider an fdt verify command. Would you be willing to buy
me
a beer every time someone forgets to run fdt verify and emails me
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Definitely not. I'm afraid you'd never be sober again, and while this
might deem a desirable state to you I would not want to see you
submitting U-Boot patches then :-)
I guess you don't know about the U-Boot patch submission drinking game?
:-)
--
Timur Tabi
Linux
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20101110150307.279a5...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
I was just looking for some consistency so I could figure out what is
being objected to. When something is rejected for specific reasons,
questioning whether those reasons actually imply the
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20101110151241.49d68...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
Would that hurt? I though Linux does it's own initialization of the
PCI system anyway, so does it matter what we did in U-Boot?
It's caused us problems in the past on 83xx. I think it still
Dear Timur Tabi,
In message 4cdb0b65.8090...@freescale.com you wrote:
I guess you don't know about the U-Boot patch submission drinking game?
:-)
May I consider this an invitation?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel
HRB
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:30:07 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20101110151241.49d68...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net you wrote:
Would that hurt? I though Linux does it's own initialization of the
PCI system anyway, so does it matter what we did in
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 15:00:48 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
- use the cross compiler again (fw_printenv is intended for a
hosted environment on the target).
the cross-compiler used to create u-boot has no guarantee that it'll
produce executables useful
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 06:58:51 Daniel Hobi wrote:
On 10.11.2010 10:23, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday, October 11, 2010 12:06:46 Daniel Hobi wrote:
- use the cross compiler again (fw_printenv is intended for a
hosted environment on the target).
the cross-compiler used
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
* fix typo in defind - define
include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h |1 +
include/configs/MPC8572DS.h |1 +
include/configs/P1022DS.h|1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 14:54:17 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Mike, what _exactly_ was the reason to drop cross compilation?
nothing was dropped. you need to set your HOSTCC correctly for the
host on which you want tools to compile.
But it is WRONG to use
On 2010-11-10, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201011100423.13449.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
- use the cross compiler again (fw_printenv is intended for a
hosted environment on the target).
the cross-compiler used to create u-boot has no guarantee
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201011101706.17988.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
based on your based comments, i'm really not surprised. you constantly
prefer
to ignore reality and the state of GNU toolchains. plus, you ignore other
I'm a software developer. If tool chains are broken, I
Dear Mike Frysinger,
In message 201011101711.17574.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote:
so do what i said -- set the HOSTCC to the host you want the tools to run on.
this will work for *all* tools instead of arbitrarily picking some to use
HOSTCC while picking others to use CROSS.
Why are you
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:28:29 +0100
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Well, see above. You are argumenting from a low-level, implementation
point of view. For the end user this is not transparent at all. He
just runs a single make foo_config and a single make all. The end
user sees and
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 17:25:31 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
IIRC, HOSTCC refers to the C compiler on the and for the build host,
i. e. when running on a x86 system it will create x86 code. This is
obviously wrong when we try to build fw_printenv for, say, a
On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 17:29:52 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
so do what i said -- set the HOSTCC to the host you want the tools to run
on. this will work for *all* tools instead of arbitrarily picking some
to use HOSTCC while picking others to use CROSS.
Why are
Hi Shinya
very thanks for your feed pack, and I am really sorry for so later
reply.
the [PATCH 1/5] those files are jz4740 base files is patch v2 of
[PATCH] [MIPS] those files are jz4740 base files
I have try to fix all your comments. only one thing, I am not very
understand the flash
From: Xiangfu Liu xian...@sharism.cc
Signed-off-by: Xiangfu Liu xian...@openmobilefree.net
---
arch/mips/cpu/xburst/Makefile | 50 +++
arch/mips/cpu/xburst/config.mk| 33 ++
arch/mips/cpu/xburst/cpu.c| 158 +++
arch/mips/cpu/xburst/interrupts.c | 33 ++
From: Xiangfu Liu xian...@sharism.cc
Signed-off-by: Xiangfu Liu xian...@openmobilefree.net
---
nand_spl/board/xburst/nanonote/Makefile | 96 +++
nand_spl/board/xburst/nanonote/u-boot.lds | 63 +
nand_spl/nand_boot_jz4740.c | 395 +
3 files
From: Xiangfu Liu xian...@sharism.cc
Signed-off-by: Xiangfu Liu xian...@openmobilefree.net
---
drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c | 250
1 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c
diff --git
From: Xiangfu Liu xian...@sharism.cc
Signed-off-by: Xiangfu Liu xian...@openmobilefree.net
---
board/xburst/nanonote/Makefile| 45
board/xburst/nanonote/config.mk | 31 ++
board/xburst/nanonote/nanonote.c | 124 ++
nic and hw structures are allocated via malloc i.e. return memory
is not zero initialized. Because of this few structure member like
function pointers are initialized with garbage values.
It may cause problem. for eg. during eth_initialize, dev-write_hwaddr
is used.
Signed-off-by: Prabhakar
Hi,
Now I'm trying to use the NEON instruction at u-boot. but it's failed
and got the data abort.
Are there any way to use the NEON instruction at u-boot?
The main purpose is to use the neon memcpy as below.
bge 1f
// copies 4 bytes, destination 32-bits aligned
On Nov 10, 2010, at 1:32 PM, haiying.w...@freescale.com
haiying.w...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
Fix u-boot-nand.lds and u-boot-nand_spl.lds according to:
Author: Peter Tyser pty...@xes-inc.com
Date: Wed Sep 29 14:05:56 2010 -0500
commit
On Nov 10, 2010, at 2:37 PM, haiying.w...@freescale.com
haiying.w...@freescale.com wrote:
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com
---
v3 change: %s/CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE/CONFIG_SYS_MONITOR_BASE/g
On Nov 10, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
* fix typo in defind - define
include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h |1 +
include/configs/MPC8572DS.h |1 +
include/configs/P1022DS.h|1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0
On Nov 10, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
When P2020DS DDR2 was merged it was merged incorrectly and propogated to
boards.cfg. Fix this by moving DDR2 config to be associated with
P2020DS and not P1_P2_RDB.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
boards.cfg |2
The following changes since commit 0c0892be0d93a5a892b93739c5eb3bf692fed4ff:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-marvell
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx.git master
Haiying Wang (3):
powerpc/85xx: Fix lds
Dear Xiangfu Liu,
In message 1289446657-12499-2-git-send-email-xian...@openmobilefree.net you
wrote:
From: Xiangfu Liu xian...@sharism.cc
Please use a more descriptive subject.
Explain what jz4740 is; also explain what xburst is. Whos is be=hind
it, what it's used for, etc.
diff --git
Dear Xiangfu Liu,
In message 1289446657-12499-4-git-send-email-xian...@openmobilefree.net you
wrote:
From: Xiangfu Liu xian...@sharism.cc
Signed-off-by: Xiangfu Liu xian...@openmobilefree.net
---
nand_spl/board/xburst/nanonote/Makefile | 96 +++
Le 10/11/2010 15:20, Eric Cooper a écrit :
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 08:53:03AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Can you make the ELF images available? I'll do the readlf/objdump
analysis and feed back on what I find.
I've uploaded them here:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ecc/u-boot.{good,bad}
Dear Prabhakar,
In message 1289451431-22179-1-git-send-email-prabha...@freescale.com you
wrote:
nic and hw structures are allocated via malloc i.e. return memory
is not zero initialized. Because of this few structure member like
function pointers are initialized with garbage values.
It may
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/configs/corenet_ds.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/corenet_ds.h b/include/configs/corenet_ds.h
index 7ad9c69..454a30a 100644
--- a/include/configs/corenet_ds.h
+++
CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE setting is common across the 'corenet_ds' board
family so move it out of P4080DS.h and into corenet_ds.h
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/configs/P4080DS.h|4
include/configs/corenet_ds.h |4
2 files changed, 4
We appear to have different refclk's on the different corenet DS boards
so move the define out of the common header.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/configs/P4080DS.h|2 ++
include/configs/corenet_ds.h |1 -
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1
90 matches
Mail list logo
