Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/8] microblaze: Enable several ethernet driver compilation

2012-01-31 Thread Michal Simek
Stephan Linz wrote: U-Boot's multipple network supports enables to use several ethernet drivers but microblaze-generic platform config file select only one driver. Reported-by: Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu Signed-off-by: Stephan Linz l...@li-pro.net --- include/configs/microblaze-generic.h |

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/8] microblaze: Add faked LL_TEMAC driver configuration

2012-01-31 Thread Michal Simek
Stephan Linz wrote: Expand the specific configuration for the microblaze-generic board in xparameters.h with a faked setup to enable the LL_TEMAC driver. Note: From now the microblaze-generic board is no longer a valid board configuration for a real piece of hardware. Rather than, we use the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] mxc_spi: move machine specifics into CPU headers

2012-01-31 Thread Jason Hui
Eric On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com wrote: Move (E)CSPI register declarations into the imx-regs.h files for each supported CPU Introduce two new macros to control conditional setup     MXC_CSPI - Used for processors with the Configurable Serial

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mx6q: Add support for ECSPI through mxc_spi driver

2012-01-31 Thread Jason Hui
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com Acked-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@de.bosch.com Acked-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de ---  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h |   44

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap_hsmmc: Wait for CMDI to be clear

2012-01-31 Thread Andreas Müller
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: Before we can send a command we need both the DATI (command inhibit on mmc_dat line) bit and CMDI (command inhibit on mmc_cmd line) are clear. The previous behavior of only checking on DATI was insufficient on some cards and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Add ECSPI support to the Sabrelite platform

2012-01-31 Thread Jason Hui
Eric, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com Acked-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@de.bosch.com Acked-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de ---  board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/imximage.cfg    |    2

[U-Boot] flash post test

2012-01-31 Thread vk
Hi all, Currently I am testing the Flash memory by using Write and Read the same pattern method (Protecting the UBoot Flash Sectors). Is it safer to test flash memory during bootup?what if power gets off during process? I want to know whether there is any alternative method to test the

[U-Boot] Memory testing of flash

2012-01-31 Thread vk
Is it safer to test flash during bootup...what if power gets off half a way while writing data on address at which uboot source code is located?Then uboot will never get started?? ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Fix VDDIO and VDDA setup

2012-01-31 Thread Matthias Fuchs
I tested both patch on my mx28evk. At least I cannot notice any missbehavior :-) Downloading the patched u-boot via USB recovery download still does not work. Marek, did you find any further mentionable difference between bootlets code and current u-boot implementation? Matthias On 31.01.2012

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] sf command: allow default bus and chip selects

2012-01-31 Thread Matthias Fuchs
Works fine. Matthias Tested-by: Matthias Fuchs matthias.fu...@esd.eu On 30.01.2012 21:02, Eric Nelson wrote: This patch allows a board configuration file to provide default bus and chip-selects for SPI flash so that first argument to the 'sf' command is optional. On boards that use the

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-01-31 Thread Stefano Babic
On 30/01/2012 19:05, Tom Rini wrote: Hi Tom, OK, doing a MAKEALL for omap3/4/5/am33xx/davinci shows we've got a few missing include problems, I'll go fix that up. OK, was it when you took over the series that you moved stuff to common/spl.c ? That idea is breaking, badly, non-omap

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Fix VDDIO and VDDA setup

2012-01-31 Thread Marek Vasut
I tested both patch on my mx28evk. At least I cannot notice any missbehavior :-) Downloading the patched u-boot via USB recovery download still does not work. Good, any improvements though? Marek, did you find any further mentionable difference between bootlets code and current u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] Memory testing of flash

2012-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear vk, In message loom.20120131t094437-...@post.gmane.org you wrote: Is it safer to test flash during bootup...what if power gets off half a way while writing data on address at which uboot source code is located?Then uboot will never get started?? Write testing of flash devices on a

[U-Boot] [PATCH] i.mx: i.mx5: update imx_get_mac_from_fuse function

2012-01-31 Thread Jason Liu
FEC does not work on the i.mx51/53evk board, it will hangup In:serial Out: serial Err: serial Net: After bisect, it due to the following commit: be252b6 net: imx: Add multi-FEC support for imx_get_mac_from_fuse has change the imx_get_mac_from_fuse fucntion prototype, but fail to update

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.mx: i.mx5: update imx_get_mac_from_fuse function

2012-01-31 Thread Fabio Estevam
On 1/31/12, Jason Liu jason@linaro.org wrote: FEC does not work on the i.mx51/53evk board, it will hangup In:serial Out: serial Err: serial Net: After bisect, it due to the following commit: be252b6 net: imx: Add multi-FEC support for imx_get_mac_from_fuse has change the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Fix VDDIO and VDDA setup

2012-01-31 Thread Fabio Estevam
On 1/30/12, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote: Note: Guys, please give this a testrun. I think it might fix the issue Robert was observing. I dug into the imx-bootlets and the bootrom X-Files and found this paranormal piece of code. Adding it fixes the boot issue on my crappy board.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Fix VDDIO and VDDA setup

2012-01-31 Thread Marek Vasut
On 1/30/12, Marek Vasut marek.va...@gmail.com wrote: Note: Guys, please give this a testrun. I think it might fix the issue Robert was observing. I dug into the imx-bootlets and the bootrom X-Files and found this paranormal piece of code. Adding it fixes the boot issue on my crappy

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Fix VDDIO and VDDA setup

2012-01-31 Thread Matthias Fuchs
On 31.01.2012 12:38, Marek Vasut wrote: I tested both patch on my mx28evk. At least I cannot notice any missbehavior :-) Downloading the patched u-boot via USB recovery download still does not work. Good, any improvements though? No. It works as before. Whatever that means :-) I will respond

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.mx: i.mx5: update imx_get_mac_from_fuse function

2012-01-31 Thread Stefano Babic
On 31/01/2012 13:07, Jason Liu wrote: FEC does not work on the i.mx51/53evk board, it will hangup In:serial Out: serial Err: serial Net: After bisect, it due to the following commit: be252b6 net: imx: Add multi-FEC support for imx_get_mac_from_fuse has change the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] mxc_spi refactoring (for mx6q and mx6qsabrelite)

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
On 01/30/2012 11:51 PM, Jason Liu wrote: Eric, 2012/1/31 Eric Nelsoneric.nel...@boundarydevices.com: This patch set refactors mxc_spi as described in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-March/068791.html and requested in

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 0/7] Change ARM926EJ-S startup code, hawkboard and calimain

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
Hi, In this patchset I tried to put everything from the discussion in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/115212.html Although this is the first version of this patchset, the version number is v5 since Sughosh's patches were already v4. Regards, Christian Christian Riesch (5):

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 5/7] arm, arm926ejs: Enable icache only if CONFIG_SYS_ICACHE_OFF is not defined

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch christian.rie...@omicron.at Cc: Albert Aribaud albert.u.b...@aribaud.net Cc: Tom Rini tr...@ti.com --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/start.S

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/7] arm, arm926ejs: Do not clear the V bit on DA850 SoCs

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
The V bit of the c1 register of CP15 should not be cleared since the SoC has no valid memory at 0x. Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch christian.rie...@omicron.at Reported-by: Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.com Cc: Albert Aribaud albert.u.b...@aribaud.net Cc: Tom Rini tr...@ti.com ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 1/7] arm, davinci: Add lowlevel_init for SoCs other than DM644X

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
The low level initialization code in arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/davinci/lowlevel_init.S was written for DM644X SoCs only. This patch makes the lowlevel_init function in this file a dummy function for SoCs other than DM644X. Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch christian.rie...@omicron.at Cc: Tom Rini

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 7/7] arm, davinci: Add support for the Calimain board from OMICRON electronics

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
This patch adds support for the Calimain board from OMICRON electronics GmbH. The board features a Texas Instruments AM1808 SoC, 128 MB DDR2 memory, and 64 MB NOR flash memory connected to CS2 and CS3. Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch christian.rie...@omicron.at --- MAINTAINERS

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 3/7] arm, arm926ejs: Flush the data cache before disabling it

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
From: Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.com The current implementation invalidates the data cache before turning it off and causes problems on the hawkboard. See the discussion in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/115212.html According to the ARM926EJ-S Technical Reference

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 2/7] arm, arm926ejs: Do cpu critical inits only for boards that require it

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
This patch reverts commit ca4b55800ed74207c35271bf7335a092d4955416 arm, arm926ejs: always do cpu critical inits since it impacts all arm926ejs based configurations and caused problems, e.g., with the hawkboard. Instead the patch removes the CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT defines from the board

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 6/7] Changes to move hawkboard to the new spl infrastructure

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
From: Sughosh Ganu urwithsugh...@gmail.com This patch moves hawkboard to the new spl infrastructure from the older nand_spl one. Removed the hawkboard_nand_config build option -- The spl code now gets compiled with hawkboard_config, after building the main u-boot image, using the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 V2] arm926: Flush the data cache before disabling it.

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
Hi Tom, On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Tom Rini tom.r...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 6:36 AM, Christian Riesch christian.rie...@omicron.at wrote: 3) As Sughosh pointed out, the current code changes the V bit (location of exceptions). Sughosh's patch removes this code that does

[U-Boot] mx28: booting u-boot via USB

2012-01-31 Thread Matthias Fuchs
Hi, I have a problem booting the current u-boot-imx version on a MX28EVK via USB. The i.MX28 CPU supports a special boot mode where the image (sb boot stream) is downloaded via USB device (all DIP switches in position 'off' on the EVK). The CPU's internal bootrom implements a HID device in this

Re: [U-Boot] Can u-Boot Ran from RAM?

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
On 01/30/2012 09:07 PM, Bud Miljkovic wrote: Hi there, While getting acquainted with possible u-Boot development issues, I read FAQ 14.2.1. Can U-Boot be configured such that it can be started in RAM? and was puzzled to learn that u-Boot cannot run from RAM. Considering a custom platform,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Add ECSPI support to the Sabrelite platform

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
On 01/31/2012 02:31 AM, Jason Hui wrote: Eric, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 3:52 AM, Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Eric Nelsoneric.nel...@boundarydevices.com Acked-by: Dirk Behmedirk.be...@de.bosch.com Acked-by: Stefano Babicsba...@denx.de ---

Re: [U-Boot] mx28: booting u-boot via USB

2012-01-31 Thread Sergey Lapin
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:03:55PM +0100, Matthias Fuchs wrote: Hi, I have a problem booting the current u-boot-imx version on a MX28EVK via USB. The i.MX28 CPU supports a special boot mode where the image (sb boot stream) is downloaded via USB device (all DIP switches in position 'off' on

Re: [U-Boot] SPL Linux Boot

2012-01-31 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: On 30/01/2012 19:05, Tom Rini wrote: Hi Tom, OK, doing a MAKEALL for omap3/4/5/am33xx/davinci shows we've got a few missing include problems, I'll go fix that up. OK, was it when you took over the series that you moved

Re: [U-Boot] mx28: booting u-boot via USB

2012-01-31 Thread Fabio Estevam
On 1/31/12, Matthias Fuchs matthias.fu...@esd.eu wrote: The USB boot mechanism is not documented that detailed. Is it possible that the SPL code overwrites the bootroms ivt and in consequence crashes the bootrom's USB code? Any further ideas? Completely untested, but please give it a try:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Add ECSPI support to the Sabrelite platform

2012-01-31 Thread Stefano Babic
On 31/01/2012 15:16, Eric Nelson wrote: On 01/31/2012 02:31 AM, Jason Hui wrote: Eric, Hi Eric, Ouch! It's all about the GPIO numbers... This occurred when I re-based to Stefano's tree and will require another patch to keep the BANK:OFFSET numbering scheme. There's a patch lingering in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Fix VDDIO and VDDA setup

2012-01-31 Thread Robert Deliën
Hi, Same here. I've applied the patch and tried it on my mx28evk and 'reboot' from the Kernel prompt results into DRAM: 0 Bytes and a hanging U-Boot. I didn't try single-stepping with the debugger yet; I'm still messing around with the PLL bypass bit and PLL configuration. Cheers,

Re: [U-Boot] Can u-Boot Ran from RAM?

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 30 January 2012 23:07:05 Bud Miljkovic wrote: While getting acquainted with possible u-Boot development issues, I read FAQ 14.2.1. Can U-Boot be configured such that it can be started in RAM? and was puzzled to learn that u-Boot cannot run from RAM. you misread it. the question is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 30 January 2012 15:02:24 Eric Nelson wrote: Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command: U-Boot sf probe instead of the more cumbersome usage when a GPIO is tacked onto the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
On 01/31/2012 08:16 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 30 January 2012 15:02:24 Eric Nelson wrote: Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command: U-Boot sf probe instead of the more

Re: [U-Boot] mx28: booting u-boot via USB

2012-01-31 Thread Matthias Fuchs
On 31.01.2012 15:25, Sergey Lapin wrote: On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:03:55PM +0100, Matthias Fuchs wrote: Hi, I have a problem booting the current u-boot-imx version on a MX28EVK via USB. The i.MX28 CPU supports a special boot mode where the image (sb boot stream) is downloaded via USB device

Re: [U-Boot] mx28: booting u-boot via USB

2012-01-31 Thread Matthias Fuchs
Hi Fabio, On 31.01.2012 15:53, Fabio Estevam wrote: On 1/31/12, Matthias Fuchs matthias.fu...@esd.eu wrote: The USB boot mechanism is not documented that detailed. Is it possible that the SPL code overwrites the bootroms ivt and in consequence crashes the bootrom's USB code? Any further

Re: [U-Boot] Memory testing of flash

2012-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Vaibhav Kothari, please keep the ML on Cc: In message CAHD55i3Odt_e9PdEAoyE=JhRwb5jaKem=xp7prb-oe1rqn9...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: Thank you very muchyour answer is really very helpful.. Though if i wanted to test flash all sectors but not one which contains uboot code ...is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-01-31 Thread Dirk Behme
On 31.01.2012 16:16, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 30 January 2012 15:02:24 Eric Nelson wrote: Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command: U-Boot sf probe instead of the more

Re: [U-Boot] Changes in uEnv.txt does not work

2012-01-31 Thread Tom Rini
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:38 AM, manishdkanchan manishdkancha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I am Manish and i have recently started working on beagleboard xm. I am facing certain issues. Need guidance to solve it. Background: I am using beagleboard xm, uboot version 9 of 2011 Intention:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Fix VDDIO and VDDA setup

2012-01-31 Thread Robert Deliën
Right, because RAM size is 0. I see, so DRAM init fails somewhere. That's exactly where and why it hangs, in my case. I think though it doesn't hang in the POWER init code anymore. In my case, I don't think it hung in power_init before your patch. I'm pretty sure it hung at the same place.

[U-Boot] MX6q SPI refactoring and related patches

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
I'm about to send an updated set of patches for mxc_spi re-factoring and the related cleanup stemming from the discussions in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/116816.html These are split into multiple patch sets as suggested by Dirk:

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 2 - 0/3] mxc_spi refactoring (for mx6q and mx6qsabrelite)

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
This patch set refactors mxc_spi as described in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-March/068791.html and requested in http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2012-January/116023.html in order to add support for the MX6Q in general and the mx6qsabrelite specifically. Patch 1

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 1 - 1/1] mx6q: define GPIO macros for translating between ordinals and port:index

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
The interface to the mxc_gpio driver uses integer (ordinal) values to refer to all GPIOs on the i.MX processors. The registers themselves and much of the i.MX documentation are banked in groups of 32, and these macros allow the use of the port:index numbering for clarity. GPIO_NUMBER() converts

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 1/2] sf command: allow default bus and chip selects

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
This patch allows a board configuration file to provide default bus and chip-selects for SPI flash so that first argument to the 'sf' command is optional. On boards that use the mxc_spi driver and a GPIO for chip select, this allows a much simpler command line: U-Boot sf probe instead of

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command: U-Boot sf probe instead of the more cumbersome usage when a GPIO is tacked onto the chip-select. Otherwise, this command-line would be needed to

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 2 - 3/3] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Add ECSPI support to the Sabrelite platform

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com Acked-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@de.bosch.com Acked-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/imximage.cfg|2 +- board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c | 25 +

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 2 - 2/3] mx6q: Add support for ECSPI through mxc_spi driver

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com Acked-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@de.bosch.com Acked-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx6/imx-regs.h | 44 ++ 1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 2 - 1/3] mxc_spi: move machine specifics into CPU headers

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
Move (E)CSPI register declarations into the imx-regs.h files for each supported CPU Introduce two new macros to control conditional setup MXC_CSPI - Used for processors with the Configurable Serial Peripheral Interface (MX3x) MXC_ECSPI - For processors with Enhanced Configurable...

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 5 - 1/1] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Conditionally define macros for environment in serial flash

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
The default settings store the persistent environment on SD card and not serial flash (SPI NOR). To use SPI NOR to save the environment instead of SD card, edit include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h and - undefine CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC - define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_SPI_FLASH The SPI driver can take as

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 4 - 1/1] mx6q: mx6qsabrelite: Provide default serial flash bus and chip-select

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com Acked-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@de.bosch.com Acked-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- board/freescale/mx6qsabrelite/mx6qsabrelite.c |2 +- include/configs/mx6qsabrelite.h |2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1

[U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 2 - 2/2] README: Add description of SPI Flash (SF) command configuration

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
Signed-off-by: Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com --- README | 20 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/README b/README index 9d713e8..4dbebcb 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -809,6 +809,7 @@ The following options need to be

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/7] arm, arm926ejs: Do not clear the V bit on DA850 SoCs

2012-01-31 Thread Sughosh Ganu
hi Christian, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Christian Riesch christian.rie...@omicron.at wrote: The V bit of the c1 register of CP15 should not be cleared since the SoC has no valid memory at 0x. Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch christian.rie...@omicron.at Reported-by: Sughosh

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Fix VDDIO and VDDA setup

2012-01-31 Thread Marek Vasut
Right, because RAM size is 0. I see, so DRAM init fails somewhere. That's exactly where and why it hangs, in my case. I think though it doesn't hang in the POWER init code anymore. In my case, I don't think it hung in power_init before your patch. I'm pretty sure it hung at the same

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] sf: eeprom_m95xxx: set a sane default timeout

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
Every board currently defines this to the same value, so just default to that to avoid having to make everyone do the same thing. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- drivers/mtd/spi/eeprom_m95xxx.c |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] sf: eeprom_m95xxx: fix up style

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- drivers/mtd/spi/eeprom_m95xxx.c | 24 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/eeprom_m95xxx.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/eeprom_m95xxx.c index ef8ed6f..bae9445 100644 ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote: Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command: U-Boot sf probe instead of the more cumbersome usage when a GPIO is tacked onto the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 11:21:29 Dirk Behme wrote: On 31.01.2012 16:16, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 30 January 2012 15:02:24 Eric Nelson wrote: Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX28: Fix VDDIO and VDDA setup

2012-01-31 Thread Marek Vasut
Right, because RAM size is 0. I see, so DRAM init fails somewhere. That's exactly where and why it hangs, in my case. I think though it doesn't hang in the POWER init code anymore. In my case, I don't think it hung in power_init before your patch. I'm pretty sure it hung at the same

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/8] microblaze: Enable several ethernet driver compilation

2012-01-31 Thread Stephan Linz
Am Dienstag, den 31.01.2012, 10:00 +0100 schrieb Michal Simek: Stephan Linz wrote: U-Boot's multipple network supports enables to use several ethernet drivers but microblaze-generic platform config file select only one driver. Reported-by: Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V6 - Part 3 - 0/2] SPI flash enhancements: allow default bus and chip-selects

2012-01-31 Thread Eric Nelson
On 01/31/2012 11:11 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 31 January 2012 12:52:06 Eric Nelson wrote: Patch 1 modifies the 'sf' command to allow a default bus and chip-select to be specified by board headers. This allows a bare 'sf' probe command: U-Boot sf probe instead of the more

[U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP SPL: Fix missing timer_init() call in OMAP4 s_init()

2012-01-31 Thread Nicolas Dechesne
In 8775471bb, the call to timer_init() was removed from common code and put in OMAP3 s_init() function. As a result the boot was broken on OMAP4. This patch adds timer_init() in OMAP4 s_init(), that fix boot on all OMAP4 boards. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dechesne n-deche...@ti.com Tested-by: Robert

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/8] microblaze: Add faked LL_TEMAC driver configuration

2012-01-31 Thread Stephan Linz
Am Dienstag, den 31.01.2012, 10:01 +0100 schrieb Michal Simek: Stephan Linz wrote: Expand the specific configuration for the microblaze-generic board in xparameters.h with a faked setup to enable the LL_TEMAC driver. Note: From now the microblaze-generic board is no longer a valid

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] sf: spansion: inline useless id defines

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
No need for dedicated defines when these really only get used once. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c | 34 -- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] sf: drop unused/duplicate command defines

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
In an effort to unify the spi flash drivers further, drop all the unused and/or duplicate command defines. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- drivers/mtd/spi/eon.c|9 - drivers/mtd/spi/macronix.c | 11 +-- drivers/mtd/spi/ramtron.c

[U-Boot] slow flash write with Freescale P1020 and PC28F256J3 NOR-flash

2012-01-31 Thread Daniel Nilsson
I am bringing up a board that has a Freescale P1020 (PowerPC e500v2) and a 16-bit PC28F256J3 NOR-flash on it. My problem is that both erases and programming takes very long time. Reading from the flash on the other hand, is quite fast (at least a few MByte/s). I have set up the BR0, OR0 and

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5 v2] sandbox: add lseek helper

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
Follow up patches want to be able to seek fd's. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- arch/sandbox/cpu/os.c | 13 + include/os.h | 15 +++ 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sandbox/cpu/os.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5 v2] sandbox: SPI emulation bus

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
This adds a SPI framework for people to hook up simulated SPI clients. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- arch/sandbox/include/asm/spi.h | 48 ++ drivers/spi/Makefile |1 + drivers/spi/sandbox_spi.c | 198 3

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5 v2] sandbox: add getopt support

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
Note: just a PoC that the current SPI flash code is based on. Not meant to reject the getopt code Simon posted. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- arch/sandbox/cpu/os.c| 13 + arch/sandbox/cpu/start.c | 24 include/os.h |

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5 v2] sandbox: spi/sf emulation

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
Should address the feedback posted by Simon. Mike Frysinger (5): sandbox: add lseek helper sandbox: add getopt support sandbox: SPI emulation bus sandbox: new SPI flash driver sandbox: enable new spi/sf layers arch/sandbox/cpu/os.c | 26 +++ arch/sandbox/cpu/start.c |

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5 v2] sandbox: enable new spi/sf layers

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
We want to test SPI flash code in the sandbox, so enable the new drivers. Acked-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- include/configs/sandbox.h |7 +++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/sandbox.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5 v2] sandbox: new SPI flash driver

2012-01-31 Thread Mike Frysinger
This adds a SPI flash driver which simulates SPI flash clients. Currently supports the bare min that U-Boot requires: you can probe, read, erase, and write. Should be easy to extend to make it behave more exactly like a real SPI flash, but this is good enough to merge now. Signed-off-by: Mike

[U-Boot] slow flash write with Freescale P1020 and PC28F256J3 NOR-flash

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
Hi Daniel, On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, Daniel Nilsson gnuf...@gmail.com wrote: I am bringing up a board that has a Freescale P1020 (PowerPC e500v2) and a 16-bit PC28F256J3 NOR-flash on it. My problem is that both erases and programming takes very long time. Reading from the flash on the

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-01-31 Thread Tom Rini
From: Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com Adds support for loading U-Boot from UART using YMODEM protocol. If YMODEM support is enabled in SPL and the romcode indicates that SPL loaded via UART then SPL will wait for start of a YMODEM transfer via the console port. Signed-off-by: Matt Porter

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] SPL: Enable YMODEM support on BeagleBone and AM335x EVM

2012-01-31 Thread Tom Rini
From: Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com Cc: Chandan Nath chandan.n...@ti.com Tested-by: Tom Rini tr...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com --- include/configs/am335x_evm.h |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/am335x_evm.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH] integrator: update the Integrator/CP config

2012-01-31 Thread Linus Walleij
The Integrator/CP config file was very outdated and gives a non functional U-Boot. So: - Set the CONFIG_ARCH_CINTEGRATOR arch flag correctly - Add proper core module configuration options - Skip cluttered command lista and just include config_cmd_default.h - Kill off #if 0 network section and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm, arm-kirkwood: disable l2c before linux boot

2012-01-31 Thread Michael Walle
Am Freitag 13 Januar 2012, 23:59:08 schrieb Michael Walle: [Sorry can't answer to the original message, because it was blocked by spam filter] Also, I'm missing something: you introduce two functions, for enabling and disabling the cache, yet the code uses only the one for disabling. So

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] arm, arm-kirkwood: disable l2c before linux boot

2012-01-31 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Michael Walle, In message 201201312349.37621.mich...@walle.cc you wrote: My enable function is just for completeness atm. Ping. Is there something still uncertain? Nothing is uncertain. But we do not add dead code. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH,

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] arm, arm-kirkwood: disable l2c before linux boot

2012-01-31 Thread Michael Walle
The decompressor expects the L2 cache to be disabled. This fixes booting some kernels, which have CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT enabled. Signed-off-by: Michael Walle mich...@walle.cc Cc: Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com Cc: Wolfgang Denk

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] net: fec_mxc: add PHYLIB support

2012-01-31 Thread Andy Fleming
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Troy Kisky troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com wrote: On 1/29/2012 7:04 PM, Andy Fleming wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Troy Kisky troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com  wrote: Signed-off-by: Troy Kiskytroy.ki...@boundarydevices.com ---  drivers/net/fec_mxc.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] net: fec_mxc: add PHYLIB support

2012-01-31 Thread Troy Kisky
On 1/31/2012 5:29 PM, Andy Fleming wrote: On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 8:13 PM, Troy Kisky troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com wrote: On 1/29/2012 7:04 PM, Andy Fleming wrote: On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Troy Kisky troy.ki...@boundarydevices.comwrote: Signed-off-by: Troy

Re: [U-Boot] Can u-Boot Ran from RAM?

2012-01-31 Thread Charles Manning
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 17:07:05 Bud Miljkovic wrote: Hi there, While getting acquainted with possible u-Boot development issues, I read FAQ 14.2.1. Can U-Boot be configured such that it can be started in RAM? and was puzzled to learn that u-Boot cannot run from RAM. This is clearly

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/3] mxc_spi refactoring (for mx6q and mx6qsabrelite)

2012-01-31 Thread Jason Hui
Eric, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 9:39 PM, Eric Nelson eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com wrote: On 01/30/2012 11:51 PM, Jason Liu wrote: Eric, 2012/1/31 Eric Nelsoneric.nel...@boundarydevices.com: This patch set refactors mxc_spi as described in    

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] SPL: Add YMODEM over UART load support

2012-01-31 Thread Christian Riesch
Hi Tom, Hi Matt, On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote: From: Matt Porter mpor...@ti.com Adds support for loading U-Boot from UART using YMODEM protocol. If YMODEM support is enabled in SPL and the romcode indicates that SPL loaded via UART then SPL will wait for start of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 4/7] arm, arm926ejs: Do not clear the V bit on DA850 SoCs

2012-01-31 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Sughosh, Sughosh Ganu wrote: hi Christian, On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Christian Riesch christian.rie...@omicron.at wrote: The V bit of the c1 register of CP15 should not be cleared since the SoC has no valid memory at 0x. Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch