On 02/01/2013 21:02, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
Sweet! Thanks Troy,
That fixes it on my Dialog based mx53loco with linaro's 4.7.3 gcc
toolchain...
Excellent, Troy!
Fixes the issue for me with gcc 4.6.2 as well.
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
Hi all,
the patch was only blocked for Wolfgang's comment regarding the
introduced ALIGN() macro. I think the other doubts regarding issues on
other Socs (i.e., MX6) can be considered closed as well. IMHO it is
Dear Fabio Estevam,
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
Hi all,
the patch was only blocked for Wolfgang's comment regarding the
introduced ALIGN() macro. I think the other doubts regarding issues on
other Socs (i.e., MX6) can be
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Ugh, why can't the stuff from common.h be used ?
Yes, I tried it initially, but it throws a lot of errors that I am not
sure that they can be easily fixed:
gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -idirafter
Dear Fabio Estevam,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Ugh, why can't the stuff from common.h be used ?
Yes, I tried it initially, but it throws a lot of errors that I am not
sure that they can be easily fixed:
Only with #include common.h ?
Regards,
On 03/01/2013 14:25, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
Hi all,
the patch was only blocked for Wolfgang's comment regarding the
introduced ALIGN() macro. I think the other doubts regarding issues on
other Socs (i.e., MX6)
On 03/01/2013 14:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Fabio Estevam,
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Ugh, why can't the stuff from common.h be used ?
Yes, I tried it initially, but it throws a lot of errors that I am not
sure that they can be easily fixed:
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Fabio Estevam,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Ugh, why can't the stuff from common.h be used ?
Yes, I tried it initially, but it throws a lot of errors that I am not
sure that they can
On 1/3/2013 7:07 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 03/01/2013 14:49, Marek Vasut wrote:
Dear Fabio Estevam,
Hi,
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
Ugh, why can't the stuff from common.h be used ?
Yes, I tried it initially, but it throws a lot of errors that I am
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Troy Kisky
troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com wrote:
It would be good to include this in commit log if not already committed.
Ok, just sent a v2 with such comment.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
___
U-Boot mailing list
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'll keep debugging it here, did reverting this commit, help
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay success on another bisect run to find what was causing the Data
Abort with linaro's gcc toolchain..
gcc version 4.7.3 20121205 (prerelease) (crosstool-NG
linaro-1.13.1-4.7-2012.12-20121214 - Linaro GCC 2012.12)
On 1/2/2013 11:33 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Thanks for bisecting, Robert. Troy/Stefano, Any suggestions about
this? It would be really nice if we could keep mx53loco functional
when using gcc 4.6.2. Regards, Fabio Estevam
Could you see if this patch makes any difference? It still needs cleaned
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Troy Kisky
troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com wrote:
On 1/2/2013 11:33 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Thanks for bisecting, Robert. Troy/Stefano, Any suggestions about this? It
would be really nice if we could keep mx53loco functional when using gcc
4.6.2. Regards, Fabio
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
Sweet! Thanks Troy,
That fixes it on my Dialog based mx53loco with linaro's 4.7.3 gcc toolchain...
Excellent, Troy!
Fixes the issue for me with gcc 4.6.2 as well.
It would be really nice to have this one applied
Robert,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fabio,
It looks like we need one more fixup after commit c73368150 on the
first run/older (non R, Dialog, bug wired extra Capacitor) version of
this board.. Do you happen to have any in your lab?
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
With the new PMIC framework: is it safe to call the PMIC API from
board_init function?
Calling it from board_late_init fixes the issue for me.
Will send the patch soon.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
Robert,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
With the new PMIC framework: is it safe to call the PMIC API from
board_init function?
Calling it from board_late_init fixes the issue
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting, I'm still only getting this far on the old Dialog board..
U-Boot 2013.01-rc2-00173-gd781d95-dirty (Dec 26 2012 - 09:42:43)
Board: MX53 LOCO
I2C: ready
DRAM: 1 GiB
I tested with 2 mx53loco boards
Hi Fabio,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
Robert,
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
With the new PMIC framework: is it safe to call the
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Interesting, I'm still only getting this far on the old Dialog board..
U-Boot 2013.01-rc2-00173-gd781d95-dirty (Dec 26 2012 - 09:42:43)
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, good to hear it works with the Dialog PMIC you have, as that
should cover a majority of the Dialog based boards customers actually
have. As the one I have here was one of the very first ones and i know
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com
wrote:
Okay, good to hear it works with the Dialog PMIC you have, as that
should cover a majority of the Dialog based boards customers actually
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll keep debugging it here, did reverting this commit, help with the resets?
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=28e5ac2d974547bde0c72aa0c1d66fd22c6ef3ad
Tried reverting it and still see the data-aborts.
I
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'll keep debugging it here, did reverting this commit, help with the resets?
Hi Robert,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Robert Nelson robertcnel...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fabio,
It looks like we need one more fixup after commit c73368150 on the
first run/older (non R, Dialog, bug wired extra Capacitor) version of
this board.. Do you happen to have any in your lab?
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Fabio Estevam
fabio.este...@freescale.com wrote:
commit c73368150 (pmic: Extend PMIC framework to support multiple instances
of PMIC devices) has incorrectly passed the PMIC name under the FSL PMIC case.
Fix that by passing FSL_PMIC as the parameter of
On 11/12/2012 17:36, Fabio Estevam wrote:
commit c73368150 (pmic: Extend PMIC framework to support multiple instances
of PMIC devices) has incorrectly passed the PMIC name under the FSL PMIC case.
Fix that by passing FSL_PMIC as the parameter of pmic_get.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam
commit c73368150 (pmic: Extend PMIC framework to support multiple instances
of PMIC devices) has incorrectly passed the PMIC name under the FSL PMIC case.
Fix that by passing FSL_PMIC as the parameter of pmic_get.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
---
29 matches
Mail list logo
