Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1248033674.15400.9.ca...@ptyser-laptop you wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 20:07 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1247935062.9174.14.ca...@ptyser-laptop you wrote:
I'd still vote for changing the directory structure in this release,
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 00:15 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1248033674.15400.9.ca...@ptyser-laptop you wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 20:07 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1247935062.9174.14.ca...@ptyser-laptop you wrote:
I'd
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 20:07 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1247935062.9174.14.ca...@ptyser-laptop you wrote:
I'd still vote for changing the directory structure in this release,
NAK. Such heavily restructuring changes should be prepared and
submitted at (or
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1248033674.15400.9.ca...@ptyser-laptop you wrote:
On Sat, 2009-07-18 at 20:07 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1247935062.9174.14.ca...@ptyser-laptop you wrote:
I'd still vote for changing the directory structure in this release,
On 23:39 Tue 14 Jul , Peter Tyser wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 12:38 +0900, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Peter Tyser wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 14:54 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
On 22:42 Fri 10 Jul , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 10 July 2009 21:20:45
I'd vote to get the directory structure changed as desired (in this
release), then integrate the Kconfig-based build system in the next
release once the directory layout is stable. Jean-Christophe is the
most familiar with the Kbuild system and might have a better idea what
its state
On 11:37 Sat 18 Jul , Peter Tyser wrote:
I'd vote to get the directory structure changed as desired (in this
release), then integrate the Kconfig-based build system in the next
release once the directory layout is stable. Jean-Christophe is the
most familiar with the Kbuild
Hi Rafal,
I like the Linux and u-boot-v2 directory layout too the more I think
about it too. How about if I resend this series but with the final
directory structure looking like:
/arch/$(ARCH)/lib/source files currently in lib_$(ARCH)
/lib/
/source files currently in
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1247935062.9174.14.ca...@ptyser-laptop you wrote:
I'd still vote for changing the directory structure in this release,
NAK. Such heavily restructuring changes should be prepared and
submitted at (or even before) the begin of the merge window, not at
it's very end.
Dear Peter Tyser,
In message 1247935976.9174.31.ca...@ptyser-laptop you wrote:
I see your point. nitpickIts a bit confusing as U-Boot documentation
seems to refer to Standalone applications alot, and in general that
documentation is specifically referring jumptable applications. eg
Hi Peter,
On 2009-07-14, at 17:20, Peter Tyser wrote:
I like the Linux and u-boot-v2 directory layout too the more I think
about it too. How about if I resend this series but with the final
directory structure looking like:
/arch/$(ARCH)/lib/source files currently in lib_$(ARCH)
/lib/
On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 14:54 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
On 22:42 Fri 10 Jul , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 10 July 2009 21:20:45 Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Peter Tyser wrote:
Before verifying MIPS builds, I'd like to make sure that why you take
lib/$(ARCH)/
On Tuesday 14 July 2009 17:20:43 Peter Tyser wrote:
I prefer the
arch/$(ARCH)/lib
so will could also move the cpu stuff there too
I like the Linux and u-boot-v2 directory layout too the more I think
about it too. How about if I resend this series but with the final
directory structure
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 12:38 +0900, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Peter Tyser wrote:
On Sun, 2009-07-12 at 14:54 +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
wrote:
On 22:42 Fri 10 Jul , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 10 July 2009 21:20:45 Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Peter Tyser wrote:
On 22:42 Fri 10 Jul , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 10 July 2009 21:20:45 Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Peter Tyser wrote:
Before verifying MIPS builds, I'd like to make sure that why you take
lib/$(ARCH)/ alternative, not $(ARCH)/lib/. If there were any
discussion on #IRC, is there
Hi,
Peter Tyser wrote:
This series moves api_examples to api/examples and moves all
lib* directories into a common lib/ directory. It also
moves the ARCH_config.mk files into their corresponding
lib directory.
Seeing 12 lib_ARCH directories and 12 ARCH_config.mk
files in U-Boot's top
On Sat, 2009-07-11 at 09:03 +0900, Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Hi,
Peter Tyser wrote:
This series moves api_examples to api/examples and moves all
lib* directories into a common lib/ directory. It also
moves the ARCH_config.mk files into their corresponding
lib directory.
Seeing 12
Peter Tyser wrote:
Before verifying MIPS builds, I'd like to make sure that why you take
lib/$(ARCH)/ alternative, not $(ARCH)/lib/. If there were any
discussion on #IRC, is there any chance we could share the summary or
decision to follow?
There was no discussion, /lib/$(ARCH) just made
On Friday 10 July 2009 21:20:45 Shinya Kuribayashi wrote:
Peter Tyser wrote:
Before verifying MIPS builds, I'd like to make sure that why you take
lib/$(ARCH)/ alternative, not $(ARCH)/lib/. If there were any
discussion on #IRC, is there any chance we could share the summary or
decision
19 matches
Mail list logo
