Updated builds of FFmpeg 5.0 against libx264-164 and also libplacebo199
are now available at ppa:savoury1/ffmpeg5 for Xenial, Bionic, and Focal
LTS. Enjoy.
** Changed in: savos
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
<-- CONTINUED FROM ABOVE -->
Regardless of solo effort or team, at least a sufficient percentage of
the users of the project DO need to support the work, just as with any
other notable projects like Linux Mint (Ubuntu of course has a well
known corporation backing them). Without question the
<-- CONTINUED FROM ABOVE -->
Although I have built high-end web-server farms previously, and then
maintained them as a server engineer, I have done very little actual
website creation (only a couple of blog type photo sites, that kind of
thing) and I don’t have a strong interest in it due my
<-- CONTINUED FROM ABOVE -->
My own two systems that all the building is done on would no doubt even
be considered "vintage" now, with one circa early 2012 and the other
circa mid-2013! Yet they are power-houses that work brilliantly, and the
base of them both is STILL the good ’ol Xenial (plus
Well this “bug report” has turned somewhat philosophical, again due the
nature of the times quite naturally! It’s useful to have these comments
on the public record as far as I’m concerned, so I’m actually glad that
the discussion here on this “bug report” is taking place. So I am
changing the
Pieter, it's quite simple, FFmpeg 5 needs to be rebuilt against the new
libx264-164 and I have been well aware of this for weeks. However, due
FFmpeg 5 not being used by any other PPAs at my site it is not a
priority. Also, in all likelihood the entire project that I've spent 2.5
years working on
** Changed in: savos
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: savos
Assignee: (unassigned) => Rob Savoury (savoury1)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965181
Title:
ffmpeg: f
OK, so it DOESN'T work for me when using a custom configfile. Putting
"export LC_ALL=C.UTF-8" into that custom config file and starting the
pbuilder build results in the same "LC_ALL=C" still being set, although
other LC_* env vars are now set to "C.UTF-8". So although it might be
INTENDED to work
So any use of a config file does not actually allowing setting
LANG/LC_ALL for the dpkg-buildpackage invocation. Already in use on my
personal build system is a detailed $HOME/.pbuilderrc config file and
adding LANG/LC_ALL exports to this file did not affect the used locales
for the actual build.
Public bug reported:
The build locale cannot be set with pbuilder and always defaults to "C"
(for both LANG and LC_ALL on Launchpad builds) rather than to "C.UTF-8"
as used by sbuild for all official Debian and Ubuntu builds. This causes
FTBFS of various packages that depend on the correct locale
Understood. It is simply a distinction therefore between ESM supported
systems and regular LTS supported systems (still in the usual five year
support window). Good to have that clarified.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
An update is that this seems to be due the fact that only root has
permissions to /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/90ubuntu-advantage which is
evidently the critical file required to authenticate with the Ubuntu ESM
servers. Running "sudo apt-get source" instead does work.
So perhaps this is how the
Public bug reported:
Running ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.1~16.04.1 on a Xenial 16.04 system
which is attached to my Ubuntu Advantage subscription as follows:
$ ua status
SERVICE ENTITLED STATUSDESCRIPTION
cis yes disabled Center for Internet Security Audit Tools
Public bug reported:
Due libutfcpp-dev from utfcpp source being architecture dependent and
not on the Launchpad i386 whitelist other software that depends on
libutfcpp-dev cannot build i386 binaries for Focal and newer series.
This includes software that is on the i386 whitelist such as taglib,
Patch fixes issue with libsmbclient users FTBFS against Samba 4.12.5 in
Groovy.
** Patch added: "add-missing-time-h-include.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1901355/+attachment/5430848/+files/add-missing-time-h-include.patch
--
You received this bug notification
The new ceph 15.2.5-0ubuntu1.1 package (https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
security/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/20200352) fixes the issue, published
a few days after I submitted the above bug report.
Renaming bug report to "Groovy: libsmbclient users FTBFS against Samba
4.12.5" due that bug still
Public bug reported:
Samba 4.12.5 as shipped in Groovy FTBFS (specifically amd64, not i386
which builds fine due no Ceph support, other arches untested) against
Ceph 15.2.5 also shipped in Groovy, due changes in Ceph > 15.2.3 to
cephfs.
Samba 4.12.5 was successfully built against Ceph 15.2.3 for
17 matches
Mail list logo
