I don't know if anybody cares about another vote in favour of uswsusp
but after spending a couple of hours trying to make suspend work again
after upgrading to Intrepid from Feisty (via Hardy) I was only able to
make it work by using uswsusp on HP nw8000 notebook. Removing uswsusp
from Ubuntu
If kernel suspend doesn't work on your hardware, please file a separate
bug report against the linux package.
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I've reinstalled uswsusp, let it reconfigure with default settings.
$ cat /etc/uswsusp.conf
# /etc/uswsusp.conf(8) -- Configuration file for s2disk/s2both
resume device = /dev/sda2
compress = y
early writeout = y
image size = 1910240542
RSA key file = /etc/uswsusp.key
shutdown method = platform
I read the thread, and I like James' latest patch
(http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18377887/pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu6.diff)
a lot, too. I'm going to sponsor it now, thanks to all for working on
this!
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
This bug was fixed in the package pm-utils - 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu7
---
pm-utils (1.1.2.4-1ubuntu7) intrepid; urgency=low
* Drop debian/patches/10-sleep-module-auto-detection.patch as we don't
want to use uswsusp unless the user explicitly chooses it. (LP: #267141)
* Add an example
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:26 +, James Westby wrote:
Hi,
I am aware of the issue, and I think the others are too.
I would actually lean towards removing uswsusp from the archive,
if we don't want people to use it, and we make it very difficult to
do so, then having it in the archive is
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 08:09 +, Martin Pitt wrote:
I read the thread, and I like James' latest patch
(http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18377887/pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu6.diff)
a lot, too. I'm going to sponsor it now, thanks to all for working on
this!
I've mentioned this before, but I'd like
Olá hyperair e a todos.
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 11:48:55 hyperair wrote:
A: Ubuntu takes so long to hibernate and resume! Why?!
B: Because Ubuntu uses the kernel method for hibernating which doesn't
involve compression.
A: Well, can I use another method to make it faster?
B: Yeah,
Hi,
I am aware of the issue, and I think the others are too.
I would actually lean towards removing uswsusp from the archive,
if we don't want people to use it, and we make it very difficult to
do so, then having it in the archive is just a cause of confusion in
my opinion.
Enabling s2ram would
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:26 +, BUGabundo wrote:
Olá hyperair e a todos.
On Wednesday 15 October 2008 11:48:55 hyperair wrote:
A: Ubuntu takes so long to hibernate and resume! Why?!
B: Because Ubuntu uses the kernel method for hibernating which doesn't
involve compression.
A: Well,
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 09:20 +, James Westby wrote:
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 01:51 +, hyperair wrote:
The config file you dropped in /etc/pm/config.d looks a tad bit like a
block of code taken out of /usr/lib/pm-utils/defaults. Doesn't that seem
a little redundant? I mean, that
note that the dependency currently breaks the ubuntu-mobile image since
that is built from universe. getting this dependency revmoved asap would
be really appreciated, as we dont get proper feedback about suspend
issues on UMPCs and netbooks due to uswsusp being installed by default
atm.
--
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 01:51 +, hyperair wrote:
The config file you dropped in /etc/pm/config.d looks a tad bit like a
block of code taken out of /usr/lib/pm-utils/defaults. Doesn't that seem
a little redundant? I mean, that particular functionality can be gotten
by just modifying the
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 10:15 +, hyperair wrote:
Ah yes, that's a good point. Then wouldn't it be a good idea to remove
the block from /usr/lib/pm-utils/defaults? Having it in two places is
redundant and can cause confusion.
Perhaps.
It does say at the top of the file Do not edit this file,
Hi,
Attached is the updated patch to add the example file in
/etc/pm/config.d/
Thanks for working on the alternative patch, it has helped me to
understand the issues better. I have just posted a message on
the ubuntu-devel mailing list asking for opinions on re-enabling s2ram
if my patch is
** Attachment added: pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu6.diff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18377887/pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu6.diff
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You received this bug notification because you are a
The config file you dropped in /etc/pm/config.d looks a tad bit like a
block of code taken out of /usr/lib/pm-utils/defaults. Doesn't that seem
a little redundant? I mean, that particular functionality can be gotten
by just modifying the SLEEP_MODULE in the file I mentioned above.
--
Chow Loong
Thank you so much Milligan.
That fix my problem, and now I have suspend and hibernation again.
Suspend is a bit slower than it used to.
So, any tips on how to do compress images, so hibernation takes just a
few secs, instead of 45 sec?
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to
I'm sorry to say that I don't think upgrading pm-utils to the new
upstream version is a viable option for intrepid. Backporting a
targeted fix may be, if someone wants to look into the code differences;
but I think we should consider other fixes in the meantime, even if they
end up being
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 07:46 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
I'm sorry to say that I don't think upgrading pm-utils to the new
upstream version is a viable option for intrepid. Backporting a
targeted fix may be, if someone wants to look into the code differences;
but I think we should consider
Here it is. No more code duplication.
--
Chow Loong Jin
** Attachment added: pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu6.debdiff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18328797/pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu6.debdiff
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 18:25 +, dlgandalf wrote:
so how do I apply these debdiffs?
do I need to uninstall uswswap?
adding the kernel option in /etc/pm/config.d/ doesn't work
what I'm trying to ask is, a small step by step for someone who has lost
track due to all the jargon like:
so how do I apply these debdiffs?
do I need to uninstall uswswap?
adding the kernel option in /etc/pm/config.d/ doesn't work
what I'm trying to ask is, a small step by step for someone who has lost
track due to all the jargon like: s2ram, uswswap, kernel suspend. But
does want a suspending
I feel like this is already intrinsically disruptive for any Ubuntu
users who try to use it - I'd like to see, at minimum, the above patch
go in. Ideally, I'd like to see 1.2.2.1 - this was certainly disruptive
for me, as a user, when I upgraded and found my suspend button missing;
since hibernate
I can't suspend on Lenovo Thinkpad X200 with Intel GMA X4500. Have this
problem been fixed yet? Or will it be fixed for final release?
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You received this bug notification because you
Okay, since pm-utils got upgraded to ubuntu4, I've created a new debdiff
for the time being, which I've attached. Would it be a good idea to at
least get this uploaded now, and then continue considering whether or
not we should upgrade to 1.2.2.1?
--
Chow Loong Jin
** Attachment added:
If you want to look at pulling the upstream package, start with 1.2.2.1
-- the previous 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 releases are buggy.
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Hi,
Thanks for working on this. Your patch looks sensible to me, however there
was a new upstream release over the weekend, including this:
* Sleep modules are stackable and have finegrained method
detection. For instance, if you like s2disk but not s2ram, you
can remove
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 11:58 +, vlowther wrote:
If you want to look at pulling the upstream package, start with 1.2.2.1
-- the previous 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 releases are buggy.
Ah, I'd missed 1.2.2.1, thanks for the heads-up.
I'm not sure whether going for this is the right idea, as opposed
to
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:16 +, James Westby wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 11:58 +, vlowther wrote:
If you want to look at pulling the upstream package, start with 1.2.2.1
-- the previous 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 releases are buggy.
Ah, I'd missed 1.2.2.1, thanks for the heads-up.
I'm
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 13:05 +, hyperair wrote:
I'll agree with you on that. But whatever it is, I'm against leaving it
broken the way it is at the moment.
I agree, and it's not going to stay broken. I was asking Victor what
his opinion was; as he is the upstream author he knows the package
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Michael Milligan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
dpkg --purge uswsusp fixes the problem for me. After doing that and
rebooting (update-initramfs is run), I have suspend back in the Gnome
power manager and suspend works too.
That fixes it for me too.
--
Martin
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 12:16 +, James Westby wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 11:58 +, vlowther wrote:
If you want to look at pulling the upstream package, start with 1.2.2.1
-- the previous 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 releases are buggy.
Ah, I'd missed 1.2.2.1, thanks for the heads-up.
I
I've worked on it a little, and managed to patch pm-utils to use
kernel's do_suspend and check_suspend, as well as uswsusp for the rest
(when auto-detected). The patch also makes sure that uswsusp's
before_hooks only executes the commands in it when hibernating, and not
when suspending.
--
Chow
dpkg --purge uswsusp fixes the problem for me. After doing that and
rebooting (update-initramfs is run), I have suspend back in the Gnome
power manager and suspend works too.
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pakraticus wrote:
People use uswsusp either because
1) It's legacy on a box that was upgraded from hardy to intrepid where
uswsusp was installed for whatever reason.
(How I encountered this).
2) They followed feisty or gutsy vintage instructions.
I'm personally against dropping the patch, for the following reasons:
1. This won't stop people who want to use uswsusp from using uswsusp.
2. If the user has installed uswsusp, then, since it's in universe, it should
mean that the user has explicitly chosen to use it
3. Dropping the patch would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James Westby wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:18 +, hyperair wrote:
I'm personally against dropping the patch, for the following reasons:
1. This won't stop people who want to use uswsusp from using uswsusp.
That's intentional, if people want
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:18 +, hyperair wrote:
I'm personally against dropping the patch, for the following reasons:
1. This won't stop people who want to use uswsusp from using uswsusp.
That's intentional, if people want to use uswsusp they can.
2. If the user has installed uswsusp,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:52:34PM -, James Westby wrote:
I believe this is incorrect, adding a file to /etc/pm/config.d/ will
allow them to use it.
Which could be supplied by uswsusp. Which could then be managed
through debconf for uswsusp.
And then there would be grounds to have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pakraticus wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 02:52:34PM -, James Westby wrote:
I believe this is incorrect, adding a file to /etc/pm/config.d/ will
allow them to use it.
Which could be supplied by uswsusp. Which could then be managed
through
Hi,
Attached is an updated patch that deletes the patch as well
as not applying it, as requested by Steve.
Thanks,
James
** Attachment removed: pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu3.diff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17976284/pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu3.diff
** Attachment added:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 06:11:24PM -, hyperair wrote:
That would be a bad idea. If we want uswsusp to work with pm-utils by default
(if uswsusp is
installed) then no changes need to be done. But what James Westby and the
rest of them want to do is
allow uswsusp to be installed, and
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
devel/2008-September/026586.html
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-
devel/2008-September/026589.html
and not in the archives yet from Matthew Garret
Just drop the Debian-specific patch that uses the uswsusp code at all.
It's an entirely
Hi,
After a mailing list discussion about this bug I propose the attached
patch for inclusion.
Thanks,
James
** Attachment added: pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu3.diff
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/17976284/pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu3.diff
** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu Intrepid)
Importance:
Note that if we check for s2ram when deciding whether to use the uswsusp
backend, it will never be used on Ubuntu; that kinda defeats the purpose
of having the package, I think.
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You
Hi Steve,
Since the last upload of pm-utils it no longer checks for s2ram when deciding
whether to
use uswsusp, only s2disk (and /dev/snapshot). This means that for those with
uswsusp installed
it is now used as the backend since this upload. When the uswsusp backend is
then asked if
it
Looking at this more closely, yes my suggested patch disables
pm-utils use of uswsusp on ubuntu, unless someone installed
the debian uswsusp package.
However, the current behavior is to disable the use of suspend when
ubuntu uswsusp is installed.
The root of this problem appears to be
The problem appears when uswsusp is installed because of an incorrect
test for the use of uswsusp for suspend for SLEEP_MODE=auto.
This is what ships in /usr/lib/pm-utils/pm-functions
# Try userspace software suspend
if [ -c /dev/snapshot ] command_exists s2disk ; then
** Tags added: regression-potential
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Interesting. Can you attach /var/log/pm-suspend.log to this bug report,
along with the output of lshal |grep quirk?
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
$ cat /var/log/pm-suspend.log
Initial commandline parameters:
Mon Sep 8 12:48:21 CST 2008: Running hooks for suspend.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/00clear suspend: disabled.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/05led suspend: not applicable.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/10NetworkManager suspend: success.
On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 00:01 +, czk wrote:
$ cat /var/log/pm-suspend.log
Initial commandline parameters:
Mon Sep 8 12:48:21 CST 2008: Running hooks for suspend.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/00clear suspend: disabled.
/usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/05led suspend: not applicable.
Sorry, I didn't enabled kernel backend just now. Now it works! Thanks.
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
This bug is happening because Ubuntu stopped using s2ram, and removed
the check for s2ram in the backend autodetection module but not in the
actual uswsusp backend. Since the uswsusp backend relies on s2ram to
suspend, pm-utils claims that the system does not support suspend.
The easiest way to
A short-term workaround would be to add a file (the name does not
matter) in /etc/pm/config.d with the following line:
SLEEP_MODULE=kernel
This will tell pm-utils to use the kernel's basic functionality for
suspend and hibernate.
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to
SLEEP_MODULE=kernel
After adding this line, suspend button appears, but it doesn't work.
System halted after pressing it.
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I can confirm on Samsung X30. After downgrading the Suspend option
becomes available again.
** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
suspend button disappears after pm-utils upgraded to 1.1.2.4-1ubuntu2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267141
You received this bug
58 matches
Mail list logo
