In reading Charles' changelog, he claimed the other patches had been
incorporated upstream. I will verify and return with a debdiff if
needed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to euca2ools in Ubuntu.
** Patch added: debdiff which carries over Ubuntu patches that haven't yet
been adopted upstream
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/euca2ools/+bug/1012419/+attachment/3187954/+files/euca2ools_2.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
In reading Charles' changelog, he claimed the other patches had been
incorporated upstream. I will verify and return with a debdiff if
needed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012419
** Patch added: debdiff which carries over Ubuntu patches that haven't yet
been adopted upstream
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/euca2ools/+bug/1012419/+attachment/3187954/+files/euca2ools_2.0.2-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Public bug reported:
The current version of euca2ools in Precise is a beta version and has
broken eustore scripts in it. We have removed the eustore scripts
altogether and Debian has sponsored the upload into Sid. It
incorporates the last Ubuntu fix needed as well, so a straight sync
should
Public bug reported:
The current version of euca2ools in Precise is a beta version and has
broken eustore scripts in it. We have removed the eustore scripts
altogether and Debian has sponsored the upload into Sid. It
incorporates the last Ubuntu fix needed as well, so a straight sync
should
Public bug reported:
The scripts in /usr/bin for eustore are included, but its python modules
are not. Also, the modules in the source package do not work with the
latest incarnation of Eustore.
** Affects: euca2ools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Brian Thomason (brian
Public bug reported:
The scripts in /usr/bin for eustore are included, but its python modules
are not. Also, the modules in the source package do not work with the
latest incarnation of Eustore.
** Affects: euca2ools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Brian Thomason (brian
Public bug reported:
There are many bugs in the GWT build in Precise that we were working on
but unable to complete before the deadline. Given its state, and the
fact that nothing in the archive depends on it, I think it best if it's
removed completely, especially given that this is an LTS.
**
Public bug reported:
There are many bugs in the GWT build in Precise that we were working on
but unable to complete before the deadline. Given its state, and the
fact that nothing in the archive depends on it, I think it best if it's
removed completely, especially given that this is an LTS.
**
Thanks Pitti!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985940
Title:
FFE exception for Precise: libpgjava
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
I would like to request a feature freeze exception to be made for the
mule package. I have updated the existing package to:
*Include the management module which is completely absent at present
*Fix the SSL functionality in some of the modules
*Fix the spring module
This is
I forgot to mention that I have the package built in my PPA at ~brian-
thomason/ppa
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985860
Title:
FFE request for Precise: Mule
To manage
Public bug reported:
Just after Debian sync freeze, Debian introduced a new version of
libpgjava for use with postgres 9.1. Also, the current version does not
build in Precise:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpgjava/+bug/888971
I have tested a build of the new version in my PPA
Thanks Scott, closing this out.
** Changed in: mule (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985860
Title:
FFE request for Precise: Mule
To manage
Hey guys,
Sorry, I dropped the ball here. I was maintaining this when I worked at
Canonical and have since moved on to another position and have been
working on another set of packages. I have added it to my checklist and
will get this patch in before final freeze. (I'm also looking into
Blueprint changed by Brian Thomason:
Work items set to:
Work items:
[gholms] Gather feedback on euca2ools: TODO
[agrimm] Gather feedback on ways to improve community involvement and
contributions: TODO
--
Eucalyptus updates in 12.10
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q
Blueprint changed by Brian Thomason:
Whiteboard set to:
This session will begin as a brief presentation of the newly released
Eucalyptus 3.0 and its new feature set which will soon be released as an
Open Source offering in the Canonical Partner Repository. We will also
discuss the idea of re
Public bug reported:
We (the Eucalyptus release team) don't feel the build of Eucalyptus 3.0
we have in Universe is currently stable enough to warrant shipping, and
we won't have suitable build until just before or after the release of
Precise. Arrangements are being made with the Server Team
Public bug reported:
We (the Eucalyptus release team) don't feel the build of Eucalyptus 3.0
we have in Universe is currently stable enough to warrant shipping, and
we won't have suitable build until just before or after the release of
Precise. Arrangements are being made with the Server Team
This was indeed just an order issue, thanks!
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900381
Title:
Missing symbols in
Public bug reported:
There appear to be missing symbols in the Ubuntu build of 1.0.0e in
Precise:
http://pastebin.com/dNNw98sf
Missing might not be the best word, as they are there:
brian@brian-desktop:~$ nm /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.a |grep MD5
nm: ebcdic.o: no symbols
I too was unable to see the icon at all until I double-clicked on a
request. Adding sni-qt
** Also affects: sni-qt
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: sni-qt
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Public bug reported:
In certain desktop files, rather than having:
Icon=icon
The vendor will put:
Icon=/path/to/icon.png
In Unity under Oneiric, this prevents the application from being
searchable via the dash.; the menu entry does not show up at all.
** Affects: unity (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = New
** Changed in: ensemble (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = New
** Changed in: python2.7 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Public bug reported:
I haven't dug into it deeply to see what errors it effects (perhaps all,
perhaps just this one), but the newest version of lintian in Oneiric
(2.5.2~git20110804ubuntu1) does not honor the override dir-or-file-in-
opt. The previous version I used (2.5.1ubuntu1) worked
Many thanks for the info there - it is much appreciated.
I will look into which is more appropriate, a profile or a patch, but
this definitely shouldn't be non-overrideable in Ubuntu as A.) All of
our Partner packages install here by default and B.) All user-submitted
apps do as well.
Not a big
Public bug reported:
Sometimes a package needs to replace a configuration file completely
that resides in another package, rather than the usual case of simply
appending to it, which is the standard usage of dotdee. A good example
of this is nginx (tomcat6 another). Some packages already provide
Public bug reported:
This is more of an abstract request, and may not end up making sense in
the end. I just wanted to get my thoughts written down.
For some config files, it seems to make sense to me to split them up
into logical sections, For instance, with the Cloud Foundry package we
did,
Public bug reported:
Failed to install on dist-upgrade
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: nginx-full 1.0.5-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-7.9-generic 3.0.0
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-7-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Aug 3 13:22:51
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820496
Title:
package nginx-full 1.0.5-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
To
** Changed in: ruby-rspec-core (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = In Progress
** Changed in: ruby-rspec-expectations (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = In Progress
** Changed in: ruby-rspec-mocks (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = In Progress
** Patch added: Upload 2: debdiff for
** Patch added: Upload 2: debdiff for ruby-rspec-expectations
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rspec-core/+bug/817664/+attachment/2240993/+files/ruby-rspec-expectations_2.5.0-2ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Patch added: Upload 2: debdiff for ruby-rspec-mocks
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rspec-core/+bug/817664/+attachment/2240994/+files/ruby-rspec-mocks_2.5.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
The following three source packages were once part of the same source
package, but the developer recently split them up:
ruby-rspec-core
ruby-rspec-expectations
ruby-rspec-mocks
However, they each build-depend upon one another due to the fact
functionality from each is
** Patch added: Upload 1: Bootstrap debdiff for ruby-rspec-core
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rspec-core/+bug/817664/+attachment/2238993/+files/ruby-rspec-core_2.5.1-1ubuntu1%7Ebootstrap1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Patch added: Upload 1: Bootstrap debdiff for ruby-rspec-mocks
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rspec-core/+bug/817664/+attachment/2239001/+files/ruby-rspec-mocks_2.5.0-1ubuntu1%7Ebootstrap1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Patch added: Upload 1: Bootstrap debdiff for ruby-rspec-expectations
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rspec-core/+bug/817664/+attachment/2239000/+files/ruby-rspec-expectations_2.5.0-2ubuntu1%7Ebootstrap1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Public bug reported:
One of the changes made between Jul 22-25 caused add-apt-repository to
quit working when being called from within an ensemble formula:
+ apt-add-repository ppa:cloudfoundry/ppa
2011-07-25 22:55:32,383: hook.output@ERROR: Fatal Python error: Py_Initialize:
Unable to get the
No, unfortunately it isn't technically possible at this time to automate
that, and I'm not sure it's desirable. Just because the update works
soundly on Debian Sid does not mean it works on top of Lucid in the same
manner.
That being said, I just uploaded this fix to Lucid and Maverick and
Natty
Hi Vistaus,
The security team isn't responsible for packages in the Canonical
Partner Repository - that would rest solely with me. One month is too
long - I need to get back in contact with the Debian developer and sync
their packages soon after they are released.
Flash updates are handled
Expect this on Monday or Tuesday.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797718
Title:
sun java 6u26 needs packaging
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
an we, just for For Purchase apps, *always* show the description that is
entered in the dev portal rather than showing the long desc in the
control file after the package is installed. Right now we package first
and publish later; often times, the vendor doesn't provide me a
Public bug reported:
It appears that the sorting of For Purchase Apps in What's New appears
to be random. Apps published recently are on the last of the 5 panes,
and apps that were published on the same day are separated by other apps
published at different times. It would be nice if it were
For what it's worth, the vendor is not using a bait and switch. This
application was published in the Partner reop before we had the ability
for For Purchase apps. The Partner repo does not support the proper
specification of a license. We are looking into moving it into the For
Purchase
Hi Robert,
This is fixed in Natty, but I still need to SRU it for Maverick. (I
appreciate the indirect reminder!) Could you mark it as such. (I don't
have the powers)
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745942
Title:
Icons not displayed for paid apps with a . in their package name
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
Everything works fine in Natty, but software-center in Maverick no
longer displays screenshots for the For Purchase apps. When we launched
Family Farm, only Fluendo DVD's screenshot was showing up. We launched
The Clockwork Man
It has been updated:
http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-
flashplugin_10.3.181.14-0lucid1_i386.deb
** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Which ubuntu release are you using James?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752193
Title:
Installation of the acroread package causes completion to treat
directories like files with
This should be fixed in the latest package in Natty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752193
Title:
Installation of the acroread package causes completion to treat
directories like
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Brian Thomason (brian-thomason)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
Michael recently fixed a bug whereby packages with a . in their name
would not properly display their icon in the software center listings.
(The fluendo codecs, as an example) However, the icons still failed to
show up until I manually
Hi Christopher,
Have you tried installing libgnome-speech7?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741203
Title:
Read Out Loud does not work
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Close acroread, then run the following command:
sudo /var/lib/dpkg/info/acroread.postinst configure
Reopen acroread and it should work.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741203
Title:
I'm probably missing something here, but skype doesn't have an
application menu, just the menu available by right clicking the tray
icon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689268
Title:
: software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Brian Thomason (brian-thomason)
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Brian Thomason (brian-thomason)
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
Hi there,
Please do provide an example and I will escalate it to Adobe.
Many thanks for the report!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743733
Title:
New acroread 9.4.2 cannot display
Hi Manouilla,
Did you attempt installing db2exc from the command line or via some
graphical interface such as synaptic or Ubuntu Software Center?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741816
** Changed in: rabbitmq-erlang-client (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/739719
Title:
rabbitmq-erlang-client doesn't ship a proper copyright file
This patch adds the complete MPL 1.1 text to debian/copyright, provides
proper attribution to Canonical for the copyright on the packaging
itself, and removes the patch that added the mpl copyright file in the
first place.
** Patch added: Patch adds MPL 1.1 to copyright file
This patch adds the complete MPL 1.1 text to debian/copyright, and
provides proper attribution to Canonical for the copyright on the
packaging itself.
This patch is for the rabbitmq-stomp package.
** Patch added: rabbitmq-stomp debian/copyright patch
This patch provides proper packaging copyright attribution to Canonical.
** Patch added: rabbitmq-plugins-common patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-erlang-client/+bug/739719/+attachment/1928211/+files/rabbitmq-plugins-common_0.0.1-0ubuntu3.debdiff
--
You received this
This has been resolved with the latest update of Adobe Air in the
Partner Repository. Sorry for the long delay!
** Changed in: adobeair (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hi Jonathan,
No, he hasn't uploaded the fix - he has agreed to upload future versions
(to Debian) without the Conflicts/Replaces/Provides in place as it is no
longer necessary. (He is a MOTU though, so does have upload access to
Universe where the -bad package resides)
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: software-center
It would be nice if, for paid apps, the software center was product
rather than package centric.
For instance, a vendor may have multiple games/applications and want to
offer various bundles with varying discounts. Packages should be
Many thanks Martin! (and sorry about the .in oversight)
Yes, this affects Maverick and Lucid as well. I'll attach those
debdiffs now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731711
Title:
** Patch added: Lucid debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-bad0.10/+bug/731711/+attachment/1910270/+files/gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.18-1ubuntu2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Patch added: Maverick debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-bad0.10/+bug/731711/+attachment/1910288/+files/gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.20-1ubuntu1.1.debdiff
** Patch removed: Lucid debdiff
** Patch added: Lucid debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins-bad0.10/+bug/731711/+attachment/1910323/+files/gst-plugins-bad0.10_0.10.18-1ubuntu1.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I spoke with one of the maintainers of this package, slomo, and he has
been kind enough to remove the Conflicts/Replaces/Provides (in
subsequent uploads) for gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mpegdemux which is causing
this inconvenience for users. This patch will fix the problem for
natty.
-Brian
** Patch
** Changed in: gst-plugins-bad0.10 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Brian Thomason (brian-thomason)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731711
Title:
mkv files with dvdsub broken
Hi,
I'm not seeing this. I tried with FF 3.6.13 and 3.6.15 with the 9.4.2
plugin. Can you send me a link to one of the offending documents?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731966
Partner for Natty is empty now, (we don't do migrations there until Beta 1)
but yes, I'll make sure the newer version is copied over at that time.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Jamie Strandboge ja...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Brian, will you be providing an update for natty in partner?
--
You
Thanks Sylvestre, I'll see about getting you upload rights for sun-java6
in Partner; I'm just not sure we have such fine grained control there or
not. In the meantime, I will grab your package and test it on Lucid+
tomorrow and push it to Jamie S. for review. The work is much
appreciated!
--
I tested this package pretty thoroughly before submitting the debdiff.
I installed it, added graphs, and verified that all the scripts that
were modified could be used successfully.
I'm sure you want a second pair of eyes on it though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Changed in: cacti (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599892
Title:
[Security] cacti - CVE-2009-4032, CVE-2010-1431, and CVE-2010-2092
--
** Patch removed: Lucid debdiff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cacti/+bug/599892/+attachment/1805141/+files/cacti_0.8.7e-2.1.debdiff
** Patch added: Updated Lucid debdiff
Sorry about that major oversight. The lucid debdiff should be complete
now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599892
Title:
[Security] cacti - CVE-2009-4032, CVE-2010-1431, and
2009-4032 - Already patched
2009-4112 - Affected but of low importance; upstream has not provided a patch
2010-1431 - Patched
2010-1644 - Patched
2010-1645 - Patched
2010-2092 - Patched
2010-2543,2544,2545 - Patched
** Patch added: Lucid debdiff
Public bug reported:
Rick Spencer has graced us with a nifty little game he wrote called
Bucket Brigade.
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Brian Thomason (brian-thomason)
Status: New
** Tags: needs-packaging
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned
** Patch added: debdiff for Lucid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xpdf/+bug/701220/+attachment/1801074/+files/xpdf_3.02-2ubuntu1.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
** Patch added: debdiff for Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xpdf/+bug/701220/+attachment/1801077/+files/xpdf_3.02-9ubuntu1.1.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
Hi,
Google Earth isn't available from the software center. Are you
referring to earth3d or did download a Google Earth DEB directly from
google?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704619
If you install the package lsb-core you should be good to go.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704619
Title:
Google Earth won't load.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Hi,
Can you please provide more information? Which apps are you trying to
install/update? Was it working until recently?
** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
https://edge.launchpad.net/~brian-thomason/+archive/ppa
This patched solution doesn't require natspec or librcc to run. This is
the solution upstream has used (with modifications) in 6.10b to fix the
problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I'm uploading a build with the archlinux patch for natty for those that
might find it helpful.
It looks like this was fixed upstream with a modified version of this
patch as of 6.10b, so the best effort to get this fixed now would be to:
A.) Ensure 6.10b works as expected
B.) Ensure 6.10b is in
Hi Nils, I was unable to reproduce the issue. Can you tell me what
versions of ia32-libs and libgtk2.0-0 you have installed? Also, can you
run update-gtk-icon-cache independently and see if it still locks up?
If so, try running an strace and see if it reveals anything interesting.
Thanks!
--
I apologize for the delay with the acroread update; Adobe did not place
it on their usual site for download (just their FTP) so I had to confirm
with them that we could indeed release it. Also, I noticed that the
plugin version was not updated, but they have assured me the problem is
fixed.
**
I am unable to reproduce this on amd64 Maverick running acroread 9.4.1.
Can you update your Firefox and Adobe Reader packages and see if the
problem still exists?
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks David,
Can you post the link to that PDF here?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690819
Title:
Artifacts in PDF Forms when Show border hover color for fields Preference
is
** Also affects: nspluginwrapper
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571247
Title:
a lot of errors when loading multiple pdf's
--
ubuntu-bugs
Well that explains it - 64 bit isn't supported yet :-) We should be
officially releasing it in Aprilish.
--
Loading www.yamana.com freezes Firefox and Linux. Reboot required
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672109
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Hi Christopher,
This is indeed a bug, and as of now, unfortunately, there is no way to
stop it. It will be fixed in the next release.
I made a boo boo and released 2.5 prematurely, and Adobe asked that I
pull it. In order to do that, I epoched the (the 1: in front of the
version if you aren't
Thank you for reporting this! I have contacted Adobe and they are
looking into resolving this issue.
--
flash plugin crashes when going fullscreen on any video site
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672225
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Hi,
Can you verify which version of Adobe Flash you are using? (you can type
about:plugins in Firefox to see)
I don't see this issue on my i386 Lucid with the latest flash installed
using Firefox 3.6.8+build1+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.10.04.1. It may very well
be a Firefox issue, but I want to ensure
Hi Nicola,
I just tested acroread on amd64 maverick and it seems to work fine. Can
you run the following and provide me the output.
dpkg -l |grep ia32
dpkg -l acroread
Thanks!
-Brian
--
Acroread won't start on 64Bit (ia32-libs?)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/672224
You received this bug
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Adobe Reader and Acrobat Font Parsing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655747
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: acroread (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
Adobe Reader and Acrobat Font Parsing Buffer Overflow Vulnerability
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655748
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
1 - 100 of 343 matches
Mail list logo
